Re: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
The thing that bugged me about the Terminator was its vast misuse of
resources. If it really wanted to kill humanity it could have just
engineered a virus. A computer virus would have disabled communication
followed by a biological virus and it could have wiped out everyone...



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Martin Baxter
truthseeker...@hotmail.comwrote:



 And, when the Terminator franchise comes to vivid reality...

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
 bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




 --
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:31:32 -0700
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

As things become more web enabled they start running the danger of a
 virus. What if his cellphone gave his stove a virus? I know its not possible
 right now but soon...very soon...

 We already have web enabled stoves and refrigerators. All it takes is some
 kid on summer vacation to play around with it.


 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
  wrote:



 Now, if we were to install Magic Chef ovens in teenagers' cars,
 texting-while-driving would become a thing of the past.

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
 bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




 --
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:22:18 -0700
 Subject: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove


 http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget

 --
 Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


 --
 Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try BingT 
 now.http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1




 --
 Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


 --
 With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. Click
 here. http://www.windowslive.com/Desktop/PhotoGallery

 




-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
No every single worker, but the majority of them are. Carter was an
exceptional police officer that got tapped for the job. Jo was a special
weapons expert who wanted to do black ops. In the first couple of seasons
she was trying to transfer out to do something else. They talked more about
this stuff in the first 2 seasons but that storyline seemed to have faded.

There is blatant product placement in the show. They mentioned it during on
of the recaps during the show hiatus. There was also the deodorant that was
used during the episode with the artificial sun. The product placement helps
pay for the special effects.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 oh, so every single worker there is  a genius? Well, I guess that would
 make it hard to be normal. Wonder why they don't have the same standards
 for the law enforcement? I also wonder why they don't have more security
 outside of the sheriff's office? I mean, one minute Carter's ticketing
 someone for double parking, the next he's trying to close a rupture in
 spacetime. And those uniforms: too Andy Griffith for me.

 And speaking of sheriff's accoutrements, have you noticed all the heavy
 handed Subaru in-episode advertising going on? Jo and Fargo kept saying
 Subaru Model  over and over a couple of shows back. the new police
 cruiser is positioned so that the camera lingers over the Subaru decal quite
 a bit. I still find that type of obvious marketing irritating...

 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:02:18 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



 To live in Eureka you must have a genius level and a security clearance.
 They never say how many people are regular people but often the spouses are
 not super geniuses. Everyone that lives there works for the company.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Keith Johnson 
 keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists
 and engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who
 collect trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech
 devices to do their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water
 works, HVAC, etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and
 for them be so? Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not
 geniuses, wouldn't there be a decent number of people in jobs who are just
 normal in intelligence? I know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love
 interest for Carter--who had some kind of high tech cleaning system. But if
 she needed a couple of workers to help her with the clothes, would they have
 to be geniuses too? Are all the assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops,
 flower shops, HVAC repair, the movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every
 janitor at GD--and I see alot of them, slinging those buckets and mops,
 'cause they're almost like Star Trek redshirts in being used for cannon
 fodder--brilliant?


 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



  Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily
 more interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the
 purpose of ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I
 liked the conflict they had between them fine before they mucked it up.



 Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over
 thinking it.  Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with
 others who are geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem
 killer.No loving parent who is aware of their child’s needs would
 subject their child to that.  Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her
 interacting with the braining kids while she was the only normal kid, made
 that issue stand out for me.



 When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes.  So
 the mom and former teacher in me was not irked



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






  I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more
 interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad
 was going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her
 smarts and instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman.
 Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga,
 etc. angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and
 others as they 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have
towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of
Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount
of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and
create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For
example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all
created there and promptly placed in their basement. :)

 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the
rest of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like
Hershey, Penn.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



  I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there
 are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the
 whole premise is unrealistic.



 Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged
 normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only
 unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all
 are painted as geniuses.



 If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.
 They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
 thought there would be anything less than a red shirt



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






  good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists
 and engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who
 collect trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech
 devices to do their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water
 works, HVAC, etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and
 for them be so? Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not
 geniuses, wouldn't there be a decent number of people in jobs who are just
 normal in intelligence? I know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love
 interest for Carter--who had some kind of high tech cleaning system. But if
 she needed a couple of workers to help her with the clothes, would they have
 to be geniuses too? Are all the assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops,
 flower shops, HVAC repair, the movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every
 janitor at GD--and I see alot of them, slinging those buckets and mops,
 'cause they're almost like Star Trek redshirts in being used for cannon
 fodder--brilliant?


 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



 Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more
 interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose
 of ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked the
 conflict they had between them fine before they mucked it up.



 Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking
 it.  Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who
 are geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer.No
 loving parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child
 to that.  Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the
 braining kids while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out
 for me.



 When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes.  So
 the mom and former teacher in me was not irked



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





  I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more
 interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad
 was going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her
 smarts and instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman.
 Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga,
 etc. angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and
 others as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i
 actually hated to see her leave.

 - Original Message -
 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
 To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:16:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

[scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
Martin,

Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find this 
group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was 
beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and 
left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of my 
friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest they 
get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too), but none 
like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been reading here have 
been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in grad school, and as 
the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.  However, I will chime in 
with my two cents from time to time.

Tasheka

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:

 
 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said so.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: tashe...@...
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   I think the fact that there's not much else on really makes 
 Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when Carter 
 and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When Nathan died 
 and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe in that 
 other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have been 
 pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of that 
 alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present timeline.  But 
 then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison was looking a 
 little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a date and that 
 Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with this.
 
 
 
 Tasheka
 
 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@ wrote:
 
 
 
  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past (maybe 
  because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else on 
  right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.  
  Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that 
  started after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she 
  doesn't die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) 
  Carter and Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance 
  between them would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm 
  voting for Tess.
 
  
 
  Angela
 
  
 
  
 
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ wrote:
 
  
 
   Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind of
 
   ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could regain 
   it
 
   down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem impossible
 
   in the short-term
 
   
 

 
   
 
   From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
 
   Behalf Of Martin Baxter
 
   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM
 
   To: SciFiNoir2
 
   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
   
 

 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the 
   Carter-Tess
 
   storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's Dr
 
   Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at 
   first,
 
   and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked up
 
   sympathetically.
 
   
 
   If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
   bloody
 
   hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
   
 
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 _  
 
   
 
   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
   From: tdlists@
 
   Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:25:49 -0700
 
   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
   
 
 
 
   
 

 
   
 
   I was getting sick of the silly Fargo side plot distractions, but last 
   week
 
   they did not have one, it seemed more like season one (which was my
 
   favorite), so I am starting to like it again.   Getting rid of the sister
 
   who found everything wrong with him was a good move too.  I realize they
 
   need conflict, but I do not think it worked with her.   I also like that
 
   they decided to have Carter move on, if they are not going to get him
 
   together with Alison, then let him move on.  I like the  chemistry that he
 
   has with the new woman and that they did not pretend that he and Alison
 
   never existed.  
 
   
 

 
   
 
   I'm also had the moved away from everyone calling him stupid and let the
 
   theme shift back to he as the commonsense guy often being the one with the

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in Redmond.  The 
whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft .  The 
existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it operates is.   That 
is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life.   I 
understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect that they would have a 
realistic representation of who would live in such a town is .. unrealistic of 
me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically on TV, so I 
should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.  All those towns you mentioned, 
no matter how technically advanced, are likely to have regular folks—most 
likely more regular folks than geniuses.  That being said, many may be the best 
of the best, but most of them are not geniuses.

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Mr. Worf
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 



The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:

 

I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic.   

 

Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses.  

 

If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.  They 
do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 





good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant?


- Original Message -
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up.  

 

Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
 Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer.No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that.  
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me.

 

When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes.  So the 
mom 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Augustus Augustus
Tasheka,

i too am so sorry 2 hear about your father.  i promise u will be in my prayers 
this evening.  also, welcome 2 the group!  beware of - Tracey and Martin (they 
are truly strange :-) - just joking Trace and 
Martin...and you both know it.  
again, welcome Tasheka.

Fate.

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
wrote:

From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 4:28 PM






 





  Tasheka:



Sorry to hear about your dad.   I was close to my dad too. 



-Original Message-

From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com] On

Behalf Of tasheka4

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM

To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts



Martin,



Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find

this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was

beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and

left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of

my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest

they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),

but none like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been

reading here have been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in

grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.

However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.



Tasheka



--- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... wrote:



 

 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said

so.

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in

bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

 http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

 

 

 

 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

 From: tashe...@...

 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   I think the fact that there's not much else on really

makes Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when

Carter and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When

Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe

in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have

been pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of

that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present

timeline.  But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison

was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a

date and that Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with

this.

 

 

 

 Tasheka

 

 

 

 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@  wrote:

 

 

 

  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past

(maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else

on right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.

Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started

after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't

die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and

Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them

would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for

Tess.

 

  

 

  Angela

 

  

 

  

 

  --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@

wrote:

 

  

 

   Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind

of

 

   ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could

regain it

 

   down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem

impossible

 

   in the short-term

 

   

 



 

   

 

   From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com]

On

 

   Behalf Of Martin Baxter

 

   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM

 

   To: SciFiNoir2

 

   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

   

 



 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the

Carter-Tess

 

   storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's

Dr

 

   Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at

first,

 

   and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked

up

 

   sympathetically.

 

   

 

   If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in

bloody

 

   hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

   

 

   http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

   

 

   

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
Tasheka:

Sorry to hear about your dad.   I was close to my dad too. 

-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of tasheka4
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

Martin,

Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find
this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was
beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and
left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of
my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest
they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),
but none like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been
reading here have been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in
grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.
However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.

Tasheka

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:

 
 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said
so.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: tashe...@...
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   I think the fact that there's not much else on really
makes Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when
Carter and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When
Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe
in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have
been pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of
that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present
timeline.  But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison
was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a
date and that Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with
this.
 
 
 
 Tasheka
 
 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@ wrote:
 
 
 
  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past
(maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else
on right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.
Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started
after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't
die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and
Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them
would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for
Tess.
 
  
 
  Angela
 
  
 
  
 
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@
wrote:
 
  
 
   Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind
of
 
   ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could
regain it
 
   down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem
impossible
 
   in the short-term
 
   
 

 
   
 
   From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com]
On
 
   Behalf Of Martin Baxter
 
   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM
 
   To: SciFiNoir2
 
   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
   
 

 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the
Carter-Tess
 
   storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's
Dr
 
   Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at
first,
 
   and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked
up
 
   sympathetically.
 
   
 
   If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
bloody
 
   hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
   
 
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 _  
 
   
 
   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
   From: tdlists@
 
   Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:25:49 -0700
 
   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
   
 
 
 
   
 

 
   
 
   I was getting sick of the silly Fargo side plot distractions, but last
week
 
   they did not have one, it seemed more like season one (which was my
 
   favorite), so I am starting to like it again.   Getting rid of the
sister
 
   who found everything wrong with him was a good move too.  I realize
they
 
   need conflict, but I do not think it worked with her.   I also like
that
 
   they decided to have Carter move on, if they are not going to get him
 
   together with Alison, then let him move on.  I like the  chemistry
that he
 
   has with the new woman and that they did 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
A little more history:

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On
the other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned
their houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s
they decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of
a drain on the city's resources and created East Palo Alto.

(known to anti drug agents everywhere)

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change
the general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated.
For example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local
barnes and noble.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



  I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in
 Redmond.  The whole town – practically everything, is set up around
 Microsoft .  The existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it
 operates is.   That is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter,
 larger than life.   I understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect
 that they would have a realistic representation of who would live in such a
 town is .. unrealistic of me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed
 unrealistically on TV, so I should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.
  All those towns you mentioned, no matter how technically advanced, are
 likely to have regular folks—most likely more regular folks than geniuses.
 That being said, many may be the best of the best, but most of them are not
 geniuses.



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Mr. Worf
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM

 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have
 towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of
 Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount
 of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and
 create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For
 example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all
 created there and promptly placed in their basement. :)

  There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
 Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the
 rest of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like
 Hershey, Penn.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



 I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there
 are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the
 whole premise is unrealistic.



 Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged
 normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only
 unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all
 are painted as geniuses.



 If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.
 They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
 thought there would be anything less than a red shirt



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





   good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists
 and engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who
 collect trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech
 devices to do their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water
 works, HVAC, etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and
 for them be so? Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not
 geniuses, wouldn't there be a decent number of people in jobs who are just
 normal in intelligence? I know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love
 interest for Carter--who had some kind of high tech cleaning system. But if
 she needed a couple of workers to help her with the clothes, would they have
 to be geniuses too? Are all the assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops,
 flower shops, HVAC repair, the movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every
 janitor at GD--and I see alot of them, slinging those buckets and mops,
 'cause they're almost like Star Trek redshirts in being used for cannon
 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong 






Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. Just 
saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong 






did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong 




rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, they 
couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss out on 
a thing or three. 

Like the rest of the story... 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 






To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: ravena...@yahoo.com 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 




While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends and 
I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no damn 
gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and response 
Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and Dwayne (the 
Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 

And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white America... 
from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic imitation of 
our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich your very 
existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product through our 
achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that comfort me when I 
am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, who *have* no talent, 
no guts? people like you who desecrate things they don't understand when the 
truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on about your way. But 
apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots his gun] 

I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and caps 
pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly NOT 
sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 

~(no)rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
 of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam 
 Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never 
 saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found 
 really labored and boring. 
 
 As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
 probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. 
 The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and 
 Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based 
 on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, 
 tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill 
 Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the 
 mix of danger, fun, and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, 
 but did it years earlier. 
 
 My wife and I loved the series and were really upset when it was canceled. 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:43:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It was not well received. It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
 other hand, it only cost $12 mil). I first saw it at an art house with a 
 bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2. 
 What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line 
 with Get Shorty and Be 

[scifinoir2] Re: This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
Sounds like a KGB plot to me.  Mr. Meinikov better watch his arse!

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

 http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget
 
 -- 
 Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/





Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Was the Manhattan Project for the A-bomb similar in terms of a town being built 
around the work being done there? 


- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:58:35 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella  
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  wrote: 








I thought about that. Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town. While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic. 



Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals. In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius. The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses. 



If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts. They do 
not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths. Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 










good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant? 


- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella  tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 








Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting. I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them. I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up. 



Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer. No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that. 
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me. 



When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes. So the 
mom and former teacher in me was not irked 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more 
interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad was 
going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her smarts and 
instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman. 
Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga, etc. 
angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
I'm Strange and I'm Proud

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Augustus Augustus
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:46 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

 







Tasheka,

i too am so sorry 2 hear about your father.  i promise u will be in my
prayers this evening.  also, welcome 2 the group!  beware of - Tracey and
Martin (they are truly strange :-) - just joking Trace and
Martin...and you both know it.
again, welcome Tasheka.

Fate.

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
wrote:


From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 4:28 PM

  

Tasheka:

Sorry to hear about your dad. I was close to my dad too. 

-Original Message-
From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com] On
Behalf Of tasheka4
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

Martin,

Thanks for the welcome! You're the first to do so. I'm just glad to find
this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there. I was
beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and
left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows. None of
my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them. The closest
they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),
but none like actual scifi which I love. So the discussions I've been
reading here have been great! I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in
grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.
However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.

Tasheka

--- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ...
wrote:

 
 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said
so.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 From: tashe...@...
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I think the fact that there's not much else on really
makes Eureka better this season. I remember that alternate timeline when
Carter and Allison were expecting a baby. She was very pregnant. When
Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe
in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have
been pregnant with Nathan's child then too. Perhaps certain portions of
that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present
timeline. But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure. Although Allison
was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a
date and that Tess really liked him. So who knows where they're going with
this.
 
 
 
 Tasheka
 
 
 
 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@  wrote:
 
 
 
  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past
(maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else
on right now...). But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.
Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started
after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't
die or something? In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and
Allison get married, have a baby, etc. So any real romance between them
would have to top or be very different than that story. I'm voting for
Tess.
 
  
 
  Angela
 
  
 
  
 
  --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@
wrote:
 
  
 
   Same here. I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind
of
 
   ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could
regain it
 
   down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem
impossible
 
   in the short-term
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com]
On
 
   Behalf Of Martin Baxter
 
   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM
 
   To: SciFiNoir2
 
   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the
Carter-Tess
 
   storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's
Dr
 
   Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at
first,
 
   and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked
up
 
   sympathetically.
 
   
 
   If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
bloody
 
   hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
   
 
   

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

AhemAHEM...

I AM truly strange. I have documentation to prove it.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: jazzynupe_...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:45:40 -0700
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts















 





  Tasheka,

i too am so sorry 2 hear about your father.  i promise u will be in my prayers 
this evening.  also, welcome 2 the group!  beware of - Tracey and Martin (they 
are truly strange :-) - just joking Trace and 
Martin...and you both know it.  
again, welcome Tasheka.

Fate.

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
wrote:

From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 4:28 PM






 


  Tasheka:



Sorry to hear about your dad.   I was close to my dad too. 



-Original Message-

From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com] On

Behalf Of tasheka4

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM

To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts



Martin,



Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find

this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was

beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and

left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of

my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest

they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),

but none like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been

reading here have been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in

grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.

However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.



Tasheka



--- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... wrote:



 

 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said

so.

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in

bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

 http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

 

 

 

 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

 From: tashe...@...

 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   I think the fact that there's not much else on really

makes Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when

Carter and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When

Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe

in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have

been pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of

that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present

timeline.  But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison

was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a

date and that Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with

this.

 

 

 

 Tasheka

 

 

 

 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@  wrote:

 

 

 

  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past

(maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else

on right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.

Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started

after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't

die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and

Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them

would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for

Tess.

 

  

 

  Angela

 

  

 

  

 

  --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@

wrote:

 

  

 

   Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind

of

 

   ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could

regain it

 

   down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem

impossible

 

   in the short-term

 

   

 



 

   

 

   From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com]

On

 

   Behalf Of Martin Baxter

 

   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM

 

   To: SciFiNoir2

 

   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

   

 



 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the

Carter-Tess

 

   storyline might be challenged by the introduction of 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

That it was, as well as the town where the pilots who trained to deliver the 
first A-bombs lived. It was done primarily for security reasons.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:13:37 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
Was the Manhattan Project for the A-bomb similar in terms of a town being built 
around the work being done there?


- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:58:35 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large 
companies have towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the 
home of Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large 
amount of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and 
create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For 
example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all 
created there and promptly placed in their basement. :) 


 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:




































I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I
think there are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic,
the whole premise is unrealistic.   


 


Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged
normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified
genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are painted as
geniuses.  


 


If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red
shirts.  They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
thought there would be anything less than a red shirt


 






From:
scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Keith
Johnson

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






 













good
point. 



I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC,
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so?
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant?





- Original Message -

From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



  










Actually, I do not think that her being
a normal teen is necessarily more interesting.  I had a problem with them
making her a genius for the purpose of ridiculing her father or to create
conflict between them.  I liked the conflict they had between them fine
before they mucked it up.  


 


Why I am okay with them making her a
genius has to do with me over thinking it.  Taking a child who is normal
and putting her in school with others who are geniuses in my view would be
isolating, and a self-esteem killer.No loving parent who is
aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that.  Some of
the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids while
she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me.


 


When they made her smart, they stopped
having those types of episodes.  So the mom and former teacher in me was
not irked


 






From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
So, Palo Alto needed regular people to get up and running? Now that they've 
spliced off from the other town, who collects their trash, runs their water 
treatment, performs pest control services, fixes gas mains, bakes their 
croissants, etc? Are all those services peformed by people with Masters and 
Phd's? 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:08:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






A little more history: 

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford 
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the 
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their 
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s they 
decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of a drain on 
the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 

(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc 


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA 
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy 
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the 
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For 
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes 
and noble. 


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella  
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  wrote: 








I live in one of those towns. OK one town over. Microsoft is in Redmond. The 
whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft . The existence 
of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic. How it operates is. That is necessary 
for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life. I understand that. 
That was my point. That to expect that they would have a realistic 
representation of who would live in such a town is .. unrealistic of me. Most 
industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically on TV, so I should not 
expect a show like Eureka to do so. All those towns you mentioned, no matter 
how technically advanced, are likely to have regular folks—most likely more 
regular folks than geniuses. That being said, many may be the best of the best, 
but most of them are not geniuses. 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Mr. Worf 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM 



To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 








The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella  
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  wrote: 





I thought about that. Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town. While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic. 



Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals. In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius. The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses. 



If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts. They do 
not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths. Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Isn't he, though? IMO, Karen Sisco is the best of Elmore Leonard's properties 
brought to the screen.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:11:51 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong















 





  
Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :)


- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong







 





  


Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. Just 
saw it at the Best Buy near my house.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong















 





  
did you like Karen Sisco, Martin?

- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong







 





  


rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, they 
couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss out on 
a thing or three.

Like the rest of the story...

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: ravena...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get 
Shorty, my friends and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: 
Don't give me no damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it!  

Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and response 
Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and Dwayne (the 
Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot!



And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy:

Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white America... 
from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic imitation of 
our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich your very 
existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product through our 
achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that comfort me when I 
am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, who *have* no talent, 
no guts? people like you who desecrate things they don't understand when the 
truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on about your way. But 
apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots his gun] 



I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and caps 
pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly NOT 
sexy.  What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 



~(no)rave! 



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:



 Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
 of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam 
 Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never 
 saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found 
 really labored and boring. 

 

 As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
 probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. 
 The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and 
 Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based 
 on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, 
 tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill 
 Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the 
 mix of danger, fun, and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, 
 but did it years earlier. 

 

 My wife and I loved the series and were 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
Yup and a few other places as well. There's a place in Oregon that built a
lot of the materials that went into A-bomb production.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 Was the Manhattan Project for the A-bomb similar in terms of a town being
 built around the work being done there?


 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:58:35 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



 The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have
 towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of
 Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount
 of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and
 create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For
 example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all
 created there and promptly placed in their basement. :)

  There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
 Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the
 rest of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like
 Hershey, Penn.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



  I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there
 are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the
 whole premise is unrealistic.



 Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show
 acknowledged normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the
 only unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs,
 all are painted as geniuses.



 If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.
 They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
 thought there would be anything less than a red shirt



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






  good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists
 and engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who
 collect trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech
 devices to do their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water
 works, HVAC, etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and
 for them be so? Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not
 geniuses, wouldn't there be a decent number of people in jobs who are just
 normal in intelligence? I know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love
 interest for Carter--who had some kind of high tech cleaning system. But if
 she needed a couple of workers to help her with the clothes, would they have
 to be geniuses too? Are all the assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops,
 flower shops, HVAC repair, the movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every
 janitor at GD--and I see alot of them, slinging those buckets and mops,
 'cause they're almost like Star Trek redshirts in being used for cannon
 fodder--brilliant?


 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



 Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more
 interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose
 of ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked the
 conflict they had between them fine before they mucked it up.



 Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over
 thinking it.  Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with
 others who are geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem
 killer.No loving parent who is aware of their child’s needs would
 subject their child to that.  Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her
 interacting with the braining kids while she was the only normal kid, made
 that issue stand out for me.



 When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes.  So
 the mom and former teacher in me was not irked



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





  I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more
 interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad
 was going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

(standing ovation)

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:19:41 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
So, Palo Alto needed regular people to get up and running? Now that they've 
spliced off from the other town, who collects their trash, runs their water 
treatment, performs pest control services, fixes gas mains, bakes their 
croissants, etc? Are all those services peformed by people with Masters and 
Phd's?

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:08:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  A little more history: 

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford 
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the 
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their 
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s they 
decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of a drain on 
the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 


(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA 
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy 
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the 
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For 
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes 
and noble. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



































I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is
in Redmond.  The whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft
.  The existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it operates is.
  That is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than
life.   I understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect that they would
have a realistic representation of who would live in such a town is ..
unrealistic of me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically
on TV, so I should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.  All those towns you
mentioned, no matter how technically advanced, are likely to have regular 
folks—most
likely more regular folks than geniuses.  That being said, many may be the best
of the best, but most of them are not geniuses.


 






From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mr. Worf

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






 






The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse,
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and
promptly placed in their basement. :) 



 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest
of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example
like Hershey, Penn. 




On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
wrote:




 




I thought about that. 
Based on how they present the show, I think there are very few none-geniuses in
the town.  While that is unrealistic, the whole premise is
unrealistic.   


 


Other than Joe and Carter and
an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged normals.  In all of Zoe’s
school scenes they painted her as the only unidentified genius. 
  The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are painted as
geniuses.  


 


If there are non-geniuses in
the script, they are less than red shirts.  They do not even get lines and
also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never thought there would be anything
less than a red shirt


 






From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Keith Johnson

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






 













good point. 



I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
It could be a hobby for him and not an occupation. Sort of like a volunteer
fire department.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 good point Tracey. You summed up perfectly how a show like that must work.
 Now personally, if I were writing the show, I'd have a lot more normal
 people in the populace. Indeed, I think the leaning toward so many cliched
 geeks is what sometimes hampers the writing of the show. Thus, our
 conversation about Zoe acting less like a self-important geek toward her dad
 being a preferred treatment of her character. Like you said, in real life
 the majority of the town would be normal--at least, if it functions as a
 real town. If it's just some kind of camp or giant campus with houses,
 that'd be a different matter.
 I still would like to see some more normals added, or more normalizing
 storylines for some of the people. I guess that's why I'd really like to see
 Henry have something else to do.


 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:27:54 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



  I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in
 Redmond.  The whole town – practically everything, is set up around
 Microsoft .  The existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it
 operates is.   That is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter,
 larger than life.   I understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect
 that they would have a realistic representation of who would live in such a
 town is .. unrealistic of me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed
 unrealistically on TV, so I should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.
  All those towns you mentioned, no matter how technically advanced, are
 likely to have regular folks—most likely more regular folks than geniuses.
 That being said, many may be the best of the best, but most of them are not
 geniuses.



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Mr. Worf
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM

 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have
 towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of
 Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount
 of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and
 create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For
 example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all
 created there and promptly placed in their basement. :)

  There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
 Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the
 rest of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like
 Hershey, Penn.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



 I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there
 are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the
 whole premise is unrealistic.



 Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged
 normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only
 unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all
 are painted as geniuses.



 If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.
 They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
 thought there would be anything less than a red shirt



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





   good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists
 and engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who
 collect trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech
 devices to do their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water
 works, HVAC, etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and
 for them be so? Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not
 geniuses, wouldn't there be a decent number of people in jobs who are just
 normal in intelligence? I know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love
 interest for Carter--who had some kind of high tech cleaning system. But if
 she needed a couple of workers to help her with the clothes, would they have
 to be geniuses too? Are all the assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops,
 flower shops, HVAC repair, the movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every
 janitor 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
If we followed Sam the janitor around that would be called reality tv and
would probably be boring. Sam the triple Phd with the desegregation ray
would be scifi.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



  As I said, I live in such a place.  Redmond AKA Microsoft city is such a
 place and to a lesser degree Bellevue is too.The company is HUGE and
 dominates everything here.  My sister-in-law says its kind of creepy seeing
 all the Microsoft buses, cars, signs, vans, coffee shops, the mall, the
 downtown shopping district, townhouses,childcare, apartments, beauty salons,
 restaurants, etc and people with the ids on car windows everywhere we go.
 The place has influence or actually runs pretty much everything here.



 So, I do not really need a history, I live it.   All I have to do is step
 outside the house



 Perhaps, what we disagree that TV Fiction rarely portrays settings,
 industries, career specialties, etc. intentionally take out many aspects of
 realism in them to accommodate the story



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Mr. Worf
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:09 PM

 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 A little more history:

 Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford
 university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On
 the other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned
 their houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s
 they decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of
 a drain on the city's resources and created East Palo Alto.

 (known to anti drug agents everywhere)

 Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc


 Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of
 MA degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy
 experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change
 the general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated.
 For example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local
 barnes and noble.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



 I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in Redmond.
 The whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft .  The
 existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it operates is.
   That is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than
 life.   I understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect that they
 would have a realistic representation of who would live in such a town is ..
 unrealistic of me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed
 unrealistically on TV, so I should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.
  All those towns you mentioned, no matter how technically advanced, are
 likely to have regular folks—most likely more regular folks than geniuses.
 That being said, many may be the best of the best, but most of them are not
 geniuses.



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Mr. Worf
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM


 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have
 towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of
 Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount
 of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and
 create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For
 example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all
 created there and promptly placed in their basement. :)

  There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
 Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the
 rest of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like
 Hershey, Penn.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



 I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there
 are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the
 whole premise is unrealistic.



 Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged
 normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only
 unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all
 are painted as geniuses.



 If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.
 They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
 thought there would be anything less than a red shirt



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
They are all looked at more of as the hired help. In university towns that
can happen. There are a lot of people that live and work around Harvard that
have a liberal arts or English history degree and can't find work! :)

But on your topic, the people that have jobs like that may not be able to
live in Palo Alto proper. Home prices are pretty steep (almost $1 million)
for most of that city.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 So, Palo Alto needed regular people to get up and running? Now that they've
 spliced off from the other town, who collects their trash, runs their water
 treatment, performs pest control services, fixes gas mains, bakes their
 croissants, etc? Are all those services peformed by people with Masters and
 Phd's?

 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:08:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



 A little more history:

 Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford
 university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On
 the other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned
 their houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s
 they decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of
 a drain on the city's resources and created East Palo Alto.

 (known to anti drug agents everywhere)

 Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc


 Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of
 MA degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy
 experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change
 the general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated.
 For example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local
 barnes and noble.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



  I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in
 Redmond.  The whole town – practically everything, is set up around
 Microsoft .  The existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it
 operates is.   That is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter,
 larger than life.   I understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect
 that they would have a realistic representation of who would live in such a
 town is .. unrealistic of me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed
 unrealistically on TV, so I should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.
  All those towns you mentioned, no matter how technically advanced, are
 likely to have regular folks—most likely more regular folks than geniuses.
 That being said, many may be the best of the best, but most of them are not
 geniuses.



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Mr. Worf
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM

 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have
 towns similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of
 Xerox Parc back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount
 of money creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and
 create. A lot of the technology that was created there we are using. For
 example, the mouse, keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all
 created there and promptly placed in their basement. :)

  There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
 Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the
 rest of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like
 Hershey, Penn.

 On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
 tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



 I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there
 are very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the
 whole premise is unrealistic.



 Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show
 acknowledged normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the
 only unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs,
 all are painted as geniuses.



 If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.
 They do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never
 thought there would be anything less than a red shirt



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





   good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

So now we know where Joss Whedon got the idea for the Hellmouth...

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:27:58 -0700
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  








As I said, I live in such a place.  Redmond AKA Microsoft city
is such a place and to a lesser degree Bellevue is too.The company is HUGE
and dominates everything here.  My sister-in-law says its kind of creepy seeing
all the Microsoft buses, cars, signs, vans, coffee shops, the mall, the
downtown shopping district, townhouses,childcare, apartments, beauty salons,
restaurants, etc and people with the ids on car windows everywhere we go.  The
place has influence or actually runs pretty much everything here.  

 

So, I do not really need a history, I live it.   All I have to
do is step outside the house 

 

Perhaps, what we disagree that TV Fiction rarely portrays
settings, industries, career specialties, etc. intentionally take out many
aspects of realism in them to accommodate the story

 





From:
scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mr.
Worf

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:09 PM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 





A little more history: 



Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s
they decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much
of a drain on the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 



(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 



Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc





Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes
and noble. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
wrote:



 



I live in one of those
towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in Redmond.  The whole
town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft .  The existence
of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it operates is.   That
is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life. 
 I understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect
that they would have a realistic representation of who would live in such a
town is .. unrealistic of me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed
unrealistically on TV, so I should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.
 All those towns you mentioned, no matter how technically advanced, are
likely to have regular folks—most likely more regular folks than geniuses. 
That being said, many may be the best of the best, but most of them are not
geniuses.


 






From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Mr. Worf

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM








To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts













 






The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse,
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and
promptly placed in their basement. :) 



 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox
Parc and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest
of the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example
like Hershey, Penn. 




On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
wrote:




 




I thought about that. 
Based on how they present the show, I think there are very few none-geniuses in
the town.  While that is unrealistic, the whole premise is
unrealistic.   


 


Other than Joe and Carter and
an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged normals.  In all of Zoe’s
school scenes they painted her as the only unidentified genius. 
  The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are painted as
geniuses.  


 


If there are non-geniuses in
the script, they are less than red shirts.  They do not 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
As I said, I live in such a place.  Redmond AKA Microsoft city is such a place 
and to a lesser degree Bellevue is too.The company is HUGE and dominates 
everything here.  My sister-in-law says its kind of creepy seeing all the 
Microsoft buses, cars, signs, vans, coffee shops, the mall, the downtown 
shopping district, townhouses,childcare, apartments, beauty salons, 
restaurants, etc and people with the ids on car windows everywhere we go.  The 
place has influence or actually runs pretty much everything here.  

 

So, I do not really need a history, I live it.   All I have to do is step 
outside the house 

 

Perhaps, what we disagree that TV Fiction rarely portrays settings, industries, 
career specialties, etc. intentionally take out many aspects of realism in them 
to accommodate the story

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Mr. Worf
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:09 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 



A little more history: 

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford 
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the 
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their 
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s they 
decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of a drain on 
the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 

(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA 
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy 
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the 
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For 
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes 
and noble. 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:

 

I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in Redmond.  The 
whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft .  The 
existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it operates is.   That 
is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life.   I 
understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect that they would have a 
realistic representation of who would live in such a town is .. unrealistic of 
me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically on TV, so I 
should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.  All those towns you mentioned, 
no matter how technically advanced, are likely to have regular folks—most 
likely more regular folks than geniuses.  That being said, many may be the best 
of the best, but most of them are not geniuses.

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Mr. Worf
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM


To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 



The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:

 

I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic.   

 

Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses.  

 

If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.  They 
do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

 

good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services 

RE: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Agreed. But that's us thinking real-world. Something that H'Wood hasn't even a 
passing notion of...

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:44:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove















 





  The thing that bugged me about the Terminator was its vast 
misuse of resources. If it really wanted to kill humanity it could have just 
engineered a virus. A computer virus would have disabled communication followed 
by a biological virus and it could have wiped out everyone... 





On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
wrote:


























And, when the Terminator franchise comes to vivid reality... 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:31:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove
















 





  As things become more web enabled they start running the 
danger of a virus. What if his cellphone gave his stove a virus? I know its not 
possible right now but soon...very soon... 

We already have web enabled stoves and refrigerators. All it takes is some kid 
on summer vacation to play around with it. 




On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
wrote:


























Now, if we were to install Magic Chef ovens in teenagers' cars, 
texting-while-driving would become a thing of the past.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:22:18 -0700
Subject: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove















 





  
http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget



-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/





 

  














Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try BingT now.




















-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/





 

  














With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. Click here.




















-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/




 

  














_
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_faster:082009

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

You are welcome. My condolences to you on your loss, and please chime in more 
often than from time to time.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: tashe...@netzero.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:06:18 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts















 





  Martin,



Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find this 
group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was 
beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and 
left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of my 
friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest they 
get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too), but none 
like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been reading here have 
been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in grad school, and as 
the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.  However, I will chime in 
with my two cents from time to time.



Tasheka



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:



 

 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said so.

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

 

 

 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 From: tashe...@...

 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   I think the fact that there's not much else on really makes 
 Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when Carter 
 and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When Nathan died 
 and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe in that 
 other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have been 
 pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of that 
 alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present timeline.  But 
 then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison was looking a 
 little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a date and that 
 Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with this.

 

 

 

 Tasheka

 

 

 

 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@ wrote:

 

 

 

  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past (maybe 
  because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else on 
  right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.  
  Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that 
  started after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she 
  doesn't die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) 
  Carter and Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance 
  between them would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm 
  voting for Tess.

 

  

 

  Angela

 

  

 

  

 

  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ wrote:

 

  

 

   Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind of

 

   ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could regain 
   it

 

   down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem impossible

 

   in the short-term

 

   

 



 

   

 

   From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On

 

   Behalf Of Martin Baxter

 

   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM

 

   To: SciFiNoir2

 

   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

   

 



 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the 
   Carter-Tess

 

   storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's Dr

 

   Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at 
   first,

 

   and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked up

 

   sympathetically.

 

   

 

   If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
   bloody

 

   hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

   

 

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 _  

 

   

 

   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 

   From: tdlists@

 

   Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:25:49 -0700

 

   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

   

 

 

 

   

 



 

   

 

   I was getting sick of the silly Fargo side plot distractions, but last 
   week

 

   they did not have one, it seemed more like season one (which was my

 

   favorite), so I am starting to like it 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Tasheka, 

Welcome! I just noticed your name in the list today. Did you do one of those 
introduction e-mails that the group has newcomers fill out? 

I think you'll enjoy this group. Tracey started it years ago, and, along with 
streaming the Tom Joyner Morning Show every morning and having an iPod for when 
I work in the yard, it's one of the things that has helped me make it in life. 
It is so great to discuss scifi, fantasy, comics, animation, politics, etc., 
with people who don't shout or criticize, who aren't racist or juvenile, who 
actually want to *share* information. 

I am amazed you made it this long without a group of likeminded scifi fans to 
discuss things with. As a black man growing up in the '70s, being a scifi fan 
was sometimes hard. Stuff lke The Six Million Dollar man was universally 
loved, but sometimes the more specific scifi like Star Trek wasn't always 
appreciated by other blacks. But, between my brothers and close friends, I 
always had a circle of fellow fans. But this list is the first time I have so 
many people of color and whites in one place who have such a wide range of 
interests. There are vampire fanatics, zombie lovers, people who think B5 rules 
(i'm one!), some who think Transformers is a juvenile movie franchise, others 
who say get over yourself and just enjoy it. There are lovers of comics, 
inveterate readers of novels, TV junkies, folks who love podcasts, gamers, 
those of us who love going to the movies--you name it it's here. 

I really think you'll have fun. And, as one of the most prolific and 
long-winded participants in the group, I can guarantee you'll never find it 
lacking for new input! :) 

As for your dad, i'm sorry to hear that. My dad was old school, loved shoot 
'em ups and Hee Haw and Three Stooges. I miss him every day, since his 
death back in '01. Lost my mother two years ago, and my wife lost her mother 
three years ago. So I can relate, and have leaned on this group to help get me 
through those hard times. 

Welcome home to your new home. 

keith 

- Original Message - 
From: tasheka4 tashe...@netzero.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:06:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts 






Martin, 

Thanks for the welcome! You're the first to do so. I'm just glad to find this 
group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there. I was beginning 
to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and left me with 
no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows. None of my friends like 
it, and believe me I've tried to convert them. The closest they get is to 
fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too), but none like 
actual scifi which I love. So the discussions I've been reading here have been 
great! I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in grad school, and as the 
semester gets going I know I'll be really busy. However, I will chime in with 
my two cents from time to time. 

Tasheka 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote: 
 
 
 Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said so. 
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 From: tashe...@... 
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 + 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I think the fact that there's not much else on really makes Eureka better 
 this season. I remember that alternate timeline when Carter and Allison were 
 expecting a baby. She was very pregnant. When Nathan died and we find out 
 she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe in that other timeline when 
 she and Carter were together, she could have been pregnant with Nathan's 
 child then too. Perhaps certain portions of that alternate timeline would be 
 the same or similar to the present timeline. But then they brought in Tess, 
 so I'm not sure. Although Allison was looking a little sad when she realized 
 Tess and Carter had gone out on a date and that Tess really liked him. So who 
 knows where they're going with this. 
 
 
 
 Tasheka 
 
 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , angelababycat asrobinson@ wrote: 
 
  
 
  I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past (maybe 
  because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else on 
  right now...). But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old. 
  Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that 
  started after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she 
  doesn't die or something? In that time line (which was like 4 years?) 
  Carter and Allison get married, have a baby, etc. So any real romance 
  between them would have to top or be very different than that story. I'm 
  

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
not to sound like a sycophant, but damn you come up with good one-liners! 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:29:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






So now we know where Joss Whedon got the idea for the Hellmouth... 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:27:58 -0700 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 








As I said, I live in such a place. Redmond AKA Microsoft city is such a place 
and to a lesser degree Bellevue is too. The company is HUGE and dominates 
everything here. My sister-in-law says its kind of creepy seeing all the 
Microsoft buses, cars, signs, vans, coffee shops, the mall, the downtown 
shopping district, townhouses,childcare, apartments, beauty salons, 
restaurants, etc and people with the ids on car windows everywhere we go. The 
place has influence or actually runs pretty much everything here. 



So, I do not really need a history, I live it. All I have to do is step outside 
the house 



Perhaps, what we disagree that TV Fiction rarely portrays settings, industries, 
career specialties, etc. intentionally take out many aspects of realism in them 
to accommodate the story 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Mr. Worf 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:09 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 





A little more history: 

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford 
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the 
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their 
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s they 
decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of a drain on 
the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 

(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc 


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA 
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy 
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the 
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For 
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes 
and noble. 


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella  
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  wrote: 



I live in one of those towns. OK one town over. Microsoft is in Redmond. The 
whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft . The existence 
of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic. How it operates is. That is necessary 
for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life. I understand that. 
That was my point. That to expect that they would have a realistic 
representation of who would live in such a town is .. unrealistic of me. Most 
industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically on TV, so I should not 
expect a show like Eureka to do so. All those towns you mentioned, no matter 
how technically advanced, are likely to have regular folks—most likely more 
regular folks than geniuses. That being said, many may be the best of the best, 
but most of them are not geniuses. 



From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Mr. Worf 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 




The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella  
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  wrote: 



I thought about that. Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town. While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic. 

Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals. In all of Zoe’s 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
wow, i don't think I realized Redmond was like that! Do you walk down the 
streets thinking you're seeing Stepford Wives, or just geeks on every corner? 
What's the political leaning of the town in the main? How about the racial 
breakdown? 

Does it ultimately feel to you like a real town, or, like your sister-in-law, 
do you feel something a little off about it? 

You know, if you expand past high tech ventures and Eureka towns, the company 
town is actually a huge part of American history, especially since the 
Industrial Revolution. Stanley dominated the town around it, I used to co-op 
with Dow Chemical, which dominates Brazoria County, Texas (it had 10,000 of the 
locals as employees at its heyday). And of course so many towns and cities in 
the Rust Belt were company towns with a huge percentage of the populace working 
for one or two companies. So on that level, our conversation isn't that 
unusual. It's just the shift toward a discussion of high tech towns that's new. 

- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:27:58 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









As I said, I live in such a place. Redmond AKA Microsoft city is such a place 
and to a lesser degree Bellevue is too. The company is HUGE and dominates 
everything here. My sister-in-law says its kind of creepy seeing all the 
Microsoft buses, cars, signs, vans, coffee shops, the mall, the downtown 
shopping district, townhouses,childcare, apartments, beauty salons, 
restaurants, etc and people with the ids on car windows everywhere we go. The 
place has influence or actually runs pretty much everything here. 



So, I do not really need a history, I live it. All I have to do is step outside 
the house 



Perhaps, what we disagree that TV Fiction rarely portrays settings, industries, 
career specialties, etc. intentionally take out many aspects of realism in them 
to accommodate the story 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Mr. Worf 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:09 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 





A little more history: 

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford 
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the 
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their 
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s they 
decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of a drain on 
the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 

(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc 


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA 
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy 
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the 
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For 
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes 
and noble. 


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella  
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  wrote: 





I live in one of those towns. OK one town over. Microsoft is in Redmond. The 
whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft . The existence 
of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic. How it operates is. That is necessary 
for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life. I understand that. 
That was my point. That to expect that they would have a realistic 
representation of who would live in such a town is .. unrealistic of me. Most 
industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically on TV, so I should not 
expect a show like Eureka to do so. All those towns you mentioned, no matter 
how technically advanced, are likely to have regular folks—most likely more 
regular folks than geniuses. That being said, many may be the best of the best, 
but most of them are not geniuses. 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Mr. Worf 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM 




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 







The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Hey what gives? No other love for Joe Morton? 

Surely I can't the only one who's seen The Brother from Another Planet, or 
who likes John Sayles?? :( 

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:41:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 







I can't stress enough how much Joe Morton brings to Eureka. Morton's one of 
those actors with a face and bearing you just trust and respect. He can play a 
likeable guy, a strong leader, a tortured and confused soul. I have followed 
him for years, whether it's been great turns in John Sayles flicks--and it's 
saying a lot that Morton is a fav of Sayles'--having the lead in the shortlived 
TV series Under One Roof, playing a memorable role as a former boxer turned 
transvestite on New York Undercover, or even his guest stint as Whitley's 
love interest on A Different World. Even his bit in Terminator 2 is 
memorable. The anguish he feels at what his work has caused for the future is 
palpable, and I hated to see the character die. 

It's a crime that Morton hasn't gotten the major roles and respect he deserves. 
He's done a lot of stuff, but never got to that A-list on TV or film. And while 
I'm really happy to see him get steady work on Eureka, and like the 
steadiness his character brings to that world, I keep hoping to see him get 
some meatier roles. That's especially true as long as the showrunners seem 
hesitant to give him a real life. Like I said, he's mayor now, but that angle's 
not explored, and I really dislike them killing off Kim--twice. 

And for those of you young 'un's who don't understand my praise of Morton, do 
yourself a favor and look up his great performances in the movie City of Hope 
(a John Sayles joint), the shortlived but well done TV series Tribeca (which 
co-starred Carl Lumbly and Lawrence Fishburne), and especially, the classic 
Sayles' film The Brother From Another Planet. That last, in which Morton 
plays an alien slave on the run, is an amazing performance given that he speaks 
not a word, and must convey everything with just his facial expressions and 
body language. 

I wonder if the Eureka showrunners really understand what a great asset they 
have in Morton...? 


- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:58:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









They are the best actors however, some of the guest stars and recurring 
characters are also good, Frances Fisher (Eva Thorne); and Tamlyn Tomita (Kim 
Anderson); and Debrah Farentino, (The Psychiatrist) are some that come to mind 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 2:57 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 








The best actors on the show are Joe Morton, Richardson, and Ferguson. All of 
them are good actors, and I think they honestly rise above material that tries 
to make them cliches too much. Ferguson is a stronger man than Carter gets to 
be: that befuddled schtick gets old. Richardson has more warmth and personality 
than her tough Allison character. Morton actually makes Henry the most 
well-rounded character, a tribut to the man's phenomenal talents (I think he's 
one of the most underrated and underused actors working). 

But I keep noticing that even as I like the stories--and I am liking this 
season--i keep seeing types in all the characters, main stars and guests. 
They are very by-the-book at times. It's the actors that seem to rise above it 
with their likeability and acting chops. They need to round out the 
characterizations just a bit... 


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:39:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the Carter-Tess 
storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's Dr 
Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at first, and 
the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked up 
sympathetically. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 







To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:25:49 -0700 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









I was getting sick of the silly Fargo side plot distractions, but last week 
they did not have one, it seemed more like season one (which was my favorite), 
so I am starting to like it again. 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
It’s funny we are talking about this.  We are thinking about leaving the 
Microsoft are and moving to the Bay Area. I was asking a business associate  
about some neighborhoods and she pointed out all these Microsoft like towns 
like Palo Alto.  I find these places a little off-putting, cut off from culture 
and ironically people.  They work hard to make them inviting and do a good job 
to a point. But I guess I’m just a city gal.  Anyway, can’t wait to live in the 
city again.

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 






So, Palo Alto needed regular people to get up and running? Now that they've 
spliced off from the other town, who collects their trash, runs their water 
treatment, performs pest control services, fixes gas mains, bakes their 
croissants, etc? Are all those services peformed by people with Masters and 
Phd's?

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:08:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

A little more history: 

Back when they started the Xerox parc concept, it was basically Stanford 
university, and the people that worked there on one side of the freeway. On the 
other side was poor black and mexican folks (and hippies) that cleaned their 
houses and worked as janitors and did their yard work. In the late 70s they 
decided that the black and mexican part of Palo Alto was too much of a drain on 
the city's resources and created East Palo Alto. 

(known to anti drug agents everywhere) 

Here is a little info on Xerox Parc:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xerox_Parc


Per capita, the majority of folks in Palo Alto, has the largest amount of MA 
degrees. But yes, you probably won't see anyone doing nano fusion energy 
experiments in their backyard anytime soon. :) But I think it does change the 
general flavor of the town considerably if everyone is well educated. For 
example, they may have a noble peace prize winner reading at their local barnes 
and noble. 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:

 

I live in one of those towns.  OK one town over.  Microsoft is in Redmond.  The 
whole town – practically everything, is set up around Microsoft .  The 
existence of Eureka is not what I find unrealistic.  How it operates is.   That 
is necessary for TV. Fiction must be bigger, brighter, larger than life.   I 
understand that.   That was my point.  That to expect that they would have a 
realistic representation of who would live in such a town is .. unrealistic of 
me.  Most industries and settings are portrayed unrealistically on TV, so I 
should not expect a show like Eureka to do so.  All those towns you mentioned, 
no matter how technically advanced, are likely to have regular folks—most 
likely more regular folks than geniuses.  That being said, many may be the best 
of the best, but most of them are not geniuses.

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Mr. Worf
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:59 PM


To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 



The premise of the show is based on reality. A few large companies have towns 
similar to this. Palo Alto, California for example was the home of Xerox Parc 
back in the 1960s-70s. Xerox, IBM and others spent a large amount of money 
creating a live/work/play space for geniuses to co-mingle and create. A lot of 
the technology that was created there we are using. For example, the mouse, 
keyboard, monitor, font, network, Apple's GUI were all created there and 
promptly placed in their basement. :) 

 There are similar places in Japan, and Europe. The combination of Xerox Parc 
and the surrounding companies and infrastructure helped to spawn the rest of 
the Silicon Valley. There are also company towns for example like Hershey, 
Penn. 

