Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread meryl
In addition to getting involved in the EFA's campaign
http://nocleanfeed.com
you can subscribe to their lists to stay informed (there are familiar
SLUG names there too!) http://www.efa.org.au/about/lists/

http://libertus.net/ and http://sites.google.com/site/filtermenot/home
have additional information about the filter on their sites

Also there's the PPA http://www.pirateparty.org.au/
who plan to fight the filter at the next election

cheers,
Meryl
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Marghanita da Cruz

meryl wrote:

In addition to getting involved in the EFA's campaign
http://nocleanfeed.com
you can subscribe to their lists to stay informed (there are familiar
SLUG names there too!) http://www.efa.org.au/about/lists/

http://libertus.net/ and http://sites.google.com/site/filtermenot/home
have additional information about the filter on their sites

Also there's the PPA http://www.pirateparty.org.au/
who plan to fight the filter at the next election


snip

Google has also blogged on the subject:
http://google-au.blogspot.com/2009/12/our-views-on-mandatory-isp-filtering.html

While there is lots of moral outrage on
the subject, I like the way Google has
explained how it is not in their interests.

I think this is a better approach than
the independent from the world approach.

jam wrote:
I wrote to Conroy talking about 
proxies and ssh tunnels and received

back many
pages reminiscent of 'Shirley 
Valentine' 'Hello wall ...'


Then, older and wiser, I realized 
*doing something* and being seen *to do
something* are vastly different and 
after all it's *your* $100 million ...


and on the 100% accurate filters, see:
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2009-December/085954.html

It would be useful if we could articulate
our concerns about the impacts on us, as
users of linux, open source, system
administrator, etc.

If we can get a single issue that is
comprehensible by the wider public
then that could clinch it.

Marghanita
--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202






--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Mike
The no clean feed group have a template for a letter on their site I  
think, I'll try to dig it up later.


I think this is very relevant to us as linux/open source/free software  
users, if we follow the philosophy free as in freedom, not fee as in  
beer then that should go not only for the os and programs we use but  
for the Internet and our access to data.


I got an email from the president of the PPA with some ideas and advice:

Hi crew,

Pirate Party Australia has been working hard on getting press releases  
out and establishing media contacts to spread our message. We are  
establishing some working groups to plan a fresh round of national  
protests, and we are working on an overhaul of our IT systems. We are  
looking at sending members to LAN parties to communicate with the  
players, and sticking flyers up in city centres, where legally feasible.


So far, we have not touched a cent of the membership fees or  
donations, and some members are using their own funds on essential  
services, because we know that every dollar counts.


To those of you who have joined us already, thank you for your  
support. I know we haven't gotten back to most of you with  
confirmations, but we do plan to once we have started collating the  
memberships.


To everyone else, I would like to tell you some hard truths that you  
might not like to hear.


To fix the world, you have to do more than click some buttons on a  
website.We appreciate that you did sign up as a preliminary member,  
but sometimes you have to roll up your sleeves and get a little dirty.  
In this case, all we are asking you to do is to go through the process  
of actually printing a document and faxing it. I know it's an old- 
world effort, but it's really just a few minutes of effort.


For those of you who have not joined because of the money, send me an  
email atdavidcra...@pirateparty.org.au and we'll see if we can work  
something out. I grew up dirt poor, so I know what it is like to  
really not have a few dollars to spare.


For those of you who have not joined due to other issues, just look at  
yesterday's release of Senator Conroy's Internet censorship report. We  
don't have time to waste. So far, around 140 people, or about 1 in 10  
of the preliminary members have signed up. This is not good enough to  
affect serious change in Australia. We are trying to protect freedom  
of speech, but it looks like many of you don't have much to say. You  
need to get angry, and you need to join, and you need to convince  
other people to join. You need to do this by painting them a picture  
of what the world will be like if we don't put up a fight against the  
slide into tyranny that we are now facing. Ask the historians to  
imagine what Stalinist Russia would have been like if Stalin had the  
computing power of today. Tell them about how fragile democracy is and  
how it can be corrupted by just a few influential people over just a  
couple of decades. Let the environmentalists know that freedom needs  
to be protected, because without freedom, we don't have a world worth  
saving. Tell the libertarians that we are trying to keep the  
government out of their lives. Inform the concerned parents that we  
are fighting for their rights to run their own families. If you're in  
the country, speak to some farmers and tell them that we will stop  
companies from patenting their seeds. Tell the sick that we'll stop  
the drug companies from revelling in their pain. Tell the musicians  
that we will work with them to ensure they can earn good money doing  
what they love. Tell the trade unionists that we will work to repeal  
laws that infringe on their freedom of assembly. Let the gamers know  
that we'll rip out Michael Atkinson's spinal column if he doesn't  
realise that violent video games don't cause violent behaviour.


OK, maybe not the last one. In fact, I'm not even sure if my freedom  
of speech rights protect that statement now-a-days, so let me  
explicitly state that it was a joke that referenced Scorpion's  
finishing move in Mortal Kombat.


I hope my point is clear. We need you to join Pirate Party Australia,  
so we can protect our freedom to make the world a better place. You  
signed up as a preliminary member, so you already agree with our  
goals, so please make it official.



Regards,

David Crafti,
President
Pirate Party Australia

P.S.: Some people have stated a concern about being on the books as  
affiliated with the party, but the AEC treats the applications as  
confidential.


__

Contact with the Pirate Party Australia

There is an email discussion list that you can participate in here.
You can also participate on our forums or join in the discussion in IRC.
All other enquiries go toenquir...@pirateparty.org.au


On 17/12/2009, at 7:13, Marghanita da Cruz marghan...@ramin.com.au  
wrote:



meryl wrote:

In addition to getting involved in 

Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread CaT
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:02:52AM +1100, Mike wrote:
 The no clean feed group have a template for a letter on their site I  
 think, I'll try to dig it up later.

http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/16/dont-waste-your-time-waste-theirs-a-guide-to-writing-to-ministers/

May (or may not) be of use.

-- 
  A search of his car uncovered pornography, a homemade sex aid, women's 
  stockings and a Jack Russell terrier.
- http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C27574%2C24675808-421%2C00.html
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Google Chrome for Linux !!!

2009-12-16 Thread Terry Dawson

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:


Well maybe it should have defaulted to a more restrictive scheme
rather than a less restrictive scheme.


I agree with that. The default should have been to move to next most 
restrictive option in each case.


Terry

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Scott Finneran

jam wrote:

I'm not sure if this belongs here, sorry if it doesn't.


Well looks like the government got it's way. Our Internet will be  
censored next year.



http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/115


I wrote to Conroy talking about proxies and ssh tunnels and received back many 
pages reminiscent of 'Shirley Valentine' 'Hello wall ...'


Then, older and wiser, I realized *doing something* and being seen *to do 
something* are vastly different and after all it's *your* $100 million ...



Doing something like this may have more of an impact:
http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/16/dont-waste-your-time-waste-theirs-a-guide-to-writing-to-ministers/

Scott

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: Tear down the great firewall

2009-12-16 Thread David Andresen
Hey y'all

Sign the petition,

http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNetid=892

ddave

On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 12:00 +1100, slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote:
 Send slug mailing list submissions to
   slug@slug.org.au
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
   slug-requ...@slug.org.au
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
   slug-ow...@slug.org.au
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of slug digest...
 Today's Topics:
 
1. Re: Australian government to censor your internets (Mike)
2. Re: Australian government to censor your internets (CaT)
3. Re: Google Chrome for Linux !!! (Terry Dawson)
4. Re: Australian government to censor your internets
   (Scott Finneran)
 email message attachment
   Forwarded Message 
  From: Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com
  To: marghan...@ramin.com.au marghan...@ramin.com.au
  Cc: slug@slug.org.au slug@slug.org.au
  Subject: Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets
  Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:02:52 +1100
  
  The no clean feed group have a template for a letter on their site I  
  think, I'll try to dig it up later.
  
  I think this is very relevant to us as linux/open source/free software  
  users, if we follow the philosophy free as in freedom, not fee as in  
  beer then that should go not only for the os and programs we use but  
  for the Internet and our access to data.
  
  I got an email from the president of the PPA with some ideas and advice:
  
  Hi crew,
  
  Pirate Party Australia has been working hard on getting press releases  
  out and establishing media contacts to spread our message. We are  
  establishing some working groups to plan a fresh round of national  
  protests, and we are working on an overhaul of our IT systems. We are  
  looking at sending members to LAN parties to communicate with the  
  players, and sticking flyers up in city centres, where legally feasible.
  
  So far, we have not touched a cent of the membership fees or  
  donations, and some members are using their own funds on essential  
  services, because we know that every dollar counts.
  
  To those of you who have joined us already, thank you for your  
  support. I know we haven't gotten back to most of you with  
  confirmations, but we do plan to once we have started collating the  
  memberships.
  
  To everyone else, I would like to tell you some hard truths that you  
  might not like to hear.
  
  To fix the world, you have to do more than click some buttons on a  
  website.We appreciate that you did sign up as a preliminary member,  
  but sometimes you have to roll up your sleeves and get a little dirty.  
  In this case, all we are asking you to do is to go through the process  
  of actually printing a document and faxing it. I know it's an old- 
  world effort, but it's really just a few minutes of effort.
  
  For those of you who have not joined because of the money, send me an  
  email atdavidcra...@pirateparty.org.au and we'll see if we can work  
  something out. I grew up dirt poor, so I know what it is like to  
  really not have a few dollars to spare.
  
  For those of you who have not joined due to other issues, just look at  
  yesterday's release of Senator Conroy's Internet censorship report. We  
  don't have time to waste. So far, around 140 people, or about 1 in 10  
  of the preliminary members have signed up. This is not good enough to  
  affect serious change in Australia. We are trying to protect freedom  
  of speech, but it looks like many of you don't have much to say. You  
  need to get angry, and you need to join, and you need to convince  
  other people to join. You need to do this by painting them a picture  
  of what the world will be like if we don't put up a fight against the  
  slide into tyranny that we are now facing. Ask the historians to  
  imagine what Stalinist Russia would have been like if Stalin had the  
  computing power of today. Tell them about how fragile democracy is and  
  how it can be corrupted by just a few influential people over just a  
  couple of decades. Let the environmentalists know that freedom needs  
  to be protected, because without freedom, we don't have a world worth  
  saving. Tell the libertarians that we are trying to keep the  
  government out of their lives. Inform the concerned parents that we  
  are fighting for their rights to run their own families. If you're in  
  the country, speak to some farmers and tell them that we will stop  
  companies from patenting their seeds. Tell the sick that we'll stop  
  the drug companies from revelling in their pain. Tell the musicians  
  that we will work with them to ensure they can earn good money doing  
  what they love. Tell the trade unionists that we will work to repeal  
  laws that 

Re: [SLUG] Re: Tear down the great firewall

2009-12-16 Thread Daniel Pittman
David Andresen da...@hayday.biz writes:

 Sign the petition,
 http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/SaveTheNetid=892

A list of better things to do, which are more likely to influence the
legislation than a petition, is here: http://nocleanfeed.com/action.html

While petitions are nice and all, their ability to convince the office of the
politicians here is actually pretty low compared to regular opinion polls and
the like.

Also, do keep in mind that the people who support this filter are also quite
capable of, and almost certainly are, generating their own petitions asking
for it; more direct methods are a good plan.

Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707
   ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Ben Donohue
Don't pirates kidnap people and hold them for ransom, therefore denying 
their freedom?


Anyway, I for one don't mind the Gov't filtering out child porn and all 
the other crap that tries to get my attention.


There is so much good stuff out there that I can fill my mind with that 
rather than the lowest common denominator crud.


Yeah so flame me!
(Also, this should be moved to slug chat)

Ben



Mike wrote:
The no clean feed group have a template for a letter on their site I 
think, I'll try to dig it up later.


I think this is very relevant to us as linux/open source/free software 
users, if we follow the philosophy free as in freedom, not fee as in 
beer then that should go not only for the os and programs we use but 
for the Internet and our access to data.


I got an email from the president of the PPA with some ideas and advice:

Hi crew,

Pirate Party Australia has been working hard on getting press releases 
out and establishing media contacts to spread our message. We are 
establishing some working groups to plan a fresh round of national 
protests, and we are working on an overhaul of our IT systems. We are 
looking at sending members to LAN parties to communicate with the 
players, and sticking flyers up in city centres, where legally feasible.


So far, we have not touched a cent of the membership fees or 
donations, and some members are using their own funds on essential 
services, because we know that every dollar counts.


To those of you who have joined us already, thank you for your 
support. I know we haven't gotten back to most of you with 
confirmations, but we do plan to once we have started collating the 
memberships.


To everyone else, I would like to tell you some hard truths that you 
might not like to hear.


To fix the world, you have to do more than click some buttons on a 
website.We appreciate that you did sign up as a preliminary member, 
but sometimes you have to roll up your sleeves and get a little dirty. 
In this case, all we are asking you to do is to go through the process 
of actually printing a document and faxing it. I know it's an 
old-world effort, but it's really just a few minutes of effort.


For those of you who have not joined because of the money, send me an 
email atdavidcra...@pirateparty.org.au and we'll see if we can work 
something out. I grew up dirt poor, so I know what it is like to 
really not have a few dollars to spare.


For those of you who have not joined due to other issues, just look at 
yesterday's release of Senator Conroy's Internet censorship report. We 
don't have time to waste. So far, around 140 people, or about 1 in 10 
of the preliminary members have signed up. This is not good enough to 
affect serious change in Australia. We are trying to protect freedom 
of speech, but it looks like many of you don't have much to say. You 
need to get angry, and you need to join, and you need to convince 
other people to join. You need to do this by painting them a picture 
of what the world will be like if we don't put up a fight against the 
slide into tyranny that we are now facing. Ask the historians to 
imagine what Stalinist Russia would have been like if Stalin had the 
computing power of today. Tell them about how fragile democracy is and 
how it can be corrupted by just a few influential people over just a 
couple of decades. Let the environmentalists know that freedom needs 
to be protected, because without freedom, we don't have a world worth 
saving. Tell the libertarians that we are trying to keep the 
government out of their lives. Inform the concerned parents that we 
are fighting for their rights to run their own families. If you're in 
the country, speak to some farmers and tell them that we will stop 
companies from patenting their seeds. Tell the sick that we'll stop 
the drug companies from revelling in their pain. Tell the musicians 
that we will work with them to ensure they can earn good money doing 
what they love. Tell the trade unionists that we will work to repeal 
laws that infringe on their freedom of assembly. Let the gamers know 
that we'll rip out Michael Atkinson's spinal column if he doesn't 
realise that violent video games don't cause violent behaviour.


OK, maybe not the last one. In fact, I'm not even sure if my freedom 
of speech rights protect that statement now-a-days, so let me 
explicitly state that it was a joke that referenced Scorpion's 
finishing move in Mortal Kombat.


I hope my point is clear. We need you to join Pirate Party Australia, 
so we can protect our freedom to make the world a better place. You 
signed up as a preliminary member, so you already agree with our 
goals, so please make it official.



Regards,

David Crafti,
President
Pirate Party Australia

P.S.: Some people have stated a concern about being on the books as 
affiliated with the party, but the AEC treats the applications as 
confidential.


__

Contact 

Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Jill Brown

Not heard that one before.

Ben Donohue wrote:
Don't pirates kidnap people and hold them for ransom, therefore 
denying their freedom?




