Re: Problem with yum
Thank You All Advice worked perfectly and is appreciated. Since we don't use adobe I think we can just get rid of the adobe-linux stuff. Again Thank You Larry Linder On Sunday 22 July 2012 12:08 pm, you wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Larry Linder larry.lin...@micro-controls.com wrote: We are at SL 5.7 and attempting to update Libre Office to 3.5.5. [root@engr01 /]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: kernel-module Cleaning up Everything [root@engr01 /]# yum list Loaded plugins: kernel-module adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00 adobe-linux-x86_64/primary | 1.2 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-x86_64 2/2 http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/download-stable/RHEL_5/repodata/repomd.xml : [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found Trying other mirror. Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: mono. Please verify its path and try again yum isn't broken. The upstream repository at ftp.novell.com is broken. A fast check shows that: http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/ is missing the download-stable subdirectory. Until this is fixed, use --disablerepo=adobe-linux-* as an option to yum.
RE: Problem with yum
Either there is something in your /etc/yum.repos.d that is pointing to that site Or there is one of the mirrorlists that your /etc/yum.repos.d is pointing to, that is. What happens if you do Yum --disablerepo=adobe-linux list Steve -Original Message- From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Larry Linder Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:03 AM To: scientific-linux-users Subject: Problem with yum We are at SL 5.7 and attempting to update Libre Office to 3.5.5. [root@engr01 /]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: kernel-module Cleaning up Everything [root@engr01 /]# yum list Loaded plugins: kernel-module adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00 adobe-linux-x86_64/primary | 1.2 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-x86_64 2/2 http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/download-stable/RHEL_5/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found Trying other mirror. Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: mono. Please verify its path and try again yum apears to be be broken!!! as I can't even list the installed. Since we do not use Adobe anything and we abandoned Novel 10 years ago - any clue is useful. Any hints as to what changed in the last several weeks? Thank You Larry Linder
Re: Problem with yum
I think he needs to exclude the mono repo; the adobe one seems fine from his output (thanks for including it!). yum --disablerepo=mono list On 07/22/2012 12:06 PM, Steven C Timm wrote: Either there is something in your /etc/yum.repos.d that is pointing to that site Or there is one of the mirrorlists that your /etc/yum.repos.d is pointing to, that is. What happens if you do Yum --disablerepo=adobe-linux list Steve -Original Message- From: owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov [mailto:owner-scientific-linux-us...@listserv.fnal.gov] On Behalf Of Larry Linder Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:03 AM To: scientific-linux-users Subject: Problem with yum We are at SL 5.7 and attempting to update Libre Office to 3.5.5. [root@engr01 /]# yum clean all Loaded plugins: kernel-module Cleaning up Everything [root@engr01 /]# yum list Loaded plugins: kernel-module adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00 adobe-linux-x86_64/primary | 1.2 kB 00:00 adobe-linux-x86_64 2/2 http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/download-stable/RHEL_5/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found Trying other mirror. Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository: mono. Please verify its path and try again yum apears to be be broken!!! as I can't even list the installed. Since we do not use Adobe anything and we abandoned Novel 10 years ago - any clue is useful. Any hints as to what changed in the last several weeks? Thank You Larry Linder
Re: Problem with yum.
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, FRANCHISSEUR Robert wrote: Hello, Back from vacation, I notice that somme of our 5.2 machines were not = updated and I don't understand why. yum is OK every where : Updating: yum noarch 3.2.19-25.sl sl-security = 925 k but some machines have been updated with : sl-release-5.2-2.x86_64 and=20 yum-conf-52-4.SL.noarch while other stay at : sl-release-5.2-1.x86_64 and=20 yum-conf-52-2.SL.noarch Have you updated you yum-conf file and/or your /etc/redhat-release file? The change to sl-release and yum-conf was to update to the new GPG key that we are now using to sign rpms. Can you try to upgrade these manually via yum and send back the error messages. yum update yum-conf yum update sl-release On machines updated I also noticed in /var/log/yum.log=20 a strange name for yum-conf Jul 18 05:26:07 Updated: 5:yum-conf-52-4.SL.noarch @@ The 5 is known as a epoch number. A kind of overriding of the version. Furthuremore on a 5.1 machine I got : YUM - security Error: Missing Dependency: yum 3.1.0-0 is needed by package yum-uti= ls Error: yum conflicts with yum-utils 1.1.16-11 Have you installed yum-utils lately. -Connie Sieh Thanks for your help. --=20 Best regards, Robert FRANCHISSEUR Apollo_gist :-)___ | Robert FRANCHISSEUR | | Laboratoire de M=E9t=E9orologie Dynamique - C.N.R.= S. | | Equipe R.A.M.S.E.S. - UPMC - Tour 45-55 3=E8me 315C= | | Boite 99 - 4, place JussieuF-75252 PARIS CEDEX 05 FRANCE | | Phone : +33 (0)1 44 27 73 87 fax : +33 (0)1 44 27 62 72 | | e-mail : robert at lmd . jussieu . fr http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr | ---
Re: Problem with yum.
-- Le (On) 2009-07-21 -0500 à (at) 16:28:35 Connie Sieh écrivit (wrote): --
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, FRANCHISSEUR Robert wrote:
Hello,
Back from vacation, I notice that somme of our 5.2 machines were not =
updated
and I don't understand why.
yum is OK every where :
Updating:
yum noarch 3.2.19-25.sl sl-security =
925 k
but some machines have been updated with :
sl-release-5.2-2.x86_64
and=20
yum-conf-52-4.SL.noarch
while other stay at :
sl-release-5.2-1.x86_64
and=20
yum-conf-52-2.SL.noarch
Have you updated you yum-conf file and/or your /etc/redhat-release file?
The change to sl-release and yum-conf was to update to the new GPG key
that we are now using to sign rpms.
Can you try to upgrade these manually via yum and send back the error
messages.
Unfortunately there is no erro messages (even after a 'yum clean all')
yum update yum-conf
yum update sl-release
[r...@cui ~]# yum update yum-conf
Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, fastestmirror, kernel-module, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* sl-security: distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr
* sl-base: distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr
sl-security 100% |=| 951 B
00:00
sl-base 100% |=| 1.1 kB
00:00
0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
[r...@cui ~]# yum update sl-release
Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, fastestmirror, kernel-module, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* sl-security: distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr
* sl-base: distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr
0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
[r...@cui ~]# rpm -qii yum.conf
package yum.conf is not installed
[r...@cui ~]# rpm -qi yum.conf
package yum.conf is not installed
[r...@cui ~]# rpm -qi yum-conf
Name: yum-conf Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 52Vendor: Scientific Linux
Release : 2.SL Build Date: Mon 23 Jun 2008
10:30:26 PM CEST
Install Date: Thu 02 Apr 2009 12:13:29 AM CEST Build Host:
norob.fnal.gov
Group : System Environment/Base Source RPM:
yum-conf-52-2.SL.src.rpm
Size: 4949 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Mon 23 Jun 2008 10:30:54 PM CEST, Key ID
da6ad00882fd17b2
URL : http://www.dulug.duke.edu/yum/
Summary : RPM installer/updater config files
Description :
Configuration files to setup yum.conf and various repositories
snip
YUM - security
Error: Missing Dependency: yum 3.1.0-0 is needed by package yum-uti=
ls
Error: yum conflicts with yum-utils 1.1.16-11
Have you installed yum-utils lately.
No,
thigpen:{root}:/u/sbob rpm -qi yum-utils
Name: yum-utilsRelocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.0.4 Vendor: Scientific Linux
Release : 3.el5 Build Date: Thu 08 Nov 2007
03:31:26 PM CET
Install Date: Thu 07 Feb 2008 11:23:08 PM CET Build Host:
norob.fnal.gov
...
--
Best regards,
Robert FRANCHISSEUR
Apollo_gist :-)___
| Robert FRANCHISSEUR |
| Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique - C.N.R.S. |
| Equipe R.A.M.S.E.S. - UPMC - Tour 45-55 3ème 315C |
| Boite 99 - 4, place JussieuF-75252 PARIS CEDEX 05 FRANCE |
| Phone : +33 (0)1 44 27 73 87 fax : +33 (0)1 44 27 62 72 |
| e-mail : robert at lmd . jussieu . fr http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr |
---
Re: Problem with yum.
