[SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-25 Thread Kevin Saenz
Hi all,
I just bought a d-link g650+ for my laptop I was just wondering if 
anyone has got the card working under any distro. At the moment I am 
looking at compiling in to 2.6.7 kernel the modules for acx100,
Have searched google to find most people with silimar problems and no 
real solution.

Thanks
Kevin
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-11-14 Thread Kevin Saenz
Hi all,

Can anyone recommend a "good" 802.11g card that will work with 2.6
kernel? I would like to be able to use either 256Bit Wep or wpa-psk to
connect to my network, price is no issue.

Thanks

Kevin
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-25 Thread James Gray
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:29 pm, Kevin Saenz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just bought a d-link g650+ for my laptop I was just wondering if
> anyone has got the card working under any distro. At the moment I am
> looking at compiling in to 2.6.7 kernel the modules for acx100,
> Have searched google to find most people with silimar problems and no
> real solution.

Hi Kevin,

I know this is probably not much help, but I have a DLink DWL-660 which 
works wonderfully under both Debian Stable & Unstable, and SuSE 9.1.  It 
uses the orinoco_cs module, and (I believe) is a Prism2 based card.  
Biggest bummer for me is the 660 doesn't support WPA...guess what the 
university is rolling out for wireless access?? G.

I know the Dlink 650's use a slightly different chipset, but I know people 
who have them working under Linux (Debian in fact).  Make sure you have the 
hotplug package installed and the right kernel modules compiled (just 
compile all the WiFi modules for starters, then strip out the ones you 
don't need later).

What problems/errors are you getting with your current set up?

James
-- 
Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-26 Thread Stuart Guthrie
I made the same mistake. The TI drivers are out there but very alpha
with no promises of working at all well. I sold mine on to a 'doze user
and solved the cisco aironet problem that led me down the path of a
D-link 650+ (the 'G' right?).

Things may have changed in the 3 months since but I'd sell it and buy
another.  The chipset unfortunately really matters.

'Orinoco' chipsets seem to the the best supported although I got an
amtel device going well after considerable effort. 

There really needs to be a 'Powers On Linux' sticker on these gizmos.

Stu


On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 21:29, Kevin Saenz wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I just bought a d-link g650+ for my laptop I was just wondering if 
> anyone has got the card working under any distro. At the moment I am 
> looking at compiling in to 2.6.7 kernel the modules for acx100,
> Have searched google to find most people with silimar problems and no 
> real solution.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Kevin

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-26 Thread Kevin Saenz
When I plug the card into the laptop (HP pavilion ze4103s)
the log message I get is
Jun 27 16:17:52 laptop kernel: PCI: Enabling device :02:00.0 ( 
-> 0002)
Jun 27 16:17:52 laptop kernel: acx100_pci: probe of :02:00.0 failed 
with err
or -5

I have downloaded acx100 libraries and currently compiling the kernel.
I know this is probably not much help, but I have a DLink DWL-660 which 
works wonderfully under both Debian Stable & Unstable, and SuSE 9.1.  It 
uses the orinoco_cs module, and (I believe) is a Prism2 based card.  
Biggest bummer for me is the 660 doesn't support WPA...guess what the 
university is rolling out for wireless access?? G.

I know the Dlink 650's use a slightly different chipset, but I know people 
who have them working under Linux (Debian in fact).  Make sure you have the 
hotplug package installed and the right kernel modules compiled (just 
compile all the WiFi modules for starters, then strip out the ones you 
don't need later).

What problems/errors are you getting with your current set up?
James
 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-26 Thread Kevin Saenz
yes it's a G. hmmm, when I was looking for wireless cards a guy from elx 
told me that they don't sell wireless cards because some of distributers 
seem to change chipset mid stream and not tell anyone.
hopefully the stuff I have found works ;-)

I made the same mistake. The TI drivers are out there but very alpha
with no promises of working at all well. I sold mine on to a 'doze user
and solved the cisco aironet problem that led me down the path of a
D-link 650+ (the 'G' right?).
Things may have changed in the 3 months since but I'd sell it and buy
another.  The chipset unfortunately really matters.
'Orinoco' chipsets seem to the the best supported although I got an
amtel device going well after considerable effort. 

There really needs to be a 'Powers On Linux' sticker on these gizmos.
 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-27 Thread Harald Richard Ashburner
Kevin Saenz said:
>yes it's a G. hmmm, when I was looking for wireless cards a guy from elx 
>told me that they don't sell wireless cards because some of distributers 
>seem to change chipset mid stream and not tell anyone.
>hopefully the stuff I have found works ;-)

ELX sold me a pci wireless card for my desktop not two weeks ago. And no
it doesn't work with linux, and looking at their site, they knew that
when they sold it to me. :(
Nothing interesting on the page I ordered it from, but deep in the 'more
info' link from that page "this don't work with linux"
Hmmm...
I'll send it back, and they're good guys so they'll no doubt sort out a
refund without too much fuss. But I guess it would have been nice not to
loose that time and postage & handling costs - which could have been
avoided if the changed chipset warning was right their on the ordering 
page where it belonged, or they stopped selling it when the chipset
changed.
Wireless hardware sucks hard under linux. That ain't the fault of the
linux users and developers.