--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Adam Kennedy
Is anyone aware of any groups taking more direct technical action
against this proposal?

I'm more of a builder of things than a talker, and it occurs to me
that if the scope of potential blocking is as wide as it (naively, to
me) appears to be (and based on comments such as 80% of the 95
million porn sites fall under this criteria from the Sex Party etc)
then the theoretical maximum size of the block list is something like
100 million URLs and contains every online games shop that sells NC
video games, and so on and so forth.

I'm pondering the idea of automating the web trawling process to find
NC content, and then just submit all 100 million NC content URLs to
the people that maintain the blocklist...

This is to some degree idle speculation, and I'm sure that any
specific attempt to do something like this would need to be more
thoroughly researched, but if anyone can recommend any technical
anti-filter forums within the various groups protesting this it would
be handy...

Adam K

2009/12/15 Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com:
 I'm not sure if this belongs here, sorry if it doesn't.

 Well looks like the government got it's way. Our Internet will be censored
 next year.

 http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/115


 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Dean Hamstead

Anyone heard of actual protests?

Dean

Adam Kennedy wrote:

Is anyone aware of any groups taking more direct technical action
against this proposal?

I'm more of a builder of things than a talker, and it occurs to me
that if the scope of potential blocking is as wide as it (naively, to
me) appears to be (and based on comments such as 80% of the 95
million porn sites fall under this criteria from the Sex Party etc)
then the theoretical maximum size of the block list is something like
100 million URLs and contains every online games shop that sells NC
video games, and so on and so forth.

I'm pondering the idea of automating the web trawling process to find
NC content, and then just submit all 100 million NC content URLs to
the people that maintain the blocklist...

This is to some degree idle speculation, and I'm sure that any
specific attempt to do something like this would need to be more
thoroughly researched, but if anyone can recommend any technical
anti-filter forums within the various groups protesting this it would
be handy...

Adam K

2009/12/15 Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com:

I'm not sure if this belongs here, sorry if it doesn't.

Well looks like the government got it's way. Our Internet will be censored
next year.

http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/115


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html



--
http://fragfest.com.au
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Marghanita da Cruz

Dean Hamstead wrote:

Anyone heard of actual protests?



there is/was this...


Aussie Gamers all around the country are preparing to take to the streets this 
Saturday to protest the lack of an R18+ rating for video games in Australia


http://treatuslikeadults.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/protest-on-the-5th-of-december/
http://gamerblips.dailyradar.com/story/treat-us-like-adults-rally-for-an-r18-rating-brisbane/
http://www.growupaustralia.com/left-4-r18-rally-imminent-337/
http://left4r18.xtremenetworkonline.com/


BTW, regarding pirates, a tour guide on 
Rhodes explained it to methe people 
of Rhodes side with pirates from time 
to time, when they are no longer happy 
with their current legitimate owners. 
Then the pirates become legitimate 
rulers until the locals get a better 
offerin this way, the Arabs, 
Crusaders and Ottomans have come and 
gone. They are currently tolerating the 
Greeks and EU.


Marghanita



--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Ben Donohue wrote:
 Don't pirates kidnap people and hold them for ransom, therefore denying
 their freedom?

 Anyway, I for one don't mind the Gov't filtering out child porn and all
 the other crap that tries to get my attention.

 There is so much good stuff out there that I can fill my mind with that
 rather than the lowest common denominator crud.

 Yeah so flame me!
 (Also, this should be moved to slug chat)

 Ben
 Hi Ben,
Filtering such sites is not the problem. Responsible ISPs and even
Google already do this. It is the government using the motherhood
argument to sneak in a very powerful propaganda tool that is the problem.
Who then determines what is appropriate (and fits in with their values)?
It is putting into the hands of a public servant the power to determine
what is filtered for the rest of eternity and that is a problem.

The argument goes - to block undesirable sites we need to be able to
determine from time to time what is inappropriate material. {This can
include anything, even material that puts the government of the day in a
bad light}

Once the legislation is implemented then what is filtered is up to the
government of the day - or more likely a public servant until they
outsource the filtering to (say) Microsoft.

I know that this is an extreme example but:
For example, if they wish to convince the public of how wonderful their
new tax has been in the reduction of methane and carbon dioxide
pollution they only have to have all material that shows otherwise
listed as inappropriate for public access and block it. We would be none
the wiser as we would not know it existed.

Just my thoughts
Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkspwAoACgkQybPcBAs9CE8OCgCfZPzB/mAR53p2F9/4pyVSCPMy
EjkAn1Ak5fNhRqXHbFWxHVF/H5SdwlM3
=sk7h
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Adam Kennedy
I'm sure it wouldn't be QUITE that simple, but for 100 lines of code
I'm sure you could modify that to search for beastiality or Left 4
Dead 2 US Edition, scrape the front page to validate it a bit, then
submit.

But like I said, doing it properly would mean a bit more co-ordination...

Adam K

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:24 PM, David Lloyd lloy0...@adam.com.au wrote:

 Why would we need to bother writing something ourselves?

 1. Go to google
 2. Type in something likely to get bad content (eg. sex)
 3. Submit EVERY SINGLE result to the list arbitrators

 (Reasoning: well, clearly WE don't know what's classified - if we did, why
 would we need the Government to write great big laws about such things?)

 DSL

 -Original Message-
 From: Adam Kennedy adamkennedybac...@gmail.com
 Reply-to: a...@ali.as
 To: Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com
 Cc: slug@slug.org.au slug@slug.org.au
 Subject: Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets
 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:08:10 +1100

 Is anyone aware of any groups taking more direct technical action
 against this proposal?

 I'm more of a builder of things than a talker, and it occurs to me
 that if the scope of potential blocking is as wide as it (naively, to
 me) appears to be (and based on comments such as 80% of the 95
 million porn sites fall under this criteria from the Sex Party etc)
 then the theoretical maximum size of the block list is something like
 100 million URLs and contains every online games shop that sells NC
 video games, and so on and so forth.

 I'm pondering the idea of automating the web trawling process to find
 NC content, and then just submit all 100 million NC content URLs to
 the people that maintain the blocklist...

 This is to some degree idle speculation, and I'm sure that any
 specific attempt to do something like this would need to be more
 thoroughly researched, but if anyone can recommend any technical
 anti-filter forums within the various groups protesting this it would
 be handy...

 Adam K

 2009/12/15 Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com:
 I'm not sure if this belongs here, sorry if it doesn't.

 Well looks like the government got it's way. Our Internet will be censored
 next year.

 http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/115


 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Daniel Pittman
Adam Kennedy a...@ali.as writes:

 I'm sure it wouldn't be QUITE that simple, but for 100 lines of code
 I'm sure you could modify that to search for beastiality or Left 4
 Dead 2 US Edition, scrape the front page to validate it a bit, then
 submit.

 But like I said, doing it properly would mean a bit more co-ordination...

The ACMA process is documented on their website and, yes, does apparently
involve a human review of the details.  This existing system is used as the
basis for the updated mandatory component of the system.

...and you could probably overload that with a few thousand items a day,
personally, since it is not designed for high volume use; they envision less
than 20K to 30K items on that particular list.

Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707
   ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread David Lloyd

Why would we need to bother writing something ourselves?

1. Go to google
2. Type in something likely to get bad content (eg. sex)
3. Submit EVERY SINGLE result to the list arbitrators

(Reasoning: well, clearly WE don't know what's classified - if we did,
why would we need the Government to write great big laws about such
things?)

DSL

-Original Message-
From: Adam Kennedy adamkennedybac...@gmail.com
Reply-to: a...@ali.as
To: Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com
Cc: slug@slug.org.au slug@slug.org.au
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:08:10 +1100


Is anyone aware of any groups taking more direct technical action
against this proposal?

I'm more of a builder of things than a talker, and it occurs to me
that if the scope of potential blocking is as wide as it (naively, to
me) appears to be (and based on comments such as 80% of the 95
million porn sites fall under this criteria from the Sex Party etc)
then the theoretical maximum size of the block list is something like
100 million URLs and contains every online games shop that sells NC
video games, and so on and so forth.

I'm pondering the idea of automating the web trawling process to find
NC content, and then just submit all 100 million NC content URLs to
the people that maintain the blocklist...

This is to some degree idle speculation, and I'm sure that any
specific attempt to do something like this would need to be more
thoroughly researched, but if anyone can recommend any technical
anti-filter forums within the various groups protesting this it would
be handy...

Adam K

2009/12/15 Mike beatbreake...@gmail.com:
 I'm not sure if this belongs here, sorry if it doesn't.

 Well looks like the government got it's way. Our Internet will be censored
 next year.

 http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/115


 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Marghanita da Cruz

Daniel Pittman wrote:

Adam Kennedy a...@ali.as writes:


I'm sure it wouldn't be QUITE that simple, but for 100 lines of code
I'm sure you could modify that to search for beastiality or Left 4
Dead 2 US Edition, scrape the front page to validate it a bit, then
submit.

But like I said, doing it properly would mean a bit more co-ordination...


The ACMA process is documented on their website and, yes, does apparently
involve a human review of the details.  This existing system is used as the
basis for the updated mandatory component of the system.

...and you could probably overload that with a few thousand items a day,
personally, since it is not designed for high volume use; they envision less
than 20K to 30K items on that particular list.


snip
For Feb 09:

Complaints received  95
Invalid complaints1 4
Investigations terminated2  6
Investigations completed47
Content items actioned3 	40 

http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_311697#ONLINE

Marghanita
--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread meryl
Heracles is right. The Filtering problem is more about stifling freedoms
of speech and censoring the Net than it is about blocking child porn,
and it is bound to be extended into other areas so freedom of speech
will become a thing of the past for us in Australia. Apart from slowing
down our already sluggish Internet speeds, if it is introduced it is
likely to be extended down the track to include all manner of sites;
possibly even political dissenters... if they get away with this and
they'll add more and more sites to the list to the point where we may
one day envy the freedoms that the Chinese have! 

Really the child porn issue is just being used as an emotional ruse to
effect censorship controls because the purveyors of such material for
the most part would most likely use VPNs and other evasive methods to
avoid detection, as such their heinous activities will be totally
unaffected by the filter. How about the government catch these crooks
and lock them up instead of punishing all of us with this net-nanny
filter. 

By and large the Filter will be way more detrimental to the
average honest Internet user and the child pornographers will just sit
back and laugh at the stupidity of Australian government.

for more info see: 
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25773857-953,00.html
http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/312845/statistics_experts_label_isp_filtering_trials_unscientific?fp=16fpid=1
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/careful-big-brother-is-editing-you/story-e6frg7go-1225792964441
http://www.openforum.com.au/content/firewall-lies
http://libertus.net/liberty/
http://www.efa.org.au/censorship/mandatory-isp-blocking/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8AZ21hCkIg
and as always there's a Downfall video on the subject!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH35CVig3fQ

cheers,
Meryl
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Adam Kennedy
After a quick scan through the restricted classification database on
the censors site, from which it appears that detailed instructions on
the production of homemade gun silencers is rated RC, I managed to
find a random YouTube video showing such details, and submitted it to
see what the process is like.

As expected, it's a fairly trivially automatable process, with a
single captcha to prevent automated submission. This should be pretty
trivial to wrap in a website, so that we'd just need to build a URL
list in advance, ask random interweb volunteers to look at and solve
catchas, and the rest would be done more or less automatically.

I know some of the filtering systems will use DNS to prefilter HTTP
requests, resolving all sites present in the block list across to the
proxies that do the more detailed filtering. This, by the way, is how
half of the UK appeared to be arriving at Wikipedia from the same IP
address earlier in the year.

Assuming this test complaint gets approved, something similar should
happen to all Australian traffic going to YouTube for any ISP using
that kind of filter system.

We'll see how it goes, and I'm sure we're rapidly getting to the point
where we should move this discussion off the SLUG list...

Adam K

2009/12/17 Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net:
 The ACMA process is documented on their website and, yes, does apparently
 involve a human review of the details.  This existing system is used as the
 basis for the updated mandatory component of the system.

 ...and you could probably overload that with a few thousand items a day,
 personally, since it is not designed for high volume use; they envision less
 than 20K to 30K items on that particular list.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 16:08 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
 Is anyone aware of any groups taking more direct technical action
 against this proposal?
..
 I'm pondering the idea of automating the web trawling process to find
 NC content, and then just submit all 100 million NC content URLs to
 the people that maintain the blocklist...

Political problems need political solutions: the technology needed to do
fast lookups on a 100 million plus string corpus already exists; all
you'd do is push the price up (and probably centralise it to one nation
wide solution). False positives, broken applications  induced latency
are much more concerning technical aspects than filter size.

The fundamental issue though, is that Australia is already censored: the
debate about whether the internet should be censored is a bit misguided
IMO: a better debate is that films are already censored: there isn't a
strong argument why the internet /shouldn't be/, unless you consider the
film censoring a problem (I do).

Really, what I think we should be pushing for is:
 - RC material is abolished as a catch all category 
 - Adults are required to ensure their children are not permitted access
to adult only material, but the means is left to the parents to achieve.
 - This would apply to movies, magazines, etc. No more special treatment
for canberra :)

-Rob 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Adam Kennedy
I'm not suggesting this be the ONLY way of dealing with the issue.

If it's possibly to at least remove all the excuses that it's cheap
and easy, and demonstrate an ongoing series of high profile false
positives, and the resulting latency issues, and that the whole thing
is ungodly expensive.

Surely taking the problem we know exist and making those problems
real, immediate, high profile, and tangible, would provide some
benefit to the people doing the more serious political work.

Adam K

2009/12/17 Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net:
 On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 16:08 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
 Is anyone aware of any groups taking more direct technical action
 against this proposal?
 ..
 I'm pondering the idea of automating the web trawling process to find
 NC content, and then just submit all 100 million NC content URLs to
 the people that maintain the blocklist...

 Political problems need political solutions: the technology needed to do
 fast lookups on a 100 million plus string corpus already exists; all
 you'd do is push the price up (and probably centralise it to one nation
 wide solution). False positives, broken applications  induced latency
 are much more concerning technical aspects than filter size.

 The fundamental issue though, is that Australia is already censored: the
 debate about whether the internet should be censored is a bit misguided
 IMO: a better debate is that films are already censored: there isn't a
 strong argument why the internet /shouldn't be/, unless you consider the
 film censoring a problem (I do).

 Really, what I think we should be pushing for is:
  - RC material is abolished as a catch all category
  - Adults are required to ensure their children are not permitted access
 to adult only material, but the means is left to the parents to achieve.
  - This would apply to movies, magazines, etc. No more special treatment
 for canberra :)

 -Rob

 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Australian government to censor your internets

2009-12-16 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 18:24 +1100, Adam Kennedy wrote:
 I'm not suggesting this be the ONLY way of dealing with the issue.
 
 If it's possibly to at least remove all the excuses that it's cheap
 and easy, and demonstrate an ongoing series of high profile false
 positives, and the resulting latency issues, and that the whole thing
 is ungodly expensive.

10's of millions is already ungodly expensive ;). 

 Surely taking the problem we know exist and making those problems
 real, immediate, high profile, and tangible, would provide some
 benefit to the people doing the more serious political work.

It may simply backfire by making 'the problem' more tangible measurable
and accessible to the fearmongers, permitting them more draconian plans
and more money wasted.

-Rob 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html