Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
It's a highlighter bug, so... On Nov 2, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: FYI, It looks like Lucene 2.9.1 is having another respin: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2013 I'm busy packing for ApacheCon - not sure what the implications are for Solr yet... it's going to be spotty communication all week due to the number of us traveling. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
I used this with an existing application (with a 1.3 schema+solrconfig) and then another with (an old 1.4 trunk schema+solrconfig). Everything looks fine. Memory usage has decreased. However, I've seen at least two reports in solr-user about memory usage increasing rapidly when jars are dropped in solr_home/lib which I haven't had time to reproduce. Also there is a report of a deadlock issue with StreamingUpdateSolrServer which I can reproduce. I'll try to look into these issues more deeply later this week. The memory usage issue might be a show stopper. I'm not sure if we should go ahead right now. On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote: OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Egsingers/solr/1.4.0/ On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Got it. Will upload shortly. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
+1 On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Got it. Will upload shortly. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
A happy non binding +1! On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: +1 On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Got it. Will upload shortly. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com - Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com Co-Author: Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search Server available from http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server Free/Busy: http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
+1 Tested on Redhat EL5 with SUN Java 1.6.0_16 and Resin 3.0.23. All my custom Solr plugins (TokenFilter, RequestHandler, SearchComponent, QParserPlugin, QParser, and UpdateRequestProcessor) work as expected without any problem. Nice job everyone:-) Bill On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Eric Pugh ep...@opensourceconnections.comwrote: A happy non binding +1! On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: +1 On Oct 30, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/http://people.apache.org/%7Egsingers/solr/1.4.0/ On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Got it. Will upload shortly. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com - Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com Co-Author: Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search Server available from http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server Free/Busy: http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
FYI, It looks like Lucene 2.9.1 is having another respin: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2013 I'm busy packing for ApacheCon - not sure what the implications are for Solr yet... it's going to be spotty communication all week due to the number of us traveling. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
+1 On Oct 30, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Got it. Will upload shortly. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: OK, take 3: http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ +1 -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Got it. Will upload shortly. On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: So what we feared has come to pass - Lucene found more bugs and is going to restart the release. The bugs found however, don't affect Solr... so I think we should just continue with our vote. I'm sorry I don't understand. Weren't we going to release with released Lucene artifacts? Yes, if their vote succeeded, but if it didn't we were going to re-evaluate at that time. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Yes, it's too bad! But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing? Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts. Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars. Sigh. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: OK... looks like we'll need to re-spin. We may have a few hours till that happens. Perhaps we should get in a couple of the little bug fixes mentioned earlier. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1529 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527 +1 -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Just make sure you apply the patches to the branch, too. Or, we can delete the branch and recreate it. On Oct 29, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: OK... looks like we'll need to re-spin. We may have a few hours till that happens. Perhaps we should get in a couple of the little bug fixes mentioned earlier. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1529 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527 any other low-risk or high priority bug fixes? -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Yes, it's too bad! But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing? Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in the package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts. Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars. Sigh. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Looks like excludes clause in packaging is excluding everyting under classes
which the missing file is.
src/test/test-files/solr/lib/classes/empty-file-main-lib.txt
$ grep classes build.xml
target name=javadoc-contrib description=Generate javadoc for
contrib classes depends=build-contrib
classes we want to build factories for
files that this task should use when looking for classes that
FYI: The file ${stub.list} contains a list of classes
!-- place to put special case classes we want to ignore --
excludes=lib/README.committers.txt **/data/ **/logs/*
**/classes/ **/*.sh **/bin/ src/scripts/ src/site/build/ **/target/
client/ruby/flare/ client/python contrib/**/build/ **/*.iml **/*.ipr
**/*.iws contrib/clustering/example/lib/**
contrib/clustering/lib/downloads/** /
So I guess it needs to be specifically included... or moved out from
under classes (I haven't looked at the test to see if it needs to be
there).
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Bill Au bill.w...@gmail.com wrote:
The test case org.apache.solr.core.SolrCoreTest.txt is failing because of a
problem with the test itself. A test data file it is expecting is missing.
This should not hold up the release. But since we have a little time, maybe
it is worth fixing.
Bill
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
OK... looks like we'll need to re-spin.
We may have a few hours till that happens. Perhaps we should get in a
couple of the little bug fixes mentioned earlier.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1529
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527
any other low-risk or high priority bug fixes?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Yes, it's too bad!
But you will replace the lucene jars in the artifacts before releasing?
Because it would not be good to have jar files with version 2.9.1 in
the
package that are not the officially released 2.9.1 artifacts.
Darn... forgot about the version number in the jars.
Sigh.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Lucene 2.9.1 respin 3 vote has started... I'm downloading now and will test + check in. Done. You're up Grant! -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
+1 Integrated with my app, and things work well. (windows vista) Ran examples and everything worked as expected. (Mac OSX) On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: OK, new artifacts are up. On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them. I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your commit you were in the process of doing a new one. -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Not sure who gets a vote, and this is my first message to this list, but I wanted to add that I deployed the maven artifacts (along with the lucene 2.9.1 ones) to my in house maven repository and successfully built all my solr dependant projects with dependency groupIdorg.apache.solr/groupId artifactIdsolr-core/artifactId version1.4.0/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.solr/groupId artifactIdsolr-solrj/artifactId version1.4.0/version /dependency Everything went swimingly and running mvn dependency:tree showed this output: [INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:1.4.0:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | | \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-snowball:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-spellchecker:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- commons-codec:commons-codec:jar:1.3:compile [INFO] | +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.2.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.solr:solr-commons-csv:jar:1.4.0:compile [INFO] | +- woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile [INFO] | \- org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile [INFO] \- org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:1.4.0:compile [INFO]+- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.5:compile [INFO]\- org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile [INFO] \- stax:stax-api:jar:1.0.1:compile Nicholas Letourneau On 10/27/09 10/27 7:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: OK, new artifacts are up. On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them. I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your commit you were in the process of doing a new one. -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Oct 28, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Nicholas Letourneau wrote: Not sure who gets a vote, Everyone gets to vote -- officially some votes are 'binding' but in practice this does not really matter. The more feedback there is, the more confidence we have that things are good (or need fixed) and this is my first message to this list, but I wanted to add that I deployed the maven artifacts (along with the lucene 2.9.1 ones) to my in house maven repository and successfully built all my solr dependant projects with dependency groupIdorg.apache.solr/groupId artifactIdsolr-core/artifactId version1.4.0/version /dependency dependency groupIdorg.apache.solr/groupId artifactIdsolr-solrj/artifactId version1.4.0/version /dependency Everything went swimingly and running mvn dependency:tree showed this output: [INFO] +- org.apache.solr:solr-core:jar:1.4.0:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-analyzers:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | | \- org.apache.lucene:lucene-core:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-highlighter:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-queries:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-snowball:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-memory:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-misc:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.lucene:lucene-spellchecker:jar:2.9.1:compile [INFO] | +- commons-codec:commons-codec:jar:1.3:compile [INFO] | +- commons-fileupload:commons-fileupload:jar:1.2.1:compile [INFO] | +- org.apache.solr:solr-commons-csv:jar:1.4.0:compile [INFO] | +- woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile [INFO] | \- org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec:jar:1.0.1:compile [INFO] \- org.apache.solr:solr-solrj:jar:1.4.0:compile [INFO]+- org.slf4j:slf4j-api:jar:1.5.5:compile [INFO]\- org.codehaus.woodstox:wstx-asl:jar:3.2.7:compile [INFO] \- stax:stax-api:jar:1.0.1:compile Nicholas Letourneau On 10/27/09 10/27 7:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: OK, new artifacts are up. On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them. I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your commit you were in the process of doing a new one. -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
I'm feeling emptiness, too. Looks like I forgot the public_html part when copying. All is restored now. On Oct 26, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote. I'm seeing emptiness at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
: OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I thought we'd fixed this, but we still several dependency jars included
multiple times in the release artifacts...
hoss...@brunner:~/tmp/solr1.4$ find apache-solr-1.4.0 -name \*.jar | perl -ple
's{.*/}{}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -r | perl -nle 'print unless /^\s*1\s/'
3 commons-io-1.4.jar
3 commons-codec-1.3.jar
2 wstx-asl-3.2.7.jar
2 slf4j-api-1.5.5.jar
2 log4j-1.2.14.jar
2 jcl-over-slf4j-1.5.5.jar
2 geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
2 commons-lang-2.4.jar
2 commons-httpclient-3.1.jar
...by itself i wouldn't let that stop us from releasing, but what does
concern me a little bit is that we're also including different versions of
some jars, which seems like it could easily cause some weird errors for
people in some situations...
Using extraction combined with clustering and/or velocity...
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/commons-lang-2.1.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/clustering/lib/commons-lang-2.4.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/velocity/src/main/solr/lib/commons-lang-2.4.jar
Using extraction in solr...
apache-solr-1.4.0/dist/solrj-lib/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/lib/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.jar
Using extraction ... at all ...
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/poi-ooxml-3.5-beta5.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/poi-ooxml-3.5-beta6.jar
This one should actually cause any problems, since the 2.5 copy is just
what jetty uses...
apache-solr-1.4.0/lib/servlet-api-2.4.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/example/lib/servlet-api-2.5-6.1.3.jar
...does anyone think these are likely to be problematic enough that we
they *must* be fixed before releasing?
?
(At a minimum: can someone who is familiar with the velocity code before
test it out in combination with extraction? ... i'm not even sure what to
look for)
-Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote.
I thought we'd fixed this, but we still several dependency jars
included
multiple times in the release artifacts...
hoss...@brunner:~/tmp/solr1.4$ find apache-solr-1.4.0 -name \*.jar |
perl -ple 's{.*/}{}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -r | perl -nle 'print
unless /^\s*1\s/'
3 commons-io-1.4.jar
3 commons-codec-1.3.jar
2 wstx-asl-3.2.7.jar
2 slf4j-api-1.5.5.jar
2 log4j-1.2.14.jar
2 jcl-over-slf4j-1.5.5.jar
2 geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
2 commons-lang-2.4.jar
2 commons-httpclient-3.1.jar
...by itself i wouldn't let that stop us from releasing, but what does
concern me a little bit is that we're also including different
versions of
some jars, which seems like it could easily cause some weird errors
for
people in some situations...
Using extraction combined with clustering and/or velocity...
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/commons-lang-2.1.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/clustering/lib/commons-lang-2.4.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/velocity/src/main/solr/lib/commons-
lang-2.4.jar
Using extraction in solr...
apache-solr-1.4.0/dist/solrj-lib/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/lib/geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec-1.0.1.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/geronimo-stax-
api_1.0_spec-1.0.jar
Using extraction ... at all ...
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/poi-ooxml-3.5-beta5.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/contrib/extraction/lib/poi-ooxml-3.5-beta6.jar
Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there.
This one should actually cause any problems, since the 2.5 copy is
just
what jetty uses...
apache-solr-1.4.0/lib/servlet-api-2.4.jar
apache-solr-1.4.0/example/lib/servlet-api-2.5-6.1.3.jar
...does anyone think these are likely to be problematic enough that we
they *must* be fixed before releasing?
?
(At a minimum: can someone who is familiar with the velocity code
before
test it out in combination with extraction? ... i'm not even sure
what to
look for)
-Hoss
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com/
Search the Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Nutch/Mahout/Tika/Droids)
using Solr/Lucene:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
: Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there. I see you changed this on the branch .. were you planning on making a new release candidate? -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there. I see you changed this on the branch .. were you planning on making a new release candidate? I'll cut another one. Although I'm not fixing the other issues.
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Hmm, I thought I removed that one. beta5 should not be in there. I see you changed this on the branch .. were you planning on making a new release candidate? I'll cut another one. Although I'm not fixing the other issues. By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them.
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
: By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them. I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your commit you were in the process of doing a new one. -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
OK, new artifacts are up. On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : By other issues, I mean the duplicate libs. I think we can live with them. I agree ... i would have voted +1 already but i figured based on your commit you were in the process of doing a new one. -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
: OK, new artifacts are up. +1 And for the record, these are the artifacts my vote is based on... 8166f7f23637fa8a7d84c3cd30aa21ab apache-solr-1.4.0.tgz f7ffa8669e12271981c212733bee1ec0 apache-solr-1.4.0.zip -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
+1 also I'll have a look at the duplicate libs issue as soon as I can, but won't be until after/during next week (ApacheCon). Erik On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : OK, new artifacts are up. +1 And for the record, these are the artifacts my vote is based on... 8166f7f23637fa8a7d84c3cd30aa21ab apache-solr-1.4.0.tgz f7ffa8669e12271981c212733bee1ec0 apache-solr-1.4.0.zip -Hoss
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
I shall fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527 for 1.4 I guess On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote: +1 also I'll have a look at the duplicate libs issue as soon as I can, but won't be until after/during next week (ApacheCon). Erik On Oct 27, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : OK, new artifacts are up. +1 And for the record, these are the artifacts my vote is based on... 8166f7f23637fa8a7d84c3cd30aa21ab apache-solr-1.4.0.tgz f7ffa8669e12271981c212733bee1ec0 apache-solr-1.4.0.zip -Hoss -- - Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
2009/10/27 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् noble.p...@corp.aol.com: I shall fix https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1527 for 1.4 I guess Perhaps we should just document this? It's not a regression, but a new, non-core feature. If we delay every time we find a bug, this release will never end. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
OK . Let us push it to 1.5. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 28, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : It's not a regression, but a new, non-core feature. If we delay every : time we find a bug, this release will never end. agreed. agreed. And assuming lucene 3.0 comes out in the somewhat near future, we will have an easy place for minor bug fixes soon enough. -- - Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev like we just discussed in the other thread? That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0 -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Also, not sure what the policy is on voting on files where the pom still needs to change.. http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/maven/org/apache/solr/solr-core/1.4.0/solr-core-1.4.0.pom points to: dependency groupIdorg.apache.lucene/groupId artifactIdlucene-analyzers/artifactId version2.9.0/version /dependency But we really want to point to 2.9.1 I guess we can go ahead and change that even though 2.9.1 does not exist in any repository yet? ryan On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev like we just discussed in the other thread? That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0 -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
I can do it again. The generation process is pretty easy now. On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote: Also, not sure what the policy is on voting on files where the pom still needs to change.. http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/maven/org/apache/solr/solr-core/1.4.0/solr-core-1.4.0.pom points to: dependency groupIdorg.apache.lucene/groupId artifactIdlucene-analyzers/artifactId version2.9.0/version /dependency But we really want to point to 2.9.1 I guess we can go ahead and change that even though 2.9.1 does not exist in any repository yet? ryan On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev like we just discussed in the other thread? That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0 -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
Yes. I need to update the POMs too, so scratch this vote for a little bit. On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: Hmmm, weren't you going to update the version numbers to 1.4.1-dev like we just discussed in the other thread? That way if someone changes some of the solr source from the download and recompiles, they don't get a version number of 1.4.0 -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote. On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
Re: [VOTE] Release Solr 1.4.0
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: OK, take two is up in the same place. Please vote. I'm seeing emptiness at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: Tis the season for releases... Please vote on releasing the Solr 1.4.0 artifacts located at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.4.0/ (note, solr.tar and solr-maven.tar are not artifacts to be released) CHANGES are spelled out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.4/CHANGES.txt Thanks, Grant