-- Le (On) 2009-07-22 +0200 à (at) 00:58:22 Franchisseur Robert écrivit (wrote): -- -- Le (On) 2009-07-21 -0500 à (at) 16:28:35 Connie Sieh écrivit (wrote): -- On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, FRANCHISSEUR Robert wrote: snip Can you try to upgrade these manually via yum and send back the error messages. Unfortunately there is no erro messages (even after a 'yum clean all') yum update yum-conf yum update sl-release [r...@cui ~]# yum update yum-conf Loaded plugins: allowdowngrade, fastestmirror, kernel-module, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * sl-security: distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr * sl-base: distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr I just realize tha the problem is with our mirror which as not been updated since july 14. No Packages marked for Update snip YUM - security Error: Missing Dependency: yum 3.1.0-0 is needed by package yum-uti= ls Error: yum conflicts with yum-utils 1.1.16-11 Same problem. Sorry for that. -- Best regards, Robert FRANCHISSEUR Apollo_gist :-)___ | Robert FRANCHISSEUR | | Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique - C.N.R.S. | | Equipe R.A.M.S.E.S. - UPMC - Tour 45-55 3ème 315C | | Boite 99 - 4, place JussieuF-75252 PARIS CEDEX 05 FRANCE | | Phone : +33 (0)1 44 27 73 87 fax : +33 (0)1 44 27 62 72 | | e-mail : robert at lmd . jussieu . fr http://www.lmd.jussieu.fr | ---
Re: problem following yum update of sudo
06/02/2009 в 17:42 +0100, Urs Beyerle: As a separate question, how do I easily deduce which SL version I am running? cat /etc/redhat-release Or go by the way of Linux Standard Base -- use lsb_release utility. For example, in our SL-incarnation for Russian school education named NauLinux: $ lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-3.1-ia32:core-3.1-noarch:graphics-3.1-ia32:graphics-3.1-noarch Distributor ID: NauLinux Description:NauLinux release 5.2 (Boron) Release:5.2 Codename: Boron Of course, you may choose information fields by other options: $ lsb_release -r Release:5.2 Urs --Oleg
Re: problem following yum update of sudo
Troy J Dawson wrote: WILLIAM J LUTTER wrote: Following a Feb 06 update of the sudo package to sudo.i386 1.6.9p17-3.el5_3.1 I find that its behavior has changed for my simple usage. The linux box runs SL5.1 (earliest SL5 as I remember). As a separate question, how do I easily deduce which SL version I am running? Back to sudo issue: I usually specify a user alias via these lines using visudo: User_Alias STAFF=user1,user2 # User privilege specification rootALL=(ALL) ALL STAFF ALL=(ALL) ALL Not very sophisticated, but it works for our small work group. We also turn off selinux. After the sudo update, usage of sudo yields an error message following entry of a password: sudo: symbol lookup error: sudo: undefined symbol: audit_log_user_command I tried following the suggestion in the visudo text: ## User Aliases ## These aren't often necessary, as you can use regular groups ## (ie, from files, LDAP, NIS, etc) in this file - just use %groupname ## rather than USERALIAS # User_Alias ADMINS = jsmith, mikem Say groupname for user1 and user2 is group12, then %group12 ALL=(ALL) ALL This also yields same error message. Not being an IT person, I'm a bit at a loss. I either need to go back to an earlier package such as sudo-1.6.7p5-30.1.3.i386 where this behavior did not occur or get clued in on what the proper visudo configuration is... Is this an obvious config file issue? If not, is it an error in the new sudo? If not, what is the simplest way to use yum to access earlier versions of sudo, or should I just remove current one and find the rpm package for sudo-1.6.7p5-30.1.3.i386 and install that via rpm commands? Bill Lutter Looking into this. Troy Hi, It looks like this only affects machines with audit libraries older than version 1.5.5-7 (the version in SL 5.1) Can you send me the output of rpm -qa | grep audit | sort Thanks Troy -- __ Troy Dawson daw...@fnal.gov (630)840-6468 Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group __
