[RCSE] Airtronics Sagitta 600 for sale

2003-06-03 Thread d. o. darnell


For you folks who contacted me about obtaining pictures of the Sagitta
600 (and, there were several of you) I am offering for sale, I have
prepared a web paged for your perusal. Please refer to:
http://dozone.net/SAG600DOC.htm
where you will find some documentation as well as a slideshow containing many shots of the ship. Thank you for your interest.

D. O. Darnell
** World's Smallest Airtronics Dealer **
http://www.dozone.net/airtronics_equipment.htm 



Re: [RCSE] shrinkable polyesters

2003-06-03 Thread Jeb Bushell
 The typical mylar we use for bagging is not designed
for  controlled shrinkability.
 
 Which begs the question of whether there exists a
 product out there that could function as a heat
shrinkable, thick, mylar-like product.  ...  I can
 envision, for instance, a mylar-like film of 0.030
or 0.050 in thick in a restraining frame of 
light wood or metal.  Cut a series of airfoil
 profiles into foam and ... pull a vacuum on...  You
should have a mold of mylar ... then simply lay-up
 molded wings... 
How about a specific clue as to what you are trying
 to do 


You've got the idea.  If the mylar could be
pre-formed then we could use less vacuum which would
result in slightly lighter wings in cases where voids
in the foam are present (these may now have to be
filled).  It would also compound curves, e.g. more
dihedral, to be built in and could improve leading
edges and tips.  As you probably know, tips are a
particular problem for bagged wings because, when they
are pleasantly shaped in plan, they acquire a WAG
airfoil.

It might also be nice to take the mylar all the way
round the core for single taper wings.  So it would
need to be shaped like a taco.  The leading edge would
finish up totally smooth. Really neat for stabs.

Jeb.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] July Contest in NEVADA

2003-06-03 Thread Lee Cox

Only 29 days left to enter the First Annual? Thermal Duration Contest being held by the Sierra Silent Soarers of Northern Nevada. Check out the web site @:www.sierrasilentsoarers.com/gs/
Great photos of the contest site and all information including entry form.

$5.00 of each entry will go into a CASH raffle??? see site for detailsLeeCox-Nevada, U.S.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).

[RCSE] SPRING FLING CONTEST IN SACRAMENTO CA. JUNE 2122

2003-06-03 Thread allen2allen2002

For all of you attending the spring fling contest I would like to 
remind you we will be having a few other events as well.

On Saturday and Sunday morning ( early ) High-Torque Motors will be 
sponsoring a Electric Pylon - Limbo race. That's right Pylon and 
Limbo, So bring out you nicest and most special electric plane to 
enter :-). Or steal one from your flying buddy. Most exciting flight 
wins.

On Saturday afternoon we can also put on a small hand launch contest 
if their is a enough interest. Come by the High-Torque booth to enter 
the Limo-Pylon race or you can also contact me by email. Entry is 
free and limited to 2 per frequency !!! and you could win a High-
Torque Motor or more? Send me a email with your name, frequency, and 
whether your interested in Pylon-Limbo, Handlaunch, or both.

Craig D. Allen LSF111
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.high-torque.com 



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] Posting Contest Results,,,HEY CD's!!!!

2003-06-03 Thread GordySoar

Guys you know that when you READ contest results you are looking for two things in this order
1 scores of friends
2 the PLANES that were flown

TD Competition (all sailplane comps for that matter) are a TEAM sport
The Team consists of the pilot and his partner...you know the one that does half the work.

His Sailplane.  Going down the list, most guys on the RCSE won't recognize the pilots, but they will recognize the sailplane they may have been considering for their next 'partnership'.

So how about it, if you are going to post any sailplane results...DS, TD, F3J, F3D, DHLG, F3F, Speed Records.what ever!  Post both partners...please.

Gordy
Waiting for the sun in Louisville 


[RCSE] Latest news about flying with the Sportube

2003-06-03 Thread GordySoar

I have been flying non stop with My Compulsion in the Sportube and none of the airlines gave me any crap.

Friday morning I flew AA to St Louis...no questions.
Today I show up at St Louis and I get crap about it being oversize and how strict they are at St Louis about over size  ...63" is the limit sir and while we realize you have been getting away without being charged the $80 oversize fee, you aren't this time.

They had me, I couldn't leave my stuff there in St Louis, and if you miss a flight they knock you $100.

I'll be raging them via a complaint form lot of good that will do

So it looks like another reason to go to three piece wingsyou can keep the snowboard tube under the limit.

This is probably a fluke of this airport, so don't over react. I had it happen once before in New Orleans.

Bummering.
Gordy 


[RCSE] ICON For Sale

2003-06-03 Thread Russ



ICON for sale. Excellent condition. Winner of 
2002 Mid South. $1600 ready to fly.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[RCSE] Paging (Antenna) Jim Thomas

2003-06-03 Thread Woody Ruszala
Jim,
   If you have a chance, will you please contact me off-list?
Woody
_
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] shrinkable polyesters

2003-06-03 Thread Rc-Model
Maybe you should see how 3M window tint films for cars is aplyed and
pre-shrinked to the shape of the back windows. First methode is dry using
i.ex. Baby Powder. The second method is wet, using sope water.  You heat the
film in cirkular motion then squeege it to shrink and shape.

With Best Regards

Czeslaw Dabrowski

- Original Message - 
From: Bill Johns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 5:52 PM
Subject: [RCSE] shrinkable polyesters


 (reposted as the original seems to have been lost in the ether)

 At 09:12 AM 6/1/2003 -0700, Jeb wrote:

 --- Bill Johns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Most all the heat shrinkables are polyesters.
 
 But are the polyesters all heat-shrinkables?

 Yes and no.  Yes in that many non cross-linked polymers will go through
 all sorts of heat distortion often resulting in a smaller dimension
 but  No in that the shrinking process might not be useful for any
 meaningful applications.  (It's an entropy driven process.  Sorta like
what
 happens to money, polymer chains want to randomize their organization,
heat
 gives them the energy to do so.  Money wants to randomize and sailplanes
 and digital servos provides the energy to allow that to happen.I bet
 many of you never thought you'd have to worry about entropy since your
 physics or chemistry classes, huh.  ;-)  )

   The one
 of special interest to RCSE is that used for vacuum
 bagging.  It's 0.014 thick and fairly stiff, so it's
 got a will of its own.  My attempts to form or shrink
 it with heat have failed because it just curls up as a
 mess.  Phil Barnes got similar results.

 That curling up into a mess is a shrinking process.  It's just not
 shrinking in a manner that is useful or controllable.  Consider the films
 we cover built-up wings with.  We tack the corners with the hot iron, tack
 it all around the edges and then having locked the perimeter down, we
start
 working on the middle sections.  Curling up into a mess is not possible as
 the frame restrains the film holding it flat.   A piece of monocote that
is
 not restrained shrivels up as it shrinks.  Maybe you need to restrain the
 perimeter before you try to induce some sort of heat distortion.

 Any thoughts?  Maybe the tensile stresses are just too
 big to manage with a film that thick.

 The chemistry of the particular polyester and way the stuff is
manufactured
 (As I understand it and this is not an area of expertise for me) is
 important in making it shrinkable in a manner that can be used as a design
 feature.  The typical mylar we use for bagging is not designed for
 controlled shrinkability.

 Which begs the question of whether there exists a product out there that
 could function as a heat shrinkable, thick, mylar-like product.  My gut
 reaction is there is something out there, we just don't know where to find
 these products or what questions to ask.  I can envision, for instance, a
 mylar-like film of 0.030 or 0.050 in thick in a restraining frame of
 light wood or metal.  Cut a series of female airfoil profiles into foam
and
 lay the cores aside.  Assemble the various female sections into a wing
 planform section and then over this locate the thick, restrained
 mylar.  Then, and this might be the key, lay a film of a very compliant
but
 tough film that you can pull a vacuum on.  Are you following this?   Start
 pulling a vacuum gently and then heat the assembly up so that the thick
 mylar-like film distorts but does not shrivel up into a mess but rather
 conforms to the foam producing a female wing mold.  The vacuum would allow
 the mylar to conform exactly to the foam.  After a nice match of
 mylar-to-foam is made, cool the whole thing down and remove the tough
 compliant layer.  You should have a mold of mylar in the exact shape of
the
 foam that would allow you to then simply lay-up molded wings using the
 foam + mylar-like film as the mold.  I don't think it would last for 100's
 of wings like the machined aluminum molds, but it would be nice a smooth
 and you might get 10+ wings out of it and it wouldn't cost a fortune to
 replace or change airfoils.

 I know that the tough, compliant, heat resistant films exist.  Many
bagging
 composite supplier have this product made of either silicone rubber or
 urethane rubber.  Not cheap, but is it available.  Other materials might
 works as well   The only thing I don't know of is the relative heat
 distortion temperature of the foam you'd cut the female airfoil profile
 from relative to the heat distortion temperature of the mylar-like
 material.   It might be that the mylar we use would work against a
 heat-cuttable foam, if not there are probably acetates or acrylates that
 would be suitable as a thin, heat distortable film.  I think you'd want to
 use a thick film because it will have to conform to the foam wing and will
 get thinner in areas of high distortion or stretch.  Also a thicker mylar
 would last longer.   All solvable problems I suspect.

 How about 

Re: [RCSE] shrinkable polyesters

2003-06-03 Thread Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech
I heard years ago that the heat-shrinkable films were bi-directionally 
stretched during manufacturing. When you apply heat, they want to return to 
their original dimensions, which is where the massive amount of shrink 
comes from. Without this pre-stretching, they would not shrink as much.

Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.djaerotech.com
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


[RCSE] Tail volume coefficient....

2003-06-03 Thread Paul Breed
A few years ago, someone gave me a real clear answer on how to size the tail on
a RES floater type plane with dihedral.
I believe that the calculations were titled tail volume coefficient

It went something like:

Vertical Stabilizer+Rudder area * moment arm (from CG ?) / (wing area* 
span) == some range

Same basic formula for Horizontal stabilizer and elevator only it did not 
account for span just wing area

There were subtle differences between the two formulas

Could someone please re-enlighten me?

Specifically I'd like to know:
Formula for Horizontal Stabilizer coefficient.
Formula to Vertical stabilizer coefficent.
	Reasonable range(s) for a slow floater type aircraft.

Thanks in advance.

Paul







RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.