I have been buying the sodium ascorbate but have now ordered a whole food type
(darn) as the ascorbate version is cheaper. I can't afford the liposomal
version as it is too expensive. Thanks for the info. dee
On 13 Jan 2010, at 02:44, Paul Bond wrote:
I would go for ascorbate every time, since as I understand it, that is what
humans cannot produce themselves (unlike the vast majority of mammals).
Specifically I would go for a Liposomal version, as it’s absorbtion rate is
so high compared to regular supplementation, and doesn’t have bowel tolerance
issues. I would go as far as to say that it’s even superior to IV
supplementation due to its affinity to cell absorbtion rather than free
roaming. There’s some compelling evidence to suggest that under some
circumstances it’s worth going to 50-100g per day(!!), in cases such as
cancer, as within the cell it can convert to H2O2.
Thank you Brooks for that really helpful article. Can you say whether in
your opinion, it is better to take sodium ascorbate or a whole form of vit C.
Thank you again and may you have many more Happy New Years! dee
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4765