[SLUG] Re: lynx's homepage?

2002-03-21 Thread Angus Lees

At 21 Mar 2002 10:17:51 +1100,
Peter Hardy wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 10:11, Jamie Honan wrote:
> > Pictures, frames, ssl, and text mode browsing.
> 
> Does w3m do http auth?  This is the one sticking point that's stopped me
> from replacing lynx with links on all of my machines.

w3m does. links does not.

i tend to use w3m for viewing local html files, and links for actual
web browsing, since links does render-while-downloading, etc which
makes it feel a little nicer over a slow link.

i got freaked out by w3m displaying an image in my xterm just a few
days ago. since when/how does an xterm display an image?

there's also w3, which can be textual or graphical, depending on what
options you have turned on. w3 is the emacs web browser, of course ;)
having said that, i've started using w3m-el, since i've found w3 to be
a little slow on my machine. (i wish some of the "popular" web browser
groups would have a look at w3 and steal some ideas out of it tho)

-- 
 - Gus
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: lynx's homepage?

2002-03-21 Thread Andre Pang

On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 11:32:03PM +1100, Angus Lees wrote:

> At 21 Mar 2002 10:17:51 +1100,
> Peter Hardy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 10:11, Jamie Honan wrote:
> > > Pictures, frames, ssl, and text mode browsing.
> > 
> > Does w3m do http auth?  This is the one sticking point that's stopped me
> > from replacing lynx with links on all of my machines.
> 
> w3m does. links does not.

What do you mean by http auth?  The login/password stuff set on a
htpasswd file?  (Just making sure that you're not talking about
general SSL).

> i got freaked out by w3m displaying an image in my xterm just a few
> days ago. since when/how does an xterm display an image?

Escape codes; I think it's G.  I don't know if there's
support for it in the official xterm, but I think rxvt has had an
experimental graphics mode thing for yonks, and therefore aterm
would too.  Not sure about Eterm and xterm.

That's pretty funky though.  I've never _seen_ graphics in a
terminal before, even though there's theoretically been support
for it for ages ...


-- 
#ozone/algorithm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  - trust.in.love.to.save
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug



Re: [SLUG] Re: lynx's homepage?

2002-03-21 Thread John Clarke

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 11:36:10AM +1100, Andre Pang wrote:

> That's pretty funky though.  I've never _seen_ graphics in a
> terminal before, even though there's theoretically been support

I assume you're talking about xterm here.  Graphics terminals have been
around for years: the first computer game I ever encountered (1975) was
Moon Lander on a mainframe (Burroughs or IBM, but I've long since
recycled the neurons which remembered which one) running on a vector
graphics terminal.

Even VT-220s could do limited graphics through downloadable character
sets.  I remember using Word Perfect 5.1 on VMS and doing Print Preview
on a VT-220.  OK, so it was a bit chunky, but it gave you a good idea
of how the page would look.


Cheers,

John
-- 
whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key id: 0xD59C360F
http://kirriwa.net/john/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug