[SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Mick Boda
Hi All,

Just a point of clarification.  I appear to be sending replies off the
mark (ie, not to the list).

I'm using Ximian as my mail client.  To post to the list do I hit reply?
Or will this use the private email.  As Jeff Waugh pointed out, my RE:'s
keep changing, that's because I usually type a a new e-mail to respond,
fearing that hitting reply sends the email to the private address.

This is only mailing list I use, everyone else I speak to is through
forums, which are obviously different.

Regards

Mick



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Peter Hardy
On 04 Apr 2003 11:33:41 +1000 Mick Boda wrote:
 I'm using Ximian as my mail client.  To post to the list do I hit
 reply? Or will this use the private email.

If you hit the reply button on the toolbar, that will reply privately. 
Check the Actions menu, and it should have a Reply to List entry, that
will set the To: address to the mailing list.

Have a play (without hitting send ;-), and see what the different reply
buttons do, basically.

-- 
Pete
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Stuart Guthrie
Right mouse on the email in the top email listing and choose 'reply to
list'

HTH

Stu

On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 11:33, Mick Boda wrote:
 Hi All,
 
 Just a point of clarification.  I appear to be sending replies off the
 mark (ie, not to the list).
 
 I'm using Ximian as my mail client.  To post to the list do I hit reply?
 Or will this use the private email.  As Jeff Waugh pointed out, my RE:'s
 keep changing, that's because I usually type a a new e-mail to respond,
 fearing that hitting reply sends the email to the private address.
 
 This is only mailing list I use, everyone else I speak to is through
 forums, which are obviously different.
 
 Regards
 
 Mick
 
 
 
 -- 
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
 More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
 


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


RE: [SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Bernie Pannell
 From: Mick Boda

 I'm using Ximian as my mail client.  To post to the list do I hit reply?
 Or will this use the private email.  As Jeff Waugh pointed out, my RE:'s
 keep changing, that's because I usually type a a new e-mail to respond,
 fearing that hitting reply sends the email to the private address.

you want your replies to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for me, using Outlook, I must hit Reply to All to get the slug address
included, otherwise, like you, if I hit Reply it only goes to the private
address of the sender, which, in my opinion, is broken, meaning that Reply
*should* default to the slug address.

As others have just indicated, looks like Ximian has a Reply to List
button.

Regards,
Bernie.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Mary
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003, Mick Boda wrote:
 Just a point of clarification.  I appear to be sending replies off the
 mark (ie, not to the list).
 
 I'm using Ximian as my mail client.  To post to the list do I hit
 reply?  Or will this use the private email.  As Jeff Waugh pointed
 out, my RE:'s keep changing, that's because I usually type a a new
 e-mail to respond, fearing that hitting reply sends the email to the
 private address.

Reply will reply only to the sender, that is, privately. Reply to
all or Group Reply will send mail to the sender, and anyone they sent
the mail to (in this case, normally the sender and the list).

Evolution also has a reply to list function, which it *seems* you can
access by right clicking on a message. Many people like you to just
reply to the list, rather than reply-to-all, because reply-to-all which
will send the original sender two copies - your one and the one that
went to the list.

See Replying to Email Messages in
http://www.ximian.com/support/manuals/evolution_10/usage-mail-getnsend-send.html

Failing all else, you can press Reply and change To: field to read
[EMAIL PROTECTED], rather than what was there already, but
reply-to-list should do this.

-Mary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


RE: [SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Dave Airlie
 included, otherwise, like you, if I hit Reply it only goes to the private
 address of the sender, which, in my opinion, is broken, meaning that Reply
 *should* default to the slug address.

This is something that comes up on every list all the time, neither way is
truly broken, its like KDE vs GNOME or vi vs emacs, so you should say
really, in my opinion, is not an ideal configuration.

Another list I'm on has the same policy and the listmaster always backs it
up with the simple line, better to send a mail to one person in error
than 1000

Dave.
 
 As others have just indicated, looks like Ximian has a Reply to List
 button.

 Regards,
 Bernie.



-- 
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug


Re: [SLUG] Replying to the list

2003-04-03 Thread Mary
Everyone who has seen the Reply-To argument before should either skip
this mail, or read my very last paragraph, as it describes new Mailman
functionality that *may* obselete this argument. Replies to slug-chat (I
set the header myself!)

On Fri, Apr 04, 2003, Dave Airlie wrote:
  included, otherwise, like you, if I hit Reply it only goes to the private
  address of the sender, which, in my opinion, is broken, meaning that Reply
  *should* default to the slug address.
 
 This is something that comes up on every list all the time, neither way is
 truly broken, its like KDE vs GNOME or vi vs emacs, so you should say
 really, in my opinion, is not an ideal configuration.

The arguments against and for setting replies to go to the list are
here:

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

http://www.metasystema.org/essays/reply-to-useful.mhtml

You'll find that the vast majority of Linux and Free Software mailing
lists do *not* set Reply-To the list - that is, the vast majority are
like the SLUG lists. This herd effect is part of the reason I don't like
to have the Reply-To set to point to the list - people will have to deal
with the group-reply or list-reply solution at some point.

Important note: SLUG now uses Mailman 2.1. If you go to
http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug and go to the box where you can
edit our subscription options, you'll see a Avoid duplicate copies of
messages?. People who really hate receiving two copies when someone
replies to them might find this useful. (Yes, procmail users, if you
filter on something other than TO_ this still means the mails will go to
the wrong place - I do this too, hence I don't use the Avoid duplicate
copies of messages? feature, but it's still worth pointing out.)

-Mary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug