Re: [sheepdog] some problem about sheepdog

2014-08-01 Thread Bastian Scholz

Your Host are 10.198.3.141 and 10.198.4.108 and
not in the same IP Subnet. (Are you able to ping
these host among each other at all?)

Your corosync listen to 192.168.1.1, which seem
to be no local interface on your hosts.

And your sheep processes listen to 127.0.0.1 which
is the loopback interface.

My advise, put your both hosts in the same IP
subnet, configure corosync to bind to these
Interfaces and if it dosnt work, post the
command you start sheep daemon with...


Cheers

Bastian


Am 2014-08-01 07:03, schrieb gzh1992n:

*Hi*



*Recently, I met some problems in learning sheepdog.*
*I have 2 machines. They information follow:*

*Node1[10.198.3.141]*
 eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FC:48:EF:2E:47:2B
  inet addr:10.198.3.141  Bcast:10.198.3.191  
Mask:255.255.255.192

  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:166041 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:272247 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:81563807 (77.7 MiB)  TX bytes:35527000 (33.8 MiB)

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:489642 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:489642 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:54504426 (51.9 MiB)  TX bytes:54504426 (51.9 MiB)


*Node2[10.198.4.108]*
eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FC:48:EF:2E:69:8B
  inet addr:10.198.4.108  Bcast:10.198.4.127  
Mask:255.255.255.192

  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:113220 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:66017 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:114656591 (109.3 MiB)  TX bytes:18070118 (17.2 MiB)

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:77863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:77863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:9968948 (9.5 MiB)  TX bytes:9968948 (9.5 MiB)



*They are not in the same ethernet switch.The corosync conf follow:*

# Please read the corosync.conf.5 manual page
compatibility: whitetank

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
threads: 0
interface {
ringnumber: 0
bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.1
mcastaddr: 239.255.1.1
mcastport: 5405
ttl: 1
}
}

logging {
fileline: off
to_stderr: no
to_logfile: yes
to_syslog: yes
logfile: /var/log/cluster/corosync.log
debug: off
timestamp: on
logger_subsys {
subsys: AMF
debug: off
}
}

amf {
mode: disabled
}

*Two  confs is same. My issue is that they not in the same cluster.*

*Node1 input  *"dog node list"
Id   Host:Port V-Nodes   Zone
 0   127.0.0.1:7000   64   16777343
Node2 input  "dog node list"
  Id   Host:Port V-Nodes   Zone
  0   127.0.0.1:7000   64   16777343

*Only two nodes in the same **ethernet switch can in the same cluster?*

*help me,please...*



--
sheepdog mailing list
sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog


[sheepdog] some problem about sheepdog

2014-07-31 Thread gzh1992n
*Hi*



*Recently, I met some problems in learning sheepdog.*
*I have 2 machines. They information follow:*

*Node1[10.198.3.141]*
 eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FC:48:EF:2E:47:2B
  inet addr:10.198.3.141  Bcast:10.198.3.191  Mask:255.255.255.192
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:166041 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:272247 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:81563807 (77.7 MiB)  TX bytes:35527000 (33.8 MiB)

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:489642 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:489642 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:54504426 (51.9 MiB)  TX bytes:54504426 (51.9 MiB)


*Node2[10.198.4.108]*
eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FC:48:EF:2E:69:8B
  inet addr:10.198.4.108  Bcast:10.198.4.127  Mask:255.255.255.192
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:113220 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:66017 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:114656591 (109.3 MiB)  TX bytes:18070118 (17.2 MiB)

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:77863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:77863 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:9968948 (9.5 MiB)  TX bytes:9968948 (9.5 MiB)



*They are not in the same ethernet switch.The corosync conf follow:*

# Please read the corosync.conf.5 manual page
compatibility: whitetank

totem {
version: 2
secauth: off
threads: 0
interface {
ringnumber: 0
bindnetaddr: 192.168.1.1
mcastaddr: 239.255.1.1
mcastport: 5405
ttl: 1
}
}

logging {
fileline: off
to_stderr: no
to_logfile: yes
to_syslog: yes
logfile: /var/log/cluster/corosync.log
debug: off
timestamp: on
logger_subsys {
subsys: AMF
debug: off
}
}

amf {
mode: disabled
}

*Two  confs is same. My issue is that they not in the same cluster.*

*Node1 input  *"dog node list"
Id   Host:Port V-Nodes   Zone
 0   127.0.0.1:7000   64   16777343
Node2 input  "dog node list"
  Id   Host:Port V-Nodes   Zone
  0   127.0.0.1:7000   64   16777343

*Only two nodes in the same **ethernet switch can in the same cluster?*

*help me,please...*
-- 
sheepdog mailing list
sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog