[RCSE] HLG launch preset on Profi 3030

2002-03-20 Thread Dave Johnson

To other 3030 owners:

I'm trying to set up a HLG preset on a momentary switch on my 3030. The obvious 
approach is FIX.VAL, but unfortunately neither elevator or rudder has the FIX.VAL 
attribute. It appears I can use AUX channels instead of elevator and rudder (since AUX 
channels *do* have FIX.VAL), but I'm hoping there's an easier way that I overlooked.

In my case, I only want elevator preset (it's a javelin-launched plane), and it's got 
a v-tail which makes using the AUX channels a little more painful, since I need to 
create a custom mixer.

Anybody got a solution other than custom mixers?

Dave Johnson
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] HLG Launch

2000-12-15 Thread Rick Brown and Jill Wiest

Dick Barker wrote:
 
 No! No! You got it all wrong. One day of f3b and six days of hlg is
 more like it. Would make people appreciate low stress hlg launches.
 --
 Dick Barker

Dick,

 Quit getting yourself all twisted up in knots over how people launch
thier HL gliders.

..
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] HLG launch Tx presets

2000-08-21 Thread Tom Watson

Ah, but that's where the multi-point mixing comes in handy.  Simply program
the elevator offset in the single point where the flap stick is at the top
of its travel, then all one has to do is move it down off that point (and
granted, to or past the next point, but that's a very short throw) at
launch.  Discrete positioning not required, just somewhere near mid-range.
Easy to do this and quite consistent using your thumb at the base of the
stick.

Personal preference, but I would think that the gear switch location is
harder to effectively and quickly reach/operate.  I'm also disappointed that
a radio in the 8103's price range doesn't offer the flexibility of assigning
such obviously popular functionality to the existing spring-loaded switch in
Glider Mode.

- Original Message -
From: "Tom Hoopes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Tom Watson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Bill Harris"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [RCSE] HLG launch Tx presets


The advantage of a HLG preset switch (spring loaded) allows for positive
actuation and predictable elevator offset when preparing to launch,
especially during critical tasks such as flying a ladder format. Positive
elimination of launch preset is just as critical to insure an effective
climbout and subsequent bunt (round over). I have found that discrete stick
positions are hard to repeat for this function, especially during a vigorous
launch.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] HLG Launch height

2000-06-09 Thread Joe Jan Wurts

Sorry about the very delayed response on this one, I've been
away from my email for quite some time now.

The now old launch height thread kind of reminds me of the
early threads on DS.  I remember the initial posts that I got in
response to my first DS posts.  Most of which had comments
that were disbelieving, uncertain, or showed a lack of the 
underlying physical realities.

I'm seeing the same trend with the HLG heights.  A few years ago,
I did a HLG launch simulation to better understand the underlying
mechanics.  My results indicated that in calm air I should be able
to get about 70 feet of altitude, and with 20 ft/sec of wind, I
should get about 100 feet.  This is assuming an 80 ft/sec throw
speed, wind tunnel airfoil data, and a standard build up for the 
remaining drag elements.

The 80 ft/sec initial throw speed was a number that I estimated
based on a good softball throw, and other SWAGs.  It turned out
to be fairly accurate, as two different radar guns have consistently
clocked me at 50 to 55 mph.

Another comment, the better HLGs out there at present have minimum
sink values in the 1 ft/sec range, at least based on analysis using the
wind tunnel, as well as the predicted, airfoil performance.  This is
consistent with the 1:10 to 1:15 "dead" air hang times that have been
recorded, if one assumes the ~70 feet initial launch altitude.

An interesting trade here is to add drag to the airframe to bring the
calm air launch height down to the only 40' - 50' "claimed" possible.
I had to triple the total profile drag to get down to 50'.  To achieve only
40', the drag had to go to 5x the wind tunnel + build-up profile drag.

One more comment on the laser range finder toy.  It, by itself, seems to
be quite accurate.  It seems to agree very well with our previously 
hand-measured 145 m F3J lines.  And, I know of other applications
that use them repeatably and reliably.  So, I'm pretty confident of 
their absolute range readings.  Whether there is a slant range
component is up to the users capability to figure out what is
vertical.  I'm not too worried, as 15 degrees of vertical error (a lot),
only shows a 3.5% absolute altitude error.  This is about the
scatter error that we noted when throwing in stable air, although
the scatter was undoubtedly due to variations in the individual 
throws.

Joe Wurts

PS and BTW,  If you cannot do at least two or more loops after
a throw around the power lines on the west of the Visalia field, 
I would recommend getting into tip launch, as your conventional launch
is not up to par.


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] HLG Launch height

2000-06-09 Thread ScrollSander

I look forward to seeing the launches and loops at Visalia this year.  You
always amaze me.

Chris Adams



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] HLG launch questions

1999-11-14 Thread Dick Barker

Yes, modern hlgs will take the stress of a javelin run up toss and that is
what most people are using. Launch speeds are in the 70 plus feet per sec
range. A bad throw can do wing damage if you hang on too long and pull down
or if you bounce up during the run.

My discus style launch is by definition at zero Cl and is pretty easy on
the wing but very stressful on the pod, boom and tail feathers.

--
Dick Barker
Seattle, WA
- The Old Fart Glider Flyer -

Walter wrote:
Do these planes have the strength to with stand that type of launch...


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] HLG launch profile

1999-08-30 Thread david

Hi there.  I've been flying my first HLG recently, and have not been
around anyone else who flies HLG.  So, I haven't been learning by
watching.  That's where I need help.

My launches are of the following variety: (1) high launch that doesn't
seem to transition quite right (drops about 40% of the height from the
apex), (2) low launch that keeps up the speed and doesn't lose height
at the apex, and (3) fast launch (at a low angle) that rises quickly
but still has some of the problems seen with 1 and 2.

So, what is the best profile?  I seem to cover a lot of ground with the
lower launches, but would love to be able to keep all of that altitude
that I lose with the high launch (very depressing to see the plane drop
that big chunk all at once).

Easy fixes?

-David

ps - hand launch IS addictive

pps - I was sore for 4 days after my first half-hour of flying



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and 
"unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]