Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow.

2006-02-07 Thread Pete McNeil
I've had an internal note that our colo provider is working on a
networking problem. That's probably what you're seeing. Apparently it
doesn't effect all paths to the 'net equally and/or it may be solved
by now.

_M

On Tuesday, February 7, 2006, 5:53:35 PM, John wrote:

JC> Agreed, my last report showed pretty slow times.  All today were slower now
JC> that I look at them.  I normally see up to 1.3M with overall times around
JC> 800-900K. 

JC> John C

JC> 0K .. .. .. .. ..   36.79 KB/s
JC>50K .. .. .. .. ..   11.51 KB/s
JC>   100K .. .. .. .. ..   19.76 KB/s
JC>   150K .. .. .. .. ..   11.98 KB/s
JC>   200K .. .. .. .. ..   37.20 KB/s
JC>   250K .. .. .. .. ..   10.60 KB/s
JC>   300K .. .. .. .. ..   16.00 KB/s
JC>   350K .. .. .. .. ..   19.05 KB/s
JC>   400K .. .. .. .. ..   22.22 KB/s
JC>   450K .. .. .. .. ..   10.32 KB/s
JC>   500K .. .. .. .. ..   13.50 KB/s
JC>   550K .. .. .. .. ..2.74 KB/s
JC>   600K .. .. .. .. ..8.40 KB/s
JC>   650K .. .. .. .. ..6.00 KB/s
JC>   700K .. .. .. .. ..9.97 KB/s
JC>   750K .. .. .. .. ..6.07 KB/s
JC>   800K .. .. .. .. ..5.89 KB/s
JC>   850K .. .. .. .. ..9.20 KB/s
JC>   900K .. .. .. .. ..6.46 KB/s
JC>   950K .. .. .. .. ..4.94 KB/s
JC>  1000K .. .. .. .. ..7.67 KB/s
JC>  1050K .. .. .. .. ..9.97 KB/s
JC>  1100K .. .. .. .. ..   13.28 KB/s
JC>  1150K .. .. .. .. ..   24.61 KB/s
JC>  1200K .. .. .. .. ..   12.36 KB/s
JC>  1250K .. .. .. .. ..   31.06 KB/s
JC>  1300K .. .. .. .. ..4.87 KB/s
JC>  1350K .. .. .. .. ..   34.77 KB/s
JC>  1400K .. .. .. .. ..   14.29 KB/s
JC>  1450K .. . .. .. ..   16.24 KB/s
JC>  1500K .. .. .. .. ..   33.33 KB/s
JC>  1550K .. . .. .. ..   21.48 KB/s
JC>  1600K .. .. .. .. ..   23.19 KB/s
JC>  1650K .. .. .. .. ..   27.34 KB/s
JC>  1700K .. .. .. .. ..   14.68 KB/s
JC>  1750K .. .. .. .. ..   47.76 KB/s
JC>  1800K .. .. .. .. ..   15.17 KB/s
JC>  1850K .. .. .. .. ..   16.17 KB/s
JC>  1900K .. .. .. .. ..   18.39 KB/s
JC>  1950K .. .. .. .. ..   74.40 KB/s
JC>  2000K .. .. .. .. ..   14.10 KB/s
JC>  2050K .. .. .. .. ..   12.70 KB/s
JC>  2100K .. .. .. .. ..   29.36 KB/s
JC>  2150K .. .. .. .. ..   16.58 KB/s
JC>  2200K .. .. .. .. ..   21.62 KB/s
JC>  2250K .. .. .. .. ..   17.49 KB/s
JC>  2300K .. .. .. .. ..   11.00 KB/s
JC>  2350K .. .. .. .. ..   21.20 KB/s
JC>  2400K .. .. .. .. ..   31.69 KB/s
JC>  2450K .. .. .. .. ..   20.12 KB/s
JC>  2500K .. .. .. .. ..   57.14 KB/s
JC>  2550K .. .. .. 13.94 KB/s

JC> 15:52:29 (12.45 KB/s) - `.new.gz' saved [2646653] 

JC> -Original Message-
JC> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JC> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JC> On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
JC> Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:46 PM
JC> To: Chuck Schick
JC> Subject: Re: [sniffer] Downloads are slow.

JC> I'm not showing this from my location and the server looks ok.

JC> I just downloaded a few rulebases, each in under 3 seconds.

JC> P

Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow.

2006-02-07 Thread David Sullivan
Somebody please tell me I'm doing something wrong here. I use this
expression in Baregrep "Final\t828931" and it yields 22,055 matching
lines across 3 of my 4 license's log files.

Since this is set to my hold weight, I'm assuming that means I've had
22,055 holds on this rule?

-- 
Best regards,
 Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...

2004-12-28 Thread Serge
rename abcdefg.snf abcdefg.old
rename abcdefg.tst abcdefg.snf
copy /V /Y abcdefg.snf C:\sniffer\abcdefg.snf
:Done
I would use
copy /V /Y abcdefg.snf C:\sniffer\abcdefg.new
Rename C:\sniffer\abcdefg.snf  abcdefg.old
Rename C:\sniffer\abcdefg.new  abcdefg.snf
C:\sniffer\abcdefg.exe reload

- Original Message - 
From: "Jim Matuska" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...


So far it seems to be working, at least it doesn't seem to be downloading 
the rulebase yet, I'll have to see if it does later when there is an 
updated rulebase.  My script uses a copy at the end rather than a move. 
It's listed below for reference.  Do you see any issues?

wget -N http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/fp0o4jye.snf -O 
abcdefg.new --http-user=* --http-passwd=*
if exist abcdefg.new goto Replace
goto Done
:Replace
rename abcdefg.new abcdefg.tst
snf2check.exe abcdefg.tst abcdefg
if errorlevel 1 goto Done
echo New File Tested GOOD!
if exist abcdefg.old del abcdefg.old
rename abcdefg.snf abcdefg.old
rename abcdefg.tst abcdefg.snf
copy /V /Y abcdefg.snf C:\sniffer\abcdefg.snf
:Done
if exist abcdefg.tst del abcdefg.tst

Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Matuska" 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...


On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that 
are
JM> inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time.  I didn't 
even
JM> know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script 
again
JM> this morning and found it didn't have the -N option in Wget, so we 
were

Watch out - you may still have not fixed it. One of the tricks with
the -N option is that the file downloaded previously must still be in
it's place for the comparison. If it has been moved then the -N will
not matter.
This make things a little bit more complex since you can't download a
rulebase file on top of the one that is running.
_M

This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
and (un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
and (un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...

2004-12-28 Thread Jim Matuska
Update, I just launched my script and it is downloading just fine.  In my 
case it was as simple as adding the -N option.

Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - 
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Matuska" 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...


On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that 
are
JM> inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time.  I didn't 
even
JM> know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script 
again
JM> this morning and found it didn't have the -N option in Wget, so we 
were

Watch out - you may still have not fixed it. One of the tricks with
the -N option is that the file downloaded previously must still be in
it's place for the comparison. If it has been moved then the -N will
not matter.
This make things a little bit more complex since you can't download a
rulebase file on top of the one that is running.
_M

This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
and (un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...

2004-12-28 Thread Jim Matuska
So far it seems to be working, at least it doesn't seem to be downloading 
the rulebase yet, I'll have to see if it does later when there is an updated 
rulebase.  My script uses a copy at the end rather than a move.  It's listed 
below for reference.  Do you see any issues?

wget -N http://www.sortmonster.net/Sniffer/Updates/fp0o4jye.snf -O 
abcdefg.new --http-user=* --http-passwd=*
if exist abcdefg.new goto Replace
goto Done
:Replace
rename abcdefg.new abcdefg.tst
snf2check.exe abcdefg.tst abcdefg
if errorlevel 1 goto Done
echo New File Tested GOOD!
if exist abcdefg.old del abcdefg.old
rename abcdefg.snf abcdefg.old
rename abcdefg.tst abcdefg.snf
copy /V /Y abcdefg.snf C:\sniffer\abcdefg.snf
:Done
if exist abcdefg.tst del abcdefg.tst

Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- Original Message - 
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Matuska" 
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...


On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:
JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that 
are
JM> inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time.  I didn't 
even
JM> know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script 
again
JM> this morning and found it didn't have the -N option in Wget, so we 
were

Watch out - you may still have not fixed it. One of the tricks with
the -N option is that the file downloaded previously must still be in
it's place for the comparison. If it has been moved then the -N will
not matter.
This make things a little bit more complex since you can't download a
rulebase file on top of the one that is running.
_M

This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information 
and (un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html


Re[2]: [sniffer] Downloads are slow...

2004-12-28 Thread Pete McNeil
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004, 12:49:21 PM, Jim wrote:

JM> I agree that something needs to be done about the update scripts that are
JM> inadvertently downloading the full rulebase all the time.  I didn't even
JM> know it but we were doing this until I went through our update script again
JM> this morning and found it didn't have the -N option in Wget, so we were

Watch out - you may still have not fixed it. One of the tricks with
the -N option is that the file downloaded previously must still be in
it's place for the comparison. If it has been moved then the -N will
not matter.

This make things a little bit more complex since you can't download a
rulebase file on top of the one that is running.

_M




This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and 
(un)subscription instructions go to 
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html