Re: [RCSE] ESC for S400 (off subject)

2001-11-14 Thread Richard Knott

You should never operate an electric motor in a model without an arming
switch. It saves your fingers by allowing you to be absolutely sure you are
ready to start the motor.

There are two ways in which an electric motor can be more dangerous than an
infernal combustion engine:
1: When an IC engine is running there is a horrible noise letting you know
it is running. (This still doesn't stop some people from getting their
fingers chopped)
2: It takes a certain amount of deliberate action to get an IC engine
running, ie connecting a glow driver, flicking the prop etc. Once you have
activated the arming switch on your electric all you have to do is push the
throttle stick forward and your stationary prop is suddenly spinning. On my
one ESC, just activating the arming switch while the throttle stick is
forward starts the motor. Very dangerous! If your ESC did not have an arming
switch then simply turning on your receiver would start the motor if the
throttle stick was forward.

So the correct sequence of starting an electric model is:1, switch on the
TX, 2, switch on the RX, 3, wiggle your sticks and OBSERVE, 4, hit the
arming switch, 5, advance the throttle.

Regards
Richard Knott

- Original Message -
From: Tim Vandenheuvel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My
 question is, is the arming switch available on many of the ESC's more
 truble than they are worth? It seems more like a hassle than anything. A
 simple on/off switch seems quite adequite. I just hate to see more than
the
 bare essentials on the outside of the airframe (switches, jacks, etc.).
Any
 input would be greatly appreciated, Pardon my off-topic post, but there
are
 only a few resources in the area.




This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager ([EMAIL PROTECTED])




Re: [RCSE] ESC for S400 (off subject)

2001-11-14 Thread tony estep


--- Don Stackhouse @ DJ Aerotech [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Switches in general are also passe these days...

This seems particularly applicable on higher power systems. If the
resistance of your switch plus leads is only .002 ohm and your motor is
drawing 50 amps, the voltage drop across the switch is .1V; on a
10-cell pack this reduces power to the motor by 10 watts.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] ESC for S400 (off subject)

2001-11-13 Thread Tim Vandenheuvel

Hi all,

I know this is off subject, however, I don't know of an electric forum and a 
lot of us glider guiders fly electric as well. So, I am seeking an ESC for 
my speed 400 P-47 (the one featured in MA, designed by Jim Ryan). My 
question is, is the arming switch available on many of the ESC's more 
truble than they are worth? It seems more like a hassle than anything. A 
simple on/off switch seems quite adequite. I just hate to see more than the 
bare essentials on the outside of the airframe (switches, jacks, etc.). Any 
input would be greatly appreciated, Pardon my off-topic post, but there are 
only a few resources in the area.

Thanks,

Tim Vandenheuvel


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]