[Scons-dev] README in repository

2012-10-09 Thread Russel Winder
I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to

a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown

I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
markup compared to ReStructured Text. On the other hand Markdown is very
Ruby, GitHub, whilst ReStructured Text is very Python.

Why the change? So that the read me file look reasonable on the
BitBucket page.

I can do the markup once a decision is made so there is no need for
anything other than a decision.

-- 
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder  t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] README in repository

2012-10-09 Thread Managan, Rob
On a related note, we need to update the information on setting environment 
variables for testing. I am not sure which shell uses "setenv MYSCONS=`pwd`" 
format but not any of the ones I use.

From: scons-dev-boun...@scons.org [scons-dev-boun...@scons.org] on behalf of 
Russel Winder [rus...@winder.org.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:22 AM
To: SCons_Developers
Subject: [Scons-dev] README in repository

I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to

a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown

I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
markup compared to ReStructured Text. On the other hand Markdown is very
Ruby, GitHub, whilst ReStructured Text is very Python.

Why the change? So that the read me file look reasonable on the
BitBucket page.

I can do the markup once a decision is made so there is no need for
anything other than a decision.

--
Russel.
=
Dr Russel Winder  t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] README in repository

2012-10-09 Thread William Deegan
Russel,


On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Russel Winder  wrote:

> I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
> the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to
> 
> a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
> b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown
> 
> I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
> markup compared to ReStructured Text. On the other hand Markdown is very
> Ruby, GitHub, whilst ReStructured Text is very Python.
> 
> Why the change? So that the read me file look reasonable on the
> BitBucket page.
> 
> I can do the markup once a decision is made so there is no need for
> anything other than a decision.

I vote for .rst  (mainly because I'm already using it on a number of other 
projects and it's python'y)

-Bill
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev


Re: [Scons-dev] README in repository

2012-10-09 Thread Dirk Bächle

Hi guys,

On 09.10.2012 19:39, William Deegan wrote:

Russel,


On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Russel Winder  wrote:


I think we have to take a vote on whether to switch the read me file at
the top of the repository hierarchy from plain text to

a) ReStructured Text, README.rst
b) Markdown, README.md or README.markdown

I have a slight preference fro Markdown due to the way it handles header
markup compared to ReStructured Text. On the other hand Markdown is very
Ruby, GitHub, whilst ReStructured Text is very Python.

Why the change? So that the read me file look reasonable on the
BitBucket page.

I can do the markup once a decision is made so there is no need for
anything other than a decision.

I vote for .rst  (mainly because I'm already using it on a number of other 
projects and it's python'y)


+1 from me for reST (*.rst). I use it quite a lot recently...at home as 
well as at work.



Dirk




-Bill
___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev



___
Scons-dev mailing list
Scons-dev@scons.org
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev