[SLUG] glibc FAQ explaination pls

2003-09-18 Thread Holmes, Robert
Hi,

I intend to upgrade glibc.  My preference is --prefix=/usr.

The FAQ warns that I should rename /usr/include as per below.

My question is after the upgrade what do with the old (renamed)
/usr/include headers?  

--snip--
2.3. How should I avoid damaging my system when I install GNU libc?
{ZW} If you wish to be cautious, do not configure with --prefix=/usr. If
you don't specify a prefix, glibc will be installed in /usr/local, where
it will probably not break anything. (If you wish to be certain, set the
prefix to something like /usr/local/glibc2 which is not used for
anything.) 
The dangers when installing glibc in /usr are twofold: 


glibc will overwrite the headers in /usr/include. Other C libraries
install a different but overlapping set of headers there, so the effect
will probably be that you can't compile anything. You need to rename
/usr/include out of the way before running `make install'. (Do not throw
it away; you will then lose the ability to compile programs against your
old libc.) 

None of your old libraries, static or shared, can be used with a
different C library major version. For shared libraries this is not a
problem, because the filenames are different and the dynamic linker will
enforce the restriction. But static libraries have no version
information. You have to evacuate all the static libraries in /usr/lib
to a safe location. 

The situation is rather similar to the move from a.out to ELF which
long-time Linux users will remember.

--snip--

I have searched the archives & the net at large to no avail.

>Warm regards,
>Robert
>
>Robert Holmes- QA Chemist Phone: +61 2 9741 5234 Fax: +61 2 9748 4924 
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]







Both the individual sending this e-mail and The Lubrizol Corporation 
intend that this electronic message be used exclusively by the individual 
or entity to which it is intended to be addressed.  This message may 
contain information that is privileged, confidential and thereby exempt and 
protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law.  If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or 
agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, 
be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of 
this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication and are not 
the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently 
delete the original message from your e-mail system. 
 
  

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] PPP connect to my ISP

2003-09-18 Thread Dave Airlie

I'm not even going to ask why you aren't using wvdial in this day and
age...

You might want to give out about the Linux for dummies with RH, but just
because configuring pppd directly was the only way 5 years ago doesn't
mean it should be used now ..

use a dialer, wvdial or RH or whatever, direct ppp configuration isn't a
good way to do things anymore..

Dave.

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Peter Hardy wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:00, Jonathan Kelly wrote:
> > my /etc/pap-secrets and /etc/chap-secrets the same with ...
> >
> > #   client  server  secret
> > "my-user-name"  *   "my-password"
>
> chap-secrets needs four fields.  It should look like
> "my-user-name"*   "my-password"   *
>
> If pppd is trying to do CHAP authentication, then you get very weird and
> obscure authentication failures. P-)
>
>

-- 
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] PPP connect to my ISP

2003-09-18 Thread Peter Hardy
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:00, Jonathan Kelly wrote:
> my /etc/pap-secrets and /etc/chap-secrets the same with ...
> 
> #   client  server  secret
> "my-user-name"  *   "my-password"

chap-secrets needs four fields.  It should look like
"my-user-name"  *   "my-password"   *

If pppd is trying to do CHAP authentication, then you get very weird and
obscure authentication failures. P-)

-- 
Pegleg Pete

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] PPP connect to my ISP

2003-09-18 Thread Jonathan Kelly
Hi there,

I thought I'd make this offering to the God-of-all-technical-knowledge
that is Slug, because it's very annoying that the windows solution
"just works" (dammit).

I'm trying to set up a dialup ppp connection to my ISP (Inspired)
while my ADSL connection is transfered to my new address. Of course,
they can't tell me what protocols are used, or any useful information
about what I need to do as I'm not running RH, and they only know how
to run the RH setup, which apparently works. There's a whole other
story there about the evil-ness of Linux-for-dummies approach of RH
hiding the need to understand how things work ... but I won't go
there.

I have the dialing and connection working, but the ISP goes straight
into some protocol (I'm guessing PAP) without asking for
username/password, like every other ISP I've ever used.

here are my ppp options, in /etc/ppp/options ...

# General configuration options for PPPD:
lock
defaultroute
noipdefault
modem
/dev/ttyS0
115200
crtscts
passive
asyncmap a
usepeerdns
noauth

my /etc/pap-secrets and /etc/chap-secrets the same with ...

#   client  server  secret
"my-user-name"  *   "my-password"

I'm guessing this is the problem somehow ... but those are the only
two bits of information required by Win2K to get the connection
working. All the PAP and CHAP stuff is voodoo mumbo jumbo to me, I
mean, what's wrong with usernames and passwords! Sigh.

and the log of the connection from /var/log/pppd/current ...

[pppd] Serial connection established.
[pppd] using channel 1
[pppd] Using interface ppp0
[pppd] Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
 ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xa7  
]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xa7  ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1  
 ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xa8  
  
]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xa8 ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xa9  
  
]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xa9 ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xaa  
  
]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xaa ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xab  
  
]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfRej id=0xab ]
[pppd] rcvd [LCP TermReq id=0xac]
[pppd] sent [LCP TermAck id=0xac]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
 ]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
 ]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
 ]
[pppd] sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1  
 ]
[pppd] Hangup (SIGHUP)

Strange ... despite the "noauth" option pppd sends a ConfReq, and
rejects all ConfReq from the Server.


Any ideas?

Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Re: Athlon not cool in Linux

2003-09-18 Thread Jan Schmidt

> why resort to expensive hardware cooling when software cooling can do a 
> better job?

Because when I REALLY hit my CPU, it's gonna need the heat dissipation
anyway. I regularly peg my CPU out at 100% for hours on end.

Which isn't to say that software cooling isn't good - in the average case,
it keeps the cpu at a lower temperature and that can help extend the life
and improve stability, but if my CPU can't cope with the temperature it hits
after an hour at 100% cpu, then it can't cope at all.

J.
-- 
Jan Schmidt  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Open Source Software: Free as in Free Speech, not Free Beer
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Font problem

2003-09-18 Thread Angus Lees
At 15 Sep 2003 12:49:10 +1000, Peter Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 12:28, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> Of course, if they are installed, then you've got bigger problems that
> I'd rather not think about unless they're actually happening. :-)

An easy way to see what fonts the XServer knows about is to run
"xfontsel"  (or "xlsfonts" for simple "dump complete list to stdout" tasks)

Of course, client-side font rendering is entirely up to the client.
GNOME and KDE now use "fontconfig" to find them; supposedly you can
use "fc-list" from the command line, but I've found that mostly
useless.

-- 
 - Gus
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Re: Font problem

2003-09-18 Thread Angus Lees
At Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:06:30 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> Checking the X font server's configuration file in
> /etc/X11/xfs/config I find I have no 'xfs' directory there.
> However, 'find' tells me I have

Debian doesn't use/need xfs by default.  I doubt you have a reason to
use it either.

-- 
 - Gus
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Fwd: CERT Advisory CA-2003-24 Buffer Management Vulnerability in OpenSSH

2003-09-18 Thread John Clarke
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:09:03PM +1000, Shaun Oliver wrote:

> oohh, I really hit a nerve here didn't I?

Apologies to the list.  This is a response to a private email and
Shaun should have kept it private.


Cheers,

John
-- 
whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key id: 0xD59C360F
http://kirriwa.net/john/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] PDA / Video 3G phone thingies

2003-09-18 Thread John Clarke
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:29:31AM +1000, Grant Parnell wrote:

> Turns out it's an OS called Symbian (see www.symbian.com) which is backed
> by most of the phone manufacturers and has an open API (whatever that
> means) if not the complete OS source code. This is often combined with 

Definitely *not* the source code.  At work we've dealt with companies
who are working with Symbian and we need NDAs just to get a copy of the
OS binary.


Cheers,

John
-- 
whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key id: 0xD59C360F
http://kirriwa.net/john/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] Sales Training and Refresher Courses by Robert Seviour

2003-09-18 Thread Robert Seviour
Listed here are the 3 seminars that Robert Seviour will be presenting in
various locations around the world between now and March 2004. For further
info please send us your details and we will send our brochure pack by
return.


Selling for Engineers
One-day Seminar

The Selling for Engineers seminar is a good introduction to effective sales
principles for people who are new to selling, and also a useful refresher
for 'old hands'.  It applies to selling both technical products and
intangible services.

Many Sales Engineers have been learning the technical skills of their job
for years but have had little formal training in selling.  This course
helps correct that imbalance.  
Typical job titles of delegates: Sales Engineer, Account Executive and
Business Development Manager.

Fee for this event is £300.



Telephone Sales Prospecting for Engineers
One-day Workshop
This event is a practical workshop teaching people in technical companies
how to find new customers on the phone.  It is applicable to business
development for both tangible products and intangible services.  The first
session addresses whom to target, what to say and how to handle problems. 
The remainder of the day consists of live sales calls with coaching from
Robert Seviour; the objective being to give delegates some positive
experiences of prospecting, make sales appointments and maybe sell
something!

Please note that this telephone sales prospecting event is restricted to a
maximum of six delegates to permit individual coaching.
Fee for this event is £300.




Closing Techniques Workshop
One day workshop
What if the customer says:
"   "  'It's too expensive'
"   "  'We're happy with our present supplier'
"   "  'I want to think about it'
 
Can you handle these common objections?
By far the most efficient way to be more profitable is to turn more of the
enquiries you receive into paid orders.  For this, the ability to resolve
objections is critical - either you close or you lose the sale.
And if you answer 'How much discount will you give me?' with: 'I'll ask my
boss', you waste profit, which could be yours with a better reply.
 
In only half a day I will teach you techniques which overcome these
objections and more. You will be able to use them immediately to win
profitable orders.
 
There is no need to lose business to your competitors or give big
discounts. 
 
Fee for this event is £300. 
 
 
If you have never had any formal sales training or need a refresher, don't
continue to work at a disadvantage. 
 

Reservations and information
Please contact Sue on: 

Tel:  +44(0)1481 720 294 Fax: +44(0)1481 720 317

If sales training is not an issue for your company please reply to this
email with the word "DELETE" in the subject line. We will remove your
details promptly.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] apt-get Older versions of redhat (freshrpms question)

2003-09-18 Thread Grant Parnell
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Joel Heenan wrote:

> Slug,
> 
> I was going to upgrade my redhat 7.2 system to redhat 9 because I was under
> the impression that no more rpms were being built  this version of redhat
> (as it says on http://valhalla.freshrpms.net/ ). Then with all the ssh stuff
> I ran apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and it found new ssh packages and
> installed them!
> 
> I am only interested in updating the system so it doesn't get r00ted, does
> anyone know what the deal is whether security packages are still being built
> and for how much longer? Do I need to upgrade or should I just keep checking
> the freshrpms website to see if they have stopped building packages for my
> system?
> 

Whilst the future of official RedHat RPMS may be in question there's 
definitely no stopping people continuing to support RedHat 7.3 for a long 
time to come. It has a very large installed base and well if people feel 
the urge to fix it, it will be fixed.

EG for a long time Anthony at the office was unofficially maintaining ssh 
rpm's for RedHat 6.2 (it never came with it as this was before openssh) 
and distributed with each new batch of the 'EverythingLinux Bleeding Edge 
RedHat 6.2' CDR's.

--

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] PDA / Video 3G phone thingies

2003-09-18 Thread Grant Parnell
The thread on Installing Linux on PDA's inspired me to go searching and my 
research started with Three's advert for the Motorola A920, I was 
interested in what it was running since it's looks like it's got almost 
all of my check points for features I want in a portable device. (see 
http://www.three.com.au/index.cfm?section=Explore&pid=450&pageid=481&sid=854 
) They still don't provide a TV remote 

Turns out it's an OS called Symbian (see www.symbian.com) which is backed
by most of the phone manufacturers and has an open API (whatever that
means) if not the complete OS source code. This is often combined with 
Java & Macromedia Flash to get access the now numerous mobile apps.

My research led me to the Motorola A760 which runs Linux (see
www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4504156025.html ) and was targeted for the
Asian market. One possible reason is the wholesale dumping of Microsoft by
the Chinese government in favour of Linux. Motorola's playing the sensible
card here hedging their bets.

With the networking features these things are packing it's possible we 
won't need mobile towers in well populated areas because traffic could 
route between phones.

I reckon by the end of the decade we'll be using fully functional
Star-trek tricorders & comm badges thus proving once again Science Fiction
can become reality.

--

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] cross platform encrypted filesystem

2003-09-18 Thread guru
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, David Kempe wrote:

Hi David, did you look at CFS ? It is very robust
and might be what you want. We like it a lot..

http://www.crypto.com/software/


> Hey Sluggers,
> anyone know of something like the subject describes?
> I am after an encrypted loopback like filesystem that is;
> 1, 'F'ree or at least 'f'ree.

kind regards
Norm

-- 
Epsilon-6! Ph:+612 8807-4780   Fax: +612 8807-4498
E-Solutions for BSD and Linux   http://www.paladincorp.com.au/
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] cross platform encrypted filesystem

2003-09-18 Thread David Kempe
Hey Sluggers,
anyone know of something like the subject describes?
I am after an encrypted loopback like filesystem that is;
1, 'F'ree or at least 'f'ree.
2, Supports linux 2.4 and windows xp

I have looked at Bestcrypt and nothing much has happened there in a while -
its not free either.
I don't think anything support PGPdisk on linux.
It doesn't have to support a large files - maybe some sort of gpg hackery
can achieve what I need if I GPG up a zip file or something.
being able to mount it in linux would be nice.

Any suggestions? the obligatory freshmeat/google searchs are drawing blanks/
obscure research papers/ crap shareware.

dave


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] Re: Athlon not cool in Linux

2003-09-18 Thread Russell Davie
thanks for that,
you have understood exactly my point, surely software cooling is a better 
engineering solution to reducing heat by getting at the source of the heat, 
rather than adding more blowers, and other air-conditioning.
why resort to expensive hardware cooling when software cooling can do a 
better job?
More importantly, How can Athlon processors be software cooled without 
hanging 'after-market' fixes to do what already happens to Intel processors?
how can idle state be incorporated into kernel compile for Athlon processors?
Russell

>you also might want to try http://vcool.occludo.net/VC_Linux.html it 
worked on my old >motherboard.




---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.518 / Virus Database: 316 - Release Date: 11/09/03
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] Slug, Christina Aguilera loves it hard 0fimZL6qe56ctdqEchpz9WgAtbmcLCxM

2003-09-18 Thread brugmans
Title: Christinas crazy video shoot!




   
We all know Christina Aguilera 
loves to show off her gorgeous body... But did you know what 
happend on her infamous video shoot she had March 02, 
2003? You won't believe your eyes, Christina really is kinky, 
she doesn't seem to know any taboos! You ready to see 
her take it to the limit?
SEE 
ALL THE FOOTAGE HERE - RISK FREE!

Christina's gagged - Christina's bound - She's going totally crazy!

At that infamous video shoot she asked the director if he could add a 
few minutes of private footage, only for the eyes of 
her boyfriend Sean Michaels, who was turning 27 end of March! You can 
see all that in high quality unedited quality on our website!
   
SEE 
  ALL THE FOOTAGE HERE - RISK FREE!
  WATCH ALL THE PRIVATE 
  FOOTAGE FOR $0.00 - YES IT'S FREE! You don't like what you get inside? 
  Fine, just cancel within the first 24 hours and that's it. Your total 
  cost is $0.00! C'mon guys how fair is this!? No bullshit, no strings 
  attached! 
  Offer 
  valid until August 15, 2003. Restricted to persons 18 years or older 
  
  (21 in the US states of TX, SC and MI).

  
  
   


  


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   dlt[32]>
  
  
  
  
   dlt[32]>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Fwd: CERT Advisory CA-2003-24 Buffer Management Vulnerability in OpenSSH

2003-09-18 Thread Shaun Oliver
at the risk of being helpful, John Clarke delivered up the following on Thu, Sep 18, 
2003 at 09:42:21AM +1000, 
Next time, I suggest you read the thread you're responding to before
making a fool of yourself in public.
*SNIP*
oohh, I really hit a nerve here didn't I?
oh well,
so you decided to fight fire with fire, I generally find water works
better.
maybe I should have read the thread, and yes I agree with you that doing
yer upgrades and updates etc as a cron job ain't necissarily a good
idea.
for my money all $1.80 per hour, I like to see what's going on.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] vim scripting

2003-09-18 Thread Ken Foskey
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 11:29, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> And to answer the question as actually asked, I think expand('%') will get
> the current file name, but I know very little about scripting vim...

your answer gave me the necessary clue stick...

I tried =expand(%) and the % had to be in quotes.  All working
now.  Here is may tag line for what it is worth...

I have cindent on so the  backspaces might not be necessary for your
settings.

>> begin this on one line only  <<

imap ,vvi
/*** vi:set 
sw=4 ts=4 et 
cin:$Id:$=expand('%')DESC=strftime("%d/%m/%y")
 KMF  CHANGE 
LOG***/

>>--

-- 
Thanks
KenF
OpenOffice.org developer

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


[SLUG] L|ps SO Beautiful - your friends will be jealous!

2003-09-18 Thread Beauty Centers
Title: FINALLY A LIP PLUMPER THAT ACTUALLY WORKS !!!





Get Plump, Sexy Lip'sIn Under 30 Days!


visit website

CITY LIP'S exclusive lip treatment...
	>
Stimulates collagen & hyaluronic moisture in your lip's resulting in BIGGER, LUSCIOUS,  more SENSUOUS Lip's
	>
CITY LIP'S is used by men & women in 34 countries.  Recommended by Plastic Surgeons, Celebrities, & Movie Stars
	>
	CITY LIP'S super-hydrating formula plumps & reduces unattractive lip wrinkles & fine lines
	>
	Easy to use, completely  pain-free and  GUARANTEED to work in 30 days or your  MONEY BACK!
Be the envy of all your friends!
retail $47.95
ONLINE SALE $24.76you save: $23.19 (48% OFF)
 ~> BUY 2 GET 1 FREE <~





buy now
visit website
	customer ratings:

Women love beauty tips, forward this to a friend!
Distributors Welcome!



   

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] apt-get Older versions of redhat (freshrpms question)

2003-09-18 Thread Dave Airlie


freshrpms just uses links to the RH dir on the FTP site it is on..
(planetmirror just fixed their freshrpms repo for me yesterday and it
works fine now  )
so as long as RH update it, freshrpms will have it..
Dave.

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, John Clarke wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:11:15PM +1000, Phil Scarratt wrote:
>
> > Check the RH website - security updates. Pretty sure it says 7.1 thru
> > 8.0 are being supported till Dec 31 2003.
>
> They are.  Updated packages for 7.1 and above have been released.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> John
>

-- 
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] apt-get Older versions of redhat (freshrpms question)

2003-09-18 Thread John Clarke
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:11:15PM +1000, Phil Scarratt wrote:

> Check the RH website - security updates. Pretty sure it says 7.1 thru 
> 8.0 are being supported till Dec 31 2003.

They are.  Updated packages for 7.1 and above have been released.


Cheers,

John
-- 
whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key id: 0xD59C360F
http://kirriwa.net/john/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] apt-get Older versions of redhat (freshrpms question)

2003-09-18 Thread Phil Scarratt
Joel Heenan wrote:

Slug,

I was going to upgrade my redhat 7.2 system to redhat 9 because I was under
the impression that no more rpms were being built  this version of redhat
(as it says on http://valhalla.freshrpms.net/ ). Then with all the ssh stuff
I ran apt-get update && apt-get upgrade and it found new ssh packages and
installed them!
I am only interested in updating the system so it doesn't get r00ted, does
anyone know what the deal is whether security packages are still being built
and for how much longer? Do I need to upgrade or should I just keep checking
the freshrpms website to see if they have stopped building packages for my
system?
Joel

Check the RH website - security updates. Pretty sure it says 7.1 thru 
8.0 are being supported till Dec 31 2003.

Fil

--
Phil Scarratt
Draxsen Technologies
IT Contractor
0403 53 12 71
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug