Re: [VOTE] Apply JAMES-358 patch (singleIPperMX option)
+1 (if not default) from me. Vincenzo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Apply JAMES-358 patch (singleIPperMX option)
+1 But not as default. bye Norman Am Freitag, den 14.07.2006, 16:51 +0200 schrieb Søren Hilmer: > +1 (but It should not be a default, the current behaviour is like the RFC > says, and our default should mirror that) > --Søren > > On Friday 14 July 2006 16:14, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > I'm sorry for another vote today, but I found the time only today to > > collect enough informations to proceed. > > > > The vote is to apply the patch attached to > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358 > > (Ok, i will fix tabs to spaces if this get a +1) > > > > Vincenzo, Bernd, Norman and I already agreed we should apply it, but > > Noel expressed in a comment "I disagree with this patch..." and maybe > > even Danny had something to say. > > > > So I decided for a vote because this is there from too much time. > > > > The patch introduce a new *optional* value for the dnsserver that make > > it to only return a single IP for each MX server (even if it is > > multihomed) when resolving mail servers for a domain. > > > > Without this patch I was unable to send 10 mails per day (or similar > > volumes). > > > > As a reference about previous discussions you can read: > > 1) JIRA Comments: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358 > > 2) Thread: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 3) Thread: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Stefano > > > > PS: I even think this should be the default, but this vote is not to > > make it the default, only to add it as an option. > > > > PS2: If you have better ideas for the configuration option name > > "" is not so good, so any better idea is welcome! > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: [VOTE] Apply JAMES-358 patch (singleIPperMX option)
+1 (but It should not be a default, the current behaviour is like the RFC says, and our default should mirror that) --Søren On Friday 14 July 2006 16:14, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > I'm sorry for another vote today, but I found the time only today to > collect enough informations to proceed. > > The vote is to apply the patch attached to > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358 > (Ok, i will fix tabs to spaces if this get a +1) > > Vincenzo, Bernd, Norman and I already agreed we should apply it, but > Noel expressed in a comment "I disagree with this patch..." and maybe > even Danny had something to say. > > So I decided for a vote because this is there from too much time. > > The patch introduce a new *optional* value for the dnsserver that make > it to only return a single IP for each MX server (even if it is > multihomed) when resolving mail servers for a domain. > > Without this patch I was unable to send 10 mails per day (or similar > volumes). > > As a reference about previous discussions you can read: > 1) JIRA Comments: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-358 > 2) Thread: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 3) Thread: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Stefano > > PS: I even think this should be the default, but this vote is not to > make it the default, only to add it as an option. > > PS2: If you have better ideas for the configuration option name > "" is not so good, so any better idea is welcome! > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt. wideTrail Phone: +45 25481225 Pilevænget 41 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DK-8961 Allingåbro Web:www.widetrail.dk - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
