Re: CS>e got a cold Craig

2017-02-25 Thread ASL raVen
Del Immune V is the best supplement I use for preventing colds or flus. If
you catch a cold, it means not take enough of it. I tend to only need to
take one capsule a day and even with Hashimoto's thyroiditis which makes
super easy to catch colds, don't get them.

https://www.delimmune.com/about-del-immune-v/


Hope you feel better. :)

RaVen


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Victor Cozzetto  wrote:

> Hi Craig,
>
> You might have hay fever. But...
>
> This is normal. CS does not suppress the body's immune response, or keep
> pathogens from getting into the body. A healthy body should respond with
> fever, sniffles, cough, sneeze, etc., as needed. The CS will reduce or
> eliminate the body's need for such, but not always. Whatever is happening
> would likely have been ten times worse without the CS ;-)
>
> A lot of other factors come into play, such as overall health,
> environmental factors, toxic load, stress, etc., as CS cannot overcome all
> things by itself. But again, if it isn't stopping the problem, it is at
> least reducing it.
>
> I'm suffering from similar effects now, from what I know is a nasty virus
> that has been knocking people out around me. But I'm still on my feet. I
> have not been bedridden in ten years, since I started using CS. But I still
> 'catch' colds and flus, experiencing mild symptoms, and once in a while
> even a slight fever. The same is true for my daughter, who has never missed
> a day of school in her life.
>
> I increase my CS intake when I feel like I caught something. In fact,
> yesterday I used the baking soda protocol that Ode explained recently. I
> have annoying sniffles, but I am fine. Personally, I do not like any drugs,
> so I do not take antihistamines, aspirin or any such thing. I let my body
> do what it needs to do, and give it CS to help.
>
> BTW, I also use MSM as a hay fever solution, which works as good or better
> than any antihistamines for many people (but not everyone). Yes, MSM is a
> joint supplement, but it does a lot more. I got worried a few years ago
> that CS was not working, and then I realized that I had developed hay
> fever. Anytime CS doesn't work, I pop MSM and I am fine. So you might want
> to consider that. And again, there are times when the sniffles will hang on
> a bit anyway, as I am experiencing right now for a second day.
>
> Good luck.
> Victor
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, okierspike  wrote:
>
>>
>> I have been on the  silver, sniff it swish it drink it and i still got
>> the sniffles.   What happened,  why didn't it ( cs )prevent it.  Been using
>> for about a month.  Even brush my teeth with it.
>>
>>


-- 

P.S.
To read and concentrate easier when reading or studying, do buy the Indoor
Sunshine® Light Bulbs. No more depressing yellow hue - crisp whitish/blue
natural looking light just like from the sun.

*http://sunshinesciences.com  *

*When you order, put **raven10** in the coupon box to receive a 10%
Discount on the shopping cart.*


Re: CS>e got a cold Craig

2017-02-25 Thread Victor Cozzetto
Hi Craig,

You might have hay fever. But...

This is normal. CS does not suppress the body's immune response, or keep
pathogens from getting into the body. A healthy body should respond with
fever, sniffles, cough, sneeze, etc., as needed. The CS will reduce or
eliminate the body's need for such, but not always. Whatever is happening
would likely have been ten times worse without the CS ;-)

A lot of other factors come into play, such as overall health,
environmental factors, toxic load, stress, etc., as CS cannot overcome all
things by itself. But again, if it isn't stopping the problem, it is at
least reducing it.

I'm suffering from similar effects now, from what I know is a nasty virus
that has been knocking people out around me. But I'm still on my feet. I
have not been bedridden in ten years, since I started using CS. But I still
'catch' colds and flus, experiencing mild symptoms, and once in a while
even a slight fever. The same is true for my daughter, who has never missed
a day of school in her life.

I increase my CS intake when I feel like I caught something. In fact,
yesterday I used the baking soda protocol that Ode explained recently. I
have annoying sniffles, but I am fine. Personally, I do not like any drugs,
so I do not take antihistamines, aspirin or any such thing. I let my body
do what it needs to do, and give it CS to help.

BTW, I also use MSM as a hay fever solution, which works as good or better
than any antihistamines for many people (but not everyone). Yes, MSM is a
joint supplement, but it does a lot more. I got worried a few years ago
that CS was not working, and then I realized that I had developed hay
fever. Anytime CS doesn't work, I pop MSM and I am fine. So you might want
to consider that. And again, there are times when the sniffles will hang on
a bit anyway, as I am experiencing right now for a second day.

Good luck.
Victor

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, okierspike  wrote:

>
> I have been on the  silver, sniff it swish it drink it and i still got the
> sniffles.   What happened,  why didn't it ( cs )prevent it.  Been using for
> about a month.  Even brush my teeth with it.
>
>


CS>e got a cold Craig

2017-02-25 Thread okierspike

I have been on the  silver, sniff it swish it drink it and i still got the 
sniffles.   What happened,  why didn't it ( cs )prevent it.  Been using for 
about a month.  Even brush my teeth with it.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Nenah Sylver  
Date: 2/24/17  11:50 PM  (GMT-06:00) To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: RE: 
CS>interesting update on Natural News-Google episode 




Jason
wrote: Hi Nenah: That's interesting, and I'll continue to watch this closely. 
That
said, a Russian hacker hacked one page on my site a few years ago to run a
malicious re-direct script to sell fake hand bags, and one of domains was
dropped without warning. I found the issue myself, researched the policy (and
then understood why it had to be a zero tolerance policy).

 

Having
found the issue, I corrected it, went through the re-inclusion steps as
outlined by Google (which allows you to explain the issue), and was
re-included.

 

The
policy, as I understand it, is zero tolerance, zero exceptions, zero excuses. 
As far as I've seen, it has not been abused.

 

It
doesn't matter if the issue is on a subdomain or the main domain, or even an
old page, or even if another "user" or "ad network" places
the code.  In my case, the page wasn't even part of my "linked"
website.

 

About
Natural News, here is what the Google technician wrote: "Hi! I work with
the Google Search team. We're seeing a bit of confusion 

&
incorrect stories circulating about what's happening here, so just to be super
clear -- Natural News is using a sneaky mobile redirect, which 

is
prohibited by our webmaster guidelines (there's a bit about this kind o issue
at 
https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2015/10/detect-and-get-rid-of-unwanted-sneaky.html
). These redirects aren't always easy to reproduce, they're sometimes in widgets
or served by ad networks, and can target specific devices, browsers, or user
locations. When we last checked, there was one on http://blogs. 
naturalnews.com/bentonite-clay-a-natural-medicine-cabinet-must-have/
. As soon as this is cleaned up, the site can submit a reconsideration request 
through
Search Console, and once that's reviewed things will return to normal. No
action has been taken based on the editorial content of this site."

===

Hi
Jason.

 

Thanks
for the post. I read that too. And yet, after listening to this discussion,
which contains a lot of sobering food for thought—go to 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji4HRD96pbs
—I’m convinced that Google looked for an excuse to take out Adams.
They found a (legitimate, minor) violation. The timing simply strikes me as
VERY coincidental. Adams has been publishing
some pretty hard-hitting articles on biosludge, the TSA, medical fraud, and 
government
involvement in the manufacture of illegal drugs. I guess he’s got some people
pretty worried.

 

But,
of course, the only thing to do is to wait and see what happens.

 

Nenah
 

 





CS>How to unsub,

2017-02-25 Thread Ron

Unsubscribe:
  



CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V2017 #18

2017-02-25 Thread Barb T
Unsubscribe 


Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 25, 2017, at 12:18 AM, "silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com" 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  
Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: 
List Owner: Mike Devour 




CS>Re: silver-digest Digest V2017 #17

2017-02-25 Thread Barb T
Unsubscribe

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:07 PM, "silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com" 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
  
Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: 
List Owner: Mike Devour 




Re: CS>test

2017-02-25 Thread Da Darrin
I use two separate email addresses, both on the silver list.
 When I post to the list and it doesn't show up I open my other email and
it is there magicaly.
Dave

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Deborah Gerard 
wrote:

> did you check your spam folder?
>
>
> On Friday, February 24, 2017 4:36 AM, Tony Moody  wrote:
>
>
> I have twice sent a reply but it seems lost.
> No copy sent back to me and
> No copy in the archives
>
> Tony M
>
>
> --
> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>   Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
>
> Unsubscribe:
>   
> Archives:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
>
> Off-Topic discussions: 
> List Owner: Mike Devour 
>
>
>
>
>


Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?

2017-02-25 Thread Ron
Yep! Maybe Alex Jones should have his say: 
http://www.infowars.com/infowars-gets-banned/


I simply disagree with anyone who thinks that Google is not dirty.

On 2/25/2017 6:31 AM, moxaman wrote:
Like Natural News or hate Natural news it should make no difference. 
Google's action to ban them has no place in a free and open society 
with a free flow and exchange of ideas, not to mention the 1st 
Amendment rights we all have.  What are they going to do next, ban 
books that have ideas or views not compliant with whomever is doing 
the banning?  This is 1000% wrong, un American must not stand.  Only 
in Nazi Germany, communist China, or Stalinist Russia would this be 
considered healthy.  Natural News goes against all the Deep State 
(NOW) has planned, and I for one applaud their stance on toxic 
vaccines and GMO foods among others.  Sure some of the stuff they 
publish is nonsense, but some of the stuff published by the NY Time is 
also.  I have since switched to duckduckgo as my search engine.  They 
don't track you and allow you to view any site you wish.  They have no 
"filters".


Bob

-Original Message- From: Jason
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 6:34 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?

Hi Tricia:

I've been on this list a very, very, very long time.

The only reason I spoke up is that I believe that many of the people on
this list actually really do care about the truth.

If I'm wrong about that, that's ok, too. :)

I'm NOT the biggest fan of Google, not since their Florida update, which
was years and years ago.

That said, the truth is that they are still the conglomerate search
engine, and this will continue as long as the majority of people use 
Google.


Until this changes, I pay very close attention to what is going on with
them.  It is called being informed.


On 2/24/2017 6:08 PM, triciawide...@aol.com wrote:
Thank goodness Google still has a spokesperson to keep us informed of 
truth.



-Original Message-
From: Jason 
To: silver-list 
Sent: Fri, Feb 24, 2017 8:05 pm
Subject: Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?

...last note:

This from SEO Round Table (a very reputable site in the SEO world):

https://www.seroundtable.com/google-natural-news-deindex-23463.html

Google has now publically stated that Natural News was notified of a
violation of using sneaky mobile redirects, and that they had the same
issue going on in 2015.

What Mike is doing is a dishonestly trying to blame Google.

Why?

Because lots of smaller independent companies that publish articles on
their websites make a lot of money from incoming traffic from Natural
News. Some may even rely on the traffic.

If these people realize that Natural News has had this issue since 2015,
and continued to practice these "google violations" after being
repeatedly informed/warned, and PURPOSEFULLY continued these tactics,
they are going to be angry.

So let's try to make sure that they are angry at Google instead of
finding out the real issue.



On 2/24/2017 3:46 PM, Jason wrote:

Hi Bob:

I agree with you 100%. Natural News has become nothing more than a
grocery store tabloid with a political motivation.

...just because Mike says something, doesn't mean that it is true. In
fact, it's laughably ridiculous:


http://searchengineland.com/natural-news-not-banned-google-fake-news-269998 



...Google gave Natural News its prominence (and they make a lot of 
money

with advertising), and for the time being, has taken it away.



On 2/24/2017 1:34 PM, bob Larson wrote:

the mix of real info & crapola in the Natural News is bad enough that
their demise is no loss at all in my opinion. do they still exist as
before in other sesrch engines?

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Sandee George 

>> wrote:

Nenah thanks for this information, which is more of the same 
deterrent

to save face and create unrest for others. It is everywhere, as we
are all en-captured in the fear of survival which is rife at this 
time

on our very damaged planet - we simply have to turn our minds inside
of ourselves and trust on what we are told by our inner voices as our
direction forward and the truth for us, we cannot allow the
perspectives of others to be our guide! This is my answer to
those who trust in outside of themselves for the truth - remember we
are all connected we are all one, so we all are connected to the GOD
conscience with sees, and knows everything, not us individually 
Let me

ask you one question WHAT IS TRUTH ? This idea, I may add, is not
religion but spirituality !
Peace, love and hugs
Sandee
An attitude of gratitude is everything!!!
san...@spiceisle.com 

>

Alive Again Colloidal Silver Products
Topical Gel & Eye Drops



Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?

2017-02-25 Thread moxaman
Like Natural News or hate Natural news it should make no difference. 
Google's action to ban them has no place in a free and open society with a 
free flow and exchange of ideas, not to mention the 1st Amendment rights we 
all have.  What are they going to do next, ban books that have ideas or 
views not compliant with whomever is doing the banning?  This is 1000% 
wrong, un American must not stand.  Only in Nazi Germany, communist China, 
or Stalinist Russia would this be considered healthy.  Natural News goes 
against all the Deep State (NOW) has planned, and I for one applaud their 
stance on toxic vaccines and GMO foods among others.  Sure some of the stuff 
they publish is nonsense, but some of the stuff published by the NY Time is 
also.  I have since switched to duckduckgo as my search engine.  They don't 
track you and allow you to view any site you wish.  They have no "filters".


Bob

-Original Message- 
From: Jason

Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 6:34 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?

Hi Tricia:

I've been on this list a very, very, very long time.

The only reason I spoke up is that I believe that many of the people on
this list actually really do care about the truth.

If I'm wrong about that, that's ok, too. :)

I'm NOT the biggest fan of Google, not since their Florida update, which
was years and years ago.

That said, the truth is that they are still the conglomerate search
engine, and this will continue as long as the majority of people use Google.

Until this changes, I pay very close attention to what is going on with
them.  It is called being informed.


On 2/24/2017 6:08 PM, triciawide...@aol.com wrote:
Thank goodness Google still has a spokesperson to keep us informed of 
truth.



-Original Message-
From: Jason 
To: silver-list 
Sent: Fri, Feb 24, 2017 8:05 pm
Subject: Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?

...last note:

This from SEO Round Table (a very reputable site in the SEO world):

https://www.seroundtable.com/google-natural-news-deindex-23463.html

Google has now publically stated that Natural News was notified of a
violation of using sneaky mobile redirects, and that they had the same
issue going on in 2015.

What Mike is doing is a dishonestly trying to blame Google.

Why?

Because lots of smaller independent companies that publish articles on
their websites make a lot of money from incoming traffic from Natural
News. Some may even rely on the traffic.

If these people realize that Natural News has had this issue since 2015,
and continued to practice these "google violations" after being
repeatedly informed/warned, and PURPOSEFULLY continued these tactics,
they are going to be angry.

So let's try to make sure that they are angry at Google instead of
finding out the real issue.



On 2/24/2017 3:46 PM, Jason wrote:

Hi Bob:

I agree with you 100%. Natural News has become nothing more than a
grocery store tabloid with a political motivation.

...just because Mike says something, doesn't mean that it is true. In
fact, it's laughably ridiculous:



http://searchengineland.com/natural-news-not-banned-google-fake-news-269998


...Google gave Natural News its prominence (and they make a lot of money
with advertising), and for the time being, has taken it away.



On 2/24/2017 1:34 PM, bob Larson wrote:

the mix of real info & crapola in the Natural News is bad enough that
their demise is no loss at all in my opinion. do they still exist as
before in other sesrch engines?

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Sandee George 

>> wrote:


Nenah thanks for this information, which is more of the same deterrent
to save face and create unrest for others. It is everywhere, as we
are all en-captured in the fear of survival which is rife at this time
on our very damaged planet - we simply have to turn our minds inside
of ourselves and trust on what we are told by our inner voices as our
direction forward and the truth for us, we cannot allow the
perspectives of others to be our guide! This is my answer to
those who trust in outside of themselves for the truth - remember we
are all connected we are all one, so we all are connected to the GOD
conscience with sees, and knows everything, not us individually Let me
ask you one question WHAT IS TRUTH ? This idea, I may add, is not
religion but spirituality !
Peace, love and hugs
Sandee
An attitude of gratitude is everything!!!
san...@spiceisle.com 

>

Alive Again Colloidal Silver Products
Topical Gel & Eye Drops




--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe: