Re: CS>An article causing concern -- making/consuming "Non NANO Particle CS"
Sorry Doug, for some reason I didn't get Reids post, so I have to reply on your post, and have deleted your comments in case my comment doesn't get through on this Silverlist email service. Reid, I have been using a unit I made from Bob Beck design many years ago, hmmm, well I think it is, and I converted it to AC 24vDC transformer. I made my own magnetic stirrer, I make about 1200ml each time, and up to 20ppm by meter, (not reliable I know, but at least I can see I made 'something'), sometimes it goes to 22 or so, I am not pedantic about ppm, and I time it on the half hour so I can remove the rods to wipe them clean. I made my unit using 2, 3mm wire, it'll last me my lifetime, and I'll be pushing 70 in a couple of months . Oh, I have Nebulised it as well, well I haven't, but the wife has when she had the Shingles, and developed a cough. As for information, I don't even look for it anymore, there is nothing to find regarding what we make. I've been taking 20-30ml every day for over 16 years, I ain't blue yet, and never will. I have a 'yard stick', if it's clear, I can drink as much as I want, although I never need to drink that much, and if I need to, it's only 2, 8 ounce glasses a day for about 5 days, if it's yellow or golden, I just cut down on the amount I drink, if its amber or tea coloured, then I mostly use it for injuries. If I see NO mud laying on the bottom of my storage vessels, then it's absolutely fine (personal opinion). Even when I was hospitalised a while back with a brain bleed, I STILL ingested my maintenance amount every morning, of course, I didn't tell them that. I will NEVER say what we/I make is "CS", because by definition it is not. That's why you can only read information, they refer EVERYTHING as "CS", you can't find any information on it because ours is a different manufacturing process. I suggestStop reading whatever you find on the Internet. Mostly is innuendo and misrepresentation, and bold faced lies. To your question, your quote..."what about the reliability of the article" end quote, NO, not reliable. (opinion). So, here's a second opinion, this can follow the information from Doug. N. From: Douglas Haack Sent: Sunday, 29 March 2020 9:59 AM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>An article causing concern -- making/consuming "Non NANO Particle CS" On Sunday, 29 March 2020, 3:07:44 am AEDT, Reid Harvey wrote: Silverlisters one and all, Can someone please help me critique the article of this link? I'm keen that family should be confident in CS and any research leads would help. As I've told them, the salient research seems to have been prior to 1950 or so, therefore not online. What about the reliability of the article of this link? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543135/
Re: CS>An article causing concern
These are the same clowns that say to be sure and vaccinate be sure and load up with all of our poisons!!! I would trust nothing that comes from them. On Saturday, March 28, 2020, 12:07:47 PM EDT, Reid Harvey wrote: Silverlisters one and all, Can someone please help me critique the article of this link? I'm keen that family should be confident in CS and any research leads would help. As I've told them, the salient research seems to have been prior to 1950 or so, therefore not online. What about the reliability of the article of this link? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543135/
Re: CS>An article causing concern -- making/consuming "Non NANO Particle CS"
Reid, thanks for the question and the great articles and their URL's Here, "Just my opinion": I've been making "Non NANO Particle CS" for 20 years...have nebulized this now for 15 years... I don't consume NANO CS at all. too expensive to buy...not sure how to set-up such a Nano fine-process up anyway... I'm not worrying, so far in my 70's -- will continue to use CS in my nebuliser -- what choice do we ahve in this "AGE of Corona Virus" Just don't OVERDO it...the safety factor signal is the Silver (ARGYRIA), Skin Greying (not fatal!) from using too muchI'm sure this creeps up and taken with some care, can be avoided...happens because people were using salt or non distilled water, that's my take on it...the cases that over the years ahve been given publicity on the WWW to some degree were "suspect" were were never really explained in technical detail, "how actually good or bad the process used was...water ppm, voltage, milli-amps, silver content of wires...and so on or the older cases were caused by doctor "prescribed silver Powdered" substances... I use distilled water at 1 or 2 PPM, stop my CS process at 12-14 ppm -- constantly monitor the milli-amps...this is an accurate measurement of whats going on in your electrolysis...use an amp meter in the circuit of the the process --- I ahve 6 anodes / 6 cathodes silver wire...make 5 to 7 litres in 75 to 100 minutesI STIR constantly with a small voltage motor in the circuit/set-up -- the STIRRING ensures and avoids "clumping", keep the CS particles moving/circulating, being repelled from each other with their "Brownian Movement/affect" I believe ... My unit was made by "Ole Bob Berger" RIP... 16 years ago, the wires still have 50% in them ... Just my humble opinion...Ole Bob did write a thin technical BOOK, and described his processes indetail (he had been a Power Generating Engineer) and had worked aroundSouth America, US trained etc...I have a copy somewhere...I tried to buy the rights from the family, they refused and nothing became of Bob's book I believe... in SILvation, DH On Sunday, 29 March 2020, 3:07:44 am AEDT, Reid Harvey wrote: Silverlisters one and all, Can someone please help me critique the article of this link? I'm keen that family should be confident in CS and any research leads would help. As I've told them, the salient research seems to have been prior to 1950 or so, therefore not online. What about the reliability of the article of this link? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543135/
Re: CS>An article causing concern
They are allopaths... that should say it all!PT On Saturday, March 28, 2020, 12:07:37 PM EDT, Reid Harvey wrote: Silverlisters one and all, Can someone please help me critique the article of this link? I'm keen that family should be confident in CS and any research leads would help. As I've told them, the salient research seems to have been prior to 1950 or so, therefore not online. What about the reliability of the article of this link? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543135/
CS>An article causing concern
Silverlisters one and all, Can someone please help me critique the article of this link? I'm keen that family should be confident in CS and any research leads would help. As I've told them, the salient research seems to have been prior to 1950 or so, therefore not online. What about the reliability of the article of this link? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25543135/
