[silk] Scientists Gather to Finalize Climate Report

2007-01-29 Thread Udhay Shankar N

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/science/29cnd-heat.html

Scientists Gather to Finalize Climate Report

By JAMES KANTER and ANDREW C. REVKIN
Published: January 29, 2007

PARIS, Jan 29 — Scientists from across the world 
gathered here today to hammer out the final 
details of an authoritative report on climate 
change that is expected to project centuries of 
rising temperatures and sea levels unless curbs 
are placed on emissions of carbon dioxide and 
other gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.


According to scientists involved with writing or 
reviewing the report, the fourth since 1990 from 
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a 
body overseen by the United Nations, it is nearly 
certain to conclude that there is at least a 90 
percent probability that human-caused emissions 
are the main driver of warming since 1950.


The report, according to several authors, who 
spoke only on condition of anonymity saying that 
details could still change, will describe a 
growing body of evidence showing that warming is 
likely to profoundly transform the planet.


Three large sections of the report will be 
forthcoming during the year, with the summary for 
policymakers and sections on basic climate science coming on Friday.


Among findings in recent drafts are that the 
Arctic Ocean could largely be devoid of sea ice 
in summers later in the century; the Alps could 
shift from snowy winter destinations to summer 
havens from the heat; growing seasons in 
temperate regions will expand, while droughts 
will likely further ravage semi-arid regions of Africa and southern Asia.


Concerns about climate change and public 
awareness on the subject are at an all time 
high, the chairman of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, told delegates today.


It would perhaps be no exaggeration to suggest 
that at no time in the past has there been a 
greater global appetite for knowledge on any 
subject as there is today on the scientific facts 
underlying the reality of global climate change, Dr. Pachauri said.


But scientists involved in the effort warned that 
squabbling between teams and representatives from 
governments of more than 100 countries over how 
to portray the most probable amount of sea-level 
rise during the 21st century could distract from 
the basic finding that a warming world will be 
one in which retreating coasts are the new normal for centuries to come.


Jerry Mahlman, an emeritus researcher at the 
National Center For Atmospheric Research in 
Boulder, Colo., who was a reviewer of the 
report’s single-spaced, 1,644-page summary of 
climate science, said that most of the leaks to 
the press so far were from people eager to find 
elements that were the scariest or most reassuring.


He added in an interview yesterday that such 
efforts distract from the basic, undisputed 
findings, saying that those point to trends that are very disturbing.


Mr. Mahlman pointed to recent disclosures that 
there is still uncertainty about the pace at 
which seas will rise due to warming and melting 
of terrestrial ice over the next 100 years. That 
span, he said, was just the start of a process of 
a rise in sea levels that would then almost 
certainly continue for 1,000 years or so.


The latest draft of the IPCC summary highlights 
the hazardous consequences of “business as 
usual,” finding that twice the pre-industrial 
concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere 
will likely warm the climate by between 3.5 
degrees and 8 degrees Fahrenheit, with a greater 
than one-in-ten chance of much higher temperatures.


Even the mid-range projection for warming, 
according to many climate experts and biologists, 
is likely to powerfully stress ecosystems and 
disrupt longstanding climate patterns related to 
water supplies and agriculture.


Many economists and energy experts long ago 
abandoned any expectation that it would be 
possible to avoid a doubling of pre-industrial 
carbon dioxide concentrations given growth of 
human populations, use of fossil fuels, 
particularly coal, and deforestation in the tropics.


As a result, a significant focus of the summary 
coming this week and of other sections of the 
report will be the necessity to boost the 
resilience of agriculture and water supplies to 
inevitable shifts, while trying to slow and, as 
soon as it can be affordably done, reverse the 
century-long climb in releases of the heat-trapping gases.


Many experts involved in the IPCC process said 
there is hope that with a prompt start on slowing 
emissions, the chances of seeing much great 
warmer and widespread disruption of ecosystems and societies can be cut.


Outside experts agreed.

``We basically have three choices - mitigation, 
adaptation, and suffering,” said John Holdren, 
the president of the American Association for the 
Advancement of Science and an energy and climate 
expert at Harvard University. ``We’re going to do 
some of each. The question is what the mix is 
going to be. The more 

[silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Bharat Shetty

Hello all,

Uday asked me to post an intro, so here I go. I'm fortunate to have a name
similar to our beautiful, diverse country of rich cultures, traditions,
heritage and history. The name is Bharat. Currently I work for IBM,
Bangalore. When free from work, I try to divide time between books,
photography and travel.

I blog here: http://colono.livejournal.com/
My site: http://freeshell.in/~codo/

Danke, Uday!. Looking forward to active participation in this mindboggling
list. Amen.

-- Bharat Shetty | http://freeshell.in/~codo

*The greater our knowledge increases the more our ignorance unfolds. - John
F. Kennedy.*


Re: [silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Deepa Mohan

Welcome Bharat, do you pronounce it as Bh-a-rat as in Ram's brother,
or Bh-aa-rat as in the country?

Silk is more mind...er...boggling than you may realize...

How do you know Udhay? I am carefully not asking why you know Udhay

Deepa.

On 1/30/07, Bharat Shetty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello all,

Uday asked me to post an intro, so here I go. I'm fortunate to have a name
similar to our beautiful, diverse country of rich cultures, traditions,
heritage and history. The name is Bharat. Currently I work for IBM,
Bangalore. When free from work, I try to divide time between books,
photography and travel.

I blog here: http://colono.livejournal.com/
My site: http://freeshell.in/~codo/

Danke, Uday!. Looking forward to active participation in this mindboggling
list. Amen.

-- Bharat Shetty | http://freeshell.in/~codo

*The greater our knowledge increases the more our ignorance unfolds. - John
F. Kennedy.*





Re: [silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Bharat Shetty

On 1/30/07, Deepa Mohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Welcome Bharat, do you pronounce it as Bh-a-rat as in Ram's brother,
or Bh-aa-rat as in the country?



Er, please note that I said, my name was *similar* to our country:P. So as
for pronounciation, the first one is more commonly used, although some more
patriotic fellas use the later one :P.

Silk is more mind...er...boggling than you may realize...


Hmm, nice to know.

How do you know Udhay? I am carefully not asking why you know Udhay


I don't know Udhay personally. I just joined this list and thats when Uday
asked me to post an intro. But aside that, I took a peep at
http://silk.arachnis.com/community.html . I've known these guys personally -
Thaths, Jace, Kalyan and Amoghavarsha. I have also heard a great deal of
details about other prominent members in this list, but haven't met them
personally.

Thats it! :-).

Deepa.


On 1/30/07, Bharat Shetty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello all,

 Uday asked me to post an intro, so here I go. I'm fortunate to have a
name
 similar to our beautiful, diverse country of rich cultures, traditions,
 heritage and history. The name is Bharat. Currently I work for IBM,
 Bangalore. When free from work, I try to divide time between books,
 photography and travel.

 I blog here: http://colono.livejournal.com/
 My site: http://freeshell.in/~codo/

 Danke, Uday!. Looking forward to active participation in this
mindboggling
 list. Amen.

 -- Bharat Shetty | http://freeshell.in/~codo

 *The greater our knowledge increases the more our ignorance unfolds. -
John
 F. Kennedy.*




-- Bharat Shetty | http://freeshell.in/~codo

*The only way to have a friend is to be one. - Ralph Waldo Emerson.*


Re: [silk] Charles Haynes introduction

2007-01-29 Thread Biju Chacko

On 29/01/07, Madhu Menon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Charles Haynes wrote:

 http://edgeplay.blogspot.com/ I'll warn you it's mostly about food so
 far, I'm pretty passionate about food and cooking.

Oh good. We could use a few people like that. ;)


Yeah, most of us are just passionate about food and *eating*.

;-)

Welcome Charles! (Chuck? Charlie? Chas? Charles seems so formal -- I
feel like I'm addressing a beheaded English king.)

-- b



Re: [silk] Charles Haynes introduction

2007-01-29 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Biju Chacko wrote [at 10:04 AM 1/30/2007] :


Welcome Charles! (Chuck? Charlie? Chas? Charles seems so formal -- I
feel like I'm addressing a beheaded English king.)


OTOH, try saying Bond. [Jim|Jimbo|Jimmy|Jamie] Bond.

Udhay
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




[silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Shyam Visweswaran
Hello all,

Should have posted this sometime back. Now seeing
the recent intros I better do so.

My name is Shyam and my only connection with
Bangalore is that my Dad was brought up there and
I visited Bangalore and Mysore decades ago when
both were sleepy Malgudi-like towns. I have
puttered around in several disciplines including
medicine, biophysics, and machine learning.
Currently I am in Pittsburgh dividing my time
between neurology and machine learning. I
maintain an alumni website - Jipmer Net - for my
med school in India which is now more than 12
years old now. It is through that website I met
the inimitable Shiv who is a regular here at
silklist.

- Shyam



 

Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html 



Re: [silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Srini RamaKrishnan

Hi,

Welcome to Silk, I am an ex-burgh, ex-bangalore, now in HYD person. 
Where do you spend your day? At school? Work?


Cheeni

Shyam Visweswaran wrote:

Hello all,

Should have posted this sometime back. Now seeing
the recent intros I better do so.

My name is Shyam and my only connection with
Bangalore is that my Dad was brought up there and
I visited Bangalore and Mysore decades ago when
both were sleepy Malgudi-like towns. I have
puttered around in several disciplines including
medicine, biophysics, and machine learning.
Currently I am in Pittsburgh dividing my time
between neurology and machine learning. I
maintain an alumni website - Jipmer Net - for my
med school in India which is now more than 12
years old now. It is through that website I met
the inimitable Shiv who is a regular here at
silklist.

- Shyam








Re: [silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Devdas Bhagat
On 30/01/07 09:42 +0530, Bharat Shetty wrote:
snip
 Thaths, Jace, Kalyan and Amoghavarsha. I have also heard a great deal of
 details about other prominent members in this list, but haven't met them
 personally.
 
You do know quite a few others actually. It's a small world.

Devdas Bhagat



Re: [silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Danese Cooper

Details?  Is Udhay telling tales?

Danese

On Jan 29, 2007, at 9:46 PM, Devdas Bhagat wrote:


On 30/01/07 09:42 +0530, Bharat Shetty wrote:
snip
Thaths, Jace, Kalyan and Amoghavarsha. I have also heard a great  
deal of
details about other prominent members in this list, but haven't  
met them

personally.


You do know quite a few others actually. It's a small world.

Devdas Bhagat






Re: [silk] My intro

2007-01-29 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Danese Cooper wrote [at 11:24 AM 1/30/2007] :


Details?  Is Udhay telling tales?


I can neither confirm nor deny that there might exist lurid tales 
about some people who may or may not be on this list.


Udhay
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




[silk] What to Eat

2007-01-29 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Read the whole thing - it makes for fascinating food (sorry!) for thought.

Udhay

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/28/magazine/28nutritionism.t.html?ei=5090en=a18a7f35515014c7ex=1327640400partner=rssuserlandemc=rsspagewanted=all


Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.

That, more or less, is the short answer to the supposedly incredibly 
complicated and confusing question of what we humans should eat in 
order to be maximally healthy. I hate to give away the game right 
here at the beginning of a long essay, and I confess that I'm tempted 
to complicate matters in the interest of keeping things going for a 
few thousand more words. I'll try to resist but will go ahead and add 
a couple more details to flesh out the advice. Like: A little meat 
won't kill you, though it's better approached as a side dish than as 
a main. And you're much better off eating whole fresh foods than 
processed food products. That's what I mean by the recommendation to 
eat food. Once, food was all you could eat, but today there are 
lots of other edible foodlike substances in the supermarket. These 
novel products of food science often come in packages festooned with 
health claims, which brings me to a related rule of thumb: if you're 
concerned about your health, you should probably avoid food products 
that make health claims. Why? Because a health claim on a food 
product is a good indication that it's not really food, and food is 
what you want to eat.


Uh-oh. Things are suddenly sounding a little more complicated, aren't 
they? Sorry. But that's how it goes as soon as you try to get to the 
bottom of the whole vexing question of food and health. Before long, 
a dense cloud bank of confusion moves in. Sooner or later, everything 
solid you thought you knew about the links between diet and health 
gets blown away in the gust of the latest study.


snip
--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




Re: [silk] test

2007-01-29 Thread Biju Chacko

On 30/01/07, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Enter one cchoice:

1) Pass
2) Fail




3) All of the above  [X]