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:

 

I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic.   

 

Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses.  

 

If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.  They 
do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
To: 

[scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong)

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
Believe me, my love for Carla Gugino is only exceeded by my love for Halle 
Berry, Rosario Dawson and porn star Jasmine Cashmere (all of whom I will watch 
in ANYTHING).  I wanted to love Karen Sisko, I really did! I DVRed it and 
everything! I was rooting for Gugino.  I was rooting for Robert Forster.  Heck, 
I was rooting for Danny DeVito's production company. But I found it slow, 
plodding and, finally, unwatchable.  It had none of the nerve and verve of Out 
of Sight, which was primo, and, more importantly none of the chemistry George 
Clooney and Jennifer Lopez brought to the movie.

~(no)rave!


--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... 
 To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. Just 
 saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 From: keithbjohn...@... 
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... 
 To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 
 
 
 
 
 rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, 
 they couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss 
 out on a thing or three. 
 
 Like the rest of the story... 
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 From: ravena...@... 
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends 
 and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no 
 damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
 Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
 twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and 
 response Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and 
 Dwayne (the Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 
 
 And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
 Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
 ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white 
 America... from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic 
 imitation of our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich 
 your very existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product 
 through our achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that 
 comfort me when I am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, 
 who *have* no talent, no guts? people like you who desecrate things they 
 don't understand when the truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on 
 about your way. But apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots 
 his gun] 
 
 I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
 play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and 
 caps pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly 
 NOT sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 
 
 ~(no)rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's 
  one of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think 
  Pam Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I 
  never saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i 
  found really labored and boring. 
  
  As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
  probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has 
  starred. The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with 
  Lopez and Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen 
  Sisco, based on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a 
  cool, sexy, tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny 
  Devito, Bill Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was 
  perfect. It had the mix 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Augustus Augustus
Tracey,

and i am proud 2 know u!

Fate.

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
wrote:

From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:13 PM






 





  







I’m Strange and I’m Proud 

   





From:
scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of 
Augustus
Augustus

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:46 PM

To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts 





   







 


 
  
  Tasheka,

  

  i too am so sorry 2 hear about your father.  i promise u will be in my
  prayers this evening.  also, welcome 2 the group!  beware of -
  Tracey and Martin (they are truly strange :-) - just joking Trace and
  Martin.. . . . . .and you both know
  it.  again, welcome Tasheka.

  

  Fate.

  

  --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multicultur aladvantage. com
  wrote: 
  

  From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multicultur aladvantage. com

  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com

  Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 4:28 PM 
  
     
  
  Tasheka:

  

  Sorry to hear about your dad. I was close to my dad too. 

  

  -Original Message-

  From: scifino...@yahoogro
  ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com] On

  Behalf Of tasheka4

  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM

  To: scifino...@yahoogro
  ups.com

  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

  

  Martin,

  

  Thanks for the welcome! You're the first to do so. I'm just glad to find

  this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there. I was

  beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and

  left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows. None of

  my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them. The closest

  they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),

  but none like actual scifi which I love. So the discussions I've been

  reading here have been great! I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in

  grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.

  However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.

  

  Tasheka

  

  --- In scifino...@yahoogro
  ups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... wrote:

  

   

   Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said

  so.

   

   If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who
  in

  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

   

   http://www.youtube.
  com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik

   

   

   

   

   To: scifino...@yahoogro
  ups.com

   From: tashe...@...

   Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +

   Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   I think the fact that there's not much else on really

  makes Eureka better this season. I remember that alternate timeline when

  Carter and Allison were expecting a baby. She was very pregnant. When

  Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe

  in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have

  been pregnant with Nathan's child then too. Perhaps certain portions of

  that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present

  timeline. But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure. Although Allison

  was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a

  date and that Tess really liked him. So who knows where they're going with

  this.

   

   

   

   Tasheka

   

   

   

   --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, angelababycat
  asrobinson@  wrote:

   

   

   

I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past

  (maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else

  on right now...). But I agree that the Carterison thing was
  getting old.

  Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started

  after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't

  die or something? In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and

  Allison get married, have a baby, etc. So any real romance between them

  would have to top or be very different than that story. I'm voting for

  Tess.

   



   

Angela

   



   



   

--- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Tracey de
  Morsella tdlists@

  wrote:

   



   

 Same here. I actually like Allison and Carter together, but
  they kind

  of

   

 ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they
  could

  regain it

   

 down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that
  seem

  impossible

   

 

Re: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong)

2009-08-25 Thread Augustus Augustus
Rave,

Marie Luv and Roxy Reynolds 4 me!

Fate.

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com wrote:

From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 
9 Holds Strong)
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:55 PM






 





  Believe me, my love for Carla Gugino is only exceeded by my 
love for Halle Berry, Rosario Dawson and porn star Jasmine Cashmere (all of 
whom I will watch in ANYTHING ).  I wanted to love Karen Sisko, I really 
did! I DVRed it and everything! I was rooting for Gugino.  I was rooting for 
Robert Forster.  Heck, I was rooting for Danny DeVito's production company. But 
I found it slow, plodding and, finally, unwatchable.  It had none of the nerve 
and verve of Out of Sight, which was primo, and, more importantly none of the 
chemistry George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez brought to the movie.



~(no)rave!



--- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ ... wrote:



 Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 

 

 

 - Original Message - 

 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... 

 To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 

 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. Just 
 saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

 

 http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik 

 

 

 

 

 

 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 

 From: KeithBJohnson@ ... 

 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 

 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 

 

 - Original Message - 

 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... 

 To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 

 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 

 

 

 

 

 rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, 
 they couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss 
 out on a thing or three. 

 

 Like the rest of the story... 

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

 

 http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 

 From: ravena...@.. . 

 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 

 

 

 

 

 While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends 
 and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no 
 damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 

 Stop hatin', start participatin' . Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
 twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and 
 response Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and 
 Dwayne (the Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 

 

 And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 

 Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
 ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white 
 America... from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic 
 imitation of our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms.. . we enrich 
 your very existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product 
 through our achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that 
 comfort me when I am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, 
 who *have* no talent, no guts? people like you who desecrate things they 
 don't understand when the truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on 
 about your way. But apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots 
 his gun] 

 

 I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
 play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and 
 caps pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly 
 NOT sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 

 

 ~(no)rave! 

 

 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@  wrote: 

  

  Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's 
  one of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think 
  Pam Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I 
  never saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i 
  found really labored and boring. 

  

  As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
  probably one of--if not 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
I had the same fear.  He had me at Brother From another Planet

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Augustus Augustus
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:03 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton

 







Keith,

i totally agree with u.  in the ep where i thought they were going 2 write off 
his character (for either jail or making him leave eureka) i was ready 2 watch 
it.  but they didnot and i am still a fan!  he is absolutely GREAT in the role.

Fate.

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:


From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:41 PM

  

Hey what gives? No other love for Joe Morton?

Surely I can't the only one who's seen The Brother from Another Planet, or 
who likes John Sayles??  :(

- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:41:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton

  

I can't stress enough how much Joe Morton brings to Eureka. Morton's one of 
those actors with a face and bearing you just trust and respect. He can play a 
likeable guy, a strong leader, a tortured and confused soul. I have followed 
him for years, whether it's been great turns in John Sayles flicks--and it's 
saying a lot that Morton is a fav of Sayles'--having the lead in the shortlived 
TV series Under One Roof, playing a memorable role as a former boxer turned 
transvestite on New York Undercover, or even his guest stint as Whitley's 
love interest on A Different World.  Even his bit in Terminator 2 is 
memorable. The anguish he feels at what his work has caused for the future is 
palpable, and I hated to see the character die. 

It's a crime that Morton hasn't gotten the major roles and respect he deserves. 
He's done a lot of stuff, but never got to that A-list on TV or film. And while 
I'm really happy to see him get steady work on Eureka, and like the 
steadiness his character brings to that world, I keep hoping to see him get 
some meatier roles. That's especially true as long as the showrunners seem 
hesitant to give him a real life. Like I said, he's mayor now, but that angle's 
not explored, and I really dislike them killing off Kim--twice.

And for those of you young 'un's who don't understand my praise of Morton, do 
yourself a favor and look up his great performances in the movie City of Hope 
(a John Sayles joint), the shortlived but well done TV series Tribeca (which 
co-starred Carl Lumbly and Lawrence Fishburne), and especially, the classic 
Sayles' film The Brother From Another Planet. That last, in which Morton 
plays an alien slave on the run, is an amazing performance given that he speaks 
not a word, and must convey everything with just his facial expressions and 
body language.

I wonder if the Eureka showrunners really understand what a great asset they 
have in Morton...?


- Original Message -
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multicultur aladvantage. com
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:58:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

They are the best actors however, some of the guest stars and recurring 
characters are also good, Frances Fisher (Eva Thorne); and Tamlyn Tomita (Kim 
Anderson); and Debrah Farentino, (The Psychiatrist) are some that come to mind

 

From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 2:57 PM
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

 

The best actors on the show are Joe Morton, Richardson, and Ferguson. All of 
them are good actors, and I think they honestly rise above material that tries 
to make them cliches too much. Ferguson is a stronger man than Carter gets to 
be: that befuddled schtick gets old. Richardson has more warmth and personality 
than her tough Allison character. Morton actually makes Henry the most 
well-rounded character, a tribut to the man's phenomenal talents (I think he's 
one of the most underrated and underused actors working).

But I keep noticing that even as I like the stories--and I am liking this 
season--i keep seeing types in all the characters, main stars and guests. 
They are very by-the-book at times. It's the actors that seem to rise above it 
with their likeability and acting chops. They need to round out the 
characterizations just a bit...


- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:39:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the 

[scifinoir2] Link shared by s...@bayindogroup.com

2009-08-25 Thread said
Amazing...

http://bostonherald.com/news/national/west/view/20090825police_drug_ring_used_comic_books_to_launder_cash/srvc=homeposition=recent

[Message sent by s...@bayindogroup.com via AddThis.com.]




Re: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong)

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
I don't know from the pornstar. I love Rosario Dawson, but am not as hormonally 
fired up by her as the rest of you guys. Halle Berry is not bad, but she's 
another who's loin-exciting abilities i've never gotten. I just don't find her 
to be smokin' hot. 
But Gugino, man she has it in spades! I still enjoyed Karen Sisco, and think it 
would have gotten better with time. 


- Original Message - 
From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:55:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 
9 Holds Strong) 






Believe me, my love for Carla Gugino is only exceeded by my love for Halle 
Berry, Rosario Dawson and porn star Jasmine Cashmere (all of whom I will watch 
in ANYTHING). I wanted to love Karen Sisko, I really did! I DVRed it and 
everything! I was rooting for Gugino. I was rooting for Robert Forster. Heck, I 
was rooting for Danny DeVito's production company. But I found it slow, 
plodding and, finally, unwatchable. It had none of the nerve and verve of Out 
of Sight, which was primo, and, more importantly none of the chemistry George 
Clooney and Jennifer Lopez brought to the movie. 

~(no)rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... 
 To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. Just 
 saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 From: keithbjohn...@... 
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... 
 To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
 Strong 
 
 
 
 
 rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, 
 they couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss 
 out on a thing or three. 
 
 Like the rest of the story... 
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 From: ravena...@... 
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends 
 and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no 
 damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
 Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
 twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and 
 response Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and 
 Dwayne (the Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 
 
 And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
 Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
 ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white 
 America... from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic 
 imitation of our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich 
 your very existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product 
 through our achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that 
 comfort me when I am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, 
 who *have* no talent, no guts? people like you who desecrate things they 
 don't understand when the truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on 
 about your way. But apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots 
 his gun] 
 
 I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
 play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and 
 caps pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly 
 NOT sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 
 
 ~(no)rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's 
  one of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think 
  Pam Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I 
  never 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
agreed! 

- Original Message - 
From: Augustus Augustus jazzynupe_...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:02:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 






Keith, 

i totally agree with u. in the ep where i thought they were going 2 write off 
his character (for either jail or making him leave eureka) i was ready 2 watch 
it. but they didnot and i am still a fan! he is absolutely GREAT in the role. 

Fate. 

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote: 



From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:41 PM 






Hey what gives? No other love for Joe Morton? 

Surely I can't the only one who's seen The Brother from Another Planet, or 
who likes John Sayles?? :( 

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net 
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:41:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 







I can't stress enough how much Joe Morton brings to Eureka. Morton's one of 
those actors with a face and bearing you just trust and respect. He can play a 
likeable guy, a strong leader, a tortured and confused soul. I have followed 
him for years, whether it's been great turns in John Sayles flicks--and it's 
saying a lot that Morton is a fav of Sayles'--having the lead in the shortlived 
TV series Under One Roof, playing a memorable role as a former boxer turned 
transvestite on New York Undercover, or even his guest stint as Whitley's 
love interest on A Different World. Even his bit in Terminator 2 is 
memorable. The anguish he feels at what his work has caused for the future is 
palpable, and I hated to see the character die. 

It's a crime that Morton hasn't gotten the major roles and respect he deserves. 
He's done a lot of stuff, but never got to that A-list on TV or film. And while 
I'm really happy to see him get steady work on Eureka, and like the 
steadiness his character brings to that world, I keep hoping to see him get 
some meatier roles. That's especially true as long as the showrunners seem 
hesitant to give him a real life. Like I said, he's mayor now, but that angle's 
not explored, and I really dislike them killing off Kim--twice. 

And for those of you young 'un's who don't understand my praise of Morton, do 
yourself a favor and look up his great performances in the movie City of Hope 
(a John Sayles joint), the shortlived but well done TV series Tribeca (which 
co-starred Carl Lumbly and Lawrence Fishburne), and especially, the classic 
Sayles' film The Brother From Another Planet. That last, in which Morton 
plays an alien slave on the run, is an amazing performance given that he speaks 
not a word, and must convey everything with just his facial expressions and 
body language. 

I wonder if the Eureka showrunners really understand what a great asset they 
have in Morton...? 


- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multicultur aladvantage. com 
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:58:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









They are the best actors however, some of the guest stars and recurring 
characters are also good, Frances Fisher (Eva Thorne); and Tamlyn Tomita (Kim 
Anderson); and Debrah Farentino, (The Psychiatrist) are some that come to mind 





From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 2:57 PM 
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 








The best actors on the show are Joe Morton, Richardson, and Ferguson. All of 
them are good actors, and I think they honestly rise above material that tries 
to make them cliches too much. Ferguson is a stronger man than Carter gets to 
be: that befuddled schtick gets old. Richardson has more warmth and personality 
than her tough Allison character. Morton actually makes Henry the most 
well-rounded character, a tribut to the man's phenomenal talents (I think he's 
one of the most underrated and underused actors working). 

But I keep noticing that even as I like the stories--and I am liking this 
season--i keep seeing types in all the characters, main stars and guests. 
They are very by-the-book at times. It's the actors that seem to rise above it 
with their likeability and acting chops. They need to round out the 
characterizations just a bit... 


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:39:36 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the Carter-Tess 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
amen! In fact, I'm gonna find that movie this weekend and check it out again! 
I'm a big John Sayles fan anyway. 

- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 6:17:31 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 









I had the same fear. He had me at Brother From another Planet 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Augustus Augustus 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:03 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 








Keith, 

i totally agree with u. in the ep where i thought they were going 2 write off 
his character (for either jail or making him leave eureka) i was ready 2 watch 
it. but they didnot and i am still a fan! he is absolutely GREAT in the role. 

Fate. 

--- On Tue, 8/25/09, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote: 


From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:41 PM 






Hey what gives? No other love for Joe Morton? 

Surely I can't the only one who's seen The Brother from Another Planet, or 
who likes John Sayles?? :( 

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net 
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:41:13 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts - Joe Morton 







I can't stress enough how much Joe Morton brings to Eureka. Morton's one of 
those actors with a face and bearing you just trust and respect. He can play a 
likeable guy, a strong leader, a tortured and confused soul. I have followed 
him for years, whether it's been great turns in John Sayles flicks--and it's 
saying a lot that Morton is a fav of Sayles'--having the lead in the shortlived 
TV series Under One Roof, playing a memorable role as a former boxer turned 
transvestite on New York Undercover, or even his guest stint as Whitley's 
love interest on A Different World. Even his bit in Terminator 2 is 
memorable. The anguish he feels at what his work has caused for the future is 
palpable, and I hated to see the character die. 

It's a crime that Morton hasn't gotten the major roles and respect he deserves. 
He's done a lot of stuff, but never got to that A-list on TV or film. And while 
I'm really happy to see him get steady work on Eureka, and like the 
steadiness his character brings to that world, I keep hoping to see him get 
some meatier roles. That's especially true as long as the showrunners seem 
hesitant to give him a real life. Like I said, he's mayor now, but that angle's 
not explored, and I really dislike them killing off Kim--twice. 

And for those of you young 'un's who don't understand my praise of Morton, do 
yourself a favor and look up his great performances in the movie City of Hope 
(a John Sayles joint), the shortlived but well done TV series Tribeca (which 
co-starred Carl Lumbly and Lawrence Fishburne), and especially, the classic 
Sayles' film The Brother From Another Planet. That last, in which Morton 
plays an alien slave on the run, is an amazing performance given that he speaks 
not a word, and must convey everything with just his facial expressions and 
body language. 

I wonder if the Eureka showrunners really understand what a great asset they 
have in Morton...? 


- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multicultur aladvantage. com 
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:58:50 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 







They are the best actors however, some of the guest stars and recurring 
characters are also good, Frances Fisher (Eva Thorne); and Tamlyn Tomita (Kim 
Anderson); and Debrah Farentino, (The Psychiatrist) are some that come to mind 





From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifinoir2@ yahoogroups. com] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 2:57 PM 
To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






The best actors on the show are Joe Morton, Richardson, and Ferguson. All of 
them are good actors, and I think they honestly rise above material that tries 
to make them cliches too much. Ferguson is a stronger man than Carter gets to 
be: that befuddled schtick gets old. Richardson has more warmth and personality 
than her tough Allison character. Morton actually makes Henry the most 
well-rounded character, a tribut to the man's phenomenal talents (I think he's 
one of the most underrated and underused actors working). 

But I keep noticing that even as I like the stories--and I am liking this 
season--i keep seeing types in all the characters, main stars and guests. 
They are very by-the-book at times. It's the actors that seem to rise above it 

[scifinoir2] Halle Berry, She's Fine (was:Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
Don't get Halle Berry?  Somebody wrote a song about it.  Want to hear it?  Here 
it go!

http://uxite.notlong.com

http://ahfuthie.notlong.com



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 I don't know from the pornstar. I love Rosario Dawson, but am not as 
 hormonally fired up by her as the rest of you guys. Halle Berry is not bad, 
 but she's another who's loin-exciting abilities i've never gotten. I just 
 don't find her to be smokin' hot. 
 But Gugino, man she has it in spades! I still enjoyed Karen Sisco, and think 
 it would have gotten better with time. 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:55:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box 
 Office,District 9 Holds Strong) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Believe me, my love for Carla Gugino is only exceeded by my love for Halle 
 Berry, Rosario Dawson and porn star Jasmine Cashmere (all of whom I will 
 watch in ANYTHING). I wanted to love Karen Sisko, I really did! I DVRed 
 it and everything! I was rooting for Gugino. I was rooting for Robert 
 Forster. Heck, I was rooting for Danny DeVito's production company. But I 
 found it slow, plodding and, finally, unwatchable. It had none of the nerve 
 and verve of Out of Sight, which was primo, and, more importantly none of 
 the chemistry George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez brought to the movie. 
 
 ~(no)rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ 
  To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. 
  Just saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 
  
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
  
  
  
  
  
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  From: KeithBJohnson@ 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ 
  To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, 
  they couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might 
  miss out on a thing or three. 
  
  Like the rest of the story... 
  
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  From: ravenadal@ 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends 
  and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me 
  no damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
  Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
  twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and 
  response Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and 
  Dwayne (the Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 
  
  And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
  Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
  ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white 
  America... from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic 
  imitation of our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich 
  your very existence, all the while contributing to the gross national 
  product through our achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits 
  that comfort me when I am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and 
  bigoted, who *have* no talent, no guts? people like you who desecrate 
  things they don't understand when the truth is - you should say thank-you, 
  man? and go on about your way. But apparently you are incapable of doing 
  that! So...[shoots his gun] 
  
  I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected 
  to play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets 
  and caps pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, 
  decidedly NOT sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous 

[scifinoir2] Being Human - Annie's boyfriend

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
I was fascinated by Annie's boyfriend's reaction to her giving him a full 
ghosting.  At first terrified, once he realizes it is just Annie he reverts 
right back to smarmy exploitation mode, mining her insecurities and making her 
feel small.  As Alonzo Harris from Training Day would say: This boy has mad 
squabbles!

~rave!



[scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong)

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
pssst Fate...ixnay on the Marie Luv and Roxy Reynoldsay!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Augustus Augustus jazzynupe_...@... wrote:

 Rave,
 
 Marie Luv and Roxy Reynolds 4 me!
 
 Fate.
 
 --- On Tue, 8/25/09, ravenadal ravena...@... wrote:
 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@...
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box 
 Office,District 9 Holds Strong)
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:55 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   Believe me, my love for Carla Gugino is only exceeded by my 
 love for Halle Berry, Rosario Dawson and porn star Jasmine Cashmere (all of 
 whom I will watch in ANYTHING ).  I wanted to love Karen Sisko, I 
 really did! I DVRed it and everything! I was rooting for Gugino.  I was 
 rooting for Robert Forster.  Heck, I was rooting for Danny DeVito's 
 production company. But I found it slow, plodding and, finally, unwatchable.  
 It had none of the nerve and verve of Out of Sight, which was primo, and, 
 more importantly none of the chemistry George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez 
 brought to the movie.
 
 
 
 ~(no)rave!
 
 
 
 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ ... wrote:
 
 
 
  Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 
 
  
 
  
 
  - Original Message - 
 
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... 
 
  To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. 
  Just saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 
 
  
 
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
  
 
  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
 
  From: KeithBJohnson@ ... 
 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 
 
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 
 
  
 
  - Original Message - 
 
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... 
 
  To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, 
  they couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might 
  miss out on a thing or three. 
 
  
 
  Like the rest of the story... 
 
  
 
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
 
  
 
  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com 
 
  From: ravenadal@ . 
 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 
 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends 
  and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me 
  no damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
 
  Stop hatin', start participatin' . Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
  twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and 
  response Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and 
  Dwayne (the Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 
 
  
 
  And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
 
  Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
  ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white 
  America... from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic 
  imitation of our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms.. . we enrich 
  your very existence, all the while contributing to the gross national 
  product through our achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits 
  that comfort me when I am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and 
  bigoted, who *have* no talent, no guts? people like you who desecrate 
  things they don't understand when the truth is - you should say thank-you, 
  man? and go on about your way. But apparently you are incapable of doing 
  that! So...[shoots his gun] 
 
  
 
  I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected 
  to play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets 
  and caps pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, 
  decidedly NOT sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 
 
  
 
  ~(no)rave! 
 
  
 
  --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@  wrote: 
 
   
 
   Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's 
   one of 

RE: [scifinoir2] Being Human - Annie's boyfriend

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella

Yeah, but she should have said nothing  or had a poltergeist fit.  Her I am
death performance was hilarious.  She was too adorable.  Then again.  He's
a nasty SOB

-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ravenadal
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:17 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Being Human - Annie's boyfriend

I was fascinated by Annie's boyfriend's reaction to her giving him a full
ghosting.  At first terrified, once he realizes it is just Annie he
reverts right back to smarmy exploitation mode, mining her insecurities and
making her feel small.  As Alonzo Harris from Training Day would say: This
boy has mad squabbles!

~rave!





Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYa
hoo! Groups Links






Re: [scifinoir2] Being Human - Annie's boyfriend

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Agreed. Wonder what she said to him at the end, though? 
- Original Message - 
From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 10:17:15 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Being Human - Annie's boyfriend 






I was fascinated by Annie's boyfriend's reaction to her giving him a full 
ghosting. At first terrified, once he realizes it is just Annie he reverts 
right back to smarmy exploitation mode, mining her insecurities and making her 
feel small. As Alonzo Harris from Training Day would say: This boy has mad 
squabbles! 

~rave! 




Re: [scifinoir2] Halle Berry, She's Fine (was:Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box Office

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson

Funny! I have nothing against her at all. I'd have to say she's pretty, she 
just doesn't give me that wow! factor when I look at her. While we're at it, 
yes, the following women would also be on my list of Don't pant and salivate 
like many other people : 

Gina Torres - she's tough and attractive as heck, though 

Rosario Dawson (love her, but just don't see the wild physical attraction) 

The Sister on Warehouse 13 

Naomi Campbell (although her attitude has turned off most men) 

Eva Mendes (really don't get that one) 

Nichele Nichols (nice gams, though, and boy did she work that costume in 
Mirror, Mirror! 

Angelina Jolie - She can look alluring, like a cat, at the right times, but 
mostly is too gaunt and strained looking for me 

Jeri Ryan - Seven certainly filled out the outer space catsuit, but so could a 
lot of women 

People that did literally make me breathless when I first beheld them, and 
continue to turn me into a drooling idiot : 

Gabrielle Union (looks like a living doll, I find it hard to pull my eyes from 
her face) 

Charisma Carpenter - one of many reasons I started watching Angel 

Sanaa Lathan - Those soulful, vulnerable looking eyes, and those lips, I'd 
watch her sell Stride gum! 

Nia Long (something about her in Love Jones) 

Kenya Moore - first saw her on Arsenio Hall wearing a tight red dress with a 
slit up the side. Arsenio could literally barely speak, and I was wondering 
Why the hell didn't I watch the Miss USA pageant?!. 

Catherine Zeta-Jones - I just kept staring at her in Zorro, those long 
brunette locks, that pert nose, the eyes--wow 

Roselyn Sanchez - tough and sexy, with a throaty voice and accent that just 
make me melt 

Selma Hayek - curves in all the right places, and that voice! I'm not into food 
and foreplay, but seeing her slowly and lovingly stir a pot of some brew she'd 
cooked up on Keenan Ivory Wayans' talk show had me all but licking the screen! 








- Original Message - 
From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:54:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Halle Berry, She's Fine (was:Karen Sisko (was: Re: 
Basterds Take Box Office 






Don't get Halle Berry? Somebody wrote a song about it. Want to hear it? Here it 
go! 

http://uxite.notlong.com 

http://ahfuthie.notlong.com 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 I don't know from the pornstar. I love Rosario Dawson, but am not as 
 hormonally fired up by her as the rest of you guys. Halle Berry is not bad, 
 but she's another who's loin-exciting abilities i've never gotten. I just 
 don't find her to be smokin' hot. 
 But Gugino, man she has it in spades! I still enjoyed Karen Sisco, and think 
 it would have gotten better with time. 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:55:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Karen Sisko (was: Re: Basterds Take Box 
 Office,District 9 Holds Strong) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Believe me, my love for Carla Gugino is only exceeded by my love for Halle 
 Berry, Rosario Dawson and porn star Jasmine Cashmere (all of whom I will 
 watch in ANYTHING). I wanted to love Karen Sisko, I really did! I DVRed 
 it and everything! I was rooting for Gugino. I was rooting for Robert 
 Forster. Heck, I was rooting for Danny DeVito's production company. But I 
 found it slow, plodding and, finally, unwatchable. It had none of the nerve 
 and verve of Out of Sight, which was primo, and, more importantly none of 
 the chemistry George Clooney and Jennifer Lopez brought to the movie. 
 
 ~(no)rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Dude! Rave is missing the boat on that one! :) 
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ 
  To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 2:20:17 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. 
  Just saw it at the Best Buy near my house. 
  
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 
  
  
  
  
  
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  From: KeithBJohnson@ 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 + 
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ 
  To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
  Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 

[scifinoir2] Is NBC's Merlin Any Good?

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Anyone watching Merlin? I believe former Buffy star Anthony Head is one of 
the stars. I keep missing it. I've heard it's a lightweight telling of the 
Arthurian era. Someone likened it to One Tree Hill in the Middle Ages, or 
perhaps, the lighter aspects of Smallville once all the youngsters took over. 
I'm curious if it's worth a viewing? 

http://www.nbc.com/merlin/ 


Re: [scifinoir2] Is NBC's Merlin Any Good?

2009-08-25 Thread Justin Mohareb
Camelot 90210.  The wife likes it, but me?  Not so much.

Justin

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Keith
Johnsonkeithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:


 Anyone watching Merlin? I believe former Buffy star Anthony Head is one
 of the stars. I keep missing it. I've heard it's a lightweight telling of
 the Arthurian era. Someone likened it to One Tree Hill in the Middle Ages,
 or perhaps, the lighter aspects of Smallville once all the youngsters took
 over.
 I'm curious if it's worth a viewing?

 http://www.nbc.com/merlin/
 



-- 
Read the Bitter Guide to the Bitter Guy.
http://thebitterguy.livejournal.com


[scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
Thanks Tracey and Fate for the condolences and the welcome!  I'm happy to be 
among other scifi fans!



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Augustus Augustus jazzynupe_...@... wrote:

 Tasheka,
 
 i too am so sorry 2 hear about your father.  i promise u will be in my 
 prayers this evening.  also, welcome 2 the group!  beware of - Tracey and 
 Martin (they are truly strange :-) - just joking Trace and 
 Martin...and you both know it.  
 again, welcome Tasheka.
 
 Fate.
 
 --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@... wrote:
 
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@...
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 4:28 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   Tasheka:
 
 
 
 Sorry to hear about your dad.   I was close to my dad too. 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 
 From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com] On
 
 Behalf Of tasheka4
 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM
 
 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 Martin,
 
 
 
 Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find
 
 this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was
 
 beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and
 
 left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of
 
 my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest
 
 they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),
 
 but none like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been
 
 reading here have been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in
 
 grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.
 
 However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.
 
 
 
 Tasheka
 
 
 
 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... wrote:
 
 
 
  
 
  Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said
 
 so.
 
  
 
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
 
 bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
  
 
  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 
  From: tasheka4@
 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +
 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
I think the fact that there's not much else on really
 
 makes Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when
 
 Carter and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When
 
 Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe
 
 in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have
 
 been pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of
 
 that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present
 
 timeline.  But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison
 
 was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a
 
 date and that Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with
 
 this.
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  Tasheka
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@  wrote:
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past
 
 (maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else
 
 on right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.
 
 Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started
 
 after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't
 
 die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and
 
 Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them
 
 would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for
 
 Tess.
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   Angela
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@
 
 wrote:
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind
 
 of
 
  
 
ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could
 
 regain it
 
  
 
down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem
 
 impossible
 
  
 
in the short-term
 
  
 

 
  
 
 
 
  
 

 
  
 
From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com]
 
 On
 
  
 
Behalf Of Martin Baxter
 
  
 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM
 
  
 
To: SciFiNoir2
 
  
 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
  
 

 
  
 
 
 
  
 

 
  
 

 
  
 

 
  
 
Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the
 
 Carter-Tess
 
  
 
storyline might 

[scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
Well, thanks, I feel right at home thanks to Tracey and Martin...I'm a bit 
strange too!




--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:

 
 AhemAHEM...
 
 I AM truly strange. I have documentation to prove it.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: jazzynupe_...@...
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:45:40 -0700
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   Tasheka,
 
 i too am so sorry 2 hear about your father.  i promise u will be in my 
 prayers this evening.  also, welcome 2 the group!  beware of - Tracey and 
 Martin (they are truly strange :-) - just joking Trace and 
 Martin...and you both know it.  
 again, welcome Tasheka.
 
 Fate.
 
 --- On Tue, 8/25/09, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@... wrote:
 
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@...
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 4:28 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
   Tasheka:
 
 
 
 Sorry to hear about your dad.   I was close to my dad too. 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 
 From: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogro ups.com] On
 
 Behalf Of tasheka4
 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:06 PM
 
 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 Martin,
 
 
 
 Thanks for the welcome!  You're the first to do so.  I'm just glad to find
 
 this group and know that there are other black scifi fans out there.  I was
 
 beginning to think I was the only one besides my dad who died last year and
 
 left me with no one to talk to about Eureka and other scifi shows.  None of
 
 my friends like it, and believe me I've tried to convert them.  The closest
 
 they get is to fantasy like True Blood and Twilight (and I like these too),
 
 but none like actual scifi which I love.  So the discussions I've been
 
 reading here have been great!  I may not be a frequent poster because I'm in
 
 grad school, and as the semester gets going I know I'll be really busy.
 
 However, I will chime in with my two cents from time to time.
 
 
 
 Tasheka
 
 
 
 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ... wrote:
 
 
 
  
 
  Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said
 
 so.
 
  
 
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
 
 bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
  
 
  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 
  From: tasheka4@
 
  Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +
 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
I think the fact that there's not much else on really
 
 makes Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when
 
 Carter and Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When
 
 Nathan died and we find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe
 
 in that other timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have
 
 been pregnant with Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of
 
 that alternate timeline would be the same or similar to the present
 
 timeline.  But then they brought in Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison
 
 was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a
 
 date and that Tess really liked him.  So who knows where they're going with
 
 this.
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  Tasheka
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, angelababycat asrobinson@  wrote:
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
   I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past
 
 (maybe because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else
 
 on right now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.
 
 Besides, didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started
 
 after Kim was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't
 
 die or something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and
 
 Allison get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them
 
 would have to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for
 
 Tess.
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   Angela
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
   --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@
 
 wrote:
 
  
 
   
 
  
 
Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind
 
 of
 
  
 
ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could
 
 regain it
 
  
 
down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem
 
 impossible
 
  
 
in the short-term
 
  
 

 
  
 
 
 
  

RE: [scifinoir2] Is NBC's Merlin Any Good?

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
Good description

-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Justin Mohareb
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:58 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Is NBC's Merlin Any Good?

Camelot 90210.  The wife likes it, but me?  Not so much.

Justin

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Keith
Johnsonkeithbjohn...@comcast.net wrote:


 Anyone watching Merlin? I believe former Buffy star Anthony Head is
one
 of the stars. I keep missing it. I've heard it's a lightweight telling of
 the Arthurian era. Someone likened it to One Tree Hill in the Middle
Ages,
 or perhaps, the lighter aspects of Smallville once all the youngsters
took
 over.
 I'm curious if it's worth a viewing?

 http://www.nbc.com/merlin/
 



-- 
Read the Bitter Guide to the Bitter Guy.
http://thebitterguy.livejournal.com




Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYa
hoo! Groups Links






[scifinoir2] Re: True Blood!!!

2009-08-25 Thread grayson.reyescole
If I've said it once (yes, I'm back from the grave, people) I've said it a 
thousand times, I think I'm the only person on the planet that hates this show. 
At first I was into it, loved it, couldn't get enough of it, especially our 
rainbow coalition hard core cookslashtrick. And then... it just... got... on... 
my... last... nerve. Sookie started to make me itch, and so did Beall {I know 
it's Bill, but that's how Sookie says it. The Jason device got about as old as 
Pinellas County (it's where I live periodlically and get pissed off in traffic 
regularly, so I can definitely attest to what it's like living in a county with 
the average age of 67). And our girl who is alternately the angrynegro/worried 
about demons/sleeping with Sam also gets on my nerves.

Now that I've gotten that off my chest... the answer is no, I'm not watching it 
anymore, but I am not judging anyone who does.

--GRC
 
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@... wrote:

 Anybody watching True Blood? What do you think.  Warning. I'm one week
 behind, so protect me from spoilers
 
  
 
 Tracey de Morsella, Managing Producer
 
 The Green Economy Post
 
 http://greeneconomypost.com
 
 tra...@...





[scifinoir2] Police: Drug ring used comic books to launder cash

2009-08-25 Thread Said Kakese Dibinga
http://bostonherald.com/news/national/west/view/20090825police_drug_ring_used_comic_books_to_launder_cash/srvc=homeposition=recent
 

Said Yenga Kakese Dibinga Director General The Bayindo Group SA POB 1782 Los 
Angeles, CA 90078-1782 c: 1.323.599.6228 em: s...@bayindogroup.com skype: 
saiddibinga

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: True Blood!!!

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
You are priceless!  Beall.  I hated it at first and then it grew on me.
Occasionally, it irkes me, so I relate to your angst about the show.  That
being said, I love it!  Go figure 

-Original Message-
From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of grayson.reyescole
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 9:59 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: True Blood!!!

If I've said it once (yes, I'm back from the grave, people) I've said it a
thousand times, I think I'm the only person on the planet that hates this
show. At first I was into it, loved it, couldn't get enough of it,
especially our rainbow coalition hard core cookslashtrick. And then... it
just... got... on... my... last... nerve. Sookie started to make me itch,
and so did Beall {I know it's Bill, but that's how Sookie says it. The Jason
device got about as old as Pinellas County (it's where I live periodlically
and get pissed off in traffic regularly, so I can definitely attest to what
it's like living in a county with the average age of 67). And our girl who
is alternately the angrynegro/worried about demons/sleeping with Sam also
gets on my nerves.

Now that I've gotten that off my chest... the answer is no, I'm not watching
it anymore, but I am not judging anyone who does.

--GRC
 
--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdli...@... wrote:

 Anybody watching True Blood? What do you think.  Warning. I'm one week
 behind, so protect me from spoilers
 
  
 
 Tracey de Morsella, Managing Producer
 
 The Green Economy Post
 
 http://greeneconomypost.com
 
 tra...@...







Post your SciFiNoir Profile at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYa
hoo! Groups Links






[scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget

-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


[scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
I know, I know but a girl can always dream that something good will last for a 
while!


--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, C.W. Badie astromancer2...@... wrote:

 You should be sttled into the idea that if it is good, it's got to go...
 
 
 
 
 
 From: tasheka4 tashe...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 5:51:09 AM
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
 
   
 New to this group, but I thought I'd chime in with my favorite cancelled 
 scifi shows.
 
 I really liked Otherworld from the 80s and was sad to see it cancelled. Does 
 anyone remember that one?
 
 Also hated to lose Alien Nation, Farscape, Babylon 5, and most recently 
 Torchwood.
 
 --- In scifino...@yahoogro ups.com, C.W. Badie astromancer2002@ ... wrote:
 
  Oh I don't know, Martin...getting into a tight sitting position is going to 
  be murder with this 'spare tire'...and trying to hit a target well over 5 
  football fields away...do I really need to explain that?
  
  
  
  
   _ _ __
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ ...
  To: SciFiNoir2 scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
  Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 6:34:16 AM
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  
    
  You still have the same mind. The rest is just a matter of compensation.
  
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
  
  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik
  
  
  
  
  
   _ _ __
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
  From: astromancer2002@ yahoo.com
  Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:03:19 -0700
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  
    
  
  
  I guess I should have mentioned that was over 20 years,70lbs, and a pair of 
  bifocals ago...
  
  
  
  
   _ _ __
  From: Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ hotmail.com
  To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@ yahoogro ups.com
  Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:48:51 AM
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  
    
  I'm going to be even nicer to you in the future...
  
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in 
  bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
  
  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik
  
  
  
  
  
   _ _ __
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
  From: astromancer2002@ yahoo.com
  Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:03:46 -0700
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  
    
  
  
  But that is the way it works in the Corps...everyone is a basic grunt 
  rifleman. Behold, I am probably the only trombone player you know who 
  could take you out at 500 meters with a service rifle! (M-16A1 A2)
  
  
  
  
   _ _ __
  From: Mr. Worf HelloMahogany@ gmail.com
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:31:02 AM
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  
    
  I'm aware of that, my focus was more on the pilot aspect of the show. It 
  didn't make sense for them to be in a fighter pilot role then a couple of 
  episodes later storming a base. 
  
  
  
  On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Augustus Augustus jazzynupe_007@ 
  yahoo.com wrote:
  
  
  
  
  Worf,
  
  C.W. is totally right.  even Marine Corps officers go to 'The Basic 
  School' where they learn 2 be grunts and how 2 lead other Marines.  
  after that, they go 2 whatever other school that they qualified for.
  
  Fate. 
  
  --- On Tue, 8/18/09, C.W. Badie astromancer2002@ yahoo.com wrote:
  
  
  From: C.W. Badie astromancer2002@ yahoo.com
  
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
  Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009, 1:30 AM
  
  
    
  
  
  Honestly, Worf, That is how they train Marine officers Probably Army 
  ones too...
  
  
  
  
   _ _ __
  From: Mr. Worf HelloMahogany@ gmail.com
  To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:10:33 AM 
  
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
  
    
  That I understand. What I didn't understand was why did they make them 
  into pilots too? 
  
  
  
  On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, C.W. Badie astromancer2002@ yahoo.com 
  wrote:
  
  
  
  
  Um...Mr. Worf, every Marine is a gruntand a rifleman At least 
  that is what I was taught...But officers lead...just not each 
  other...What does make me ill about that show was a few years down the 
  road, drill instructors started wearing campain covers (smokie hats) 
  with dress blues. I'm sorry, but that is the most retarded thing I have 
  every seen the Marine Corp do...Even worse than the Army taking 
  the headgear that distinguished their special forces from the rest of 
  the soldiers and letting everyone wear it...
  
  
  
  
  

[scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
Like the movie Logan's Run...didn't know there had been a series too.


--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, George Arterberry brotherfromhow...@... 
wrote:

 Maybe before most posters time but Logan's Run the tv show had potential.Not 
 as campy as the movie..sort of.
 
 --- On Wed, 8/19/09, gwashin...@... gwashin...@... wrote:
 
 
 From: gwashin...@... gwashin...@...
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 9:45 AM
 
 
   
 
 
 
 My thoughts on SAAB (which I do like alot is this).
 
 The pilot episode and the first 2 eps were great, then it went sort of down 
 hill from there.
 
 
 -GTW
 
 
  **
 A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! 
 (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100126575x122284 6709x1201493018/ aol?redir= 
 http://www. freecreditreport .com/pm/default. 
 aspx?sc=668072hmpgID=115bcd=Julystepsfooter NO115)





[scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
And maybe for non-scifi fans who they hope will crossover to scifi if there's 
less science in the scifi; however, that doesn't usually work.  My friends who 
don't like scifi aren't gonna watch it no matter how 'dumbed-down' it is.  The 
worst is that it becomes a total mismomer when you remove all the science from 
scifi.  Kinda like the stupid name change of the channel.  Just my opinion 
though.

Tasheka


--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, C.W. Badie astromancer2...@... wrote:

 Excellent question, Mr. Worf...I'd say for the studio execs
 
 
 
 
 
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:49:37 PM
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
 
   
 My question is who are they dumbing it down for?
 
 
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Martin Baxter truthseeker013@ hotmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 The intellectual elitist in me rages at the thought of that dumbing-down.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 
 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 From: HelloMahogany@ gmail.com
 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:18:33 -0700 
 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
 
   
 I think that the problem with shows like this is that studios think that 
 they have to dumb down the show a little for non-scifi audiences. I have 
 read a few conversations that were against the vtechnobabble that shows 
 like star trek and others have. In the process they change the storylines to 
 fit actors that may be more liked than others. 
 
 
 
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:49 AM, George Arterberry brotherfromhoward@ 
 yahoo.com wrote:
 
 
 
 
 Maybe before most posters time but Logan's Run the tv show had 
 potential.Not as campy as the movie... ...sort of.
 
 --- On Wed, 8/19/09, gwashin...@aol. com gwashin...@aol. com wrote:
 
 
 From: gwashin...@aol. com gwashin...@aol. com
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: GREATEST CANCELED SCIFI SHOWS
 To: scifino...@yahoogro ups.com
 Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 9:45 AM
 
 
   
 My thoughts on SAAB (which I do like alot is this).
 
 The pilot episode and the first 2 eps were great, then it went sort of 
 down hill from there..
 
 
 -GTW
 
 
  **
 A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! 
 (http://pr.atwola. com/promoclk/ 100126575x122284 6709x1201493018/ 
 aol?redir= http://www. freecreditreport .com/pm/default. 
 aspx?sc=668072hmpgID=115bcd=Julystepsfooter NO115)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
 Mahogany at: http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/mahogany_ pleasures_ 
 of_darkness/
 
 
 
 With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos. Click here. 
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
 Mahogany at: http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/mahogany_ pleasures_ of_darkness/





[scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
Yeah, Lexi and Carter remind me of me and my brother.  We're night and day 
different too.

Tasheka

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:

 
 Tracey and Keith,
 
 Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within the 
 story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off early 
 on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as sort 
 of his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: keithbjohn...@...
 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:47:52 +
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 Agreed, Tracey. I was stunned when the daughter became a genius, and I didn't 
 like his sister either. Again, they try way too hard to manufacture conflicts 
 for Carter, when they could simply just let the show flow!
 
 I didn't like Lexi at first. But you know what? Like his daughter, had they 
 moved her out of Carter's house and let her function on her own away from 
 him, away from the daily spats, I'd have liked her to stay. She added 
 normalcy outside the nerds that populate the town.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:30:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 OK Keith, don't get me started on they need Hewitt producing
 again to prevent them from destroying the show rant.
 
  
 
 I do not like Jo's boyfriend either.  Even though it was weird,
 I kinda liked Jo better with Max headroom (Matt Frewer).Jo and the
 boyfriend have no chemistry and their lines  kind of fall flat.
 
  
 
 I daughter started to irk me when they decided to make her a genius
 and join in on the dumb jokes. When the aunt came and they tag teamed him it
 got worse.  I think moving her into the café was a good move 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 From:
 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
 Keith
 Johnson
 
 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:19 PM
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 A
 couple more thoughts:
 
 
 
 * I'm actually glad Nathan Stark is gone, at least in terms of the contrived
 rivalry he and Carter had. I was tired of that angle too. I guess I just like
 Carter's character, and feel the character needs more development to stand on
 his own, outside of angles like the battles with Stark or the he's the
 dumbest guy in the room thing.
 
   
 
 * I don't care for Jo's boyfriend--too generic cool genius--but do like that
 she has a boyfriend. Nice to see some softer angles to her...
 
 
 
 * After all this time, the voice of the computer Sarah (named after Sarah
 Michelle Gellar) still cracks me up. Everyone relizes that that
 female voice is actually done by the actor who plays Fargo?
 
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 
 From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@...
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:52:34 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canad a Eastern
 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Everyone watching the new season of Eureka? I must
 saying I'm enjoying it, even more than last season. I think that's because
 Carter is noticeably more instrumental in solving cases than last year. Every 
 ep
 so far, as the big brains discuss string theory, M-branes, and quantum
 mechanics, Carter's always the one guy in the room who cuts through the
 superficial coverings to get to the heart of a problem. Indeed, one wonders 
 how
 the scientists can do anything: as smart as they are, they seem to exemplify
 what my mom used to say about Book sense, but no common sense.
 
 
 
 Fortunately they have also toned down the Carter-is-kinda-dumb thing too.
 Tracey mentioned that last year that had gotten out of hand. There are still
 some moments like that, but I frankly don't think they're needed. Carter's
 obviously not a supergenius, so let's lose the Uh...English please? I'm
 clueless scht ick. A couple of weeks ago, for example, Allison spoke of
 the space object coming to Earth in 126 hours, and Carter looks confused.
 Allison then had to amend and say five days! Give me a break: you
 telling me Carter, an intelligent and highly competent man of the law, can't
 figure that out? Again, good thing that angle is being minimized.
 
 
 
 Some other thoughts on the show:
 
 
 
 * I like the new lady brought in, who runs Section 5 (?) At first she 
 irritated
 the hell out of me by belittling Carter's intelligence, but I like the tender
 side and sense and humour she has.   
 
 
 
 * Good to see that Carter is 

[scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread tasheka4
I think the fact that there's not much else on really makes Eureka better this 
season.  I remember that alternate timeline when Carter and Allison were 
expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When Nathan died and we find out 
she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe in that other timeline when 
she and Carter were together, she could have been pregnant with Nathan's child 
then too.  Perhaps certain portions of that alternate timeline would be the 
same or similar to the present timeline.  But then they brought in Tess, so I'm 
not sure.  Although Allison was looking a little sad when she realized Tess and 
Carter had gone out on a date and that Tess really liked him.  So who knows 
where they're going with this.

Tasheka

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, angelababycat asrobin...@... wrote:

 I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past (maybe 
 because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else on right 
 now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.  Besides, 
 didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started after Kim 
 was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't die or 
 something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and Allison 
 get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them would have 
 to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for Tess.
 
 Angela
 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ wrote:
 
  Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind of
  ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could regain it
  down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem impossible
  in the short-term
  
   
  
  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
  Behalf Of Martin Baxter
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM
  To: SciFiNoir2
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
  
   
  
  
  
  Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the Carter-Tess
  storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's Dr
  Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at first,
  and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked up
  sympathetically.
  
  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody
  hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
  
  
  
  
  
_  
  
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
  From: tdlists@
  Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:25:49 -0700
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
  

  
   
  
  I was getting sick of the silly Fargo side plot distractions, but last week
  they did not have one, it seemed more like season one (which was my
  favorite), so I am starting to like it again.   Getting rid of the sister
  who found everything wrong with him was a good move too.  I realize they
  need conflict, but I do not think it worked with her.   I also like that
  they decided to have Carter move on, if they are not going to get him
  together with Alison, then let him move on.  I like the  chemistry that he
  has with the new woman and that they did not pretend that he and Alison
  never existed.  
  
   
  
  I'm also had the moved away from everyone calling him stupid and let the
  theme shift back to he as the commonsense guy often being the one with the
  big ideas.  I get the sense that maybe they experimented and are returning
  to what worked in the first place.   I did not like the 5 day stupid think
  either.  I'm not sure why they keep pursuing that angle.  I hope it is a
  fluke.
  
   
  
  By the way, I liked the husband on True Blood, but I think he is just a
  guest star with at best re-occurring status. 
  
   
  
  Let's hope there are no Fargo bowling or car stories next week and that they
  stay on track 
  
   
  
  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On
  Behalf Of Keith Johnson
  Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 8:53 PM
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
  Everyone watching the new season of Eureka? I must saying I'm enjoying it,
  even more than last season. I think that's because Carter is noticeably more
  instrumental in solving cases than last year. Every ep so far, as the big
  brains discuss string theory, M-branes, and quantum mechanics, Carter's
  always the one guy in the room who cuts through the superficial coverings to
  get to the heart of a problem. Indeed, one wonders how the scientists can do
  anything: as smart as they are, they seem to exemplify what my mom used to
  say about Book sense, but no common sense.
  
  Fortunately they have also toned down the Carter-is-kinda-dumb thing too.
  Tracey mentioned that last year that had gotten out of hand. There are still
  some moments like that, but I frankly don't think they're needed. Carter's
  

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Great points, Tasheka! And welcome to the group, if no one else has said so.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: tashe...@netzero.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:11:42 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts















 





  I think the fact that there's not much else on really makes 
Eureka better this season.  I remember that alternate timeline when Carter and 
Allison were expecting a baby.  She was very pregnant.  When Nathan died and we 
find out she's pregnant in this timeline, I thought maybe in that other 
timeline when she and Carter were together, she could have been pregnant with 
Nathan's child then too.  Perhaps certain portions of that alternate timeline 
would be the same or similar to the present timeline.  But then they brought in 
Tess, so I'm not sure.  Although Allison was looking a little sad when she 
realized Tess and Carter had gone out on a date and that Tess really liked him. 
 So who knows where they're going with this.



Tasheka



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, angelababycat asrobin...@... wrote:



 I've been keeping up with Eureka more this season than in the past (maybe 
 because it's getting better, or maybe because there's not much else on right 
 now...).  But I agree that the Carterison thing was getting old.  Besides, 
 didn't the show have an alternate reality or something that started after Kim 
 was killed and Henry tried to change history to where she doesn't die or 
 something?  In that time line (which was like 4 years?) Carter and Allison 
 get married, have a baby, etc.  So any real romance between them would have 
 to top or be very different than that story.  I'm voting for Tess.

 

 Angela

 

 

 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ wrote:

 

  Same here.  I actually like Allison and Carter together, but they kind of

  ruined the continuity with them two season's ago. Maybe they could regain it

  down the line, but making her a pregnant widow, makes that seem impossible

  in the short-term

  

   

  

  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On

  Behalf Of Martin Baxter

  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 4:40 AM

  To: SciFiNoir2

  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

   

  

  

  

  Tracey, for a minute there in last week's ep, I thought that the Carter-Tess

  storyline might be challenged by the introduction of Billy Campbell's Dr

  Manly character, consideriung the way she was goo-goo-eyeing him at first,

  and the malfunctioning baby monitor that had Carter and Allison linked up

  sympathetically.

  

  If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody

  hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

  

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

  

  

  

  

  

_  

  

  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

  From: tdlists@

  Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:25:49 -0700

  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  



  

   

  

  I was getting sick of the silly Fargo side plot distractions, but last week

  they did not have one, it seemed more like season one (which was my

  favorite), so I am starting to like it again.   Getting rid of the sister

  who found everything wrong with him was a good move too.  I realize they

  need conflict, but I do not think it worked with her.   I also like that

  they decided to have Carter move on, if they are not going to get him

  together with Alison, then let him move on.  I like the  chemistry that he

  has with the new woman and that they did not pretend that he and Alison

  never existed.  

  

   

  

  I'm also had the moved away from everyone calling him stupid and let the

  theme shift back to he as the commonsense guy often being the one with the

  big ideas.  I get the sense that maybe they experimented and are returning

  to what worked in the first place.   I did not like the 5 day stupid think

  either.  I'm not sure why they keep pursuing that angle.  I hope it is a

  fluke.

  

   

  

  By the way, I liked the husband on True Blood, but I think he is just a

  guest star with at best re-occurring status. 

  

   

  

  Let's hope there are no Fargo bowling or car stories next week and that they

  stay on track 

  

   

  

  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On

  Behalf Of Keith Johnson

  Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 8:53 PM

  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

  Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

   

  

  

  

  

  

  Everyone watching the new season of Eureka? I must saying I'm enjoying it,

  even more than last season. I think that's because Carter is noticeably more

  instrumental in solving cases than last year. Every ep so far, as the big

  brains discuss string theory, M-branes, and quantum 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Applies to me and my two younger sisters as well.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: tashe...@netzero.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:01:21 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Eureka Thoughts















 





  Yeah, Lexi and Carter remind me of me and my brother.  We're 
night and day different too.



Tasheka



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:



 

 Tracey and Keith,

 

 Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within the 
 story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off early 
 on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as sort 
 of his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound.

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

 

 

 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 From: keithbjohn...@...

 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:47:52 +

 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 Agreed, Tracey. I was stunned when the daughter became a genius, and I didn't 
 like his sister either. Again, they try way too hard to manufacture conflicts 
 for Carter, when they could simply just let the show flow!

 

 I didn't like Lexi at first. But you know what? Like his daughter, had they 
 moved her out of Carter's house and let her function on her own away from 
 him, away from the daily spats, I'd have liked her to stay. She added 
 normalcy outside the nerds that populate the town.

 

 - Original Message -

 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@...

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:30:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 OK Keith, don't get me started on they need Hewitt producing

 again to prevent them from destroying the show rant.

 

  

 

 I do not like Jo's boyfriend either.  Even though it was weird,

 I kinda liked Jo better with Max headroom (Matt Frewer).Jo and the

 boyfriend have no chemistry and their lines  kind of fall flat.

 

  

 

 I daughter started to irk me when they decided to make her a genius

 and join in on the dumb jokes. When the aunt came and they tag teamed him it

 got worse.  I think moving her into the café was a good move 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 From:

 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
 Keith

 Johnson

 

 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:19 PM

 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 

 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A

 couple more thoughts:

 

 

 

 * I'm actually glad Nathan Stark is gone, at least in terms of the contrived

 rivalry he and Carter had. I was tired of that angle too. I guess I just like

 Carter's character, and feel the character needs more development to stand on

 his own, outside of angles like the battles with Stark or the he's the

 dumbest guy in the room thing.

 

   

 

 * I don't care for Jo's boyfriend--too generic cool genius--but do like that

 she has a boyfriend. Nice to see some softer angles to her...

 

 

 

 * After all this time, the voice of the computer Sarah (named after Sarah

 Michelle Gellar) still cracks me up. Everyone relizes that that

 female voice is actually done by the actor who plays Fargo?

 

 

 

 

 

 - Original Message -

 

 From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@...

 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 

 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:52:34 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canad a Eastern

 

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Everyone watching the new season of Eureka? I must

 saying I'm enjoying it, even more than last season. I think that's because

 Carter is noticeably more instrumental in solving cases than last year. Every 
 ep

 so far, as the big brains discuss string theory, M-branes, and quantum

 mechanics, Carter's always the one guy in the room who cuts through the

 superficial coverings to get to the heart of a problem. Indeed, one wonders 
 how

 the scientists can do anything: as smart as they are, they seem to exemplify

 what my mom used to say about Book sense, but no common sense.

 

 

 

 Fortunately they have also toned down the Carter-is-kinda-dumb thing too.

 Tracey mentioned that last year that had gotten out of hand. There are still

 some moments like that, but I frankly don't think they're needed. Carter's

 obviously not a supergenius, so let's lose the Uh...English please? I'm

 clueless scht ick. A couple of weeks ago, for 

RE: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Now, if we were to install Magic Chef ovens in teenagers' cars, 
texting-while-driving would become a thing of the past.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:22:18 -0700
Subject: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove















 





  
http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget

-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/



 

  














_
Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you.
http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1

RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

It would *have* to be changed, and any changes would throw the movie so far 
off-kilter as to make it unwatchable. Once again, H'Wood seeks to prove that 
its head is firmly embedded up its a$$.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:45:39 -0700
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  American movie directors suck at coming up with remakes of 
Asian cinema. The casting of Will Smith in this role will just be a trainwreck. 
Plus the censors won't allow the ending or the last 1/4 of the film. 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Tracey de Morsella 
tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com wrote:



































It’s true.  …unless it’s in development hell.  I dunno


 






From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mr. Worf

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:34 PM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District
9 Holds Strong






 






OH MY GOD SAY IT AINT SO I thought you were joking then I looked it
up. They are going to mess that movie up. The entire twist of the movie is
important and they will more than likely change it in the american version.




On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
wrote:




 




I've
heard good things about Old Boy, and lots of conversation about the
rumored version starring Will Smith.








- Original Message -

From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com






Sent:
Monday, August 24, 2009 6:45:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9
Holds Strong



  










Ok, I will post a review. :) But if she is having nightmares about
shrimp I can tell you now that she won't be able to handle Thirst. 



Some of the images in Old boy was pretty graphic. I didn't bring it up because
there isn't any scifi in it. It is an interesting story though. A guy gets
snatched off of the street and imprisoned for 15 years in a small hotel looking
room. One day he is given 7 days to figure out why he was placed there. Cool
movie. It would have never been produced in Hollywood.




On
Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
wrote:




 




Let
us know how it is, please. After my wife seeing District 9--a feat
I pulled off only because she had *no* clue of what it would be like--I can't
sneak in Thirst. She had nightmares about shrimp jumping off a
dinner plate and menacing her--no fooling!










- Original Message -

From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com






Sent:
Monday, August 24, 2009 12:56:40 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9
Holds Strong



  










I saw the trailer for Thirst. It looks good. I saw the movie Old
boy and was blown away by several scenes and the twisted ass plot. I am looking
forward to the movie because the director is known for making good dark, and
twisted films. 






On
Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
wrote:




 




No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to
see it though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick
Thirst? I've heard some good things about it.

I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky
camera in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and
the negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the
movie was portrayed well).  The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but
overall I really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon...



*

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce



Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a
pivotal Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the
weekend with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice.



Basterds is touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently
struggling indie, even though Universal is distributing the film
internationally and will share evenly in any worldwide profit. Sony's sci-fi
thriller District 9 finished second after falling just 49% in its
sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day cume of $73.5 million.



The weekend's other three wide openers bowed softly. Robert Rodriguez's
PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. rung up $6.6
million for sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad
registered $2.8 million in 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games
3D: The Movie -- slotted for one week only in 

RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Here's hoping for development hell.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:39:02 -0700
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  








It’s true.  …unless it’s in development hell.  I dunno

 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mr. Worf

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:34 PM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District
9 Holds Strong





 





OH MY GOD SAY IT AINT SO I thought you were joking then I looked it
up. They are going to mess that movie up. The entire twist of the movie is
important and they will more than likely change it in the american version.



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
wrote:



 



I've
heard good things about Old Boy, and lots of conversation about the
rumored version starring Will Smith.







- Original Message -

From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com





Sent:
Monday, August 24, 2009 6:45:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9
Holds Strong



  









Ok, I will post a review. :) But if she is having nightmares about
shrimp I can tell you now that she won't be able to handle Thirst. 



Some of the images in Old boy was pretty graphic. I didn't bring it up because
there isn't any scifi in it. It is an interesting story though. A guy gets
snatched off of the street and imprisoned for 15 years in a small hotel looking
room. One day he is given 7 days to figure out why he was placed there. Cool
movie. It would have never been produced in Hollywood.




On
Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
wrote:



 



Let
us know how it is, please. After my wife seeing District 9--a feat
I pulled off only because she had *no* clue of what it would be like--I can't
sneak in Thirst. She had nightmares about shrimp jumping off a
dinner plate and menacing her--no fooling!









- Original Message -

From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com





Sent:
Monday, August 24, 2009 12:56:40 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9
Holds Strong



  









I saw the trailer for Thirst. It looks good. I saw the movie Old
boy and was blown away by several scenes and the twisted ass plot. I am looking
forward to the movie because the director is known for making good dark, and
twisted films. 






On
Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
wrote:



 



No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to
see it though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick
Thirst? I've heard some good things about it.

I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky
camera in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and
the negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the
movie was portrayed well).  The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but
overall I really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon...



*

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce



Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a
pivotal Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the
weekend with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice.



Basterds is touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently
struggling indie, even though Universal is distributing the film
internationally and will share evenly in any worldwide profit. Sony's sci-fi
thriller District 9 finished second after falling just 49% in its
sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day cume of $73.5 million.



The weekend's other three wide openers bowed softly. Robert Rodriguez's
PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. rung up $6.6
million for sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad
registered $2.8 million in 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games
3D: The Movie -- slotted for one week only in 1,399 extra-dimensional
venues -- fetched just $800,000.



Among other second-frame holdovers, Warners' literary adaptation The Time
Traveler's Wife fell a modest 46% to $10 million in fourth place for a
$37.4 million cume, while further down the rankings Paramount Vantage's comedy
The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard slid 53% to $2.7 million and a
$11.2 million cume. Disney's Ponyo dipped 32% to $2.4 million with
an $8.1 million cume, and Summit Entertainment's youth musical
Bandslam dropped 60% to $890,000 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

I have to go with the latter, Keith. I've only seen it twice, but I adore it.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:17:10 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong















 





  
Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never seen 
it.

- Original Message -
From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong







 





  I love Tarantino.  Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie 
of all-time.  I have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie 
Brown.  I can't wait to see Inglourious Basterds.  I was going to go last 
night, but I decided to go to see District 9 instead.  



~rave!



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:



 After watching Tarentino's one hour manic interview with Charlie Rose, I'm 
 more interested in seeing Basterds. Guy is very smart, very well read, very 
 well versed in history. His movies can be a bit overblown, but that's not it. 
 I can see myself seeing it on cable. I hear it's actually much more of a 
 talky than the grossout violence fest we seem to keep getting fed by the 
 trailers. 

 

 

 - Original Message - 

 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@... 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:36:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I can’t get up any enthusiasm to see bastards either. Don’t know why. 
 I’m not even sure I will pursue it on cable. It seems like it is some sort 
 of Dirty Dozen tribute and I loved that, but I’m not feeling it. 

 

 

 

 Gotta get a baby sitter so we can go see District 9 

 

 

 

 

 

 From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of Keith Johnson 

 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:06 PM 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
 though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've heard 
 some good things about it. 

 I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
 in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
 negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the movie 
 was portrayed well). The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but overall I 
 really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon... 

 

 * 

 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce
  

 

 Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
 Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the 
 weekend with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice. 

 

 Basterds is touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently 
 struggling indie, even though Universal is distributing the film 
 internationally and will share evenly in any worldwide profit. Sony's sci-fi 
 thriller District 9 finished second after falling just 49% in its sophomore 
 session to $18.9 million and a 10-day cume of $73.5 million. 

 

 The weekend's other three wide openers bowed softly. Robert Rodriguez's 
 PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. rung up $6.6 million for 
 sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad registered $2.8 million in 
 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games 3D: The Movie -- slotted for 
 one week only in 1,399 extra-dimensional venues -- fetched just $800,000. 

 

 Among other second-frame holdovers, Warners' literary adaptation The Time 
 Traveler's Wife fell a modest 46% to $10 million in fourth place for a $37.4 
 million cume, while further down the rankings Paramount Vantage's comedy The 
 Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard slid 53% to $2.7 million and a $11.2 million 
 cume. Disney's Ponyo dipped 32% to $2.4 million with an $8.1 million cume, 
 and Summit Entertainment's youth musical Bandslam dropped 60% to $890,000 
 and a $4.5 million cume. 

 

 The weekend top 10 films collected $108 million, or 31% more than the top 
 performers over the same frame last year, according to Nielsen EDI. That 
 marked a third straight year-over-year weekend uptick. 

 

 In a limited bow, Paramount Vantage unspooled comedy The Mark Pease 
 Experience, starring Ben Stiller and Jason Schwartzman, in 10 theaters and 

RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Keith, the good things about Oldboy are more than due. Seeing the movie named 
in previous posts this morning made me go over the scenes in my head, as best I 
can remember them, and I'm feeling the thrill of it anew. Haven't found it yet 
in my travels but, when I do, it's mine.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:16:09 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  
I've heard good things about Old Boy, and lots of conversation about the 
rumored version starring Will Smith.

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:45:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong







 





  Ok, I will post a review. :) But if she is having nightmares 
about shrimp I can tell you now that she won't be able to handle Thirst. 

Some of the images in Old boy was pretty graphic. I didn't bring it up because 
there isn't any scifi in it. It is an interesting story though. A guy gets 
snatched off of the street and imprisoned for 15 years in a small hotel looking 
room. One day he is given 7 days to figure out why he was placed there. Cool 
movie. It would have never been produced in Hollywood.



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:





















Let us know how it is, please. After my wife seeing District 9--a feat I 
pulled off only because she had *no* clue of what it would be like--I can't 
sneak in Thirst. She had nightmares about shrimp jumping off a dinner plate 
and menacing her--no fooling!



- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:56:40 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong







 





  I saw the trailer for Thirst. It looks good. I saw the movie 
Old boy and was blown away by several scenes and the twisted ass plot. I am 
looking forward to the movie because the director is known for making good 
dark, and twisted films. 




On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:






















No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it though. 
Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've heard some good 
things about it.


I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera in 
the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the movie 
was portrayed well).  The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but overall I 
really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon...



*
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce



Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the weekend 
with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice.

Basterds is 
touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently struggling indie, even 
though Universal is distributing the film internationally and will share evenly 
in any worldwide profit. Sony's sci-fi thriller District 9 finished second 
after falling just 49% in its sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day 
cume of $73.5 million.

The weekend's other three wide openers bowed 
softly. Robert Rodriguez's PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. 
rung up $6.6 million for sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad 
registered $2.8 million in 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games 3D: 
The Movie -- slotted for one week only in 1,399 extra-dimensional venues -- 
fetched just $800,000.

Among other second-frame holdovers, Warners' 
literary adaptation The Time Traveler's Wife fell a modest 46% to $10 million 
in fourth place for a $37.4 million cume, while further down the rankings 
Paramount Vantage's comedy The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard slid 53% to $2.7 
million and a $11.2 million cume. Disney's Ponyo dipped 32% to $2.4 million 
with an $8.1 million cume, and Summit Entertainment's youth musical Bandslam 
dropped 60% to $890,000 and a $4.5 million cume.

The weekend top 10 films 
collected $108 million, or 31% more than the top performers over the same frame 
last year, according to Nielsen EDI. That marked a third straight 
year-over-year 
weekend uptick.

In a limited bow, Paramount Vantage unspooled comedy The 
Mark Pease Experience, 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

No, Keith, you're on the mark again.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:13:53 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
Yeah, but back in the day that wasn't always taken as gay. Words like dandy 
were very common, and men of means in many periods were foppish, sniffing their 
snuff, wearing brightly colored clothes, all but swooning when excited or 
tired, etc.
But nowadays that type of behaviour typically is construed--and often 
intended--as being gay. While I agree it doesn't *have* to mean that, the way 
H'Wood usually works, it usually does mean that.

But maybe I'm wrong...

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:29:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  Has anyone seen the movie the Scarlet Pimpernel? (the 1970s 
version is unintentionally hilarious!) I think that is a good example of what 
Martin is referring to. There are guys that fall into that category, sort of an 
anti-macho category. Like Prince or David Spade for example. 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
wrote:


























Keith, I'm not taking Vincent's flouncing as gay. I've known men to behave in 
just that way, and leave a room with the choicest of pickins among the ladies.

And do more than just wine and dine them, if you know what I mean.


If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net

Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:35:09 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
I was going to ask, why was Allison's son dropped? I  mean, they make all this 
noise about her being pregnant, and last week she even stated she was home at a 
decent hour every day. So where the hell is her son??


Fargo isn't gay: he has a girlfriend now. I'm pretty sure it's that crazy girl 
who morphed her body into a duplicate of Jo's. Fargo loves him some women: they 
just don't love him back.

The guy who runs Cafe Diem (who was also a wizard in the horrible Legend of 
Earthsea miniseries) seems to be gay to me, the way he's portrayed.



- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:47:50 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  I think that they hinted that Fargo is gay a couple of 
episodes ago. 

I think that the sheriff and allison having a romance would have made 
interesting tv when they first started the show, but as time passed on it 
wasn't going anywhere and lost steam. 



I think that they killed off Stark's character because his character wasn't 
going anywhere. There are a few others that just disappeared as well such as 
the son, and the animal trainer guy. 

They killed off Stark back when they killed the son. He was first exposed to 
the alien object that was in sector 5. He left the show then came back. Then 
they killed him again with a time paradox. 



Allison's son was fully exposed to the alien object by accident. He was 
autistic / physics genius. The problem is that making him autistic didn't give 
him many plots to participate in. 



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:





















A couple more thoughts:

* I'm actually glad Nathan Stark is gone, at least in terms of the contrived 
rivalry he and Carter had. I was tired of that angle too. I guess I just like 
Carter's character, and feel the character needs more development to stand on 
his own, outside of angles like the battles with Stark or the he's the dumbest 
guy in the room thing.


  
* I don't care for Jo's boyfriend--too generic cool genius--but do like that 
she has a boyfriend. Nice to see some softer angles to her...

* After all this time, the voice of the computer Sarah (named after Sarah 
Michelle Gellar) still cracks me up. Everyone relizes that that female voice 
is actually done by the actor who plays Fargo?




- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:52:34 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  
Everyone watching the new season of Eureka? I must saying I'm enjoying it, 
even more than last season. I think that's because Carter is noticeably more 
instrumental in 

RE: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

It's theoretically possible, if you've got a ship, a wormhole and something 
that generates a heckuva lot of gravity.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:01:15 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions















 





  
well, to us, time moves in a linear fashion, from past to future. But 
that's only for objects that exist at sublight speeds. For any phenomena that 
move *at* lightspeed, time stands completely still. A photon that left a star 
from the Andromeda galaxy 2.2 million years ago notes *no* passage of time 
whatsoever. 
Ain't that wild?
I don't think any current theories allow for us to travel back in time, only 
forward, or not be affected by it at all.

- Original Message -
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:08:55 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions







 





  Yeah, the video is confusing in this regard and at points was 
off (albeit stylistically cool), but you're right.

I still don't think time is linear, however. :)
~ Where love and magic meet ~


http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html


Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath





On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:






















If time were linear (a line), it'd be one dimension. A true line is one 
dimensional, a plane (like a sheet of paper), would be two dimensional, of 
course the cube is three, and then the concept of spacetime is associated with 
four by some



Speaking of time, there's a new book out I've heard about where one of the 
physicists working on the new supercollider in Europe tries to explain 
Relativity in an easy-to-understand method.  It's called Why Does E=mc2? And 
Why Should We Care? The concept of time is discussed, including why it's truly 
relative (depending on one's frame of reference only) and why it flows in only 
one direction, at least for those of use with mass.  I listen to a program 
called Think, from KERA in Dallas. The book's author, Brian Cox, did an 
hourlong interview recently that was pretty good. You can find the interview 
here: 



http://www.kera.org/audio/think.php 
Einstein's Theory of Relativity



[2009-08-12 13:00:00] Is Einstein's theory of relativity too complex
for the average Joe to comprehend, or just waiting for the right
teacher? We'll discuss common misconceptions about relativity this hour
with Brian Cox, particle physicist and co-author of the new book Why
Does E=MC2 And Why Should We Care? (DaCapo, 2009).


Here's a link to a review of the book. I plan to pick it up soon:  

http://www.powells.com/biblio/9780306817588






- Original Message -
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:27:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions







 





  Observed time isn't a dimension, though. And if it's in a 
line, it should be two dimensions as a line's two dimensional.


~ Where love and magic meet ~




http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html




Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath







On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Omari Confer clockwork...@gmail.com wrote:




























They dont speak of time in its abstractthey refer to time as observed time.

Who i was when i began this email...and who I am right now..

c w m



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com 
wrote:













 





  Really cool, but the stuff on time bewildered me.

Time shouldn't exist in just one dimension. And while some people would jump on 
that and claim time is linear, if it were linear by its very definition it 
should take up two dimensions not just one.







And it's not linear.
I think most of what scientists observe of as being time are the effects of 
time versus time itself.
And now that I've given everyone a bigger headache than they started with...I 
will end this email. LOL






~ Where love and magic meet ~
http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  

[scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread daikaiju66
Oldboy is one of the best movies I've seen this decade. I bought the South 
Korean special edition way back when and I plan to buy the Tartan dvd and use 
it as a lending copy.

Whatever you do don't read any spoilers before seeing the movie. It's one of 
the best first time movie going experience you can have.

Mr. Worf,
The American version did plan on neutering the story. They were going to base 
it on the manga and not the film. The manga doesn't have the same twist or 
ending. The antagonist's motivations are supposed to be totally different as 
well.

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:

 
 Keith, the good things about Oldboy are more than due. Seeing the movie 
 named in previous posts this morning made me go over the scenes in my head, 
 as best I can remember them, and I'm feeling the thrill of it anew. Haven't 
 found it yet in my travels but, when I do, it's mine.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: keithbjohn...@...
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:16:09 +
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 I've heard good things about Old Boy, and lots of conversation about the 
 rumored version starring Will Smith.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:45:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   Ok, I will post a review. :) But if she is having 
 nightmares about shrimp I can tell you now that she won't be able to handle 
 Thirst. 
 
 Some of the images in Old boy was pretty graphic. I didn't bring it up 
 because there isn't any scifi in it. It is an interesting story though. A guy 
 gets snatched off of the street and imprisoned for 15 years in a small hotel 
 looking room. One day he is given 7 days to figure out why he was placed 
 there. Cool movie. It would have never been produced in Hollywood.
 
 
 
 On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Let us know how it is, please. After my wife seeing District 9--a feat I 
 pulled off only because she had *no* clue of what it would be like--I can't 
 sneak in Thirst. She had nightmares about shrimp jumping off a dinner plate 
 and menacing her--no fooling!
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:56:40 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   I saw the trailer for Thirst. It looks good. I saw the 
 movie Old boy and was blown away by several scenes and the twisted ass plot. 
 I am looking forward to the movie because the director is known for making 
 good dark, and twisted films. 
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
 though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've heard 
 some good things about it.
 
 
 I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
 in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
 negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the movie 
 was portrayed well).  The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but overall I 
 really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon...
 
 
 
 *
 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce
 
 
 
 Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
 Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the 
 weekend 
 with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice.
 
 Basterds is 
 touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently struggling indie, 
 even 
 though Universal is distributing the film internationally and will share 
 evenly 
 in any worldwide profit. Sony's sci-fi thriller District 9 finished second 
 after falling just 49% in its sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day 
 cume of $73.5 million.
 
 The weekend's other three wide openers bowed 
 softly. Robert Rodriguez's PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. 
 rung up $6.6 million for sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad 
 registered $2.8 million in 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games 3D: 
 The Movie -- slotted for one week only in 1,399 extra-dimensional venues -- 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant? 


- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting. I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them. I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up. 



Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer. No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that. 
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me. 



When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes. So the 
mom and former teacher in me was not irked 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more 
interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad was 
going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her smarts and 
instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman. 
Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga, etc. 
angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and others 
as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i actually hated 
to see her leave. 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:16:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Tracey and Keith, 

Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within the 
story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off early 
on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as sort of 
his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 







To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:47:52 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









Agreed, Tracey. I was stunned when the daughter became a genius, and I didn't 
like his sister either. Again, they try way too hard to manufacture conflicts 
for Carter, when they could simply just let the show flow! 

I didn't like Lexi at first. But you know what? Like his daughter, had they 
moved her out of Carter's house and let her function on her own away from him, 
away from the daily spats, I'd have liked her to stay. She added normalcy 
outside the nerds that populate the town. 

- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:30:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









OK Keith, don’t get me started on they need Hewitt producing again to prevent 
them from destroying the show rant. 



I do not like Jo’s boyfriend either. Even though it was weird, I kinda liked Jo 
better with Max headroom (Matt Frewer). Jo and the boyfriend have no chemistry 
and their lines kind of fall flat. 


Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
yeah, but i believe the energy requirements are something like that put out by 
a few billion stars, right? so effectively, not possible, at least, not for 
humans in a ship who hope to survive for more than a few picoseconds. 


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:00:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions 






It's theoretically possible, if you've got a ship, a wormhole and something 
that generates a heckuva lot of gravity. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:01:15 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions 






well, to us, time moves in a linear fashion, from past to future. But 
that's only for objects that exist at sublight speeds. For any phenomena that 
move *at* lightspeed, time stands completely still. A photon that left a star 
from the Andromeda galaxy 2.2 million years ago notes *no* passage of time 
whatsoever. 
Ain't that wild? 
I don't think any current theories allow for us to travel back in time, only 
forward, or not be affected by it at all. 

- Original Message - 
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:08:55 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions 




Yeah, the video is confusing in this regard and at points was off (albeit 
stylistically cool), but you're right. 



I still don't think time is linear, however. :) 



~ Where love and magic meet ~ 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com 
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html 
Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html 
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath 



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 







If time were linear (a line), it'd be one dimension. A true line is one 
dimensional, a plane (like a sheet of paper), would be two dimensional, of 
course the cube is three, and then the concept of spacetime is associated with 
four by some 

Speaking of time, there's a new book out I've heard about where one of the 
physicists working on the new supercollider in Europe tries to explain 
Relativity in an easy-to-understand method. It's called Why Does E=mc2? And 
Why Should We Care? The concept of time is discussed, including why it's truly 
relative (depending on one's frame of reference only) and why it flows in only 
one direction, at least for those of use with mass. I listen to a program 
called Think, from KERA in Dallas. The book's author, Brian Cox, did an 
hourlong interview recently that was pretty good. You can find the interview 
here: 

http://www.kera.org/audio/think.php 
Ein stein's Theory of Relativity 
[2009-08-12 13:00:00] Is Einstein's theory of relativity too complex for the 
average Joe to comprehend, or just waiting for the right teacher? We'll discuss 
common misconceptions about relativity this hour with Brian Cox, particle 
physicist and co-author of the new book Why Does E=MC2 And Why Should We 
Care? (DaCapo, 2009). 

Here's a link to a review of the book. I plan to pick it up soon: 

http://www.powells.com/biblio/9780306817588 





- Original Message - 
From: Adrianne Brennan  adrianne.bren...@gmail.com  
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 



Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:27:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions 




Observed time isn't a dimension, though. And if it's in a line, it should be 
two dimensions as a line's two dimensional. 






~ Where love and magic meet ~ 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com 
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html 
Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html 
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath 



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Omari Confer  clockwork...@gmail.com  
wrote: 





They dont speak of time in its abstractthey refer to time as observed time. 

Who i was when i began this email...and who I am right now.. 

c w m 





On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Adrianne Brennan  adrianne.bren...@gmail.com 
 wrote: 






Really cool, but the stuff on time bewildered me. 



Time shouldn't exist in just one dimension. And while some people would jump on 
that and claim time is linear, if it were linear by its very definition it 
should take up two dimensions not just one. 


And it's 

[scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread daikaiju66
BTW I highly recommend the other two movies in the Vengeance Trilogy, Sympathy 
For Mr. Vengeance and Lady Vengeance. They all have something epic about them 
and it's great to see Chan Wook Park's growth as a filmmaker. 

I really suggest watching them in order if you have a chance. They all stand 
alone but it's intersting to see the callbacks and references to Mr. Vengeance 
and Oldboy in Lady Vengeance.

He also has two other films that are worth a look. JSA is a murder mystery set 
in the DMZ between North and South Korea. I'm A Cyborg But That's OK is a 
quirky drama about a young woman in a mental hospital. It wasn't my cup of tea 
but my wife really liked it.

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:

 
 Keith, the good things about Oldboy are more than due. Seeing the movie 
 named in previous posts this morning made me go over the scenes in my head, 
 as best I can remember them, and I'm feeling the thrill of it anew. Haven't 
 found it yet in my travels but, when I do, it's mine.
 
 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 
 
 
 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: keithbjohn...@...
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:16:09 +
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   
 I've heard good things about Old Boy, and lots of conversation about the 
 rumored version starring Will Smith.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:45:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   Ok, I will post a review. :) But if she is having 
 nightmares about shrimp I can tell you now that she won't be able to handle 
 Thirst. 
 
 Some of the images in Old boy was pretty graphic. I didn't bring it up 
 because there isn't any scifi in it. It is an interesting story though. A guy 
 gets snatched off of the street and imprisoned for 15 years in a small hotel 
 looking room. One day he is given 7 days to figure out why he was placed 
 there. Cool movie. It would have never been produced in Hollywood.
 
 
 
 On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Let us know how it is, please. After my wife seeing District 9--a feat I 
 pulled off only because she had *no* clue of what it would be like--I can't 
 sneak in Thirst. She had nightmares about shrimp jumping off a dinner plate 
 and menacing her--no fooling!
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:56:40 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
   I saw the trailer for Thirst. It looks good. I saw the 
 movie Old boy and was blown away by several scenes and the twisted ass plot. 
 I am looking forward to the movie because the director is known for making 
 good dark, and twisted films. 
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
 though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've heard 
 some good things about it.
 
 
 I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
 in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
 negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the movie 
 was portrayed well).  The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but overall I 
 really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon...
 
 
 
 *
 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce
 
 
 
 Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
 Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the 
 weekend 
 with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice.
 
 Basterds is 
 touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently struggling indie, 
 even 
 though Universal is distributing the film internationally and will share 
 evenly 
 in any worldwide profit. Sony's sci-fi thriller District 9 finished second 
 after falling just 49% in its sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day 
 cume of $73.5 million.
 
 The weekend's other three wide openers bowed 
 softly. Robert Rodriguez's PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. 
 rung up $6.6 million for sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad 
 registered $2.8 million in 10th, and 

Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions

2009-08-25 Thread Adrianne Brennan
There was something interesting where they proved you could slow down the
speed of light, right? Thus removing it as a constant.
~ Where love and magic meet ~
http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html
Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates:
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series:
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath


On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Keith Johnson
keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 well, to us, time moves in a linear fashion, from past to future. But
 that's only for objects that exist at sublight speeds. For any phenomena
 that move *at* lightspeed, time stands completely still. A photon that left
 a star from the Andromeda galaxy 2.2 million years ago notes *no* passage of
 time whatsoever.
 Ain't that wild?
 I don't think any current theories allow for us to travel back in time,
 only forward, or not be affected by it at all.

 - Original Message -
 From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:08:55 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions



 Yeah, the video is confusing in this regard and at points was off (albeit
 stylistically cool), but you're right.

 I still don't think time is linear, however. :)

 ~ Where love and magic meet ~
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com
 Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html
 Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates:
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
 Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series:
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath


 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
  wrote:



 If time were linear (a line), it'd be one dimension. A true line is one
 dimensional, a plane (like a sheet of paper), would be two dimensional, of
 course the cube is three, and then the concept of spacetime is associated
 with four by some

 Speaking of time, there's a new book out I've heard about where one of the
 physicists working on the new supercollider in Europe tries to explain
 Relativity in an easy-to-understand method.  It's called Why Does E=mc2?
 And Why Should We Care? The concept of time is discussed, including why
 it's truly relative (depending on one's frame of reference only) and why it
 flows in only one direction, at least for those of use with mass.  I listen
 to a program called Think, from KERA in Dallas. The book's author, Brian
 Cox, did an hourlong interview recently that was pretty good. You can find
 the interview here:

 http://www.kera.org/audio/think.php
 Ein*stein's Theory of 
 Relativityhttp://podcastdownload.npr.org/anon.npr-podcasts/podcast/77/510036/111822071/KERA_111822071.mp3
 *
 [2009-08-12 13:00:00] Is Einstein's theory of relativity too complex for
 the average Joe to comprehend, or just waiting for the right teacher? We'll
 discuss common misconceptions about relativity this hour with Brian Cox,
 particle physicist and co-author of the new book Why Does E=MC2 And Why
 Should We Care? (DaCapo, 2009).

 Here's a link to a review of the book. I plan to pick it up soon:

 http://www.powells.com/biblio/9780306817588




 - Original Message -
 From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:27:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions



 Observed time isn't a dimension, though. And if it's in a line, it should
 be two dimensions as a line's two dimensional.



 ~ Where love and magic meet ~
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com
 Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html
 Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates:
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
 Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series:
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath


 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Omari Confer clockwork...@gmail.comwrote:



 They dont speak of time in its abstractthey refer to time as observed
 time.

 Who i was when i began this email...and who I am right now..

 c w m


 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Adrianne Brennan 
 adrianne.bren...@gmail.com wrote:



 Really cool, but the stuff on time bewildered me.

 Time shouldn't exist in just one dimension. And while some people would
 jump on that and claim time is linear, if it were linear by its very
 definition it should take up two dimensions not just one.

 And it's not linear.

 I think most of what scientists observe of as being time are the effects
 of time versus time itself.

 And now that I've given everyone a bigger headache than they started
 with...I will end this email. LOL

 ~ Where love and magic meet ~
 http://www.adriannebrennan.com
 Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
For example, look at how men talked and acted just a century or so ago here. 
There's lots of talk about Abraham Lincoln being a closet gay because he slept 
in the same bed with a man who was a very good friend of his. Don't know about 
that, but back then, men sleeping in the same bed wasn't considered to be all 
that unusual in many circumstances. You're on the road, rooms are expensive, 
money's tight--you share a bed. Heck, I can recall even seeing old shows like 
The Three Stooges or Laurel and Hardy where men shared a bed because of 
funds and availability, and as a child, it *never* occurred to me that 
something was untoward. Back then, the humor in the scene was simply two dudes 
sharing a little bed, maybe one snoring and moving around too much for the 
other to sleep, but that was it. Nowadays, however, such scenes are fraught 
with suggestion, and usually played for jokes that all center around the men 
nervously proclaiming I'm not gay, i'm not enjoying this! to each other. 

Read letters from some men from the Civil War and Revolutionary War period. 
You'll see men say about their fellows, things like My heart races when he 
enters a room, so full of confidence is he, or, My love for you, dear fellow, 
is unbounded by anything, so much joy have you brought to me. These are 
usually men who are married with children. Now, were they on the downlow? I 
don't think so: passions like that were simply more openly expressed, and there 
wasn't the stigma of being perceived as gay so quickly. But let a man make a 
statement like that nowadays, and think anyone would just toss it off as 
normal? Doubtful. 

Look at all the countries in the world where men kissing each other on the 
checks is normal, where really warm embraces are nothing unusual. There are 
Middle Eastern and African countries where men hold hands in public, and it's 
considered to be absolutely fine. But not in America. 

Some of this I think is the difference in relationships between men and women. 
For most of recorded time, women have been seen as wives, mothers, and, sadly, 
all but servants in some countries. They're there to provide services, have 
kids, keep the house. But for most countries in most times, men haven't really 
been taught to see women as equals and real friends. They don't seek their 
advice in affairs of state, business, or war. In so many countries today, men 
don't hang out with women after dinner to chat about the world; rather, they 
retreat to hang with the fellows. That real bonding was left for men, who were 
out hunting, killing, building, and politicking together. So there seemed to be 
a bigger emphasis on that strong bond between men that was seen as normal. And 
I think some of the affection that could have gone to a woman who was respected 
as a friend as well as a mate, went to the men instead. 

Nowadays--in America at least--women have gained in respect and position. More 
men see women as equals, more men like me confide in our wives, seek out their 
advice in all things. Hell, if I were Prez, you can damn well bet my wife would 
be advising me on everything from healthcare to military policy! Not sure of 
all the reasons, but in the last century there's been a major shift in how 
sexuality is viewed in that way. What was once normal or amusing is now curious 
and suggestive. I even think of Morris Day: back in the day, he was just a bit 
of a dandy. now people say, Is Morris Day gay? 

and even guys who are gay now like to play up their behaviour. Shows like Will 
and Grace, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, America's Top Model all 
showcase men who are extremely stereotyped in their mannerisms. 

So, my long-winded feeling is that, even if Vincent isn't gay, the way he's 
acting, people will perceive him as such. When he waves his hands and says I'm 
NOT going to be offended you didn't ask me to do your wedding cake! one 
wonders, and I can't believe that's an accidental thing. The truth is most 
Americans nowadays will thing gay. 


- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:13:53 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 







Yeah, but back in the day that wasn't always taken as gay. Words like dandy 
were very common, and men of means in many periods were foppish, sniffing their 
snuff, wearing brightly colored clothes, all but swooning when excited or 
tired, etc. 
But nowadays that type of behaviour typically is construed--and often 
intended--as being gay. While I agree it doesn't *have* to mean that, the way 
H'Wood usually works, it usually does mean that. 

But maybe I'm wrong... 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:29:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Has anyone seen the movie the Scarlet Pimpernel? 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
To live in Eureka you must have a genius level and a security clearance.
They never say how many people are regular people but often the spouses are
not super geniuses. Everyone that lives there works for the company.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 good point.

 I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a
 small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists
 and engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who
 collect trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech
 devices to do their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water
 works, HVAC, etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and
 for them be so? Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not
 geniuses, wouldn't there be a decent number of people in jobs who are just
 normal in intelligence? I know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love
 interest for Carter--who had some kind of high tech cleaning system. But if
 she needed a couple of workers to help her with the clothes, would they have
 to be geniuses too? Are all the assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops,
 flower shops, HVAC repair, the movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every
 janitor at GD--and I see alot of them, slinging those buckets and mops,
 'cause they're almost like Star Trek redshirts in being used for cannon
 fodder--brilliant?


 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



  Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more
 interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose
 of ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked the
 conflict they had between them fine before they mucked it up.



 Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking
 it.  Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who
 are geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer.No
 loving parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child
 to that.  Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the
 braining kids while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out
 for me.



 When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes.  So
 the mom and former teacher in me was not irked



 *From:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] *On
 Behalf Of *Keith Johnson
 *Sent:* Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM
 *To:* scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






  I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more
 interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad
 was going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her
 smarts and instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman.
 Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga,
 etc. angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and
 others as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i
 actually hated to see her leave.

 - Original Message -
 From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
 To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:16:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts



 Tracey and Keith,

 Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within
 the story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off
 early on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as
 sort of his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound.

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
 bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik



  --

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:47:52 +
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts





 Agreed, Tracey. I was stunned when the daughter became a genius, and I
 didn't like his sister either. Again, they try way too hard to manufacture
 conflicts for Carter, when they could simply just let the show flow!

 I didn't like Lexi at first. But you know what? Like his daughter, had they
 moved her out of Carter's house and let her function on her own away from
 him, away from the daily spats, I'd have liked her to stay. She added
 normalcy outside the nerds that populate the town.

 - Original Message -
 From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:30:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
 Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Found this on the Web from a synopsis someone wrote of one Eureka ep. Now 
that I read it, I remember that scene... h 
ttp://www.recapist.com/2007/08/01/eureka-episode-204-games-people-play 

E ureka - Episode 204 - Games People Play 
...Carter's once again having A Very Bad Day, and that's before everyone he 
cares about starts disappearing on him. First, it's Jo, who disappears on him 
mid-conversation while moving around the desks in the sheriff's office. When 
Jack heads over to Cafe Diem to ask if anyone's seen her, he learns two 
important things: Vincent's gay (or at the very least flexisexual) and nobody's 
heard of Jo. [When Carter asks about his deputy, Jo, Vincent appears to 
assume that's a man, Joe] 

Vincent's pink shirt might have been a tipoff about the flexisexual thing, but 
the Is he cute? response to Jack's query about his new deputy seals the deal. 
The thing about nobody remembering Jo (Jack: I have a deputy named Jo Lupo -- 
small but surprisingly strong, a bit of a gun nut) is more of a shock, 
frankly. 



- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:23:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Keith, I'm not taking Vincent's flouncing as gay. I've known men to behave in 
just that way, and leave a room with the choicest of pickins among the ladies. 

And do more than just wine and dine them, if you know what I mean. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:35:09 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






I was going to ask, why was Allison's son dropped? I mean, they make all this 
noise about her being pregnant, and last week she even stated she was home at a 
decent hour every day. So where the hell is her son?? 

Fargo isn't gay: he has a girlfriend now. I'm pretty sure it's that crazy girl 
who morphed her body into a duplicate of Jo's. Fargo loves him some women: they 
just don't love him back. 

The guy who runs Cafe Diem (who was also a wizard in the horrible Legend of 
Earthsea miniseries) seems to be gay to me, the way he's portrayed. 


- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:47:50 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 




I think that they hinted that Fargo is gay a couple of episodes ago. 

I think that the sheriff and allison having a romance would have made 
interesting tv when they first started the show, but as time passed on it 
wasn't going anywhere and lost steam. 

I think that they killed off Stark's character because his character wasn't 
going anywhere. There are a few others that just disappeared as well such as 
the son, and the animal trainer guy. 

They killed off Stark back when they killed the son. He was first exposed to 
the alien object that was in sector 5. He left the show then came back. Then 
they killed him again with a time paradox. 

Allison's son was fully exposed to the alien object by accident. He was 
autistic / physics genius. The problem is that making him autistic didn't give 
him many plots to participate in. 



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 






A couple more thoughts: 

* I'm actually glad Nathan Stark is gone, at least in terms of the contrived 
rivalry he and Carter had. I was tired of that angle too. I guess I just like 
Carter's character, and feel the character needs more development to stand on 
his own, outside of angles like the battles with Stark or the he's the dumbest 
guy in the room thing. 

* I don't care for Jo's boyfriend--too generic cool genius--but do like that 
she has a boyfriend. Nice to see some softer angles to her... 

* After all this time, the voice of the computer Sarah (named after Sarah 
Michelle Gellar) still cracks me up. Everyone relizes that that female voice 
is actually done by the actor who plays Fargo? 





- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:52:34 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Everyone watching the new season of Eureka? I must saying I'm enjoying it, 
even more than last season. I think that's because Carter is noticeably more 
instrumental in solving cases than last year. Every ep so far, as the big 
brains discuss string theory, M-branes, and quantum mechanics, Carter's always 
the one guy in the room who cuts through the superficial coverings to get to 
the heart of a problem. Indeed, one wonders how the scientists can do anything: 
as smart as they are, they seem to 

Re: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread Mr. Worf
As things become more web enabled they start running the danger of a virus.
What if his cellphone gave his stove a virus? I know its not possible right
now but soon...very soon...

We already have web enabled stoves and refrigerators. All it takes is some
kid on summer vacation to play around with it.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Martin Baxter
truthseeker...@hotmail.comwrote:



 Now, if we were to install Magic Chef ovens in teenagers' cars,
 texting-while-driving would become a thing of the past.

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in
 bloody hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




 --
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:22:18 -0700
 Subject: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove


 http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget

 --
 Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


 --
 Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try BingT 
 now.http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1

 




-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
oh, so every single worker there is a genius? Well, I guess that would make it 
hard to be normal. Wonder why they don't have the same standards for the law 
enforcement? I also wonder why they don't have more security outside of the 
sheriff's office? I mean, one minute Carter's ticketing someone for double 
parking, the next he's trying to close a rupture in spacetime. And those 
uniforms: too Andy Griffith for me. 

And speaking of sheriff's accoutrements, have you noticed all the heavy handed 
Subaru in-episode advertising going on? Jo and Fargo kept saying Subaru Model 
 over and over a couple of shows back. the new police cruiser is 
positioned so that the camera lingers over the Subaru decal quite a bit. I 
still find that type of obvious marketing irritating... 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:02:18 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






To live in Eureka you must have a genius level and a security clearance. They 
never say how many people are regular people but often the spouses are not 
super geniuses. Everyone that lives there works for the company. 


On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 






good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant? 



- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella  tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting. I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them. I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up. 



Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer. No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that. 
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me. 



When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes. So the 
mom and former teacher in me was not irked 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more 
interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad was 
going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her smarts and 
instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman. 
Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga, etc. 
angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and others 
as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i actually hated 
to see her leave. 


- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter  truthseeker...@hotmail.com  
To: SciFiNoir2  scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com  
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:16:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 







Tracey and Keith, 

Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within the 
story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off early 
on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as sort of 
his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound. 


If all the world's a stage and all the people 

[scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
It was not well received.  It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
other hand, it only cost $12 mil).  I first saw it at an art house with a bunch 
of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2.  What it 
is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line with Get 
Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction.  Jackie Brown is full of great 
performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously dim-witted), Samuel 
L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), Bridget Fonda, Michael 
Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam Grier.  Tarantino's 
showcase homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase and respectful - which, 
alas, may have something to do with the tepid box office.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
 seen it. 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I love Tarantino. Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie of all-time. I 
 have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie Brown. I can't 
 wait to see Inglourious Basterds. I was going to go last night, but I 
 decided to go to see District 9 instead. 
 
 ~rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  After watching Tarentino's one hour manic interview with Charlie Rose, I'm 
  more interested in seeing Basterds. Guy is very smart, very well read, 
  very well versed in history. His movies can be a bit overblown, but that's 
  not it. I can see myself seeing it on cable. I hear it's actually much more 
  of a talky than the grossout violence fest we seem to keep getting fed by 
  the trailers. 
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:36:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  I can’t get up any enthusiasm to see bastards either. Don’t 
  know why. I’m not even sure I will pursue it on cable. It seems like 
  it is some sort of Dirty Dozen tribute and I loved that, but I’m not 
  feeling it. 
  
  
  
  Gotta get a baby sitter so we can go see District 9 
  
  
  
  
  
  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
  Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
  Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:06 PM 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
  though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've 
  heard some good things about it. 
  I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
  in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
  negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the 
  movie was portrayed well). The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but 
  overall I really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon... 
  
  * 
  http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce
   
  
  Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
  Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the 
  weekend with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice. 
  
  Basterds is touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently 
  struggling indie, even though Universal is distributing the film 
  internationally and will share evenly in any worldwide profit. Sony's 
  sci-fi thriller District 9 finished second after falling just 49% in its 
  sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day cume of $73.5 million. 
  
  The weekend's other three wide openers bowed softly. Robert Rodriguez's 
  PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. rung up $6.6 million for 
  sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad registered $2.8 million 
  in 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games 3D: The Movie -- slotted 
  for one week only in 1,399 extra-dimensional venues -- fetched just 
  $800,000. 
  
  Among other second-frame holdovers, Warners' literary adaptation The Time 
  Traveler's Wife fell a modest 46% to $10 million in fourth place for a 
  $37.4 million cume, while further down the rankings Paramount Vantage's 
  comedy The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard slid 53% to $2.7 million and a 
  $11.2 million cume. Disney's Ponyo dipped 32% to $2.4 million with an 
  $8.1 million cume, and Summit Entertainment's youth musical Bandslam 
  dropped 

[scifinoir2] Author Nnedi Okorafor's take on District 9

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
http://nnedi.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-response-to-district-419i-mean.html



[scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread daikaiju66
Jackie Brown is a much more restrained and adult movie than Pulp Fiction. 
Samuel L. Jackson's performance from that one is highly underrated.

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, ravenadal ravena...@... wrote:

 It was not well received.  It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
 other hand, it only cost $12 mil).  I first saw it at an art house with a 
 bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2.  
 What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line 
 with Get Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction.  Jackie Brown is full 
 of great performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously 
 dim-witted), Samuel L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), 
 Bridget Fonda, Michael Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam 
 Grier.  Tarantino's showcase homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase 
 and respectful - which, alas, may have something to do with the tepid box 
 office.
 
 ~rave!
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote:
 
  Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
  seen it. 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: ravenadal ravenadal@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  I love Tarantino. Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie of all-time. I 
  have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie Brown. I 
  can't wait to see Inglourious Basterds. I was going to go last night, but 
  I decided to go to see District 9 instead. 
  
  ~rave! 
  
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
   
   After watching Tarentino's one hour manic interview with Charlie Rose, 
   I'm more interested in seeing Basterds. Guy is very smart, very well 
   read, very well versed in history. His movies can be a bit overblown, but 
   that's not it. I can see myself seeing it on cable. I hear it's actually 
   much more of a talky than the grossout violence fest we seem to keep 
   getting fed by the trailers. 
   
   
   - Original Message - 
   From: Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ 
   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:36:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
   Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
   Strong 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   I can’t get up any enthusiasm to see bastards either. Don’t 
   know why. I’m not even sure I will pursue it on cable. It seems 
   like it is some sort of Dirty Dozen tribute and I loved that, but 
   I’m not feeling it. 
   
   
   
   Gotta get a baby sitter so we can go see District 9 
   
   
   
   
   
   From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
   Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
   Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:06 PM 
   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
   Subject: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
   though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've 
   heard some good things about it. 
   I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky 
   camera in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, 
   and the negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human 
   in the movie was portrayed well). The Nigerian thing was a major issue, 
   but overall I really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review 
   soon... 
   
   * 
   http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce

   
   Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a 
   pivotal Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously 
   during the weekend with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping 
   boxoffice. 
   
   Basterds is touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently 
   struggling indie, even though Universal is distributing the film 
   internationally and will share evenly in any worldwide profit. Sony's 
   sci-fi thriller District 9 finished second after falling just 49% in 
   its sophomore session to $18.9 million and a 10-day cume of $73.5 
   million. 
   
   The weekend's other three wide openers bowed softly. Robert Rodriguez's 
   PG-rated family fantasy Shorts from Warner Bros. rung up $6.6 million 
   for sixth place; Fox Searchlight's comedy Post Grad registered $2.8 
   million in 10th, and Disney's sports documentary X Games 3D: The Movie 
   -- slotted for one week only in 1,399 extra-dimensional venues -- fetched 
   just $800,000. 
   
   Among other second-frame holdovers, Warners' literary adaptation The 
   Time Traveler's Wife fell a modest 46% 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam Grier 
disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never saw Get 
Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found really 
labored and boring. 

As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, probably 
one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. The cool 
and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and Clooney. And 
you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based on Out of 
Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, tough lady. I 
think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill Duke, and Robert 
Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the mix of danger, fun, 
and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, but did it years 
earlier. 

My wife and I loved the series and were really upset when it was canceled. 


- Original Message - 
From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:43:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 






It was not well received. It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
other hand, it only cost $12 mil). I first saw it at an art house with a bunch 
of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2. What it 
is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line with Get 
Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction. Jackie Brown is full of great 
performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously dim-witted), Samuel 
L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), Bridget Fonda, Michael 
Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam Grier. Tarantino's showcase 
homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase and respectful - which, alas, 
may have something to do with the tepid box office. 

~rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
 seen it. 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I love Tarantino. Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie of all-time. I 
 have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie Brown. I can't 
 wait to see Inglourious Basterds. I was going to go last night, but I 
 decided to go to see District 9 instead. 
 
 ~rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  After watching Tarentino's one hour manic interview with Charlie Rose, I'm 
  more interested in seeing Basterds. Guy is very smart, very well read, 
  very well versed in history. His movies can be a bit overblown, but that's 
  not it. I can see myself seeing it on cable. I hear it's actually much more 
  of a talky than the grossout violence fest we seem to keep getting fed by 
  the trailers. 
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:36:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  I can’t get up any enthusiasm to see bastards either. Don’t 
  know why. I’m not even sure I will pursue it on cable. It seems like 
  it is some sort of Dirty Dozen tribute and I loved that, but I’m not 
  feeling it. 
  
  
  
  Gotta get a baby sitter so we can go see District 9 
  
  
  
  
  
  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
  Behalf Of Keith Johnson 
  Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:06 PM 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
  though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've 
  heard some good things about it. 
  I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
  in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
  negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the 
  movie was portrayed well). The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but 
  overall I really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon... 
  
  * 
  http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce
   
  
  Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
  Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously 

[scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread ravenadal
While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends and 
I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no damn 
gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it!  
Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and response 
Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and Dwayne (the 
Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot!

And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy:
Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white America... 
from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic imitation of 
our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich your very 
existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product through our 
achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that comfort me when I 
am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, who *have* no talent, 
no guts? people like you who desecrate things they don't understand when the 
truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on about your way. But 
apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots his gun] 

I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and caps 
pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly NOT 
sexy.  What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 

~(no)rave! 



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
 of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam 
 Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never 
 saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found 
 really labored and boring. 
 
 As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
 probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. 
 The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and 
 Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based 
 on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, 
 tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill 
 Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the 
 mix of danger, fun, and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, 
 but did it years earlier. 
 
 My wife and I loved the series and were really upset when it was canceled. 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:43:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It was not well received. It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
 other hand, it only cost $12 mil). I first saw it at an art house with a 
 bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2. 
 What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line 
 with Get Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction. Jackie Brown is full 
 of great performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously 
 dim-witted), Samuel L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), 
 Bridget Fonda, Michael Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam 
 Grier. Tarantino's showcase homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase 
 and respectful - which, alas, may have something to do with the tepid box 
 office. 
 
 ~rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
  seen it. 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: ravenadal ravenadal@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  I love Tarantino. Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie of all-time. I 
  have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie Brown. I 
  can't wait to see Inglourious Basterds. I was going to go last night, but 
  I decided to go to see District 9 instead. 
  
  ~rave! 
  
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
   
   After watching Tarentino's one hour manic interview with Charlie Rose, 
   I'm more interested in seeing Basterds. Guy is very smart, very well 
   read, very well versed in history. His movies can be a bit overblown, but 
   that's not it. I can see myself seeing it on cable. I hear it's actually 
   much more of a talky than the grossout violence fest we seem to keep 
   getting fed by the trailers. 
   
   
   - Original Message - 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
aagh! I disagree on Karen Sisco. Great show, and it didn't have time to grow 
in directions like you mentioned. 

Your stuff below entertained me more than the movie Be Cool did. It was a bit 
too self-consciously hip and clever for my taste 

- Original Message - 
From: ravenadal ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:41:14 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 






While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends and 
I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no damn 
gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and response 
Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and Dwayne (the 
Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 

And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white America... 
from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic imitation of 
our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich your very 
existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product through our 
achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that comfort me when I 
am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, who *have* no talent, 
no guts? people like you who desecrate things they don't understand when the 
truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on about your way. But 
apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots his gun] 

I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and caps 
pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly NOT 
sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 

~(no)rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
 of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam 
 Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never 
 saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found 
 really labored and boring. 
 
 As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
 probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. 
 The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and 
 Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based 
 on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, 
 tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill 
 Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the 
 mix of danger, fun, and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, 
 but did it years earlier. 
 
 My wife and I loved the series and were really upset when it was canceled. 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:43:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It was not well received. It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
 other hand, it only cost $12 mil). I first saw it at an art house with a 
 bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2. 
 What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line 
 with Get Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction. Jackie Brown is full 
 of great performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously 
 dim-witted), Samuel L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), 
 Bridget Fonda, Michael Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam 
 Grier. Tarantino's showcase homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase 
 and respectful - which, alas, may have something to do with the tepid box 
 office. 
 
 ~rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
  seen it. 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: ravenadal ravenadal@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  I love Tarantino. Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie of all-time. I 
  have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie Brown. I 
  can't wait to see Inglourious Basterds. I was going to go last night, but 
  I decided to go to see District 9 instead. 
  
  ~rave! 
  
  --- In 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Tracey de Morsella
I thought about that.  Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town.  While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic.   

 

Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals.  In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius.The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses.  

 

If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts.  They 
do not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths.  Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 






good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant?


- Original Message -
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up.  

 

Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
 Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer.No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that.  
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me.

 

When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes.  So the 
mom and former teacher in me was not irked

 

From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

 





I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more 
interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad was 
going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her smarts and 
instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman.
Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga, etc. 
angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and others 
as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i actually hated 
to see her leave.

- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:16:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

Tracey and Keith,

Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within the 
story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off early 
on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as sort of 
his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




  _  

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:47:52 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

  

 

Agreed, Tracey. I was stunned when the daughter became a genius, and I didn't 
like his sister either. Again, they try way too hard to manufacture conflicts 
for Carter, when they could simply just let the show 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Keith, I figure that to be the Product of the Season. One season, we were 
bombarded with Degree ads left and right.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:31 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
oh, so every single worker there is  a genius? Well, I guess that would make it 
hard to be normal. Wonder why they don't have the same standards for the law 
enforcement? I also wonder why they don't have more security outside of the 
sheriff's office? I mean, one minute Carter's ticketing someone for double 
parking, the next he's trying to close a rupture in spacetime. And those 
uniforms: too Andy Griffith for me.

And speaking of sheriff's accoutrements, have you noticed all the heavy handed 
Subaru in-episode advertising going on? Jo and Fargo kept saying Subaru Model 
 over and over a couple of shows back. the new police cruiser is 
positioned so that the camera lingers over the Subaru decal quite a bit. I 
still find that type of obvious marketing irritating...

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:02:18 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  To live in Eureka you must have a genius level and a security 
clearance. They never say how many people are regular people but often the 
spouses are not super geniuses. Everyone that lives there works for the 
company. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:





















good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant?



- Original Message -
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  








Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily
more interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the
purpose of ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked
the conflict they had between them fine before they mucked it up.  


 


Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me
over thinking it.  Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with
others who are geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem
killer.No loving parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject
their child to that.  Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting
with the braining kids while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand
out for me.


 


When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of
episodes.  So the mom and former teacher in me was not irked


 






From:
scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Keith
Johnson

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM

To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts






 













I
hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is
more interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad
was going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her smarts
and instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman.

Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga, etc.
angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and others
as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i actually hated
to see her leave.



- Original Message -

From: Martin Baxter 

RE: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

And, when the Terminator franchise comes to vivid reality... 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:31:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove















 





  As things become more web enabled they start running the 
danger of a virus. What if his cellphone gave his stove a virus? I know its not 
possible right now but soon...very soon... 

We already have web enabled stoves and refrigerators. All it takes is some kid 
on summer vacation to play around with it. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
wrote:


























Now, if we were to install Magic Chef ovens in teenagers' cars, 
texting-while-driving would become a thing of the past.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

From: hellomahog...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:22:18 -0700
Subject: [scifinoir2] This is scary! Cellphone takes over man's stove















 





  
http://www.switched.com/2009/08/19/cell-phone-inexplicably-turns-on-brooklyn-mans-oven?icid=sphere_blogsmith_inpage_engadget


-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/




 

  














Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. Try BingT now.




















-- 
Bringing diversity to perversity for 9 years! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/




 

  














_
With Windows Live, you can organize, edit, and share your photos.
http://www.windowslive.com/Desktop/PhotoGallery

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

As do I. Live and learn, as my friend Lily told me...

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:26:47 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
Found this on the Web from a synopsis someone wrote of one Eureka ep. Now 
that I read it, I remember that 
scene...http://www.recapist.com/2007/08/01/eureka-episode-204-games-people-play
Eureka - Episode 204 - Games People Play...Carter's once again having A Very 
Bad Day, and that's before everyone he cares about starts disappearing on him. 
First, it's Jo, who disappears on him mid-conversation while moving
around the desks in the sheriff's office. When Jack heads over to Cafe
Diem to ask if anyone's seen her, he learns two important things:
Vincent's gay (or at the very least flexisexual) and nobody's heard of
Jo. [When Carter asks about his deputy, Jo, Vincent appears to assume that's 
a man, Joe]

Vincent's pink shirt might have been a tipoff about the flexisexual
thing, but the Is he cute? response to Jack's query about his new
deputy seals the deal. The thing about nobody remembering Jo (Jack: I
have a deputy named Jo Lupo -- small but surprisingly strong, a  bit of
a gun nut) is more of a shock, frankly.



- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:23:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  


Keith, I'm not taking Vincent's flouncing as gay. I've known men to behave in 
just that way, and leave a room with the choicest of pickins among the ladies.

And do more than just wine and dine them, if you know what I mean.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:35:09 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
I was going to ask, why was Allison's son dropped? I  mean, they make all this 
noise about her being pregnant, and last week she even stated she was home at a 
decent hour every day. So where the hell is her son??

Fargo isn't gay: he has a girlfriend now. I'm pretty sure it's that crazy girl 
who morphed her body into a duplicate of Jo's. Fargo loves him some women: they 
just don't love him back.

The guy who runs Cafe Diem (who was also a wizard in the horrible Legend of 
Earthsea miniseries) seems to be gay to me, the way he's portrayed.


- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:47:50 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  I think that they hinted that Fargo is gay a couple of 
episodes ago. 

I think that the sheriff and allison having a romance would have made 
interesting tv when they first started the show, but as time passed on it 
wasn't going anywhere and lost steam. 


I think that they killed off Stark's character because his character wasn't 
going anywhere. There are a few others that just disappeared as well such as 
the son, and the animal trainer guy. 

They killed off Stark back when they killed the son. He was first exposed to 
the alien object that was in sector 5. He left the show then came back. Then 
they killed him again with a time paradox. 


Allison's son was fully exposed to the alien object by accident. He was 
autistic / physics genius. The problem is that making him autistic didn't give 
him many plots to participate in. 



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:





















A couple more thoughts:

* I'm actually glad Nathan Stark is gone, at least in terms of the contrived 
rivalry he and Carter had. I was tired of that angle too. I guess I just like 
Carter's character, and feel the character needs more development to stand on 
his own, outside of angles like the battles with Stark or the he's the dumbest 
guy in the room thing.

  
* I don't care for Jo's boyfriend--too generic cool genius--but do like that 
she has a boyfriend. Nice to see some softer angles to her...

* After all this time, the voice of the computer Sarah (named after Sarah 
Michelle Gellar) still cracks me up. Everyone relizes that that female voice 
is actually done by the actor who plays Fargo?



- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:52:34 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

rave, I think that Tarantino's decision not to show too much of Miss Grier 
falls into the same category as showing too much of The Carla's gams. My first 
time seeing Jackie Brown was at a family reunion, ina common room of my 
aunt's house with several of my younger cousins (all 18+, fear not). One of 
them wondered why she wasn't showing more skin, and I replied by hopping on the 
computer in the corner of the room and googling an image of her, topless.

That pic got printed off several times.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: ravena...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:43:17 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  It was not well received.  It only did $39 million at the box 
office (on the other hand, it only cost $12 mil).  I first saw it at an art 
house with a bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp 
Fiction 2.  What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more 
in line with Get Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction.  Jackie Brown is 
full of great performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously 
dim-witted), Samuel L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), Bridget 
Fonda, Michael Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam Grier.  
Tarantino's showcase homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase and 
respectful - which, alas, may have something to do with the tepid box office.



~rave!



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:



 Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
 seen it. 

 

 - Original Message - 

 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 I love Tarantino. Pulp Fiction is still my favorite movie of all-time. I 
 have seen everything Tarantino has made. I even liked Jackie Brown. I can't 
 wait to see Inglourious Basterds. I was going to go last night, but I 
 decided to go to see District 9 instead. 

 

 ~rave! 

 

 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 

  

  After watching Tarentino's one hour manic interview with Charlie Rose, I'm 
  more interested in seeing Basterds. Guy is very smart, very well read, 
  very well versed in history. His movies can be a bit overblown, but that's 
  not it. I can see myself seeing it on cable. I hear it's actually much more 
  of a talky than the grossout violence fest we seem to keep getting fed by 
  the trailers. 

  

  

  - Original Message - 

  From: Tracey de Morsella tdlists@ 

  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:36:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

  Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
  Strong 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  I can’t get up any enthusiasm to see bastards either. Don’t 
  know why. I’m not even sure I will pursue it on cable. It seems like 
  it is some sort of Dirty Dozen tribute and I loved that, but I’m not 
  feeling it. 

  

  

  

  Gotta get a baby sitter so we can go see District 9 

  

  

  

  

  

  From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com ] On 
  Behalf Of Keith Johnson 

  Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 9:06 PM 

  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

  Subject: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
  though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've 
  heard some good things about it. 

  I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
  in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
  negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the 
  movie was portrayed well). The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but 
  overall I really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon... 

  

  * 

  http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce
   

  

  Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 
  Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the 
  weekend with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping boxoffice. 

  

  Basterds is touted by some as a make-or-break film for the recently 
  struggling indie, even though Universal is distributing the film 
  internationally and will share evenly in any worldwide profit. Sony's 
  sci-fi thriller District 9 finished 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Less tha a red shirt? 

That is priceless! 

- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:56:43 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









I thought about that. Based on how they present the show, I think there are 
very few none-geniuses in the town. While that is unrealistic, the whole 
premise is unrealistic. 



Other than Joe and Carter and an rare visitor, they never show acknowledged 
normals. In all of Zoe’s school scenes they painted her as the only 
unidentified genius. The janitors, baby store owners, restaurateurs, all are 
painted as geniuses. 



If there are non-geniuses in the script, they are less than red shirts. They do 
not even get lines and also do not get dramatic deaths. Never thought there 
would be anything less than a red shirt 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 7:00 AM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 









good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant? 


- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 







Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting. I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them. I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up. 



Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer. No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that. 
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me. 



When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes. So the 
mom and former teacher in me was not irked 





From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:scifino...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf 
Of Keith Johnson 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:10 PM 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 








I hear you. I just agree with Tracey that Zoe as a normal teen is more 
interesting. Her becoming another supergenius rolling her eyes at her dad was 
going to be too much. I like that they've minimized focusing on her smarts and 
instead focused on her as a daughter and young woman. 
Lexi was another cliche that irritated me: the whole organic food, yoga, etc. 
angle was so incredibly cardboard I groaned at first. But like Zoe and others 
as they expanded her role a bit she became more interesting. i actually hated 
to see her leave. 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:16:24 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Tracey and Keith, 

Zoe being a genius really didn't strike me as all that contrived, within the 
story line, considering all of the complicated e-scams she'd pulled off early 
on. I wasn't keen on Lexi at first, but I warmed to her, seeing her as sort of 
his antithesis, as freewheeling as he was tightly-wound. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 






To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
did you like Karen Sisco, Martin? 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong 






rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, they 
couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss out on 
a thing or three. 

Like the rest of the story... 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: ravena...@yahoo.com 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 + 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 




While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get Shorty, my friends and 
I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: Don't give me no damn 
gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it! 
Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and response 
Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and Dwayne (the 
Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot! 

And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy: 
Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white America... 
from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic imitation of 
our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich your very 
existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product through our 
achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that comfort me when I 
am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, who *have* no talent, 
no guts? people like you who desecrate things they don't understand when the 
truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on about your way. But 
apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots his gun] 

I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and caps 
pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly NOT 
sexy. What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 

~(no)rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
 of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam 
 Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never 
 saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found 
 really labored and boring. 
 
 As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
 probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. 
 The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and 
 Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based 
 on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, 
 tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill 
 Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the 
 mix of danger, fun, and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, 
 but did it years earlier. 
 
 My wife and I loved the series and were really upset when it was canceled. 
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:43:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 It was not well received. It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
 other hand, it only cost $12 mil). I first saw it at an art house with a 
 bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2. 
 What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line 
 with Get Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction. Jackie Brown is full 
 of great performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously 
 dim-witted), Samuel L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), 
 Bridget Fonda, Michael Keaton, Robert Forster and, last but not least, Pam 
 Grier. Tarantino's showcase homage for blaxploitation queen Grier is chase 
 and respectful - which, alas, may have something to do with the tepid box 
 office. 
 
 ~rave! 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  Is Jackie Brown not a good movie, or not that well received? I've never 
  seen it. 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: ravenadal ravenadal@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 7:23:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Sent too soon...

I remarked the pink shirt only so far as to marvel at his courage for sporting 
it. In another forum (SiffyBoards, if memory serves), someone did call him gay 
for it, and I had to post, in reply, a story I once read on the BBC's news 
page, explaining that, in many Asian cultures, pink is considered a masculine 
color, as it blends red for courage and white for purity and spirituality.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:26:47 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
Found this on the Web from a synopsis someone wrote of one Eureka ep. Now 
that I read it, I remember that 
scene...http://www.recapist.com/2007/08/01/eureka-episode-204-games-people-play
Eureka - Episode 204 - Games People Play...Carter's once again having A Very 
Bad Day, and that's before everyone he cares about starts disappearing on him. 
First, it's Jo, who disappears on him mid-conversation while moving
around the desks in the sheriff's office. When Jack heads over to Cafe
Diem to ask if anyone's seen her, he learns two important things:
Vincent's gay (or at the very least flexisexual) and nobody's heard of
Jo. [When Carter asks about his deputy, Jo, Vincent appears to assume that's 
a man, Joe]

Vincent's pink shirt might have been a tipoff about the flexisexual
thing, but the Is he cute? response to Jack's query about his new
deputy seals the deal. The thing about nobody remembering Jo (Jack: I
have a deputy named Jo Lupo -- small but surprisingly strong, a  bit of
a gun nut) is more of a shock, frankly.



- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:23:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  


Keith, I'm not taking Vincent's flouncing as gay. I've known men to behave in 
just that way, and leave a room with the choicest of pickins among the ladies.

And do more than just wine and dine them, if you know what I mean.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:35:09 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
I was going to ask, why was Allison's son dropped? I  mean, they make all this 
noise about her being pregnant, and last week she even stated she was home at a 
decent hour every day. So where the hell is her son??

Fargo isn't gay: he has a girlfriend now. I'm pretty sure it's that crazy girl 
who morphed her body into a duplicate of Jo's. Fargo loves him some women: they 
just don't love him back.

The guy who runs Cafe Diem (who was also a wizard in the horrible Legend of 
Earthsea miniseries) seems to be gay to me, the way he's portrayed.


- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:47:50 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  I think that they hinted that Fargo is gay a couple of 
episodes ago. 

I think that the sheriff and allison having a romance would have made 
interesting tv when they first started the show, but as time passed on it 
wasn't going anywhere and lost steam. 


I think that they killed off Stark's character because his character wasn't 
going anywhere. There are a few others that just disappeared as well such as 
the son, and the animal trainer guy. 

They killed off Stark back when they killed the son. He was first exposed to 
the alien object that was in sector 5. He left the show then came back. Then 
they killed him again with a time paradox. 


Allison's son was fully exposed to the alien object by accident. He was 
autistic / physics genius. The problem is that making him autistic didn't give 
him many plots to participate in. 



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:





















A couple more thoughts:

* I'm actually glad Nathan Stark is gone, at least in terms of the contrived 
rivalry he and Carter had. I was tired of that angle too. I guess I just like 
Carter's character, and feel the character needs more development to stand on 
his own, outside of angles like the battles with Stark or the he's the dumbest 
guy in the room thing.

  
* I don't care for Jo's boyfriend--too generic cool genius--but do like that 
she has a boyfriend. Nice to see some softer angles to her...

* After all this time, the voice of the computer Sarah (named after Sarah 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Yeah, true. The worst so far for me is the Stride Gum ad that was an episode of 
Smallville. Remember, it was the *terrible* episode that saw the return of 
Pete Ross, the token, underused black character on the show. There was a plant 
that was infusing Green K essence into the gum. Pete would chew a stick and 
then gain stretching powers a la Mr. Fantastic. 
Silly show, not just because they brought back Pete to give him another lame 
storyline, not just because it made one ask again how it is that Green K is 
omnipresent in Smallville yet still mostlysecret from the outside world . But 
silly because it was a horrible commercial, horribly writ. 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:31:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Keith, I figure that to be the Product of the Season. One season, we were 
bombarded with Degree ads left and right. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:31 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






oh, so every single worker there is a genius? Well, I guess that would make it 
hard to be normal. Wonder why they don't have the same standards for the law 
enforcement? I also wonder why they don't have more security outside of the 
sheriff's office? I mean, one minute Carter's ticketing someone for double 
parking, the next he's trying to close a rupture in spacetime. And those 
uniforms: too Andy Griffith for me. 

And speaking of sheriff's accoutrements, have you noticed all the heavy handed 
Subaru in-episode advertising going on? Jo and Fargo kept saying Subaru Model 
 over and over a couple of shows back. the new police cruiser is 
positioned so that the camera lingers over the Subaru decal quite a bit. I 
still find that type of obvious marketing irritating... 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:02:18 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 




To live in Eureka you must have a genius level and a security clearance. They 
never say how many people are regular people but often the spouses are not 
super geniuses. Everyone that lives there works for the company. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 






good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant? 



- Original Message - 
From: Tracey de Morsella  tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com  
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily more 
interesting. I had a problem with them making her a genius for the purpose of 
ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them. I liked the conflict 
they had between them fine before they mucked it up. 

Why I am okay with them making her a genius has to do with me over thinking it. 
Taking a child who is normal and putting her in school with others who are 
geniuses in my view would be isolating, and a self-esteem killer. No loving 
parent who is aware of their child’s needs would subject their child to that. 
Some of the Zoe storylines that involved her interacting with the braining kids 
while she was the only normal kid, made that issue stand out for me. 

When they made her smart, they stopped having those types of episodes. So the 
mom and former teacher in me was not irked 



From: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com [mailto: 

Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Keith Johnson
Agreed, sometimes clothing choices are just like hairstyles: it simply depends 
on the culture as to what they mean. For example, as a child, I could *never* 
get one single adult to explain to me why long hair on men was considered 
unsightly, yet every Sunday I worshiped the Son of God whose pictures all 
showed hair flowing down past his neck. Nor, why we'd all sit around watching 
BW movies about manly men who were pirates and rogues and Arabian princes and 
the like, all with earrings, yet when men started piercing their ears in the 
modern era, it was assumed they were gay. 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:36:56 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Sent too soon... 

I remarked the pink shirt only so far as to marvel at his courage for sporting 
it. In another forum (SiffyBoards, if memory serves), someone did call him gay 
for it, and I had to post, in reply, a story I once read on the BBC's news 
page, explaining that, in many Asian cultures, pink is considered a masculine 
color, as it blends red for courage and white for purity and spirituality. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:26:47 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






Found this on the Web from a synopsis someone wrote of one Eureka ep. Now 
that I read it, I remember that scene... h 
ttp://www.recapist.com/2007/08/01/eureka-episode-204-games-people-play 

Eureka - Episode 204 - Games People Play 
...Carter's once again having A Very Bad Day, and that's before everyone he 
cares about starts disappearing on him. First, it's Jo, who disappears on him 
mid-conversation while moving around the desks in the sheriff's office. When 
Jack heads over to Cafe Diem to ask if anyone's seen her, he learns two 
important things: Vincent's gay (or at the very least flexisexual) and nobody's 
heard of Jo. [When Carter asks about his deputy, Jo, Vincent appears to 
assume that's a man, Joe] 

Vincent's pink shirt might have been a tipoff about the flexisexual thing, but 
the Is he cute? response to Jack's query about his new deputy seals the deal. 
The thing about nobody remembering Jo (Jack: I have a deputy named Jo Lupo -- 
small but surprisingly strong, a bit of a gun nut) is more of a shock, 
frankly. 



- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com 
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:23:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 




Keith, I'm not taking Vincent's flouncing as gay. I've known men to behave in 
just that way, and leave a room with the choicest of pickins among the ladies. 

And do more than just wine and dine them, if you know what I mean. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik 






To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:35:09 + 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 






I was going to ask, why was Allison's son dropped? I mean, they make all this 
noise about her being pregnant, and last week she even stated she was home at a 
decent hour every day. So where the hell is her son?? 

Fargo isn't gay: he has a girlfriend now. I'm pretty sure it's that crazy girl 
who morphed her body into a duplicate of Jo's. Fargo loves him some women: they 
just don't love him back. 

The guy who runs Cafe Diem (who was also a wizard in the horrible Legend of 
Earthsea miniseries) seems to be gay to me, the way he's portrayed. 


- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:47:50 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts 




I think that they hinted that Fargo is gay a couple of episodes ago. 

I think that the sheriff and allison having a romance would have made 
interesting tv when they first started the show, but as time passed on it 
wasn't going anywhere and lost steam. 

I think that they killed off Stark's character because his character wasn't 
going anywhere. There are a few others that just disappeared as well such as 
the son, and the animal trainer guy. 

They killed off Stark back when they killed the son. He was first exposed to 
the alien object that was in sector 5. He left the show then came back. Then 
they killed him again with a time paradox. 

Allison's son was fully exposed to the alien object by accident. He was 
autistic / physics genius. The problem is that making him autistic didn't give 
him many 

RE: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

That line of thought is a fundamental consideration in the theories of Miguel 
Alcubierre, a guy who's working really hard on developing a viable warp drive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:17:56 -0400
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions















 





  There was something interesting where they proved you could 
slow down the speed of light, right? Thus removing it as a constant.
~ Where love and magic meet ~
http://www.adriannebrennan.com


Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html
Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html


Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath



On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:






















well, to us, time moves in a linear fashion, from past to future. But 
that's only for objects that exist at sublight speeds. For any phenomena that 
move *at* lightspeed, time stands completely still. A photon that left a star 
from the Andromeda galaxy 2.2 million years ago notes *no* passage of time 
whatsoever. 


Ain't that wild?
I don't think any current theories allow for us to travel back in time, only 
forward, or not be affected by it at all.

- Original Message -
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com


To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:08:55 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions









 





  Yeah, the video is confusing in this regard and at points was 
off (albeit stylistically cool), but you're right.

I still don't think time is linear, however. :)


~ Where love and magic meet ~


http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html




Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath







On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:
























If time were linear (a line), it'd be one dimension. A true line is one 
dimensional, a plane (like a sheet of paper), would be two dimensional, of 
course the cube is three, and then the concept of spacetime is associated with 
four by some





Speaking of time, there's a new book out I've heard about where one of the 
physicists working on the new supercollider in Europe tries to explain 
Relativity in an easy-to-understand method.  It's called Why Does E=mc2? And 
Why Should We Care? The concept of time is discussed, including why it's truly 
relative (depending on one's frame of reference only) and why it flows in only 
one direction, at least for those of use with mass.  I listen to a program 
called Think, from KERA in Dallas. The book's author, Brian Cox, did an 
hourlong interview recently that was pretty good. You can find the interview 
here: 





http://www.kera.org/audio/think.php 
Einstein's Theory of Relativity





[2009-08-12 13:00:00] Is Einstein's theory of relativity too complex
for the average Joe to comprehend, or just waiting for the right
teacher? We'll discuss common misconceptions about relativity this hour
with Brian Cox, particle physicist and co-author of the new book Why
Does E=MC2 And Why Should We Care? (DaCapo, 2009).


Here's a link to a review of the book. I plan to pick it up soon:  

http://www.powells.com/biblio/9780306817588






- Original Message -
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com




Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:27:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions







 





  Observed time isn't a dimension, though. And if it's in a 
line, it should be two dimensions as a line's two dimensional.


~ Where love and magic meet ~






http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html






Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath









On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Omari Confer clockwork...@gmail.com wrote:






























They dont speak of time in its abstractthey refer to time as observed time.

Who i was when i began this email...and who I am right now..

c w m



On Sun, Aug 23, 

RE: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

True.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:01:39 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions















 





  
yeah, but i believe the energy requirements are something like that put out by 
a few billion stars, right? so effectively, not possible, at least, not for 
humans in a ship who hope to survive for more than a few picoseconds.


- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:00:53 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions







 





  


It's theoretically possible, if you've got a ship, a wormhole and something 
that generates a heckuva lot of gravity.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:01:15 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions















 





  
well, to us, time moves in a linear fashion, from past to future. But 
that's only for objects that exist at sublight speeds. For any phenomena that 
move *at* lightspeed, time stands completely still. A photon that left a star 
from the Andromeda galaxy 2.2 million years ago notes *no* passage of time 
whatsoever. 
Ain't that wild?
I don't think any current theories allow for us to travel back in time, only 
forward, or not be affected by it at all.

- Original Message -
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 8:08:55 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions







 





  Yeah, the video is confusing in this regard and at points was 
off (albeit stylistically cool), but you're right.

I still don't think time is linear, however. :)
~ Where love and magic meet ~


http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html


Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath





On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:






















If time were linear (a line), it'd be one dimension. A true line is one 
dimensional, a plane (like a sheet of paper), would be two dimensional, of 
course the cube is three, and then the concept of spacetime is associated with 
four by some



Speaking of time, there's a new book out I've heard about where one of the 
physicists working on the new supercollider in Europe tries to explain 
Relativity in an easy-to-understand method.  It's called Why Does E=mc2? And 
Why Should We Care? The concept of time is discussed, including why it's truly 
relative (depending on one's frame of reference only) and why it flows in only 
one direction, at least for those of use with mass.  I listen to a program 
called Think, from KERA in Dallas. The book's author, Brian Cox, did an 
hourlong interview recently that was pretty good. You can find the interview 
here: 



http://www.kera.org/audio/think.php 
Einstein's Theory of Relativity



[2009-08-12 13:00:00] Is Einstein's theory of relativity too complex
for the average Joe to comprehend, or just waiting for the right
teacher? We'll discuss common misconceptions about relativity this hour
with Brian Cox, particle physicist and co-author of the new book Why
Does E=MC2 And Why Should We Care? (DaCapo, 2009).


Here's a link to a review of the book. I plan to pick it up soon:  

http://www.powells.com/biblio/9780306817588






- Original Message -
From: Adrianne Brennan adrianne.bren...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 10:27:43 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Visualizing Up To Ten Dimensions







 





  Observed time isn't a dimension, though. And if it's in a 
line, it should be two dimensions as a line's two dimensional.


~ Where love and magic meet ~




http://www.adriannebrennan.com
Experience the magic of Blood of the Dark Moon:  
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/botdm.html




Take a bite out of Blood and Mint Chocolates: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/bamc.html
Dare to take The Oath in this erotic fantasy series: 
http://www.adriannebrennan.com/books.html#the_oath







On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Omari Confer clockwork...@gmail.com wrote:












RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

I'll keep an eye out for those also, and thanks for the recommends!

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: daikaij...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:49:18 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  BTW I highly recommend the other two movies in the Vengeance 
Trilogy, Sympathy For Mr. Vengeance and Lady Vengeance. They all have something 
epic about them and it's great to see Chan Wook Park's growth as a filmmaker. 



I really suggest watching them in order if you have a chance. They all stand 
alone but it's intersting to see the callbacks and references to Mr. Vengeance 
and Oldboy in Lady Vengeance.



He also has two other films that are worth a look. JSA is a murder mystery set 
in the DMZ between North and South Korea. I'm A Cyborg But That's OK is a 
quirky drama about a young woman in a mental hospital. It wasn't my cup of tea 
but my wife really liked it.



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter truthseeker...@... wrote:



 

 Keith, the good things about Oldboy are more than due. Seeing the movie 
 named in previous posts this morning made me go over the scenes in my head, 
 as best I can remember them, and I'm feeling the thrill of it anew. Haven't 
 found it yet in my travels but, when I do, it's mine.

 

 If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
 hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik

 

 

 

 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 From: keithbjohn...@...

 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:16:09 +

 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   

 I've heard good things about Old Boy, and lots of conversation about the 
 rumored version starring Will Smith.

 

 - Original Message -

 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:45:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   Ok, I will post a review. :) But if she is having 
 nightmares about shrimp I can tell you now that she won't be able to handle 
 Thirst. 

 

 Some of the images in Old boy was pretty graphic. I didn't bring it up 
 because there isn't any scifi in it. It is an interesting story though. A guy 
 gets snatched off of the street and imprisoned for 15 years in a small hotel 
 looking room. One day he is given 7 days to figure out why he was placed 
 there. Cool movie. It would have never been produced in Hollywood.

 

 

 

 On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Let us know how it is, please. After my wife seeing District 9--a feat I 
 pulled off only because she had *no* clue of what it would be like--I can't 
 sneak in Thirst. She had nightmares about shrimp jumping off a dinner plate 
 and menacing her--no fooling!

 

 

 

 - Original Message -

 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@...

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

 

 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:56:40 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern

 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

   I saw the trailer for Thirst. It looks good. I saw the 
 movie Old boy and was blown away by several scenes and the twisted ass plot. 
 I am looking forward to the movie because the director is known for making 
 good dark, and twisted films. 

 

 

 

 

 On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 No surprise about Tarantino's flick. I'm not really motivated to see it 
 though. Anyone seen or heard of the Korean vampire flick Thirst? I've heard 
 some good things about it.

 

 

 I saw District 9 yesterday and loved it. Had two issues: the shaky camera 
 in the first 20 minutes or so, which darn near had me throwing up, and the 
 negative portrayal of the Nigerians (though to be fair, no human in the movie 
 was portrayed well).  The Nigerian thing was a major issue, but overall I 
 really enjoyed the flick. Hope to drop a full review soon...

 

 

 

 *

 http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i91e05ffd5e045bf1badc73eee3940fce

 

 

 

 Quentin Tarantino's World War II actioner Inglourious Basterds, a pivotal 

 Weinstein Co. release starring Brad Pitt, debuted gloriously during the 
 weekend 

 with an estimated $37.6 million in chart-topping 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Well stated, my friend And, as for the last statement, brand it another triumph 
for American logic. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:26:51 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
For example, look at how men talked and acted just a century or so ago here. 
There's lots of talk about Abraham Lincoln being a closet gay because he slept 
in the same bed with a man who was a very good friend of his. Don't know about 
that, but back then, men sleeping in the same bed wasn't considered to be all 
that unusual in many circumstances. You're on the road, rooms are expensive, 
money's tight--you share a bed. Heck, I can recall even seeing old shows like 
The Three Stooges or Laurel and Hardy where men shared a bed because of 
funds and availability, and as a child, it *never* occurred to me that 
something was untoward. Back then, the humor in the scene was simply two dudes 
sharing a little
bed, maybe one snoring and moving around too much for the other to
sleep, but that was it. Nowadays, however, such scenes are fraught with 
suggestion, and usually played for jokes that all center around the men 
nervously proclaiming I'm not gay, i'm not enjoying this! to each other. 

Read letters from some men from the Civil War and Revolutionary War period. 
You'll see men say about their fellows, things like My heart races when he 
enters a room, so full of confidence is he, or, My love for you, dear fellow, 
is unbounded by anything, so much joy have you brought to me. These are 
usually men who are married with children. Now, were they on the downlow? I 
don't think so: passions like that were simply more openly expressed, and there 
wasn't the stigma of being perceived as gay so quickly. But let a man make a 
statement like that nowadays, and think anyone would just toss it off as 
normal? Doubtful.

Look at all the countries in the world where men kissing each other on the 
checks is normal, where really warm embraces are nothing unusual. There are 
Middle Eastern and African countries where men hold hands in public, and it's 
considered to be absolutely fine. But not in America.

Some of this I think is the difference in relationships between men and women. 
For most of recorded time, women have been seen as wives, mothers, and, sadly, 
all but servants in some countries. They're there to provide services, have 
kids, keep the house. But for most countries in most times, men haven't really 
been taught to see women as equals and real friends. They don't seek their 
advice in affairs of state, business, or war. In so many countries today, men 
don't hang out with women after dinner to chat about the world; rather, they 
retreat to hang with the fellows.  That real bonding was left for men, who were 
out hunting, killing, building, and politicking together. So there seemed to be 
a bigger emphasis on that strong bond between men that was seen as normal.  And 
I think some of the affection that could have gone to a woman who was respected 
as a friend as well as a mate, went to the men instead.

Nowadays--in America at least--women have gained in respect and position. More 
men see women as equals, more men like me confide in our wives, seek out their 
advice in all things. Hell, if I were Prez, you can damn well bet my wife would 
be advising me on everything from healthcare to military policy!  Not sure of 
all the reasons, but in the last century there's been a major shift in how 
sexuality is viewed in that way. What was once normal or amusing is now curious 
and suggestive.  I even think of Morris Day: back in the day, he was just a bit 
of a dandy. now people say, Is Morris Day gay?

and even guys who are gay now like to play up their behaviour. Shows like Will 
and Grace, Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, America's Top Model all 
showcase men who are extremely stereotyped in their mannerisms.

So, my long-winded feeling is that, even if Vincent isn't gay, the way he's 
acting, people will perceive him as such. When he waves his hands and says I'm 
NOT going to be offended you didn't ask me to do your wedding cake! one 
wonders, and I can't believe that's an accidental thing. The truth is most 
Americans nowadays will thing gay.


- Original Message -
From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:13:53 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  
Yeah, but back in the day that wasn't always taken as gay. Words like dandy 
were very common, and men of means in many periods were foppish, sniffing their 
snuff, wearing brightly colored clothes, all but swooning when excited or 
tired, etc.
But nowadays that 

RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Agreed. Now, go find somewhere and let out the scream of terror and loathing 
building inside you after having to post that. 

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:48:32 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
Yeah, true. The worst so far for me is the Stride Gum ad that was an episode of 
Smallville. Remember, it was the *terrible* episode that saw the return of 
Pete Ross, the token, underused black character on the show. There was a plant 
that was infusing Green K essence into the gum. Pete would chew a stick and 
then gain stretching powers a la Mr. Fantastic.
Silly show, not just because they brought back Pete to give him another lame 
storyline, not just because it made one ask again how it is that Green K is 
omnipresent in Smallville yet still mostlysecret from the outside world. But 
silly because it was a horrible commercial, horribly writ.

- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:31:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  


Keith, I figure that to be the Product of the Season. One season, we were 
bombarded with Degree ads left and right.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:42:31 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts















 





  
oh, so every single worker there is  a genius? Well, I guess that would make it 
hard to be normal. Wonder why they don't have the same standards for the law 
enforcement? I also wonder why they don't have more security outside of the 
sheriff's office? I mean, one minute Carter's ticketing someone for double 
parking, the next he's trying to close a rupture in spacetime. And those 
uniforms: too Andy Griffith for me.

And speaking of sheriff's accoutrements, have you noticed all the heavy handed 
Subaru in-episode advertising going on? Jo and Fargo kept saying Subaru Model 
 over and over a couple of shows back. the new police cruiser is 
positioned so that the camera lingers over the Subaru decal quite a bit. I 
still find that type of obvious marketing irritating...

- Original Message -
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:02:18 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  To live in Eureka you must have a genius level and a security 
clearance. They never say how many people are regular people but often the 
spouses are not super geniuses. Everyone that lives there works for the 
company. 



On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
wrote:





















good point. 

I guess the question is, how many people in Eureka are geniuses? Even in a 
small town you have a lot of basic services that don't require scientists and 
engineers. I mean, i know they love to show that even the people who collect 
trash or work in sewage plants are geniuses who use high tech devices to do 
their work. But, even if the heads of waste management, water works, HVAC, 
etc., were big brains, would *all* the people who work with and for them be so? 
Just as Jo and Carter, who serve the people, are not geniuses, wouldn't there 
be a decent number of people in jobs who are just normal in intelligence? I 
know there was one dry cleaner--a brief love interest for Carter--who had some 
kind of high tech cleaning system. But if she needed a couple of workers to 
help her with the clothes, would they have to be geniuses too? Are all the 
assistants at pizza parlors, doughnut shops, flower shops, HVAC repair, the 
movie theatre, etc., big brains? Is every janitor at GD--and I see alot of 
them, slinging those buckets and mops, 'cause they're almost like Star Trek 
redshirts in being used for cannon fodder--brilliant?



- Original Message -
From: Tracey de Morsella tdli...@multiculturaladvantage.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 11:58:48 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Eureka Thoughts







 





  








Actually, I do not think that her being a normal teen is necessarily
more interesting.  I had a problem with them making her a genius for the
purpose of ridiculing her father or to create conflict between them.  I liked
the conflict they had between them fine before they mucked it up.  


 


Why I am okay 

RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong

2009-08-25 Thread Martin Baxter

Loved it. Would have the DVD collection now, if not for a lack of money. Just 
saw it at the Best Buy near my house.

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik




To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: keithbjohn...@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:36:51 +
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong















 





  
did you like Karen Sisco, Martin?

- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter truthseeker...@hotmail.com
To: SciFiNoir2 scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: RE: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds 
Strong







 





  


rave, those fantastic gams were on display a few times and, to be honest, they 
couldn't flash them too much. Any more exposure, and menfolk might miss out on 
a thing or three.

Like the rest of the story...

If all the world's a stage and all the people merely players, who in bloody 
hell hired the director? -- Charles L Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
From: ravena...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:41:14 +
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong















 





  While Stay Cool, is a decidedly inferior film to Get 
Shorty, my friends and I have had hours of fun quoting lines from that movie: 
Don't give me no damn gun! You know what I'm gonna do with it!  

Stop hatin', start participatin'. Come on, twinkle twinkle, baby, twinkle 
twinkle. Wanna take a shot at me kid? Do it. We often do the call and response 
Dabu (head nod) Player! (with attitude) and Vince Vaughn (and Dwayne (the 
Rock) Johnson's performances are a hoot!



And, of course, there is Sin LaSalle's soliloquy:

Have you lost your mind? I mean, how is it that you can disrespect a mans 
ethnicity when you know we've influenced nearly every facet of white America... 
from our music to our style of dress. Not to mention your basic imitation of 
our sense of cool; walk, talk, dress, mannerisms... we enrich your very 
existence, all the while contributing to the gross national product through our 
achievements in corporate America. It's these conceits that comfort me when I 
am faced with the ignorant, cowardly, bitter and bigoted, who *have* no talent, 
no guts? people like you who desecrate things they don't understand when the 
truth is - you should say thank-you, man? and go on about your way. But 
apparently you are incapable of doing that! So...[shoots his gun] 



I HATED Karen Sisco precisely because the gorgeous Carla Gugino elected to 
play a real female federal agent who in man pants, oversized jackets and caps 
pulled down on her head was, yes, cool and tough, but, alas, decidedly NOT 
sexy.  What a waste of Gugino's fabulous gams! 



~(no)rave! 



--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:



 Interesting. I haven't seen Jackie Brown yet, but it's on my list. It's one 
 of those where I keep coming halfway into it on cable. I don't think Pam 
 Grier disrobes anymore for movie roles. Speaking of the other films, I never 
 saw Get Shorty, but had the misfortune of seeing Be Cool, which i found 
 really labored and boring. 

 

 As for other stuff based on Elmore's books, I *loved* Out of Sight, 
 probably one of--if not the best--movies in which Jennifer Lopez has starred. 
 The cool and easygoing direction of Soderbergh meshed well with Lopez and 
 Clooney. And you know what I really loved? The TV series Karen Sisco, based 
 on Out of Sight. Carla Gugino was perfect in that role as a cool, sexy, 
 tough lady. I think that type of role suits her best. Add Danny Devito, Bill 
 Duke, and Robert Forster as her father, and the cast was perfect. It had the 
 mix of danger, fun, and coolness that Burn Notice is often credited for, 
 but did it years earlier. 

 

 My wife and I loved the series and were really upset when it was canceled. 

 

 

 - Original Message - 

 From: ravenadal ravena...@... 

 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 

 Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:43:17 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 

 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Basterds Take Box Office,District 9 Holds Strong 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 It was not well received. It only did $39 million at the box office (on the 
 other hand, it only cost $12 mil). I first saw it at an art house with a 
 bunch of Taratino fan boys who hated it because it wasn't Pulp Fiction 2. 
 What it is is another Leonard Elmore book to film adaptation, more in line 
 with Get Shorty and Be Cool than Pulp Fiction. Jackie Brown is full 
 of great performances from the likes of Robert DeNiro (hilariously 
 dim-witted), Samuel L. Jackson (who slowly morphs into Mephistopheles), 
 Bridget Fonda, Michael