[RCSE] Shadow Receiver Test

2005-04-12 Thread Jim Monaco
Well, the foot of snow we had on Sunday is gone, the flying field is dry and
the temp was about 60, so it was a good day to get out at lunchtime and do some
tests.  

My new Shadow 3 was put in my beater ICON and range tested.  It showed slightly
better range than the hitec superslim that was in it before.  All directions
were good so I launched and specked it out and no problems were observed.  

My buddy Mike Verzuh came along and slammed his 57 module in and we were going
to see how in handled interference.  We were very impressed.  As long as I was
a few feet closer to the model, I had full control, as we got next to each
other the receiver would kick into failsafe.


I set the failsafe to 3/4 landing mode (flaps and elevator comp) and some left
rudder.  I got some altitude and turned off the transmitter.  There were no
glitches or wierdness - it simply put the flaps down and started a slow
circling descent.  I let it run for about 30 seconds, then turned back on and
control was instantly back.


All in all very impressive for a PPM receiver.

Jim
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format


Re: [RCSE] Shadow Receiver Test

2005-04-12 Thread Joe Rodriguez




"beater ICON" (-: I wish I had a $1800 beater laying around.



  - Original Message - 
  From: Jim 
  Monaco 
  To: soaring@airage.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:30 
  PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Shadow Receiver 
Test
  Well, the foot of snow we had on Sunday is gone, the flying 
  field is dry andthe temp was about 60, so it was a good day to get out at 
  lunchtime and do sometests. My new Shadow 3 was put in my 
  beater ICON and range tested. It showed slightlybetter range than 
  the hitec superslim that was in it before. All directionswere good 
  so I launched and specked it out and no problems were observed. 
  My buddy Mike Verzuh came along and slammed his 57 module in and we 
  were goingto see how in handled interference. We were very 
  impressed. As long as I wasa few feet closer to the model, I had 
  full control, as we got next to eachother the receiver would kick into 
  failsafe.I set the failsafe to 3/4 landing mode (flaps and 
  elevator comp) and some leftrudder. I got some altitude and turned 
  off the transmitter. There were noglitches or wierdness - it simply 
  put the flaps down and started a slowcircling descent. I let it run 
  for about 30 seconds, then turned back on andcontrol was instantly 
  back.All in all very impressive for a PPM 
  receiver.JimRCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane 
  News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only 
  format with MIME turned off. Email sent from web based email such as 
  Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text 
format


Re: [RCSE] Shadow Receiver Test

2005-04-12 Thread James V. Bacus
The beater ICON means the one that gets flown most of the time.  The 
daily driver.  8-)

They are $1900 the last time I looked.
At 06:04 PM 4/12/2005, Joe Rodriguez wrote:
beater ICON (-:  I wish I had a $1800 beater laying around.
Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in text format


RE: [RCSE] Shadow Receiver Test

2005-04-12 Thread Jim Monaco
Jim Bacus is right - it IS the daily driver, it was not purchased new and it
was not in pristine condition when I got it and I didn't pay anywhere near
the retail cost for it.  It does still fly great though and I can get froggy
with it and not worry too much about what's gonna happen.  Not that I
encourage things to happen - but they do and if they do, I hope they happen
to this one... :)

Jim


Jim Monaco

-Original Message-
From: James V. Bacus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:41 PM
To: soaring@airage.com
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Shadow Receiver Test

The beater ICON means the one that gets flown most of the time.  The
daily driver.  8-)

They are $1900 the last time I looked.


At 06:04 PM 4/12/2005, Joe Rodriguez wrote:
beater ICON (-:  I wish I had a $1800 beater laying around.


Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club, and Team JR
AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level IV   R/C Soaring blog at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that
subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with
MIME turned off.  Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL
are generally NOT in text format

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Please note that subscribe and 
unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off.  
Email sent from web based email such as Hotmail and AOL are generally NOT in 
text format