[VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-09 Thread Norman Maurer
Hi there,

its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
need the new mailbox api changes.

This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.

Changes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29

Please review and cast your vote:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/

[ ] +1 Go ahead
[ ] +0 No time to review
[ ] -1 Something wrong with it

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-09 Thread Norman Maurer
[ x ] +1 Go ahead

Bye,
Norman

2011/6/9 Norman Maurer :
> Hi there,
>
> its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
> need the new mailbox api changes.
>
> This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.
>
> Changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29
>
> Please review and cast your vote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/
>
> [ ] +1 Go ahead
> [ ] +0 No time to review
> [ ] -1 Something wrong with it
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-09 Thread Stefano Bagnara
2011/6/9 Norman Maurer :
> Hi there,
>
> its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
> need the new mailbox api changes.
>
> This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.
>
> Changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29

In a x.y.z versioning I think we should increase "y" when adding new
features. "z" should be used for minor bug fixes.
So, given this includes new features I think 0.3 would have better
explained this (and also we should no fear increasing numbers as we
still are at 0.2 with a project that is not so "alpha" as the version
number expectation).

> Please review and cast your vote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/

[X] +1 Go ahead

Versioning is not blocking for me, but I think it would be better to
follow some established convention for version numbers, in future.

Stefano

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-09 Thread Norman Maurer
well I thought lowrisk features could go to .z . at least thats what
others do too.

But Im not strong on this.

bye
Norman

Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011 schrieb Stefano Bagnara :
> 2011/6/9 Norman Maurer :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
>> need the new mailbox api changes.
>>
>> This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.
>>
>> Changes:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29
>
> In a x.y.z versioning I think we should increase "y" when adding new
> features. "z" should be used for minor bug fixes.
> So, given this includes new features I think 0.3 would have better
> explained this (and also we should no fear increasing numbers as we
> still are at 0.2 with a project that is not so "alpha" as the version
> number expectation).
>
>> Please review and cast your vote:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/
>
> [X] +1 Go ahead
>
> Versioning is not blocking for me, but I think it would be better to
> follow some established convention for version numbers, in future.
>
> Stefano
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-11 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Norman Maurer
 wrote:



> [X] +1 Go ahead
> [ ] +0 No time to review
> [ ] -1 Something wrong with it

(there are still a few small issues but no blockers for me)

Robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-11 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Norman Maurer
 wrote:
> well I thought lowrisk features could go to .z . at least thats what
> others do too.

(Reserving point releases (.z) for bug fixes allows downstreams to
easily take just these fixes but means that minor release (.x.)
increments vary in impact)

> But Im not strong on this.

+1

Just needs to be documented

Robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-12 Thread Eric Charles

[x] +1 Go ahead
- Eric

On 09/06/11 18:44, Norman Maurer wrote:

Hi there,

its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
need the new mailbox api changes.

This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.

Changes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29

Please review and cast your vote:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/

[ ] +1 Go ahead
[ ] +0 No time to review
[ ] -1 Something wrong with it

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



[RESULT]: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-12 Thread Norman Maurer
hi there,

the VOTE passed.
+1 stefano, robert, eric, norman

I will push the artifacts to maven central.

thanks,
Norman


Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011 schrieb Eric Charles :
> [x] +1 Go ahead
> - Eric
>
> On 09/06/11 18:44, Norman Maurer wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
> need the new mailbox api changes.
>
> This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.
>
> Changes:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29
>
> Please review and cast your vote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/
>
> [ ] +1 Go ahead
> [ ] +0 No time to review
> [ ] -1 Something wrong with it
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache James IMAP 0.2.1

2011-06-12 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
[x] +1 Go ahead

Vincenzo

2011/6/12 Eric Charles 

> [x] +1 Go ahead
> - Eric
>
>
> On 09/06/11 18:44, Norman Maurer wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> its time again for the next IMAP release before we move forward and
>> need the new mailbox api changes.
>>
>> This release does not need any api changes from the 0.2 release.
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&jqlQuery=project+%3D+IMAP+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%220.3%22+AND+resolution+in+%28Fixed%2C+%22Won%27t+Fix%22%2C+Duplicate%2C+Invalid%2C+Incomplete%2C+%22Cannot+Reproduce%22%2C+Later%2C+%22Not+A+Problem%22%29
>>
>> Please review and cast your vote:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-062/
>>
>> [ ] +1 Go ahead
>> [ ] +0 No time to review
>> [ ] -1 Something wrong with it
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>
>