[SLUG] ADSL - FULL Bridge - HELP!! - Netcomm1300+4

2004-01-13 Thread Grahame M. Kelly
Hi Sluggers.

I am trying without much reliability to have a Netcomm 1300 + 4 ADSL
modem running in full bridge mode with SwifDSL.com.au as the ISP.
ISP is wonderfull, its the bloody modem or my setup I suspect.
I can't run half bridge (which works wonderfully without problem for weeks)
its simply I need full bridge so the Linux box with Apache+SSL certificate
work with the assigned static IP address (SSL need it otherwise certificate
porblems arise).

I am using SuSE Pro 9.0 and every setups and runs without errors.
Ifconfig looks follows:

eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:BF:4E:1F:F9
  inet addr:192.168.1.6  Bcast:255.255.255.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::250:bfff:fe4e:1ff9/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:5357 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:4265 errors:2 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:2
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
  RX bytes:2475248 (2.3 Mb)  TX bytes:528631 (516.2 Kb)
  Interrupt:5 Base address:0xd800

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:E8:13:83:9B
  inet addr:192.168.10.1  Bcast:192.168.10.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::200:e8ff:fe13:839b/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:1195 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:1610 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
  RX bytes:143087 (139.7 Kb)  TX bytes:1652323 (1.5 Mb)
  Interrupt:11 Base address:0xd400

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:68 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:68 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:4360 (4.2 Kb)  TX bytes:4360 (4.2 Kb)

ppp0  Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
  inet addr:218.214.53.231  P-t-P:202.154.95.185  Mask:255.255.255.255
  UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1492  Metric:1
  RX packets:5260 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:4163 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
  RX bytes:2353044 (2.2 Mb)  TX bytes:432752 (422.6 Kb)


and routing is fine:

Has anyone got a Netcomm 1300+4 running FULL BRIDGE mode ?
Can you offer any suggestions on what I should look at?

Thanks Grahame.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ADSL - FULL Bridge - HELP!! - Netcomm1300+4

2004-01-13 Thread Del
Has anyone got a Netcomm 1300+4 running FULL BRIDGE mode ?
Can you offer any suggestions on what I should look at?
I have a number of them running on Swiftel.  The simple fact is
that I've found that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
Swiftel say it's a Telstra problem, that on some lines PPPoE
just doesn't work and so you have to use PPPoA on the modem.
I don't think they know what the problem is.  The fact is that
in some situations it just can't be made to work.
So you have a couple of options:

(a) replace the modem.  It might work better with a different
modem, can't guarantee this because I haven't tried it although
the reports on whirlpool seem to indicate that this is the case.
(b) pay for a 4 IP netblock from Swiftel and run the modem
as a router, giving you a spare (routed) IP for your SSL
server.
(c) change ISPs.  TPG run all of their modems in bridged mode
and it always works all of the time.  They don't have a reasonably
priced 512/512 plan, though, and I find their network is a bit
slower than Swiftel's.
--
Del
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ADSL - FULL Bridge - HELP!! - Netcomm1300+4

2004-01-13 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:32:01PM +1100, Grahame M. Kelly wrote:
 I am trying without much reliability to have a Netcomm 1300 + 4 ADSL
 modem running in full bridge mode with SwifDSL.com.au as the ISP.

Full Bridge (I presume we're talking RFC1483 bridging here) and this:

 ppp0  Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol

Are somewhat counter to each other.  The typical mode of a DSL modem in a
bridging configuration is one where one of the ethernet cards is assigned
the IP address needed, and the modem is plugged into that port.  The
ethernet card then throws appropriately addressed packets out that port
(after having been told that it's default gateway is out that port,
typically) and the packets get routed nicely.

Your ethernet cards are both currently assigned reserved addresses, which is
nice but probably not what you're after here.  You'll want to reassign your
'net connection one's address to the one given by your provider.

- Matt
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ADSL - FULL Bridge - HELP!! - Netcomm1300+4

2004-01-13 Thread Terry Collins
Del wrote:

...snip.

 Swiftel say it's a Telstra problem, that on some lines PPPoE
 just doesn't work and so you have to use PPPoA on the modem.
 I don't think they know what the problem is.  The fact is that
 in some situations it just can't be made to work.
 
 So you have a couple of options:
 
 (a) replace the modem.  It might work better with a different
 modem, can't guarantee this because I haven't tried it although
 the reports on whirlpool seem to indicate that this is the case.
 
Well, if that is the case, then DO NOT use the Netcomm NB3300.  I am on
Swiftel with that modem and it continually returns to PPPoA.

-- 
   Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at woa.com.au  www:
http://www.woa.com.au  
   Wombat Outdoor Adventures Bicycles, Computers, GIS, Printing,
Publishing

 People without trees are like fish without clean water
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html