Re: [scifinoir2] Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crim

2010-08-27 Thread Martin Baxter
Neither can I.

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Good question. I think that it was probably around for a few years. They
 were hinting at stuff like this for a while. They have been doing a lot of
 precog type software work, as well as interesting AI / psychosis research.
 The story itself is pretty old.

  I remember reading the requirements for a major at San Francisco State a
 while back that was a psychology / computer science/ engineering degree.
 (Finish it and you would have a MA in all 3.) There were a couple of others.
 The only job that I could think of for that combination had to be AI
 research.



 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 I wonder how long this has been around without us knowing it...


 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.comwrote:



  Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crime

 By Boyce Watkins, 
 PhDhttp://www.bvblackspin.com/bloggers/boyce-watkins-phd/ on
 Aug 25th 2010 1:16PM
 Filed under: News http://www.bvblackspin.com/category/news/, 
 Politicshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/politics/
 , Race and Civil 
 Rightshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/race-and-civil-rights/

 Comments 
 (5)http://www.bvblackspin.com/2010/08/25/software-will-be-used-to-predict-who-will-commit-crime/?omcamp=EMC-CVNL#commentsInline
  Print
  [image: The real Minority Report: U.S. police trial computer software
 that The real minority report: U.S. police software predicts who is most
 likely to commit crime]

 It is being reported that law enforcement officials in Washington, D.C.,
 plan to use a new computer program that claims to be able to predict which
 citizens are most likely to commit crime. The concept conjures up images of
 the *Tom Cruise* film *Minority Report*, where agents were able to
 predict pre-crime: crime that hasn't happened yet and is set to occur. But
 far from science fiction, this program is actually based on reality.

 The program was developed by *Richard Berk*, a professor at *The
 University of Pennsylvania*. The first version of the program was used
 to predict future murders among parolees, but it is being argued that the
 software can be used for all kinds of crime.

 When a person goes on probation or parole they are supervised by an
 officer. The question that officer has to answer is 'what level of
 supervision do you provide?' Berk told* ABC News*.

 The program could have real implications, including determining the
 amount of a person's bail or how long they are to remain in a halfway house
 upon their release from prison. The program works by using a large database
 of crimes and other factors, including geographic location, age, prior
 offenses and the criminal record of the person being considered.

 This is not the only kind of technology used to predict crime. Some
 departments actually use brain scanners to predict someone's intentions
 before they act. Apparently, changes in brain chemistry can communicate
 hostility toward the person being discussed by the possible offender.

 All of this seems to represent a very interesting brave new world. I am
 not sure what to think about the use of computer algorithms to categorize
 people based on the likelihood of deviant behavior. I can say that judges
 have, for centuries, used ad hoc measures to determine the length of a
 sentence and level of bail for inmates. Also, parole boards use their own
 predictors to decide if a person should be released from prison or not. It
 seems that computer programs are simply the next step. While I am disturbed
 by these programs, their presence seems almost inevitable.

 One also can't deny the influence of race in these kinds of decisions.
 While I am sure the program doesn't use race as an explicit variable in its
 calculations, there are several factors highly correlated with race that
 could also be used in such a program, such as income, geographic location or
 education level. I am hopeful that the*American Civil Liberties Union* 
 (ACLU)
 will keep an eye on how such programs are used.

 While the use of this program can certainly be criticized, there is also
 the truth that there are some occasions when one can see prison in the
 pipeline for a misguided young person. I once told a friend of mine that if
 she didn't intervene more deeply in to her son's life, he would end up in
 the penitentiary, since prison beds are kept nice and warm for uneducated
 black boys who have nothing to do. I knew then that based upon his location
 in his city, there were far too many ways for him to get in to trouble with
 his friends. Two years later, he was in jail for his first offense, and he
 was in prison shortly thereafter.

 So, most of us must admit that there are ways to predict who among us
 might be most at risk. The question is what we choose to do with that
 information: Do we use it to simply protect the rich from the poor, or do we
 use it to help that 

[scifinoir2] Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crim

2010-08-26 Thread Mr. Worf
Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crime

By Boyce Watkins,
PhDhttp://www.bvblackspin.com/bloggers/boyce-watkins-phd/ on
Aug 25th 2010 1:16PM
Filed under: News http://www.bvblackspin.com/category/news/,
Politicshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/politics/
, Race and Civil
Rightshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/race-and-civil-rights/

Comments 
(5)http://www.bvblackspin.com/2010/08/25/software-will-be-used-to-predict-who-will-commit-crime/?omcamp=EMC-CVNL#commentsInline
Print
[image: The real Minority Report: U.S. police trial computer software that
The real minority report: U.S. police software predicts who is most likely
to commit crime]

It is being reported that law enforcement officials in Washington, D.C.,
plan to use a new computer program that claims to be able to predict which
citizens are most likely to commit crime. The concept conjures up images of
the *Tom Cruise* film *Minority Report*, where agents were able to predict
pre-crime: crime that hasn't happened yet and is set to occur. But far
from science fiction, this program is actually based on reality.

The program was developed by *Richard Berk*, a professor at *The University
of Pennsylvania*. The first version of the program was used to predict
future murders among parolees, but it is being argued that the software can
be used for all kinds of crime.

When a person goes on probation or parole they are supervised by an
officer. The question that officer has to answer is 'what level of
supervision do you provide?' Berk told* ABC News*.

The program could have real implications, including determining the amount
of a person's bail or how long they are to remain in a halfway house upon
their release from prison. The program works by using a large database of
crimes and other factors, including geographic location, age, prior offenses
and the criminal record of the person being considered.

This is not the only kind of technology used to predict crime. Some
departments actually use brain scanners to predict someone's intentions
before they act. Apparently, changes in brain chemistry can communicate
hostility toward the person being discussed by the possible offender.

All of this seems to represent a very interesting brave new world. I am not
sure what to think about the use of computer algorithms to categorize people
based on the likelihood of deviant behavior. I can say that judges have, for
centuries, used ad hoc measures to determine the length of a sentence and
level of bail for inmates. Also, parole boards use their own predictors to
decide if a person should be released from prison or not. It seems that
computer programs are simply the next step. While I am disturbed by these
programs, their presence seems almost inevitable.

One also can't deny the influence of race in these kinds of decisions. While
I am sure the program doesn't use race as an explicit variable in its
calculations, there are several factors highly correlated with race that
could also be used in such a program, such as income, geographic location or
education level. I am hopeful that the*American Civil Liberties Union* (ACLU)
will keep an eye on how such programs are used.

While the use of this program can certainly be criticized, there is also the
truth that there are some occasions when one can see prison in the pipeline
for a misguided young person. I once told a friend of mine that if she
didn't intervene more deeply in to her son's life, he would end up in the
penitentiary, since prison beds are kept nice and warm for uneducated black
boys who have nothing to do. I knew then that based upon his location in his
city, there were far too many ways for him to get in to trouble with his
friends. Two years later, he was in jail for his first offense, and he was
in prison shortly thereafter.

So, most of us must admit that there are ways to predict who among us might
be most at risk. The question is what we choose to do with that information:
Do we use it to simply protect the rich from the poor, or do we use it to
help that person before it's too late? Perhaps the ACLU, *NAACP* and other
concerned parties should access this information as much as the police.


Re: [scifinoir2] Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crim

2010-08-26 Thread Martin Baxter
I wonder how long this has been around without us knowing it...

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



  Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crime

 By Boyce Watkins, PhDhttp://www.bvblackspin.com/bloggers/boyce-watkins-phd/ 
 on
 Aug 25th 2010 1:16PM
 Filed under: News http://www.bvblackspin.com/category/news/, 
 Politicshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/politics/
 , Race and Civil 
 Rightshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/race-and-civil-rights/

 Comments 
 (5)http://www.bvblackspin.com/2010/08/25/software-will-be-used-to-predict-who-will-commit-crime/?omcamp=EMC-CVNL#commentsInline
  Print
  [image: The real Minority Report: U.S. police trial computer software
 that The real minority report: U.S. police software predicts who is most
 likely to commit crime]

 It is being reported that law enforcement officials in Washington, D.C.,
 plan to use a new computer program that claims to be able to predict which
 citizens are most likely to commit crime. The concept conjures up images of
 the *Tom Cruise* film *Minority Report*, where agents were able to
 predict pre-crime: crime that hasn't happened yet and is set to occur. But
 far from science fiction, this program is actually based on reality.

 The program was developed by *Richard Berk*, a professor at *The
 University of Pennsylvania*. The first version of the program was used to
 predict future murders among parolees, but it is being argued that the
 software can be used for all kinds of crime.

 When a person goes on probation or parole they are supervised by an
 officer. The question that officer has to answer is 'what level of
 supervision do you provide?' Berk told* ABC News*.

 The program could have real implications, including determining the amount
 of a person's bail or how long they are to remain in a halfway house upon
 their release from prison. The program works by using a large database of
 crimes and other factors, including geographic location, age, prior offenses
 and the criminal record of the person being considered.

 This is not the only kind of technology used to predict crime. Some
 departments actually use brain scanners to predict someone's intentions
 before they act. Apparently, changes in brain chemistry can communicate
 hostility toward the person being discussed by the possible offender.

 All of this seems to represent a very interesting brave new world. I am not
 sure what to think about the use of computer algorithms to categorize people
 based on the likelihood of deviant behavior. I can say that judges have, for
 centuries, used ad hoc measures to determine the length of a sentence and
 level of bail for inmates. Also, parole boards use their own predictors to
 decide if a person should be released from prison or not. It seems that
 computer programs are simply the next step. While I am disturbed by these
 programs, their presence seems almost inevitable.

 One also can't deny the influence of race in these kinds of decisions.
 While I am sure the program doesn't use race as an explicit variable in its
 calculations, there are several factors highly correlated with race that
 could also be used in such a program, such as income, geographic location or
 education level. I am hopeful that the*American Civil Liberties Union* (ACLU)
 will keep an eye on how such programs are used.

 While the use of this program can certainly be criticized, there is also
 the truth that there are some occasions when one can see prison in the
 pipeline for a misguided young person. I once told a friend of mine that if
 she didn't intervene more deeply in to her son's life, he would end up in
 the penitentiary, since prison beds are kept nice and warm for uneducated
 black boys who have nothing to do. I knew then that based upon his location
 in his city, there were far too many ways for him to get in to trouble with
 his friends. Two years later, he was in jail for his first offense, and he
 was in prison shortly thereafter.

 So, most of us must admit that there are ways to predict who among us might
 be most at risk. The question is what we choose to do with that information:
 Do we use it to simply protect the rich from the poor, or do we use it to
 help that person before it's too late? Perhaps the ACLU, *NAACP* and other
 concerned parties should access this information as much as the police.

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crim

2010-08-26 Thread Mr. Worf
Good question. I think that it was probably around for a few years. They
were hinting at stuff like this for a while. They have been doing a lot of
precog type software work, as well as interesting AI / psychosis research.
The story itself is pretty old.

 I remember reading the requirements for a major at San Francisco State a
while back that was a psychology / computer science/ engineering degree.
(Finish it and you would have a MA in all 3.) There were a couple of others.
The only job that I could think of for that combination had to be AI
research.



On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 I wonder how long this has been around without us knowing it...


 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



  Software Predicts Who Will Commit Crime

 By Boyce Watkins, 
 PhDhttp://www.bvblackspin.com/bloggers/boyce-watkins-phd/ on
 Aug 25th 2010 1:16PM
 Filed under: News http://www.bvblackspin.com/category/news/, 
 Politicshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/politics/
 , Race and Civil 
 Rightshttp://www.bvblackspin.com/category/race-and-civil-rights/

 Comments 
 (5)http://www.bvblackspin.com/2010/08/25/software-will-be-used-to-predict-who-will-commit-crime/?omcamp=EMC-CVNL#commentsInline
  Print
  [image: The real Minority Report: U.S. police trial computer software
 that The real minority report: U.S. police software predicts who is most
 likely to commit crime]

 It is being reported that law enforcement officials in Washington, D.C.,
 plan to use a new computer program that claims to be able to predict which
 citizens are most likely to commit crime. The concept conjures up images of
 the *Tom Cruise* film *Minority Report*, where agents were able to
 predict pre-crime: crime that hasn't happened yet and is set to occur. But
 far from science fiction, this program is actually based on reality.

 The program was developed by *Richard Berk*, a professor at *The
 University of Pennsylvania*. The first version of the program was used to
 predict future murders among parolees, but it is being argued that the
 software can be used for all kinds of crime.

 When a person goes on probation or parole they are supervised by an
 officer. The question that officer has to answer is 'what level of
 supervision do you provide?' Berk told* ABC News*.

 The program could have real implications, including determining the amount
 of a person's bail or how long they are to remain in a halfway house upon
 their release from prison. The program works by using a large database of
 crimes and other factors, including geographic location, age, prior offenses
 and the criminal record of the person being considered.

 This is not the only kind of technology used to predict crime. Some
 departments actually use brain scanners to predict someone's intentions
 before they act. Apparently, changes in brain chemistry can communicate
 hostility toward the person being discussed by the possible offender.

 All of this seems to represent a very interesting brave new world. I am
 not sure what to think about the use of computer algorithms to categorize
 people based on the likelihood of deviant behavior. I can say that judges
 have, for centuries, used ad hoc measures to determine the length of a
 sentence and level of bail for inmates. Also, parole boards use their own
 predictors to decide if a person should be released from prison or not. It
 seems that computer programs are simply the next step. While I am disturbed
 by these programs, their presence seems almost inevitable.

 One also can't deny the influence of race in these kinds of decisions.
 While I am sure the program doesn't use race as an explicit variable in its
 calculations, there are several factors highly correlated with race that
 could also be used in such a program, such as income, geographic location or
 education level. I am hopeful that the*American Civil Liberties Union* (ACLU)
 will keep an eye on how such programs are used.

 While the use of this program can certainly be criticized, there is also
 the truth that there are some occasions when one can see prison in the
 pipeline for a misguided young person. I once told a friend of mine that if
 she didn't intervene more deeply in to her son's life, he would end up in
 the penitentiary, since prison beds are kept nice and warm for uneducated
 black boys who have nothing to do. I knew then that based upon his location
 in his city, there were far too many ways for him to get in to trouble with
 his friends. Two years later, he was in jail for his first offense, and he
 was in prison shortly thereafter.

 So, most of us must admit that there are ways to predict who among us
 might be most at risk. The question is what we choose to do with that
 information: Do we use it to simply protect the rich from the poor, or do we
 use it to help that person before it's too late? Perhaps the ACLU, *NAACP
 * and other concerned parties should access this