Re: [Server-devel] xs-activation-server over IPv6

2009-02-14 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/2/14 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
 Later. 0.5.2 or 0.6. If you need it in a formal release, let me know
 and I'll see about building a 0.5.2

That would be very useful if you could do that within the next week...
also if you could include my xs-activity-server patches?
We will be deploying 10 servers very soon so this will greatly reduce
the amount of work we have to do on each one..

Thanks,
Daniel
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-activation-server over IPv6

2009-02-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
 2009/2/14 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
 Later. 0.5.2 or 0.6. If you need it in a formal release, let me know
 and I'll see about building a 0.5.2

 That would be very useful if you could do that within the next week...
 also if you could include my xs-activity-server patches?
 We will be deploying 10 servers very soon so this will greatly reduce
 the amount of work we have to do on each one..

I'll see what I can do ;-) -- got your patches marked for review, I'll
get into that on Monday.

At this stage, my main concern is the openssl-on-586-breaks-yum
problem. That is a showstopper and justifies a 0.5.2 .

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-activation-server over IPv6

2009-02-12 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/2/8 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
 So initially I am going with #1-- do you think you can tweak the
 initrd a bit more to poke at ef01 over mesh, and ef02 over abg?
 Looking at activate.py, adding it to the array in try_network()...

Thanks, done!
New patch at http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9246

Are your XS-side changes included in the latest 0.5.1 release, or is
this scheduled for later?

Thanks!
Daniel
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] xs-activation-server over IPv6

2009-02-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
 Thanks. The modification required is in
 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lanbond0

 change:
IPV6INIT=no
 to
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=fe80::abcd:ef01/64

That is the hardcoded address that the XO tries to reach. I want this
to work on mesh and a/b/g, but the address is link-local, so options:

1 - we can use fe80::abcd:ef01/64 for mshbond0 (which means it works
with old XO builds) and fe80::abcd:ef02/64 (note the 2) for lanbond0

2 - we can assign the same addr to lanbond0 _and_ mshbond0. The kernel
handles it alright, but userland finds it weird. For starters, xinetd
doesn't like the idea.

Even if we can get xinetd to dance, #2 looks fairly fragile, the kind
of thing upstream is going to say even if it's technically possible,
don't do that!.

So initially I am going with #1-- do you think you can tweak the
initrd a bit more to poke at ef01 over mesh, and ef02 over abg?
Looking at activate.py, adding it to the array in try_network()...

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel