Re: auto-version-values

2004-12-07 Thread Tim Frank
Stefan,
Stefan Burkard wrote on 07/12/04 11:00 AM:
---> ok, thanks for the advice. additionally i saw that the 
double-version only occurs when i first put in the document. when i put 
in a new version of an existing doc, it just creates ONE new version.
Hmm, maybe this wasn't what I thought it was, but I guess that might 
depend on which client you used to create the document. I think I'd only 
ever seen 1 version created myself, but I honestly wasn't paying that 
much attention.

just two other questions:
- what are the consequences for dumb-client-documents that are checked 
out (automatically), but not checked in (manually) again?
The consequence would be that a dumb client would never be able to 
actually create a new version of your document. You would have to 
perform the checking from a "smart client". This is normally not a 
problem if you have some sort of CMS/workflow interface to control the 
checkin features. You could leverage the "ease of use" of web folders or 
the KDE webdav:// protocol for day-to-day updates rather than a clunky 
web interface.

I have had locking issues with dumb clients though, so if something gets 
locked by a smart client after an auto-checkout it will automatically 
get checked-in when the lock is removed again from the smart client. 
This is per the spec, but not always desired program behaviour.

Long and the short of it, use a smart client for all 
checkout/checkin/uncheckout/locking.

- what is the versioncontrol-method for? to activate and disactivate 
version-controlling on a document?
If you don't use the "auto-version-control" parameter, yes, this is the 
method that would be called to place a resource under version control. 
We had an earlier discussion about how to take a resource out of version 
control and I think the consensus was you "couldn't". I think you would 
have to create a new resource that was specifically not under version 
and fill the contents/metadata from the last version.

I have spent quite a bit of time investigating how all of these 
properties work with or against each other. The gist of everything is 
that dumb clients just mess everything up or make things more 
complicated. The only upside is easier use by the end user because you 
can have drag-drop, remote editing, remote saving, etc.

I think you are wading your way through :)
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: auto-version-values

2004-12-07 Thread Stefan Burkard
Tim Frank wrote:
If you leave the auto-version parameter blank, empty, no value then 
NOTHING will happen automatically. I will mention that you should be 
careful with understanding how these parameters work with "dumb" webdav 
clients such as Windows WebFolders. The dumb behaviour is to 
automatically overwrite whatever is "live" as there is no 
checkout/checking issued. I would recommend using the "checkout" option 
for that reason, as a safeguard.
---> ok, thanks for the advice. additionally i saw that the 
double-version only occurs when i first put in the document. when i put 
in a new version of an existing doc, it just creates ONE new version.

just two other questions:
- what are the consequences for dumb-client-documents that are checked 
out (automatically), but not checked in (manually) again?
- what is the versioncontrol-method for? to activate and disactivate 
version-controlling on a document?

There is a duplicate of the file created in history to allow the 
uncheckout command to function. Uncheckout is like undo. You can 
checkout a file, do 20 changes on it, then decide "No, I really don't 
want to save those changes for this version", so you issue the 
uncheckout command to rollback to the last good copy from the history.
---> understand, thanks a lot!
stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: auto-version-values

2004-12-07 Thread Miguel Figueiredo

 Hello Stefan,

 Adding to Tim's response, the propatch commands does not change the file
content, but just it's metadata, witch is also being versioned but in the
associated xml file of versioning, inside the metainfo store. It's pretty
easy to confirm this if your metadata store is a txfilestore.

 Hope this helps,
 Miguel Figueiredo

-Original Message-
From: Tim Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: terça-feira, 7 de Dezembro de 2004 14:38
To: Slide Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: auto-version-values

Stefan,

If you leave the auto-version parameter blank, empty, no value then 
NOTHING will happen automatically. I will mention that you should be 
careful with understanding how these parameters work with "dumb" webdav 
clients such as Windows WebFolders. The dumb behaviour is to 
automatically overwrite whatever is "live" as there is no 
checkout/checking issued. I would recommend using the "checkout" option 
for that reason, as a safeguard.

There is a duplicate of the file created in history to allow the 
uncheckout command to function. Uncheckout is like undo. You can 
checkout a file, do 20 changes on it, then decide "No, I really don't 
want to save those changes for this version", so you issue the 
uncheckout command to rollback to the last good copy from the history.

Hope that helps.

Tim

Stefan Burkard wrote on 07/12/04 09:23 AM:
> hi slide-users
> 
> ok, because my post about versioning ends up in a huge discussion about 
> other things, i make a new one :-)
> 
> 
> i'm now a step ahead (thanks to warwick burrows). i set the following in 
> domain.xml:
> checkout
> true
> 
> when i put a new file in the repository i do a put, and right after 
> that, i'm doing about 20 proppatches. finally, i do a manual checkin.
> 
> result: 2 (equal) versions in "history" and a current one in "files". i 
> guess that i always have the current version in history too, have i?
> 
> question: why have i got two equal versions in history? are they created 
> on (automatical) checkout and (manual) checkin?
> 
> and second question: warwick burrows wrote "... disable auto-versioning 
> altogether and do both checkout and checkin yourself..."
> how can i do this? set "auto-version-control" to false or "auto-version" 
> to an empty string?
> 
> thanks and greetings
> stefan
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: auto-version-values

2004-12-07 Thread Tim Frank
Stefan,
If you leave the auto-version parameter blank, empty, no value then 
NOTHING will happen automatically. I will mention that you should be 
careful with understanding how these parameters work with "dumb" webdav 
clients such as Windows WebFolders. The dumb behaviour is to 
automatically overwrite whatever is "live" as there is no 
checkout/checking issued. I would recommend using the "checkout" option 
for that reason, as a safeguard.

There is a duplicate of the file created in history to allow the 
uncheckout command to function. Uncheckout is like undo. You can 
checkout a file, do 20 changes on it, then decide "No, I really don't 
want to save those changes for this version", so you issue the 
uncheckout command to rollback to the last good copy from the history.

Hope that helps.
Tim
Stefan Burkard wrote on 07/12/04 09:23 AM:
hi slide-users
ok, because my post about versioning ends up in a huge discussion about 
other things, i make a new one :-)

i'm now a step ahead (thanks to warwick burrows). i set the following in 
domain.xml:
checkout
true

when i put a new file in the repository i do a put, and right after 
that, i'm doing about 20 proppatches. finally, i do a manual checkin.

result: 2 (equal) versions in "history" and a current one in "files". i 
guess that i always have the current version in history too, have i?

question: why have i got two equal versions in history? are they created 
on (automatical) checkout and (manual) checkin?

and second question: warwick burrows wrote "... disable auto-versioning 
altogether and do both checkout and checkin yourself..."
how can i do this? set "auto-version-control" to false or "auto-version" 
to an empty string?

thanks and greetings
stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]