Re: [SLUG] Re: fedora 13 qemu guest (Peter Miller) (Daniel Pittman)

2010-09-09 Thread Daniel Pittman
Brett Mahar brett.ma...@gmail.com writes:

 That sounds suspiciously like you are either running fully emulated (eg: no
 KVM support) on Slackware, or that you don't have virtio on that platform.

 It would be interesting, to me, to know if either of those guesses were
 true, because I have a current need to improve my skills diagnosing KVM
 performance issues and feedback helps with that. :)

 I only thought it was that because I could not think what else it could
 be. In the next few weeks I hope to have some time to investigate further,
 and will let you know.

Well, cool.  FWIW, checking for virtio should be as simple as lspci inside the
guest, and checking if you have a virtio device or not.

 Is the backing store for the virtual machine also on the USB disk?  If so
 it would point a finger toward guest I/O performance is the pain point, and
 the introduction of USB would just be making a painful service slower.

 In all cases the virtual hard drive was on an (real) external usb drive (not
 the same one as the host OS was sometimes on). So I don't think the guest
 I/O is the culprit.

Yeah, that would eliminate that by ensuring it was identical.

Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707
   ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: fedora 13 qemu guest (Peter Miller) (Daniel Pittman)

2010-09-08 Thread Brett Mahar
 That sounds suspiciously like you are either running fully emulated (eg: no
 KVM support) on Slackware, or that you don't have virtio on that platform.


 It would be interesting, to me, to know if either of those guesses were true,
 because I have a current need to improve my skills diagnosing KVM performance
 issues and feedback helps with that. :)

I only thought it was that because I could not think what else it
could be. In the next few weeks I hope to have some time to
investigate further, and will let you know.


 Is the backing store for the virtual machine also on the USB disk?  If so it
 would point a finger toward guest I/O performance is the pain point, and the
 introduction of USB would just be making a painful service slower.

In all cases the virtual hard drive was on an (real) external usb
drive (not the same one as the host OS was sometimes on). So I don't
think the guest I/O is the culprit.

Brett.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html