Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Patrick J. LoPresti]

Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.

Thank you.

 - Pat

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Connie Sieh]

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:


Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:

   https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.

Thank you.

- Pat



I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile 
than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No 
promises of course (disclaimer).


-Connie Sieh

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Yi Ding]

Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
beta testers.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>
>> Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
>> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
>>
>>https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
>>
>> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
>> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> - Pat
>>
>
> I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
> than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
> promises of course (disclaimer).
>
> -Connie Sieh

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Graham Allan]

I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I appreciate 
the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a nightmare to build?


I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build available 
(http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I haven't looked at it.


Graham

On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:

Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
beta testers.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:


Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.


I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
promises of course (disclaimer).

-Connie Sieh



--
-
Graham Allan - I.T. Manager - al...@physics.umn.edu - (612) 624-5040
School of Physics and Astronomy - University of Minnesota
-

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Connie Sieh]

On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:


Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that?


I forgot to announce it.  Will do so soon.  In class this week.

-Connie Sieh



Graham

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:

The Scientific Linux build is available at:

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/

Pat

On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:

I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I
appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a
nightmare to build?

I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build
available (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I
haven't looked at it.

Graham

On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:

Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
beta testers.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:


Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.


I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
promises of course (disclaimer).

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Yi Ding]

This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for
devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them
would they be able to redistribute them?


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

> On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:
>
>  Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that?
>>
>
> I forgot to announce it.  Will do so soon.  In class this week.
>
> -Connie Sieh
>
>
>
>> Graham
>>
>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>>
>>> The Scientific Linux build is available at:
>>>
>>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.**org/linux/scientific/6x/**
>>> external_products/devtoolset/
>>>
>>> Pat
>>>
>>> On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
>>>
 I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I
 appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a
 nightmare to build?

 I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build
 available 
 (http://people.centos.org/tru/**devtools/)
 though I
 haven't looked at it.

 Graham

 On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:

> Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
> compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
> beta testers.
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
>>
>>  Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
>>> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/**knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_**
>>> Developer_Toolset/
>>>
>>> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
>>> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
>>>
>>
>> I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to
>> compile
>> than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.
>>  No
>> promises of course (disclaimer).
>>
>
>>

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Paul Robert Marino]

Sure  you can for the most part where do you think scientific linux came from. But you don't need a license to get them they are all on Red Hat's public FTP server along with all the other SRPMS for every other free speech or open source piece of software they support. Really the FTP site is the safe bet for that because they won't post SRPM's for any proprietary code on their public FTP server but the ones you get off of access.redhat.com may include proprietary code.-- Sent from my HP Pre3On Jul 16, 2013 13:58, Yi Ding  wrote: This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them would they be able to redistribute them?

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:


Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that?


I forgot to announce it.  Will do so soon.  In class this week.

-Connie Sieh



Graham

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:

The Scientific Linux build is available at:

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/

Pat

On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:

I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I
appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a
nightmare to build?

I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build
available (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I
haven't looked at it.

Graham

On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:

Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
beta testers.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:


Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.


I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
promises of course (disclaimer).

Re: Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Connie Sieh]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Paul Robert Marino wrote:


Sure  you can for the most part where do you think scientific linux came
from.
 But you don't need a license to get them they are all on Red Hat's public
FTP server along with all the other SRPMS for every other free speech or
open source piece of software they support. Really the FTP site is the safe
bet for that because they won't post SRPM's for any proprietary code on
their public FTP server but the ones you get off of access.redhat.com may
include proprietary code.


The BETA SRPMS are NOT on Red Hat's public FTP server.

I am not a lawyer so this is only a opinion and not legal advice.  I do 
NOT think you can redistribute the result since you obtained the SRPM via 
"RHN" and not via the public ftp server.


-Connie Sieh



-- Sent from my HP Pre3


On Jul 16, 2013 13:58, Yi Ding  wrote:

This isn't devtoolset specific, but if someone were to get the SRPMs for
devtoolset-2 Beta (by using a RHEL license), and were to recompile them
would they be able to redistribute them?


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:
  On Tue, 14 May 2013, Graham Allan wrote:

Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to
miss that?


I forgot to announce it.  Will do so soon.  In class this week.

-Connie Sieh


  Graham

  On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky
  wrote:
The Scientific Linux build is available at:

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoo
lset/

Pat

On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
  I was just wondering if this ever
  went anywhere? Obviously I
  appreciate the "no promises" part
  :-) Was it too much of a
  nightmare to build?

  I saw that CentOS got to the stage
  of having a test build
  available
  (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/)
  though I
  haven't looked at it.

  Graham

  On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding
  wrote:
Awesome.  This should
be really useful for
us (finally a modern
era
compiler on RHEL
supported by Redhat).
 Let me know if you
want any
beta testers.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012
at 4:59 PM, Connie
Sieh 
wrote:
  On Wed, 12
  Sep 2012,
  Patrick J.
  LoPresti
  wrote:

Red
Hat
has
released
a
compilation
environment
supporting
C++11
as
part
of
the
"Red
Hat
Developer
Toolset"
for
RHEL
6.x:


https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I
am
curious
to
know
whether
anybody
has
recompiled
this
for
Scientific
Linux,
whether
anybody
has
an
interest
in
doing
so,
etc.


  I have.
   Working
  on

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Pat Riehecky]

The Scientific Linux build is available at:

http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/

Pat

On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I appreciate the 
"no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a nightmare to build?


I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build available 
(http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I haven't looked at it.


Graham

On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:

Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
beta testers.

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:

On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:


Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/

I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.


I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
promises of course (disclaimer).

-Connie Sieh






--
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Red Hat Developer Toolset (C++11) ?

[Graham Allan]

Thanks, this is wonderful! I wonder how I managed to miss that?

Graham

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:07:33PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote:
> The Scientific Linux build is available at:
> 
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6x/external_products/devtoolset/
> 
> Pat
> 
> On 05/14/2013 12:04 PM, Graham Allan wrote:
> >I was just wondering if this ever went anywhere? Obviously I
> >appreciate the "no promises" part :-) Was it too much of a
> >nightmare to build?
> >
> >I saw that CentOS got to the stage of having a test build
> >available (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools/) though I
> >haven't looked at it.
> >
> >Graham
> >
> >On 9/17/2012 9:50 AM, Yi Ding wrote:
> >>Awesome.  This should be really useful for us (finally a modern era
> >>compiler on RHEL supported by Redhat).  Let me know if you want any
> >>beta testers.
> >>
> >>On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Connie Sieh  wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> >>>
> Red Hat has released a compilation environment supporting C++11 as
> part of the "Red Hat Developer Toolset" for RHEL 6.x:
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/Red_Hat_Developer_Toolset/
> 
> I am curious to know whether anybody has recompiled this for
> Scientific Linux, whether anybody has an interest in doing so, etc.
> >>>
> >>>I have.  Working on releasing it.  It is a bit more complicated to compile
> >>>than the standard SL.  Have to modify the build system to handle it.  No
> >>>promises of course (disclaimer).