[RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Rense Lange

Today, my XP3 hit a pole, a 3 ft high metal pole. It did not hit hard, and
little harm was done, but hard enough to say that it hit rather than just
touched.  I had noted the pole earlier, but it seemed far away: you know,
nothing to worry about far away. At first I considered the possibility that
the accident could be due to the flaws in my flying skills or my
eyesight,(I am due for new glasses) but then I remembered some old physics
lessons. 

And, it dawned on me: This should not have happened as the attracting force
between two objects (a) increases with the mass of the objects, and (b)
decreases with their distance, quadratic no less, if I remember well. Well,
the XP3 certainly has not a great mass - it came out weighing 11oz. Also,
the last time I saw the pole it was far from the plane, hence there should
have been very little force in this respect as well. But, it now seems
obvious that the pole must have attracted (almost lured) the plane,
exactly what physics says should NOT have happened! 

I'm sure some of you guys have had similar experiences. Perhaps we should
inform the National Bureau of Standards (or some such institution)
concerning this violation of the laws of nature. Or, on a more ominous
note, we might look into what plane manufacturers do in their workshops to
bring about such effects!

--- Rense Lange
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread RCsoarnut
Hey Rense

 I'll be with you in a minute, I have a few more pins to stick in this map:-)

Denny Maize
www.polecataero.com
717-789-0146


Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Ken Lilja
As an aircraft mechanic I have also noted unusual physical anomalies:
When an access cover on a flat floor is opened, gravity appears to be focussed at the 
aperture.  A tool at rest nearby will accelerate and disappear through this aperture.  
It may be found, but sometimes I think it travels to the Bermuda
Triangle.
Ken Lilja




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Easwen6877

Gee, I thought that Slopeheads were a violation of nature...
 
Airwreck


Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Rense Lange


Denny, nothing personal and nothing XP3 specific here: I've had this with other planes also. My Sharonhit a tree, and I could have sworn that its mass pulled up the branches! The factthat it seems to work for itty-bitty planes as well only strengthens my argument!


--- Rense Lange
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]



- Original Message - 
From: 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/15/2002 8:39:24 PM 
Subject: Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?
Hey Rense I'll be with you in a minute, I have a few more pins to stick in this map:-)Denny Maizewww.polecataero.com717-789-0146 


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Dieter @ ShredAir

I thought it was common knowledge that model airplane related items 
and activities defy the laws of physics. I know this, based on my 
experience with thin CA. At this point, I'm not sure if I've fixed 
more or wrecked more with that stuff. I know it readily flows against 
gravity and occasionally beams itself to locations far removed from 
the point of application.

Dieter Mahlein
http://shredair.com

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Albert Wedworth
Hi Rense
Al
I always thought... That if something is on the field it WILL be hit!
It's called.
THE LAW OF ATTRACTION !
Last year at the Mid Winter Electrics
I found a three inch piece of pipe sticking out of the sand.
Well, Jason hit it with his rudder when he was putting on a demo for Sean @
Aeromodel.
It was so cool.
Cheers
Al
The Bag Lady
www.thebagladyal.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
888-457-1550
Albert E. Wedworth
- Original Message -
From: Rense Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?



 Today, my XP3 hit a pole, a 3 ft high metal pole. It did not hit hard, and
 little harm was done, but hard enough to say that it hit rather than
just
 touched.  I had noted the pole earlier, but it seemed far away: you
know,
 nothing to worry about far away. At first I considered the possibility
that
 the accident could be due to the flaws in my flying skills or my
 eyesight,(I am due for new glasses) but then I remembered some old physics
 lessons.

 And, it dawned on me: This should not have happened as the attracting
force
 between two objects (a) increases with the mass of the objects, and (b)
 decreases with their distance, quadratic no less, if I remember well.
Well,
 the XP3 certainly has not a great mass - it came out weighing 11oz. Also,
 the last time I saw the pole it was far from the plane, hence there should
 have been very little force in this respect as well. But, it now seems
 obvious that the pole must have attracted (almost lured) the plane,
 exactly what physics says should NOT have happened!

 I'm sure some of you guys have had similar experiences. Perhaps we should
 inform the National Bureau of Standards (or some such institution)
 concerning this violation of the laws of nature. Or, on a more ominous
 note, we might look into what plane manufacturers do in their workshops to
 bring about such effects!

 --- Rense Lange
 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.



Re: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Jim Bacus

Scroll down this web page and check out how a HLG was attracted to the 
longest drive marker in HLG golf.  Heh heh heh, stuff happens.

http://www.jimbacus.net/soaring/HlgGolf.html

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.


Fwd: [RCSE] A violation of the laws of nature?

2002-12-15 Thread Easwen6877
In a message dated 12/15/2002 6:57:23 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 

 foamy
 V
Gee, I thought that Slopeheads were a violation of nature...

Airwreck 
 
 
oops, left that word out...


---BeginMessage---

Gee, I thought that Slopeheads were a violation of nature...
 
Airwreck

---End Message---