Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread ashok _
On Dec 10, 2007 8:39 AM, Gautam John wrote:
 I'm currently working with a non-profit and as part of our work we run
 ~400 libraries across Bangalore and many more across the state. We are
 hopeful, if we find sponsors, of putting a computer in each library
 both to manage the library and as a tool for the kids to work/play
 with. As it stands, the computer request includes Windows XP as the OS
 of choice.


If the hardware specifications are recent  (dual core processor, 1 gb
ram etc...) you
could look at a virtualized instance of windows i.e. one that runs as
a virtual machine
within a Ubuntu installation (AFAIK, a windows XP license allows you
to install it on
one desktop and also another instance as a virtual machine...)... VmWare player
is free (http://www.vmware.com/player)...

To manage  libraries there is an excellent opensource library management system
called Koha (http://www.koha.org/).

Basically the virtual windows instance means that even if the virtual
windows gets hit by
viruses, malware etc.. you can simply delete the virtual windows,  and
copy a backed up
instance of the virtual machine and have it up and running again
instantly.  Much much
easier to manage than having to invest in antivirus and re-installing
windows etc...

 On the other hand, I have been using Ubuntu for a while now and am
 happy with it and the philosophy behind it. However, it's difficult to
 translate this into a meaningful argument for a project of this scale.
 As far as I can tell there is the price/support argument and the
 philosophy, which matters less than I might expect.




Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
One fat (comparatively fat at least) box running xp, and multiple thin
clients running citrix winframe or similar. Or hell, wyse terminals running
X windows.

srs





Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Gautam John
Thank you, all, for the suggestions.

As it stands, we will install one computer per library and if BSNL get
their act together, each one will have an Internet connection.
However, the latter is not a given.

Amongst the suggestions, a common thread, barring Eugen, is ways and
methods to 'secure' XP. Surely Ubuntu would be a better bet? I was
rather hoping for arguments that I could use in favour of that. But, I
suppose, freedom of choice would mean giving the end user the ability
to use XP or Ubuntu. Though I'm not sure we have the resources to
maintain both.

Cheers!

-Gautam



Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Ramakrishnan Sundaram
Gautam John said the following on 10/12/2007 12:35:

 their act together, each one will have an Internet connection.
 However, the latter is not a given.
...
 suppose, freedom of choice would mean giving the end user the ability
 to use XP or Ubuntu. Though I'm not sure we have the resources to
 maintain both.

If internet access is not a given, what are the computers going to be
used for? Do you have any apps in mind? Edubuntu comes bundled with
several apps - XP does not. Would that itself be a deciding factor?

Ram



Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Kiran Jonnalagadda

On 10-Dec-07, at 2:05 PM, Gautam John wrote:


Amongst the suggestions, a common thread, barring Eugen, is ways and
methods to 'secure' XP. Surely Ubuntu would be a better bet? I was
rather hoping for arguments that I could use in favour of that. But, I
suppose, freedom of choice would mean giving the end user the ability
to use XP or Ubuntu. Though I'm not sure we have the resources to
maintain both.


What are the arguments against non-Windows setups? I'd say the choice  
between Ubuntu, Kubuntu and Edubuntu would be a fair one.





Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Gautam John
On Dec 10, 2007 2:16 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If internet access is not a given, what are the computers going to be
 used for? Do you have any apps in mind? Edubuntu comes bundled with
 several apps - XP does not. Would that itself be a deciding factor?

A primary purpose is to maintain a roster of books and track what's
being read etc. Assuming internet access, we'd like to collate this
data centrally. As an aside, we're currently looking for an open
source library management package.

The idea is also to load 'educational titles', thus far XP based, so
that the kids have an adjunct to the books.



Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
 A primary purpose is to maintain a roster of books and track what's
 being read etc. Assuming internet access, we'd like to collate this
 data centrally. As an aside, we're currently looking for an open
 source library management package.
 
 The idea is also to load 'educational titles', thus far XP based, so
 that the kids have an adjunct to the books.

Edubuntu + koha is just fine for that. Especially if there aint no internet
connection




Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Gautam John
On Dec 10, 2007 2:17 PM, Kiran Jonnalagadda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What are the arguments against non-Windows setups? I'd say the choice
 between Ubuntu, Kubuntu and Edubuntu would be a fair one.

That it isn't Windows. Though I'd be happy if I could find a study
that showed that it doesn't really matter to kids what the OS/apps
are...



Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Ramakrishnan Sundaram
Suresh Ramasubramanian said the following on 10/12/2007 12:52:

 data centrally. As an aside, we're currently looking for an open
 source library management package.

 Edubuntu + koha is just fine for that.

Yes, but Koha's a pain to setup. I tried it some time ago and gave up.

Ram



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 1:08 pm, Srini Ramakrishnan wrote:
 By carrying that statement to its logical end, I'd say Hindus are not
 alone - the Muslims fear being dubbed hardcore radicals if they wear
 traditional Islamic attire, and the Christians fear being termed as
 proselytizing missionaries when they wear the cross and carry a Bible.


This in fact is an interesting observation although I disagree with the 
detail.

A far larger percentage of Hindus and Christians in the West are likely to 
behave secular and deny religious belief than Muslims. 

In India criticizing a Muslim or criticizing a proselytizing missionary 
carries more negative consequences than criticizing Hindu behavior.

Perhaps I am taking the analogy too far (but maybe I am not) but in India the 
criticism faced by a Hindu is practically the same whether he kills a Muslim 
or a Christian, or whether he merely criticizes them. Either way he is dubbed 
a murderer just as the steps I have seen in this thread that escalate group 
blame from editing an encyclopedia to being goose stepping murderers. Easier 
to set up a murder if the consequences are the same. With law enforcement and 
judicial system being what it is the real murderer will never be booked, and 
a whole group will get branded and will live with the brand.

The same paradigm  holds true for Islamist terrorism. 

Tightening law enforcement and the judicial system are only half the answer. 

The other half lies in consciously accepting that group guilt and group 
responsibility for crimes or perceived crimes are both legally and 
morally wrong and to move towards identification of individuals rather than 
groups. This acceptance does not exist at the highest levels in India and I 
can frequently pick up media examples in which a group is held guilty, or 
group punishment inflicted on a group is overlooked as a genuine expression 
of grievance. Both are wrong.

Judging by the depth of penetration of these traits among Indians I can see 
that upholding of the constitution has got to be an onerous, uphill task.


shiv







Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 1:10 pm, Ramakrishnan Sundaram wrote:
 I'm an atheist, sometimes militantly so, and I have several friends who
 are openly religiously Hindu. No one, to my knowledge, has ever
 suggested that they are right-wing Hindus.

Your friends are lucky, because they would be dubbed murderers the minute they 
get branded as right wing. I have not been so lucky and have often been 
branded a right wing RSS supporter, which makes me a murderer of Christians.

When we speak of personal experiences, yours is different from mine.

shiv



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
 Perhaps I am taking the analogy too far (but maybe I am not) but in
 India the
 criticism faced by a Hindu is practically the same whether he kills a

Collective guilt? Well, I don't know.  Nothing short of public apathy - and
a latent hatred of muslims - would have made conditions ripe for someone
like Modi.

I have a friend who is a roman catholic from the konkan coast (the sort who
were hindus a few centuries ago till converted by the Portuguese
missionaries) - stayed at Ahmedabad for about a year in the late 90s.

He tried very hard to rent an apartment in predominantly hindu localities
- which just happened to be closer to where his office was. No dice.

So, told the realtor to go back to the nicer apartments and call him Mohan
Prabhu (the hindu name he has, traditionally, along with his Christian
name .. Konkani Christians from those clans - Miranda, Remedios etc -
generally do) and he found zero trouble getting space from the same
landlords who insisted they were full up, or flat out refused to rent to a
guy with a muslim sounding name






Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Gautam John
On Dec 10, 2007 2:37 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, but Koha's a pain to setup. I tried it some time ago and gave up.

What did you end up using?



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Valsa Williams
Congratulations ! I wish I was there.

Cheers !

Valsa


On Dec 9, 2007 8:34 PM, Udhay Shankar N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The first message on Silklist [1] was sent on 19 December 1997. Next
 Wednesday, it'll be 10 years since that happened. Many generations in
 internet time, or even in dog years.

 Anybody wants to do a meetup where lots of beer is comsumed, and
 stories are traded?

 Discuss.

 Udhay

 [1] http://www.netropolis.org/silklist/msg3.html

 --
 ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))





Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread ashok _
On Dec 10, 2007 12:07 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram wrote:

  data centrally. As an aside, we're currently looking for an open
  source library management package.
 
  Edubuntu + koha is just fine for that.

 Yes, but Koha's a pain to setup. I tried it some time ago and gave up.


Yeah, koha has a slight learning curve but the community support is good.
You should be able to find Koha skills locally... (I am involved in a
project automating
parliamentary libraries in africa... and we have used Koha, as skills
were available locally
within african universities)



Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Valsa Williams
An organisation called L2C2 in Kolkatta contributes and implements Koha.
The lead  person's name is Indranil Das Gupta  email id :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gautam, do contact him.



On Dec 10, 2007 3:11 PM, Gautam John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Dec 10, 2007 2:37 PM, Ramakrishnan Sundaram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  Yes, but Koha's a pain to setup. I tried it some time ago and gave up.

 What did you end up using?




Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
 An organisation called L2C2 in Kolkatta contributes and implements Koha.
 The lead  person's name is Indranil Das Gupta  email id :
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gautam, do contact him.

Indranil is a good guy - I know him from his ilug-cal days

srs




Re: [silk] Open Source Evangalism

2007-12-10 Thread Gautam John
On Dec 10, 2007 3:22 PM, Valsa Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 An organisation called L2C2 in Kolkatta contributes and implements Koha.
 The lead  person's name is Indranil Das Gupta  email id :
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gautam, do contact him.

Thanks Valsa!



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread ashok _
On Dec 10, 2007 12:28 PM, shiv sastry wrote:

 A far larger percentage of Hindus and Christians in the West are likely to
 behave secular and deny religious belief than Muslims.


Where do you get such information?  i know very many expatriate / people-of-
indian origin muslims / hindus who behave secular, and act in ways not
associated
with the cliches you are suggesting I also know many such people
who are religious
and traditional despite having lived their lives away from india



[silk] FoU Camp V3 Pictures

2007-12-10 Thread Ramakrishna Reddy
Hey Silkers


Moods and Dudes at the FoUCamp V3. These are a few pictures through my lens

http://flickr.com/photos/ramkrsna/sets/72157603413659484/

My favorite picture is the Coconut and the Vodka.

regards

-- 
Ramakrishna Reddy   GPG
Key ID:31FF0090
Fingerprint =  18D7 3FC1 784B B57F C08F  32B9 4496 B2A1 31FF 0090



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 3:06 pm, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
 Nothing short of public apathy - and
 a latent hatred of muslims - would have made conditions ripe for someone
 like Modi.

It is public ignorance rather than public apathy

Do you know that it is easily possible to justify the massacre of Muslims in 
Gujarat if you just get your arguments right?

I believe this is exactly what India is setting itself up for by failing to 
understand that group punishment by one entity cannot be criticized while 
condoning and overlooking group punishment by another entity.

Unfortunately, politics favors criticism of the right wing as a group rather 
than cracking down on the idea  group punishment and group guilt. Every act 
of Islamist terrorism is openly touted as punishment of a group for a 
previous wrong on Muslims as a group. Political parties and commentators 
frequently overlook this fact for their own ends, and that actually opens the 
door wider for group punishment of Muslims by Hindu groups.

Check the photo I took of a poster in Bangalore that clearly links group 
punishment in the form of bomb blasts to persecution of Muslims

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a11/cybersurg/brf/muslim-riot-blast.jpg

All it takes is a Modi to call for retaliation,  justifying the random killing 
of Muslims as retaliation for random bomb blasts (or some other trigger). Tit 
for tat.

In India we don't seem to recognize that group blame and group guilt are 
concepts that are not constitutionally valid and need to be condemned whoever 
does them. But we have not even reached a stage of being able to recognize 
when an entire group is being blamed or implicated.

Innocent citizens of Mumbai were punished in retaliation for the demolition of 
the Babri Masjid in a tit for tat retribution.

A thousand Innocent Muslims were murdered in Gujarat in an ostensibly tit for 
tat retribution for the burning of Hindu pilgrims in a railway coach.

If the the entire right wing are blamed for the latter, how is it wrong for 
the right wing to blame all Muslims for the former? Tit for tat group blame 
and group punishment after all.  If you can blame the entire right wing, you 
need to blame all Muslims, in order to be fair. 

When will educated Indians start seeing the contraditions that we live with? 
Like I said, it is ignorance. Not apathy.

shiv






Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread Venky TV
On Dec 10, 2007 4:09 PM, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If the the entire right wing are blamed for the latter, how is it wrong for
 the right wing to blame all Muslims for the former? Tit for tat group blame
 and group punishment after all.  If you can blame the entire right wing, you
 need to blame all Muslims, in order to be fair.

Not really.  By that line of reasoning, all right wing Muslims would
need to blamed -- the ones who explicitly or implicitly support
terrorism -- not all Muslims.

Not that I am supporting the concept of group blame, but this
particular argument sounds like a strawman to me.  Both right wing
Hindus and Muslims are being blamed here.  I don't really see a case
for religion-based discrimination.

Venky.



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 3:32 pm, ashok _ wrote:
  A far larger percentage of Hindus and Christians in the West are likely
  to behave secular and deny religious belief than Muslims.

 Where do you get such information?  i know very many expatriate /
 people-of- indian origin muslims / hindus who behave secular, and act in
 ways not associated
 with the cliches you are suggesting I also know many such people
 who are religious
 and traditional despite having lived their lives away from india...

I am not talking of private behavior. In public count the percentage of Hindu 
women wearing bindis or mangalsutras versus Muslim women wearing hijabs in 
say the UK.

shiv



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
 I am not talking of private behavior. In public count the percentage of
 Hindu women wearing bindis or mangalsutras versus Muslim women wearing
hijabs
 in say the UK.

Er. Count the number of hindu women wearing a madisar 9 yard saree v/s the
hejab.




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Deepa Mohan
On 12/9/07, Udhay Shankar N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The first message on Silklist [1] was sent on 19 December 1997. Next
 Wednesday, it'll be 10 years since that happened. Many generations in
 internet time, or even in dog years.

 Anybody wants to do a meetup where lots of beer is comsumed, and
 stories are traded?

 Discuss.

 Udhay

Will be missing this one, too, as I am out of towneither it's a
jinx or a devious plot...I am not interested in the beer but in the
stories...

Deepa.

 [1] http://www.netropolis.org/silklist/msg3.html

 --
 ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))






Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread ashok _
On Dec 10, 2007 2:55 PM, shiv sastry wrote:
 I am not talking of private behavior. In public count the percentage of Hindu
 women wearing bindis or mangalsutras versus Muslim women wearing hijabs in
 say the UK.

how would such a count be attempted... ? You speak as if you already
conducted such
a count 



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 6:44 pm, ashok _ wrote:
 how would such a count be attempted... ? You speak as if you already
 conducted such
 a count 

er yes

shiv



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 5:01 pm, Venky TV wrote:
 Not really.  By that line of reasoning, all right wing Muslims would
 need to blamed -- the ones who explicitly or implicitly support
 terrorism -- not all Muslims.

Bingo!. If we split hairs this is spot on.

So when did you last hear anyone blaming any Muslims, right wing or any wing 
for any bomb blasts?

I only hear that terrorists have no religion but, on the other hand,  
Muslims get killed by right wing  Hindus.

Lots of straw men about it seems.

shiv



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
Wednesday is a bad day. Therefore it may be a good day to meet. I don't like 
beer but it will do if the place does not have conversation-killingly loud 
music.

shiv

On Sunday 09 Dec 2007 8:34 pm, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 The first message on Silklist [1] was sent on 19 December 1997. Next
 Wednesday, it'll be 10 years since that happened. Many generations in
 internet time, or even in dog years.

 Anybody wants to do a meetup where lots of beer is comsumed, and
 stories are traded?

 Discuss.

 Udhay

 [1] http://www.netropolis.org/silklist/msg3.html



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Udhay Shankar N

shiv sastry wrote: [ on 06:59 PM 12/10/2007 ]


Wednesday is a bad day. Therefore it may be a good day to meet. I don't like
beer but it will do if the place does not have conversation-killingly loud
music.


How about your house? :-)

Udhay

--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread Venky TV
On Dec 10, 2007 6:55 PM, shiv sastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So when did you last hear anyone blaming any Muslims, right wing or any wing
 for any bomb blasts?

 I only hear that terrorists have no religion but, on the other hand,
 Muslims get killed by right wing  Hindus.

I *have* encountered the phrase terrorists have no religion but
definitely not as often as the term Islamic fundamentalists or
Muslim extremists.  Most bomb blast reports in India routinely blame
Muslim militants anyway[1][2].

Venky.

[1] 
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Serial_blasts_claim_12_lives_in_Uttar_Pradesh/articleshow/2564801.cms
[2] http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=12840



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread ashok _
On Dec 10, 2007 4:21 PM, shiv sastry wrote:

 er yes

 shiv

maybe you counted the same women twice or thrice over... since
its hard to differentiate at a glance between two women wearing a
hijab :)



Re: [silk] FoU Camp V3 Pictures

2007-12-10 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Ramakrishna Reddy wrote: [ on 04:08 PM 12/10/2007 ]


Hey Silkers


Moods and Dudes at the FoUCamp V3. These are a few pictures through my lens

http://flickr.com/photos/ramkrsna/sets/72157603413659484/

My favorite picture is the Coconut and the Vodka.


Yes, me too.

What about Vinit / Surabhi's pictures?

Udhay

--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Bharath Chari
If we can shift the date to the 15th, it could be at my house. Penance for 
having sent the first message! Most likely won't be in town between the 17th 
and 24th.

Bharath
ps : Shiv, as I remember, is the reason the 1st message got numbered as the 3rd 
message. His computer clock was off.


Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 shiv sastry wrote: [ on 06:59 PM 12/10/2007 ]
 
 Wednesday is a bad day. Therefore it may be a good day to meet. I
 don't like
 beer but it will do if the place does not have conversation-killingly
 loud
 music.
 
 How about your house? :-)
 
 Udhay
 



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Udhay Shankar N

Bharath Chari wrote: [ on 07:32 PM 12/10/2007 ]

If we can shift the date to the 15th, it could be at my house. 
Penance for having sent the first message! Most likely won't be in 
town between the 17th and 24th.


I am not in town this weekend. So 15th is out for me. Can we have it 
on some other day?


Udhay

--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Bharath Chari
I think I can manage to be in town on the 17th. That's Monday. Does it work for 
everyone?

Bharath

Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 Bharath Chari wrote: [ on 07:32 PM 12/10/2007 ]
 
 If we can shift the date to the 15th, it could be at my house. Penance
 for having sent the first message! Most likely won't be in town
 between the 17th and 24th.
 
 I am not in town this weekend. So 15th is out for me. Can we have it on
 some other day?
 
 Udhay
 



Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread Kiran Jonnalagadda

On 10-Dec-07, at 7:22 PM, ashok _ wrote:


On Dec 10, 2007 4:21 PM, shiv sastry wrote:


er yes

shiv


maybe you counted the same women twice or thrice over... since
its hard to differentiate at a glance between two women wearing a
hijab :)


Or counted Indian Christian women as Hindus without bindis... since  
it's hard to tell them apart by face alone. :)




Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 7:20 pm, Venky TV wrote:
 I *have* encountered the phrase terrorists have no religion but
 definitely not as often as the term Islamic fundamentalists or
 Muslim extremists.  Most bomb blast reports in India routinely blame
 Muslim militants anyway[1][2].

 Venky.

 [1]
 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Serial_blasts_claim_12_lives_in_Uttar_P
radesh/articleshow/2564801.cms [2]
 http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=12840

Hehehe - I have a readymade (Here's one that I put in the oven earlier) 
answer for that one. (You would have heard that one too). But I think I'll 
stop. Thanks for the points made. i don't want to push the envelope any 
further.

shiv



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 7:18 pm, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 how about your house? :-):-)


My place is fine - but Thu being a working day for everyone at home we'll have 
to close up shop by 10-30 PM at the latest. Some beer will be needed, and no 
dinner is planned :) Will get chips and stuff.

shiv




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 7:43 pm, Bharath Chari wrote:
 I think I can manage to be in town on the 17th. That's Monday. Does it work
 for everyone?

Whoops - just saw this. 17th is no good because Shashi is planning something 
on 18th morning and I can't mess up her plans for the 18th

Let's look at other dates.

shiv



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Udhay Shankar N

shiv sastry wrote: [ on 08:26 PM 12/10/2007 ]

My place is fine - but Thu being a working day for everyone at home 
we'll have

to close up shop by 10-30 PM at the latest. Some beer will be needed, and no
dinner is planned :) Will get chips and stuff.


Let's just do it on a weekend. 21st or 22nd?

Bharath? Will you be around?

Udhay

--
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Bharath Chari
Shiv,

Come on - I am sure we will let you go back home before the 18th or 
thereabouts. This was planned at my place on the 17th :-)

Bharath

shiv sastry wrote:
 On Monday 10 Dec 2007 7:43 pm, Bharath Chari wrote:
 I think I can manage to be in town on the 17th. That's Monday. Does it work
 for everyone?
 
 Whoops - just saw this. 17th is no good because Shashi is planning something 
 on 18th morning and I can't mess up her plans for the 18th
 
 Let's look at other dates.
 
 shiv
 
 



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Bharath Chari
Nope. Definitely not in town on 21st and 22nd. 

Bharath

Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 shiv sastry wrote: [ on 08:26 PM 12/10/2007 ]
 
 My place is fine - but Thu being a working day for everyone at home
 we'll have
 to close up shop by 10-30 PM at the latest. Some beer will be needed,
 and no
 dinner is planned :) Will get chips and stuff.
 
 Let's just do it on a weekend. 21st or 22nd?
 
 Bharath? Will you be around?
 
 Udhay
 



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Josey John
Hey:
 
I'm one of the editors with Mint, a financial newspaper of the Hindustan Times 
group. I'd like to come for this sit-down if not to talk to all of you for a 
potential column or story, for the beer. :) Am likely in Bangalore 17-19 
(Mon-Wed) Dec. Let me know if it happens.
 
Thanks,
 
JoseyJosey Puliyenthuruthel JOHN Mobile: +91 98185 82855 Alternate email: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:34:43 +0530 To: silklist@lists.hserus.net From: 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet  The first 
 message on Silklist [1] was sent on 19 December 1997. Next  Wednesday, it'll 
 be 10 years since that happened. Many generations in  internet time, or 
 even in dog years.  Anybody wants to do a meetup where lots of beer is 
 comsumed, and  stories are traded?  Discuss.  Udhay  [1] 
 http://www.netropolis.org/silklist/msg3.html  --  ((Udhay Shankar N)) 
 ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))  
_
Post free property ads on Yello Classifieds now! www.yello.in
http://ss1.richmedia.in/recurl.asp?pid=221

Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Udhay Shankar N
Bharath Chari wrote:

 Shiv,

 Come on - I am sure we will let you go back home before the 18th or
 thereabouts. This was planned at my place on the 17th :-)

OK, I give. Let's do it on the 17th at your place. Who else is in?

Udhay




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Bharath Chari
If no one else is game, then we will have 2/3rd of the (statistically invalid) 
original eyeballs. On par for an Internet business, what say?

Bharath

Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 Bharath Chari wrote:
 
 Shiv,

 Come on - I am sure we will let you go back home before the 18th or
 thereabouts. This was planned at my place on the 17th :-)
 
 OK, I give. Let's do it on the 17th at your place. Who else is in?
 
 Udhay
 
 
 



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 9:12 pm, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 OK, I give. Let's do it on the 17th at your place. Who else is in?

 Udhay


You'll have to show me Bharath's place

shiv




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Venkat Mangudi
Udhay Shankar N wrote:
 OK, I give. Let's do it on the 17th at your place. Who else is in?

I'm in for the 17th. Where is Bharath's place?



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Gautam John
I'm in as well for the 17th.



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Bharath Chari
http://chari.arachnis.com. Click on Location.

Bharath

Gautam John wrote:
 I'm in as well for the 17th.
 
 



Re: [silk] Dec 12, 13, 14: Technology, Governance, Citizenship meet, Bangalore

2007-12-10 Thread Venkat Mangudi
Dinesh,

Thanks for letting us know. I will probably attend on the 14th. I assume
quite a bit of Open Source is being used and will be used going forward
in governance.

Venkat

Dinesh, Servelots wrote:
 Technology, Governance and Citizenship
 
 12th, 13th and 14th December, 2007
 Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
 
 Technology is central to new modes of governance, and to emerging
 definitions of citizenship, participation, and progress. As state
 functions get automated through e-governance, experiences get
 codified, and paradigms of knowledge production come under the digital
 eye, the notions of governance and citizenship are changing.
 
 This conference explores questions at the intersection of technology
 and society in contemporary India, bringing together researchers and
 practitioners from a wide range of technical and social scientific
 backgrounds. Its aim is not so much to reiterate the conventional
 definitions of development, technology, transparency, and governance,
 but to unpack the construction of these terms in a way that allows us
 to make sense of the new practices of governance, and of contemporary
 politics, law and citizenship.
 
 See the 3 day program and key participants of the workshop.
 http://janasu.org/tgc
 
 Dec 12th, 2007
 The first day of the workshop will introduce case studies of projects
 in India that highlight the technical aspects of e-governance,
 providing a concrete basis for discussions.
 
 Dec 13th, 2007
 The second day's presentations will explore the social and
 epistemological questions emerging out of e-governance architectures
 and their implementation.
 
 Dec 14th, 2007
 On the final day of the workshop, speakers will attempt to articulate
 a broader platform of research into questions about the intersection
 of technology and society.
 
 Registration is now open. Again check out the link:
 http://janastu.org/tgc
 
 




Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread shiv sastry
On Monday 10 Dec 2007 7:52 pm, Kiran Jonnalagadda wrote:
 Or counted Indian Christian women as Hindus without bindis... since  
 it's hard to tell them apart by face alone.

Indian Christians are few and far between but but wearing a bindi is not a 
problem for Indian Christian women.  In fact Indian Muslim girls wear bindis 
too on occasion.

But whether they are Hindu, Christian or Muslim, the degree of choice and 
freedom  available to wear something or the other is variable.

A survey of that variability would probably throw up some interesting results. 
but hey it doesn't pay to be a sociologist in India.

Either you're a doctor. Or you're an Engineer. Nothing else exists and a 
Freudian indicator of how Indians see occupation and status was seen once 
again with Medical students holding brooms in protest. That was presumably 
meant to show how high up they are in the Indian pecking order and how low 
down a mere broom wielder is. Caste doesn't leave us that easily, though we 
like to imagine that it does.

shiv









Re: [silk] Wikipedia

2007-12-10 Thread Kiran Jonnalagadda

On 11-Dec-07, at 9:49 AM, shiv sastry wrote:

A survey of that variability would probably throw up some  
interesting results.

but hey it doesn't pay to be a sociologist in India.


So you're saying that you're too cheap to get a real survey done, but  
expect to be taken seriously on facts you admit to making up yourself.


FWIW, there are sociologists in India. Some are on this list.




Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Ramakrishna Reddy
On Dec 10, 2007 9:12 PM, Udhay Shankar N [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Bharath Chari wrote:

  Shiv,
 
  Come on - I am sure we will let you go back home before the 18th or
  thereabouts. This was planned at my place on the 17th :-)

 OK, I give. Let's do it on the 17th at your place. Who else is in?

I'm In, if its on the 17th, I'll be leaving to Pune on the 18th
morning. So 17th is confirmed right ?


-- 
Ramakrishna Reddy   GPG
Key ID:31FF0090
Fingerprint =  18D7 3FC1 784B B57F C08F  32B9 4496 B2A1 31FF 0090



Re: [silk] 10th Anniversary silkmeet

2007-12-10 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Dec 11, 2007 1:08 PM, Ramakrishna Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm In, if its on the 17th, I'll be leaving to Pune on the 18th
 morning. So 17th is confirmed right ?

Looks like it - I spoke to Bharath, our host, and he seems to be on. :)

Udhay
-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))