Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:41:48 AM, Corby wrote: AC To which addresss should I send these? AC Also, I mis-stated the spam. They were not plain text, but AC html, but clearly have many classic spam attributes. I will AC send them along, but need to know where. Please zip them and send them to support@ However, before you do this you might consider upgrading to the latest interim release. We had another report like yours that was apparently solved by the newest update (V2-3.0i2). It might be worth trying this first to see if it solves the problem. Please keep us posted. Thanks, _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam
On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:48:43 AM, Corby wrote: AC I suppose everyone's userbases have differenent AC requirements. An ISP or private enterprise might worry about AC false postives on horny teenagers and penis enlargement, but AC for our local government agency, it causes problems. AC AC Corby This is why each user's rule base can be customized. If you have requirements for additional black-rules then we can work with you to create them. Each rule base can be customized by blocking rules from the core, adding local white rules, and adding local black rules. (New rule types are also on the way.) The end result is a customized version of our core rulebase for each license ID. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/Help.html