All the best with it. 

-- 
Kind regards,
Hal Ashburner
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-27 Thread ksaenz
I have the card working now ;-)

I have followed the doco on linuxquestions.org. I will test it against other
wireless devices shortly.

> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:29 pm, Kevin Saenz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just bought a d-link g650+ for my laptop I was just wondering if
> > anyone has got the card working under any distro. At the moment I am
> > looking at compiling in to 2.6.7 kernel the modules for acx100,
> > Have searched google to find most people with silimar problems and no
> > real solution.
> 
> Hi Kevin,
> 
> I know this is probably not much help, but I have a DLink DWL-660 which 
> works wonderfully under both Debian Stable & Unstable, and SuSE 9.1.  It 
> uses the orinoco_cs module, and (I believe) is a Prism2 based card.  
> Biggest bummer for me is the 660 doesn't support WPA...guess what the 
> university is rolling out for wireless access?? G.
> 
> I know the Dlink 650's use a slightly different chipset, but I know people 
> who have them working under Linux (Debian in fact).  Make sure you have the 
> hotplug package installed and the right kernel modules compiled (just 
> compile all the WiFi modules for starters, then strip out the ones you 
> don't need later).
> 
> What problems/errors are you getting with your current set up?
> 
> James
> -- 
> Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
> 
> 




-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-29 Thread Rev Simon Rumble
This one time, at band camp, Stuart Guthrie wrote:

> 'Orinoco' chipsets seem to the the best supported although I got an
> amtel device going well after considerable effort. 

Prism 2.5 chipsets are also well supported, particularly if you want
to run it in access point mode.

-- 
Rev Simon Rumble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.rumble.net

 "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it,
  he is obligated to do so."
- Thomas Jefferson
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless pcmcia cards

2004-06-29 Thread Kevin Saenz
Ok what 11g cards come with either chip set also where can I find them?
I have got the D-link card working but I can't use airsnort as it needs 
one of the below cards.
Also I can't use the wep option. (Well I have tried the  iwconfig wlan0 
key s:today  settings but I get a weird error)

This one time, at band camp, Stuart Guthrie wrote:
 

'Orinoco' chipsets seem to the the best supported although I got an
amtel device going well after considerable effort. 
   

Prism 2.5 chipsets are also well supported, particularly if you want
to run it in access point mode.
 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-24 Thread Simon Wong
I've decided to upgrade my wireless pcmcia card to something *really*
well supported under Linux.

It seems that the Prism chipsets are very well developed so after
perusing the Prism54 supported cards list
(http://prism54.org/supported_cards.php?sort_by=success_cnt) it seems
that the Netgear Wg511 and the 3com OfficeConnect 11g are the pick of
the bunch.

I want something that will do 128bit WEP, WPA (for when it's supported
and yes, I will use a *real* VPN later).

It would be great to have something that allows you to set it up as an
AP and to sniff air traffic for testing work.

Does anyone have any experience with these cards or another on the list?

-- 
Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wongy.org

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-24 Thread James Gregory
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 11:00 +1000, Simon Wong wrote:
> It would be great to have something that allows you to set it up as an
> AP and to sniff air traffic for testing work.
> 
> Does anyone have any experience with these cards or another on the list?

I used to use a Linksys WPC11 card (I think that is what it was).
Frankly I was underwhelmed by it. I think it was prism, but I'm not sure
(I'm sure someone here will know about it). My current laptop has an
Atheros wireless card built in to it and it's been working superbly
pretty much since day 1. The drivers are proprietary, but available at
no cost and quite stable and functional.

I've not tried the sniffing etc, so I'm afraid I can't comment on that.
Is there an easy way for me to test that?

HTH,

James.

-- 
James Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-24 Thread Simon Wong
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 11:36, James Gregory wrote:
> I've not tried the sniffing etc, so I'm afraid I can't comment on that.
> Is there an easy way for me to test that?

There are a number of apps (airsnort,kismet) that are for sniffing
wireless traffic.

Essentially, I *think* you need to be able to put the card into monitor
mode.



-- 
Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wongy.org

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-25 Thread Simon Males

I used to use a Linksys WPC11 card (I think that is what it was).
Frankly I was underwhelmed by it. I think it was prism, but I'm not sure
(I'm sure someone here will know about it). My current laptop has an
Atheros wireless card built in to it and it's been working superbly
pretty much since day 1. The drivers are proprietary, but available at
no cost and quite stable and functional.
You have a prism2 card, which is basically 802.11b only. Prism2 cards 
have the best support for WPA on linux. Using the hostap drivers that 
is. Not they same type of card Simon Wong is asking about.

I've not tried the sniffing etc, so I'm afraid I can't comment on that.
Is there an easy way for me to test that?
Install kismet, and you'll have to give kismet.conf a quick hack.
--
Simon Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-25 Thread Simon Males
Simon Wong wrote:
I've decided to upgrade my wireless pcmcia card to something *really*
well supported under Linux.
Its like looking for the digital holy grail.
It seems that the Prism chipsets are very well developed so after
perusing the Prism54 supported cards list
(http://prism54.org/supported_cards.php?sort_by=success_cnt) it seems
that the Netgear Wg511 and the 3com OfficeConnect 11g are the pick of
the bunch.
Got a Netgear WG511, because I basically visited the same page.
I want something that will do 128bit WEP, WPA (for when it's supported
and yes, I will use a *real* VPN later).
Can't wait till WPA support hits the streets, so I can finally WiFi at 
uni in linux.

It would be great to have something that allows you to set it up as an
AP and to sniff air traffic for testing work.
Prism2/2.5/3 cards are the one for that. Using hostap drivers, with the 
hostapd service.

Does anyone have any experience with these cards or another on the list?
Yeah its pretty good, but I keep hitting this bug.
http://prism54.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87
--
Simon Males <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-25 Thread Rocci
Simon Males wrote:
Simon Wong wrote:
I've decided to upgrade my wireless pcmcia card to something *really*
well supported under Linux.

Its like looking for the digital holy grail.
It seems that the Prism chipsets are very well developed so after
perusing the Prism54 supported cards list
(http://prism54.org/supported_cards.php?sort_by=success_cnt) it seems
that the Netgear Wg511 and the 3com OfficeConnect 11g are the pick of
the bunch.

Got a Netgear WG511, because I basically visited the same page.
I want something that will do 128bit WEP, WPA (for when it's supported
and yes, I will use a *real* VPN later).

Can't wait till WPA support hits the streets, so I can finally WiFi at 
uni in linux.

It would be great to have something that allows you to set it up as an
AP and to sniff air traffic for testing work.

Prism2/2.5/3 cards are the one for that. Using hostap drivers, with 
the hostapd service.

Does anyone have any experience with these cards or another on the list?

Yeah its pretty good, but I keep hitting this bug.
http://prism54.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87
I've just installed a DLink DWL-G650 (Atheros chipset) using the MADWifi 
drivers.
I've only just managed to compile the WPA support (wpa_supplicant) 
successfully. While the wpa_supplicant binary seems to run ok and look 
for an AP,
I can't be certain it works until I test it on the uni network tomorrow.
I've had to jump through some hoops to get this card to work but I 
REALLY wanted to have network access at uni with Linux.
Hopefully my efforts will bear success.
I will post an update advising of my success or failure.

Having said that, IF you are at all thinking of going with an Atheros 
based card I suggest you visit 
http://www.mattfoster.clara.co.uk/madwifi-faq.htm first.
Then should you require WPA support, take a look at 
http://hostap.epitest.fi/wpa_supplicant/
You may not see fiery hoops as I did, but only a walk in the park. ;)

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-08-25 Thread Simon Wong
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 21:16, Simon Males wrote:
> Its like looking for the digital holy grail.

Feels like it :-)

> Can't wait till WPA support hits the streets, so I can finally WiFi at 
> uni in linux.

Yeah, what a drag!

> Prism2/2.5/3 cards are the one for that. Using hostap drivers, with the 
> hostapd service.

Okay but the thing is working out which damn cards have which chipsets
:-(

I feel I'm stuck in a Google whirlpool...

> 
> > Does anyone have any experience with these cards or another on the list?
> 
> Yeah its pretty good, but I keep hitting this bug.
> 
> http://prism54.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87

I'm wondering whether to stick with 802.11b for the moment and find a
Prism2/2.5/3 based card.

-- 
Simon Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wongy.org

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Wireless PCMCIA cards - recommendations

2004-09-02 Thread Rocci
Simon Wong wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 21:16, Simon Males wrote:
 

Its like looking for the digital holy grail.
   

Feels like it :-)
 

Can't wait till WPA support hits the streets, so I can finally WiFi at 
uni in linux.
   

Yeah, what a drag!
 

Prism2/2.5/3 cards are the one for that. Using hostap drivers, with the 
hostapd service.
   

Okay but the thing is working out which damn cards have which chipsets
:-(
I feel I'm stuck in a Google whirlpool...
 

Does anyone have any experience with these cards or another on the list?
 

Yeah its pretty good, but I keep hitting this bug.
http://prism54.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87
   

I'm wondering whether to stick with 802.11b for the moment and find a
Prism2/2.5/3 based card.
 

This might be a bit late now but I thought it might be of use to some.
I've finally got wpa (TKIP+PEAP+MSCHAPv2) happening on my laptop at Uni.
Using a DLink DWL-G650 Atheros based card (RevC) running the MADWiFi 
driver & wpa_supplicant on 2.4.27 (haven't had time to try on 2.6 
kernel) I finally have access to the Uni network with Linux. Ahh 
what a nice relief.
My main prob was due to the lack of support for Linux at UOW. No one 
there could tell me how to get hold of the ca certificate so I just 
logged in using XP , copied and converted that ca certificate on Linux 
and SHAZAAM !! I'm now cruising on 802.11 a & b @ UOW's WiFi network.
Oh yeah and KDE3.2's KWiFiManager works a treat.

So, if ne1's still shopping for a card, you may wish to consider an 
Atheros based card *IF* the others seem a bit tricky. ;)

- Rocci.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html