Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread Ken Foskey
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:01 +1000, Heracles wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Hi All,
 Just found my own answer. I still had the old libswfdecmozilla plugin
 loaded so it was trying to display the flash. Removed the link and it
 now works EXCEPT for the sound.
 Heracles
 
 Heracles wrote:
  Has anyone had much luck with the 64 bit flash plugin. I can't seem to
  get it to work properly. All I get is a black screen.

Make sure you are using the genuine alpha for Flash.   There is a
nswrapper thing that is really dodgy.

This might help, have only scanned it but looks pretty good

http://ubuntulinuxhelp.com/adobe-flash-10-64-bit-use-the-alpha-version-instead/

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ken Foskey wrote:
Snip...
 
 Make sure you are using the genuine alpha for Flash.   There is a
 nswrapper thing that is really dodgy.
 
 This might help, have only scanned it but looks pretty good
 
 http://ubuntulinuxhelp.com/adobe-flash-10-64-bit-use-the-alpha-version-instead/
 
Thanks Ken,
I checked and I am using the official alpha plugin
libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz  to be exact.
I can now get silent video perfectly, that is I get no sound.
My sound card is a Creative Sound Blaster Live! and the onboard sound is
turned off in the BIOS so all shpuld be fine. I have sound in all other
applications and if I capture a flash file and play it back using Totem
2.22.1 I get sound.

Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ/vRHybPcBAs9CE8RAvuWAKCAgVDpcMM1UrkL22w8D+vzIOfaogCdGoTR
WjAy0YE93pReRg5DbQCcINo=
=y77T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread peter
 heracles == heracles  herac...@iprimus.com.au writes:

heracles -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

heracles Ken Foskey wrote: Snip...
 
heracles Thanks Ken, I checked and I am using the official alpha
heracles plugin libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz to
heracles be exact.  I can now get silent video perfectly, that is I
heracles get no sound.  My sound card is a Creative Sound Blaster
heracles Live! and the onboard sound is turned off in the BIOS so all
heracles shpuld be fine. I have sound in all other applications and
heracles if I capture a flash file and play it back using Totem
heracles 2.22.1 I get sound.


Last I remember, Mozilla+Flash tries to use the (obsolete) OSS
framework instead of ALSA.  I think there's a wrpper programme you can
use to force use of ALSA, but its name currently escapes me.

On a related topic, has anyone been able to get the GNU Flash
replacement, gnash, working well?  For me, it seems to leak memory,
and use up lots of processor time without displaying things correctly
--- same as the non-free flash player.

Peter c
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
pe...@chubb.wattle.id.au writes:
 heracles == heracles  herac...@iprimus.com.au writes:
 heracles Ken Foskey wrote: Snip...
 
 heracles Thanks Ken, I checked and I am using the official alpha
 heracles plugin libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz to
 heracles be exact.  I can now get silent video perfectly, that is I
 heracles get no sound.  My sound card is a Creative Sound Blaster
 heracles Live! and the onboard sound is turned off in the BIOS so all
 heracles shpuld be fine. I have sound in all other applications and
 heracles if I capture a flash file and play it back using Totem
 heracles 2.22.1 I get sound.

 Last I remember, Mozilla+Flash tries to use the (obsolete) OSS
 framework instead of ALSA.

No longer, in Flash 10, which is nice.

 I think there's a wrpper programme you can use to force use of ALSA,
 but its name currently escapes me.

Historically, libflashsupport, which the OP indicated he had an older
version of installed that caused some of the problems with crashing.

 On a related topic, has anyone been able to get the GNU Flash
 replacement, gnash, working well?

Well?  No.

 For me, it seems to leak memory, and use up lots of processor time
 without displaying things correctly --- same as the non-free flash
 player.

Just like my experience, only non-free Flash gets it right
occasionally, at least. ;)

More seriously, none of the free Flash replacements worked correctly
outside of the Firefox environment when I last tested them, which was
very disappointing.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
Ken Foskey fos...@tpg.com.au writes:
 On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:01 +1000, Heracles wrote:

 Just found my own answer. I still had the old libswfdecmozilla plugin
 loaded so it was trying to display the flash. Removed the link and it
 now works EXCEPT for the sound.
 Heracles

 Heracles wrote:
  Has anyone had much luck with the 64 bit flash plugin. I can't seem to
  get it to work properly. All I get is a black screen.

 Make sure you are using the genuine alpha for Flash.  There is a
 nswrapper thing that is really dodgy.

I think you mean nspluginwrapper, which is a tool that runs Netscape
compatible plugins in a separate process from the main Firefox process.

The underlying model is sound[1], but since nspluginwrapper is not as
well integrated into the browser — being separately developed — it has
some minor rough edges.

Generally speaking, keeping up to date with the latest release of
nspluginwrapper if you are updating your plugins is a good plan.

Regards,
Daniel

Footnotes: 
[1]  Opera have used it for years, and it works extremely well.  Flash
 crashing never peturbed the browser, which was good when it did
 that approximately every time it was used.

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread foskey
Quoting Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net:
 More seriously, none of the free Flash replacements worked correctly
 outside of the Firefox environment when I last tested them, which
 was
 very disappointing.

Flash crashes in Firefox occasionally and gives up on some of my son's
flash games which frustrates him however I always get good results from
vlc playing flash.   I use an extension to grab the media file then play
it outside firefox.

Ta
Ken
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread Daniel Pittman
fos...@tpg.com.au writes:
 Quoting Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net:

 More seriously, none of the free Flash replacements worked correctly
 outside of the Firefox environment when I last tested them, which was
 very disappointing.

 Flash crashes in Firefox occasionally and gives up on some of my son's
 flash games which frustrates him however I always get good results
 from vlc playing flash.  I use an extension to grab the media file
 then play it outside firefox.

Apropos my other comment, the latest releases of nspluginwrapper support
native mode where they run a 32/32 or 64/64 plugin in their out of
process model.

You might find it worthwhile to try that and see if it insulates you
from having the entire browser crash just because flash did.

(Plus, the flashblock extension is your friend, so that you don't get a
 dozen competitive pages with flash at ones, but you probably already
 knew that. :)

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-04 Thread Michael Chesterton


On 05/05/2009, at 12:09 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
(Plus, the flashblock extension is your friend, so that you don't  
get a

dozen competitive pages with flash at ones, but you probably already
knew that. :)


I used to run a plugin which i think was called aniblock, which gave you
options of not running animated gifs (or running once only), but you  
could

right click the gif and run it if you wanted.

Anyone know how to do this now? ATM I've turned animated gifs off via
about:config but I've lost the option of right clicking running them.

--

http://chesterton.id.au/blog/
http://barrang.com.au/


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-03 Thread Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Has anyone had much luck with the 64 bit flash plugin. I can't seem to
get it to work properly. All I get is a black screen.

Heracles


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ/mD0ybPcBAs9CE8RApnBAKC+PdQd/Tu+DypmOnqyUrDj4q4HgQCggs5W
rcmn6fbWbfgwsShEHTYePUA=
=FSv9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-03 Thread Daniel Pittman
Heracles herac...@iprimus.com.au writes:

 Has anyone had much luck with the 64 bit flash plugin. I can't seem to
 get it to work properly. All I get is a black screen.

Yes, but.  The first but is that you told us exactly nothing about your
environment, so the fact that it works fine for me under Opera on
Debian/sid may not mean anything if you run a different browser,
distribution or whatever.

The second but is that if you have a 64-bit CPU without LAHF support the
JIT engine behind 64-bit flash will emit those instructions anyway[1]
and cause the flash plugin to crash.

This is a known issue, reported to Adobe, and they have given no
indication of any response to it at all.

Regards,
Daniel

Footnotes: 
[1]  Apparently 64-bit Windows emulates them in software if they are
 absent, but Linux doesn't, so this work fine for Windows...

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-03 Thread Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi All,
Just found my own answer. I still had the old libswfdecmozilla plugin
loaded so it was trying to display the flash. Removed the link and it
now works EXCEPT for the sound.
Heracles

Heracles wrote:
 Has anyone had much luck with the 64 bit flash plugin. I can't seem to
 get it to work properly. All I get is a black screen.
 
 Heracles
 
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ/miUybPcBAs9CE8RAhQXAKC+YdM27K7p2I2b4jXmkucWC6ITmwCgxVUQ
d/rTNReGEi/sYx9pLZ94SvQ=
=x2Rj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] 64 bit flash

2009-05-03 Thread Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Just found out that one of the flags is LAHF_lm.
Environment is Ubuntu 8.04 X86_64 with 1.5GB RAM
Flash now works with no sound.

Thanks
Heracles

Daniel Pittman wrote:
 Heracles herac...@iprimus.com.au writes:
 
 Has anyone had much luck with the 64 bit flash plugin. I can't seem to
 get it to work properly. All I get is a black screen.
 
 Yes, but.  The first but is that you told us exactly nothing about your
 environment, so the fact that it works fine for me under Opera on
 Debian/sid may not mean anything if you run a different browser,
 distribution or whatever.
 
 The second but is that if you have a 64-bit CPU without LAHF support the
 JIT engine behind 64-bit flash will emit those instructions anyway[1]
 and cause the flash plugin to crash.
 
 This is a known issue, reported to Adobe, and they have given no
 indication of any response to it at all.
 
 Regards,
 Daniel
 
 Footnotes: 
 [1]  Apparently 64-bit Windows emulates them in software if they are
  absent, but Linux doesn't, so this work fine for Windows...
 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJ/mrwybPcBAs9CE8RAs4pAJ9mT5pe5NwmY5GJXsK6nJfn0OvDzACgq4EY
Ln9KsE3XVNm/SDOYntpMQes=
=r3H0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] 64 bit flash chroot

2005-12-27 Thread tuxta2

Hi once again,
I am running Ubuntu Breezy 64 bit for the first time, it seems stable 
and pretty good.
I ran into a hurdle though, there is no 64bit flashplayer, and the 
mplayer codecs dont work on 64 bit.
I read that I can run a 32 bit firefox in a chroot environment and 
therefore be able to use all the plugins etc.

Can I do the same with mplayer and its codecs??
I really have no idea how to do this, can someone point me to a good 
howto? yes I did google but got frustrated, Im obviously not very good 
at finding what I am after.
I am hoping I dont have to go back to 32 bit Ubuntu, it seems a shame 
not to use the hardware for what it was designed for.


Also for the 64 bit desktop users out there, is there anything else I 
have to look out for other than flash and codecs not working?


Thanks again

Tuxta
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html