Re: SolrCloud High Availability during indexing operation
Doc count did not change after I restarted the nodes. I am doing a single commit after all 80k docs. Using Solr 4.4. Regards, Saurabh On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting. Did the doc count change after you started the nodes again? > Can you tell us about commits? > Which version? 4.5 will be out soon. > > Otis > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > On Sep 23, 2013 8:37 PM, "Saurabh Saxena" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am testing High Availability feature of SolrCloud. I am using the > > following setup > > > > - 8 linux hosts > > - 8 Shards > > - 1 leader, 1 replica / host > > - Using Curl for update operation > > > > I tried to index 80K documents on replicas (10K/replica in parallel). > > During indexing process, I stopped 4 Leader nodes. Once indexing is done, > > out of 80K docs only 79808 docs are indexed. > > > > Is this an expected behaviour ? In my opinion replica should take care of > > indexing if leader is down. > > > > If this is an expected behaviour, any steps that can be taken from the > > client side to avoid such a situation. > > > > Regards, > > Saurabh Saxena > > >
Re: solr4.4 admin page show "loading"
Use Chrome. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Micheal Chao wrote: > hi, I have installed solr4.4 on tomcat7.0. the problem is I can't see the > solr admin page, it's always show "loading". I can't find any error in > tomcat logs, and I can send search request, and get the result. > > what can I do? please help me, thank you very much. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr4-4-admin-page-show-loading-tp4091039.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
join datas from muliti collections
Hi I have two collections with different schema. And I want to do inner join like SQL: select A.xx,B.xx from A,B where A.yy=B.yy How can I achieve this in Solr. I'm using SolrCloud with solr 4.4 regards
Re: java.lang.LinkageError when using custom filters in multiple cores
Upgraded to 4.4.0, and that seems to have fixed it. The transition was mostly painless once I realized that the interface to the AbstractAnalysisFactory had changed between 4.2 and 4.3. Thanks. - Hayden On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > Did you try latest solr? There was a library loading bug with multiple > cores. Not a perfect match to your description but close enough. > > Regards, > Alex > On 21 Sep 2013 02:28, "Hayden Muhl" wrote: > > > I have two cores "favorite" and "user" running in the same Tomcat > instance. > > In each of these cores I have identical field types "text_en", "text_de", > > "text_fr", and "text_ja". These fields use some custom token filters I've > > written. Everything was going smoothly when I only had the "favorite" > core. > > When I added the "user" core, I started getting java.lang.LinkageErrors > > being thrown when I start up Tomcat. The error always happens with one of > > the classes I've written, but it's unpredictable which class the > > classloader chokes on. > > > > Here's the really strange part. I comment out the "text_*" fields in the > > user core and the errors go away (makes sense). I add "text_en" back in, > no > > error (OK). I add "text_fr" back in, no error (OK). I add "text_de" back > > in, and I get the error (ah ha!). I comment "text_de" out again, and I > > still get the same error (wtf?). > > > > I also put a break point at > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.findClass(SolrResourceLoader.java:424), > > and when I load everything one at a time, I don't get any errors. > > > > I'm running Tomcat 5.5.28, Java version 1.6.0_39 and Solr 4.2.0. I'm > > running this all within Eclipse 1.5.1 on a mac. I have not tested this > on a > > production-like system yet. > > > > Here's an example stack trace. In this case it was one of my Japanese > > filters, but other times it will choke on my synonym filter, or my > compound > > word filter. The specific class it fails on doesn't seem to be relevant. > > > > SEVERE: null:java.lang.LinkageError: loader (instance of > > org/apache/catalina/loader/WebappClassLoader): attempted duplicate > class > > definition for name: "com/shopstyle/solrx/KatakanaVuFilterFactory" > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:631) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615) > > at > java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:141) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:283) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:58) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197) > > at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > > at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) > > at > > > > > org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.findClass(WebappClassLoader.java:904) > > at > > > > > org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1353) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:295) > > at java.net.FactoryURLClassLoader.loadClass(URLClassLoader.java:627) > > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247) > > at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > > at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:249) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.findClass(SolrResourceLoader.java:424) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.newInstance(SolrResourceLoader.java:462) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.util.plugin.AbstractPluginLoader.create(AbstractPluginLoader.java:89) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.util.plugin.AbstractPluginLoader.load(AbstractPluginLoader.java:151) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.schema.FieldTypePluginLoader.readAnalyzer(FieldTypePluginLoader.java:392) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.schema.FieldTypePluginLoader.create(FieldTypePluginLoader.java:86) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.schema.FieldTypePluginLoader.create(FieldTypePluginLoader.java:43) > > at > > > > > org.apache.solr.util.plugin.AbstractPluginLoader.load(AbstractPluginLoader.java:151) > > at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.readSchema(IndexSchema.java:373) > > at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.(IndexSchema.java:121) > > at > > > org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.createFromLocal(CoreContainer.java:1018) > > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:1051) > > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$3.call(CoreContainer.java:634) > > at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$3.call(CoreContainer.java:629) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) > > at > java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303) > > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138) > > at > > > > > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecu
Re: Solr query processing
That's right. Otis Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Sep 23, 2013 12:55 PM, "Scott Smith" wrote: > I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, "that's > right". > > > 1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q. > And yes, I can simply AND the multiple "q"s together. Just want to avoid > that if I'm wrong. > > 2. A subtler issue is that when a full query is executied, Solr must > look at the schema to see how each field was tokenized (or not) and the > various other filters applied to a field so that it can properly transform > fields data (e.g., tokenize the text, but not keywords). As an aside, it > would be nice if the queryparser could do the same thing in Lucene (I know, > wrong forum :)). > Scott >
Re: SolrCloud High Availability during indexing operation
Interesting. Did the doc count change after you started the nodes again? Can you tell us about commits? Which version? 4.5 will be out soon. Otis Solr & ElasticSearch Support http://sematext.com/ On Sep 23, 2013 8:37 PM, "Saurabh Saxena" wrote: > Hello, > > I am testing High Availability feature of SolrCloud. I am using the > following setup > > - 8 linux hosts > - 8 Shards > - 1 leader, 1 replica / host > - Using Curl for update operation > > I tried to index 80K documents on replicas (10K/replica in parallel). > During indexing process, I stopped 4 Leader nodes. Once indexing is done, > out of 80K docs only 79808 docs are indexed. > > Is this an expected behaviour ? In my opinion replica should take care of > indexing if leader is down. > > If this is an expected behaviour, any steps that can be taken from the > client side to avoid such a situation. > > Regards, > Saurabh Saxena >
SolrCloud High Availability during indexing operation
Hello, I am testing High Availability feature of SolrCloud. I am using the following setup - 8 linux hosts - 8 Shards - 1 leader, 1 replica / host - Using Curl for update operation I tried to index 80K documents on replicas (10K/replica in parallel). During indexing process, I stopped 4 Leader nodes. Once indexing is done, out of 80K docs only 79808 docs are indexed. Is this an expected behaviour ? In my opinion replica should take care of indexing if leader is down. If this is an expected behaviour, any steps that can be taken from the client side to avoid such a situation. Regards, Saurabh Saxena
Select all descendants in a relation index
Hello,
I am using Solr to index Drupal node relations (over 300k relations on over
500k nodes), where each relation consists of the following fields:
- id : the id of the relation
- source_id : the source (parent) node id
- targe_id : the targe (child) node id
I need to be able to find all descendants of a node with one query.
So far I've managed to get direct children using the join syntax of Solr4 such
as (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join):
/solr/collection/select?q={!join from=source_id to=target_id}source_id:12
Note that each node can have multiple parents and multiple children.
Is there a way to get all descendants of node 12 without having to create a
loop in PHP to find all children, then all children of each child, etc ?
If not, is it possible to create a recursive query directly in Solr, or is
there a better way to index tree structures ?
Any help or suggestion would be highly appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Semiaddict
Using CachedSqlEntityProcessor with delta imports in DIH
I'm trying to use the CachedSqlEntityProcessor on a child entity that also has a delta query. Full imports and delta imports of the parent entity work fine however delta imports for the child entity have no effect. If I remove the processor="CachedSqlEntityProcessor" attribute from the child entity, the delta import works flawlessly but the full import is very slow. Here's my data-config.xml: http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"/> I need to be able to run delta imports based on the media_tags_map table in addition to the story_sentences table. Any idea why delta imports for media_tags_map won't work when the CachedSqlEntityProcessor is used? I've searched extensively but can't find an example that uses both CachedSqlEntityProcessor and deltaQuery on the sub-entity or any explanation of why the above configuration won't work as expected. -- Thanks, David
Re: Searching for closed polylines that contain a given point
Mark, Yes you can. You should index polygons, not polylines. A polyline semantically refers to the actual line but rather you want to index the coverage of the nation (the space encircled by the polyline), not the border literally. One thing to be aware of is that indexed non-point shapes are pixelated to a grid kinda like how a vector shape is actually drawn to a computer screen which is composed of a matrix of pixels. The approach will hopefully scale ok for your requirements but if you want more detailed precision along the borders then it might not -- if you set distErrPct too low then you'll run out of memory while indexing. To get started, see: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4 ~ David On 9/23/13 5:21 PM, "Mark Backman" wrote: > > >I'm new to spatial search within solr. If I have a set of records >containing closed polylines describing, say, the boundaries of nations, >can I use solr to build an index of these records against which I can >search to see if a point is contained within any of them? > > >Thanks, > >-Mark
Searching for closed polylines that contain a given point
I'm new to spatial search within solr. If I have a set of records containing closed polylines describing, say, the boundaries of nations, can I use solr to build an index of these records against which I can search to see if a point is contained within any of them? Thanks, -Mark
Re: Hash range to shard assignment
Yes, actually that would be a very comfortable solution. Is that planned ? And if so, when will it be released ? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hash-range-to-shard-assignment-tp4091204p4091591.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
SolrParams to and from NamedList
Hi,
In a request-handler, if I run the below code, I get an exception from Solr
undefined field: "[Ljava.lang.String;@41061b68"
It appears the conversion between SolrParams and NamedList and back again fails
if one of the parameters is an array. This could be a couple of configuration
parameters like
category
author
public void handleRequestBody(SolrQueryRequest req, SolrQueryResponse rsp)
throws Exception {
SolrParams params = req.getParams();
NamedList parameterList = params.toNamedList();
SolrParams newSolrParams = SolrParams.toSolrParams(parameterList);
req.setParams(newSolrParams);
super.handleRequestBody(req, rsp);
How can I generate the correct conversion?
Thanks.
Indexing bulk loads of PDF files and extracting information from them
Hi all, I am looking to index the entire directory of PDF files. We have a very large volume of PDFs (3000+, possibly much more), so adding them manually would be cumbersome. I have seen more than a couple of dozen links explaining how to index PDF using SOLR, but none were details enough to help me get started. I understand that indexing a word or PDF document requires the use of the ExtractingRequestHandler which uses Apache Tika. My question is: How do I configure the Handler so that it can extract the required information from bulk loads of PDF? I know I am asking a broad question, but I am struggling to find a good guidance and something that would give me a step to step approach. There is an example configuration in the following link: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtractingRequestHandler I have also seen these threads: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5947157/index-search-pdf-content-with-solr http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/general/158117 I am still trying to understand the configuration process, so any concrete help would be welcome. Thanks, Sadika Amreen Data Scientist PYA Analytics DISCLOSURE Any U.S. tax advice contained in the body of this email was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax provisions. IMPORTANT NOTICE This E-mail (including any attachments) contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION protected by Federal and/or State law and is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) designated as recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of the E-mail, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E-mail is strictly prohibited. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege. If you have received this E-mail in error, please immediately notify us by phone at (800) 270-9629 or reply to the sender of this email and then permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail (including any attachments) and destroy any printout thereof.
Solr query processing
I just want to state a couple of things and hear someone say, "that's right". 1. In a solr query you can have multiple fq's, but only a single q. And yes, I can simply AND the multiple "q"s together. Just want to avoid that if I'm wrong. 2. A subtler issue is that when a full query is executied, Solr must look at the schema to see how each field was tokenized (or not) and the various other filters applied to a field so that it can properly transform fields data (e.g., tokenize the text, but not keywords). As an aside, it would be nice if the queryparser could do the same thing in Lucene (I know, wrong forum :)). Scott
How to sort over all documents by score after Result Grouping / Field Collapsing
Hi, I have solr documents like this: I know I can use solr Result Grouping / Field Collapsing to get the top 2 result by grouping by source_id. Within each groups, documents sorted by scroe by query like this: http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=bank&group.field=source_id&group=true&group.limit=2&group.main=true&sort=score My question is: 1. Is it possible to sort overall documents after I do above grouping? 2. Is there any other ways to implement above functions(by using solr functions directly)? 3. Is it possible to implement this by writing java code something like customized request handler to do this? Thanks in advance, Jun -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-sort-over-all-documents-by-score-after-Result-Grouping-Field-Collapsing-tp4091593.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Hash range to shard assignment
Custom routers is an idea that is floated around ad easy to implement. Just that it is something we resist to add another extension point. The point is we are planning other features which would obviate the need for a custom router. Something like splitting a shard by a query. Will it be a good enough solution for you? On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:52 PM, lochri wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. > > Still I would think it is sub-optimal to split shards when we actually don't > know which mailboxes we actually split. It may create splits of small users > which leads to unnecessary distribution of the smaller users. > > We thought about doing the routing ourself. As far as a I understood we can > do distributed searches across multiple collections. What do you think about > this option ? > > For the ideal solution: when will custom routers be supported ? > > Regards, > Lochri > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hash-range-to-shard-assignment-tp4091204p4091503.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- - Noble Paul
OpenNLP Analyzers not working properly
Hi, iam working on OpenNLP with SOLR. I have successfully applied the patch LUCENE-2899-x.patch to latest SOLR code branch_4x. I desgined some analyers based on OpenNLP filters and tokenziers and index some documnets on that fields. Searching on OpenNLP field is not constant. Not able to search on these OpenNLP designed fields in solr schema.xml properly. Also, how to use payloads for boosting the document. Please help me on this.
Re: Get only those documents that are fully satisfied.
Hi Jack, I've been working with the following schema field analyzer: Regarding the query, the one I'm using right now is: But with this query, I just get results by the presence of any of the words at the sentence. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-only-those-documents-that-are-fully-satisfied-tp4091531p4091565.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Complez query combining fq and q with join
Hi all,Thanks in advance for your help.I am trying to create a query joining
two cores using {!join} functionality.I have two cores, "personcore" and
"personjobcore". *Person core schema*PersonIDGenderAge*Company core
schema*PersonJobIDPersonIDCompanyNameCompanyTypeAddressI have to create a
complex query like this one joining both cores and getting results only from
Person.*(Gender:Male AND Company:IBM AND CompanyType:All) OR (Gender:Female
AND Address:United States)*I am finding really hard to create this query
using {!join} as I have to define several join sentences and using boolean
operator within them.Is that possible?This an example what I am
tryinghttp://localhost:8080/solr4/person/select/?&q=Gender:Male AND {!join
from=PersonID to=PersonID fromIndex=personjob}((CoCompanyName:ibm) AND
(CompanyType:All))
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Complez-query-combining-fq-and-q-with-join-tp4091563.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Facet search on a docvalue field in a multi shard collection
Hi I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5260 as proposed by Erick. I hope anyone working with doc values can lead me in a direction of how to solve the bug. Best regards Trym Den 23-09-2013 16:01, Erick Erickson skrev: I haven't dived into the code, but it sure looks like a JIRA to me, can you open one? Best, Erick On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:48 AM, "Trym R. Møller" wrote: Hi Erick Thanks for your input. I have retrieved and build the branch http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_5 Doing the same setup as in my previous post (two shard collection, fieldA af docValue type, index a single document and doing a facet search on fieldA), I now get the below exception. The cause (which is not visible from the stacktrace) is as previous: "Cannot use facet.mincount=0 on field fieldA which is not indexed" What could be my next steps from here? 620710 [qtp1728933440-15] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore ▒ org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field: fieldA. at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$2.call(SimpleFacets.java:569) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$2.call(SimpleFacets.java:554) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$1.execute(SimpleFacets.java:508) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getFacetFieldCounts(SimpleFacets.java:579) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getFacetCounts(SimpleFacets.java:265) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent.process(FacetComponent.java:78) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:208) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:135) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1859) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:703) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:406) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:195) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1419) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:455) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:557) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1075) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:384) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1009) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:116) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:368) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:489) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handleRequest(BlockingHttpConnection.java:53) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.content(AbstractHttpConnection.java:953) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(AbstractHttpConnection.java:1014) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:861) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:240) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handle(BlockingHttpConnection.java:72) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.run(SocketConnector.java:264) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:608) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:543) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) Den 22-09-2013 17:09, Erick Erickson skrev: right, I think you're running into a bug I remember going by. I can't find it now, JIRA seems to be not responding. As I remember, where if a shard doesn't have a doc on it, you get an error. Although why facet.limit should figure in here is a mystery to me, maybe a coincidence? Significant work has been done about not requiring values for DocValues fields and stuff. Can you give a try on 4.x or the soon-to-be-released 4.5? Best, Erick On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:26 AM, "Trym R. Møller" wrote: Hi I have a problem doing facet search on a doc value field in a multi shard collection. Any ideas what I may be doing wrong? My Solr schema specifies fieldA as a docvalue type and I have created a two shard collection usin
Re: Facet search on a docvalue field in a multi shard collection
I haven't dived into the code, but it sure looks like a JIRA to me, can you open one? Best, Erick On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:48 AM, "Trym R. Møller" wrote: > Hi Erick > > Thanks for your input. > > I have retrieved and build the branch > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_5 > Doing the same setup as in my previous post (two shard collection, fieldA af > docValue type, index a single document and doing a facet search on fieldA), > I now get the below exception. The cause (which is not visible from the > stacktrace) is as previous: "Cannot use facet.mincount=0 on field fieldA > which is not indexed" > > What could be my next steps from here? > > 620710 [qtp1728933440-15] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore ▒ > org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field: fieldA. > at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$2.call(SimpleFacets.java:569) > at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$2.call(SimpleFacets.java:554) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) > at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$1.execute(SimpleFacets.java:508) > at > org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getFacetFieldCounts(SimpleFacets.java:579) > at > org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getFacetCounts(SimpleFacets.java:265) > > at > org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent.process(FacetComponent.java:78) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:208) > at > org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:135) > at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1859) > at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:703) > at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:406) > at > org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:195) > > at > org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1419) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:455) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:557) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1075) > at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:384) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1009) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:116) > at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:368) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:489) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handleRequest(BlockingHttpConnection.java:53) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.content(AbstractHttpConnection.java:953) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(AbstractHttpConnection.java:1014) > at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:861) > at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:240) > > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handle(BlockingHttpConnection.java:72) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.run(SocketConnector.java:264) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:608) > at > org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:543) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) > > Den 22-09-2013 17:09, Erick Erickson skrev: > >> right, I think you're running into a bug I remember going by. I can't >> find it now, JIRA seems to be not responding. As I remember, >> where if a shard doesn't have a doc on it, you get an error. >> >> Although why facet.limit should figure in here is a mystery to me, >> maybe a coincidence? >> >> Significant work has been done about not requiring values for >> DocValues fields and stuff. Can you give a try on 4.x or the >> soon-to-be-released 4.5? >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:26 AM, "Trym R. Møller" wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I have a problem doing facet search on a doc value field in a multi shard >>> collection. Any ideas what I may be doing wrong? >>> >>> My Solr schema specifies fieldA as a docvalue type and I have created a >>> two >>> shard collection using Solr
Re: solr - searching part of words
Solr is very flexible and you can configure it in lots of amazing ways. You need to start with carefully specifying the rules that you wish to implement. Is the numeric the boundary, or do you want to support arbitrary prefixes, or... what? Be specific, because that determines what features of Solr to use and precisely how to use them. The word delimiter filter and edge n-gram filter are possible tools to use in such cases. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Mysurf Mail Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 3:34 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: solr - searching part of words My field is defined as *text_en is defined as in the original schema.xml that comes with solr Now, my field has the following vaues - "one" - "one1" searching for "one" returns only the field "one". What causes it? how can I change it?
Re: Get only those documents that are fully satisfied.
It all depends on your query parameters and schema field type analyzers, of which you have told us nothing. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: asuka Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:57 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Get only those documents that are fully satisfied. Hi, I've got an scenario similar to the following one. ID1 PAUL MCCARTNEY FLOWERS IN THE DIRT 1989 LP2 ALICE IN CHAINS DIRT 1992 LP3 GUNS'N'ROSES THE SPAGHETTI INCIDENT? 1993 I can't picture how I can perform searches that give me, as a result, those LP's where all their NAME terms have been satisfied; for example, imagine I search for "DIRT"; I would like to get only the doc with ID LP2, since at LP1, we've got the words "FLOWERS IN THE" that haven't been included at the query. If the query is: "the dirt spaguetti incident?" I should get the docs LP2 and LP3. Kind regards -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-only-those-documents-that-are-fully-satisfied-tp4091531.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[DIH] Logging skipped documents
Hello, I have a question, I index documents and a small part them are skipped, (I am in onError="skip" mode) I'm trying to get a list of them, in order to analyse what's worng with these documents Is there a mean to get the list of skipped documents, and some more information (my onError="skip" is in an XPathEntityProcessor, the name of the file processed would be OK) Cordialement, --- Jérôme Dupont Bibliothèque Nationale de France Département des Systèmes d'Information Tour T3 - Quai François Mauriac 75706 Paris Cedex 13 téléphone: 33 (0)1 53 79 45 40 e-mail: jerome.dup...@bnf.fr --- Participez à la Grande Collecte 1914-1918 Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement.
Get only those documents that are fully satisfied.
Hi, I've got an scenario similar to the following one. ID1 PAUL MCCARTNEY FLOWERS IN THE DIRT 1989 LP2 ALICE IN CHAINS DIRT 1992 LP3 GUNS'N'ROSES THE SPAGHETTI INCIDENT? 1993 I can't picture how I can perform searches that give me, as a result, those LP's where all their NAME terms have been satisfied; for example, imagine I search for "DIRT"; I would like to get only the doc with ID LP2, since at LP1, we've got the words "FLOWERS IN THE" that haven't been included at the query. If the query is: "the dirt spaguetti incident?" I should get the docs LP2 and LP3. Kind regards -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-only-those-documents-that-are-fully-satisfied-tp4091531.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Problems with gaps removed with SynonymFilter
Unfortunately the current SynonymFilter cannot handle posInc != 1 ...
we could perhaps try to fix this ... patches welcome :)
So for now it's best to place SynonymFilter before StopFilter, and
before any other filters that may create graph tokens (posLen > 1,
posInc == 0).
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:45 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem applying StopFilterFactory and
> SynonimFilterFactory. The problem is that SynonymFilter removes the gaps
> that were previously put by the StopFilterFactory. I'm applying filters in
>
> query time, because users need to change synonym lists frequently.
>
> This is my schema, and an example of the issue:
>
>
> String: "documentacion para agentes"
>
> org.apache.solr.analysis.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory
> {luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_35}
> position1 2 3
> term text documentaciónpara agentes
> startOffset 0 14 19
> endOffset 13 18 26
> org.apache.solr.analysis.LowerCaseFilterFactory
> {luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_35}
> position1 2 3
> term text documentaciónpara agentes
> startOffset 0 14 19
> endOffset 13 18 26
> org.apache.solr.analysis.StopFilterFactory {words=stopwords_intranet.txt,
> ignoreCase=true, enablePositionIncrements=true,
> luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_35}
> position1 3
> term text documentación agentes
> startOffset 0 19
> endOffset 13 26
> org.apache.solr.analysis.SynonymFilterFactory
> {synonyms=sinonimos_intranet.txt, expand=true, ignoreCase=true,
> luceneMatchVersion=LUCENE_35}
> position1 2
> term text documentación agente
> archivo agentes
> typeSYNONYM SYNONYM
> SYNONYM SYNONYM
> startOffset 0 19
> 0 19
> endOffset 1326
> 13 26
>
>
> As you can see, the position should be 1 and 3, but SynonymFilter removes
> the gap and moves token from position 3 to 2
> I've got the same problem with Solr 3.5 y 4.0.
> I don't know if it's a bug or an error with my configuration. In other
> schemas that I have worked with, I had always put the SynonymFilter
> previous to StopFilter, but in this I prefered using this order because of
>
> the big number of synonym that the list has (i.e. I don't want to generate
>
> a lot of synonyms for a word that I really wanted to remove).
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Dávila Atienza
> AEAT - Departamento de Informática Tributaria
>
> David Dávila Atienza
> AEAT - Departamento de Informática Tributaria
> Subdirección de Tecnologías de Análisis de la Información e Investigación
> del Fraude
> Área de Infraestructuras
> Teléfono: 915831543
> Extensión: 31543
[Solr Join Score Mode] Query parser lack
Hi guys,
I was studying in deep the join feature, and I noticed that in Solr , the
join query parser is not working in scoring.
If you add the parameter "scoreMode" it is completely ignored...
Checking the source code it's possible to see that the join query is built
as follow :
public class JoinQParserPlugin extends QParserPlugin {
*JoinQuery jq = new JoinQuery(fromField, toField, fromIndex, fromQuery);*
And the JoinQuery object has no implementation regarding the score mode.
Looking in the lucene code we can find , in the class :
org.apache.lucene.search.join.JoinUtil a complete usage of the score mode param.
Why has not be ported ? Anyone is planning to change the JoinQParserPlugin ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4043
looking here is possible to customize a query parser adding a wrapping
of the JoinUtil, but nothing official ?
Cheers
--
--
Benedetti Alessandro
Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
"Tyger, tyger burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
Re: SolrCloud - Path must not end with / character
Hi guys, I just met this problem too. After read the source code, I found collection1 is missing in the zookeeper configuration. You can solve this problem by just remove the version-2 folder of zookeeper configration and init the zookeeper again. Hope this helps. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-Path-must-not-end-with-character-tp4087159p4091465.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: deployee issu on solr
Could you send your error? 2013/9/23 Ramesh > Unable to deploying solr 4.4 on JBoss -4.0.0 I am getting error like > > > >
deployee issu on solr
Unable to deploying solr 4.4 on JBoss -4.0.0 I am getting error like
Re: Hash range to shard assignment
Thanks for the clarification. Still I would think it is sub-optimal to split shards when we actually don't know which mailboxes we actually split. It may create splits of small users which leads to unnecessary distribution of the smaller users. We thought about doing the routing ourself. As far as a I understood we can do distributed searches across multiple collections. What do you think about this option ? For the ideal solution: when will custom routers be supported ? Regards, Lochri -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Hash-range-to-shard-assignment-tp4091204p4091503.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Facet search on a docvalue field in a multi shard collection
Hi Erick Thanks for your input. I have retrieved and build the branch http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_4_5 Doing the same setup as in my previous post (two shard collection, fieldA af docValue type, index a single document and doing a facet search on fieldA), I now get the below exception. The cause (which is not visible from the stacktrace) is as previous: "Cannot use facet.mincount=0 on field fieldA which is not indexed" What could be my next steps from here? 620710 [qtp1728933440-15] ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore ▒ org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Exception during facet.field: fieldA. at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$2.call(SimpleFacets.java:569) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$2.call(SimpleFacets.java:554) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets$1.execute(SimpleFacets.java:508) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getFacetFieldCounts(SimpleFacets.java:579) at org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getFacetCounts(SimpleFacets.java:265) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.FacetComponent.process(FacetComponent.java:78) at org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:208) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:135) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1859) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:703) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:406) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:195) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler$CachedChain.doFilter(ServletHandler.java:1419) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:455) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:137) at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:557) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:231) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doHandle(ContextHandler.java:1075) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doScope(ServletHandler.java:384) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doScope(SessionHandler.java:193) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doScope(ContextHandler.java:1009) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:135) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.handle(ContextHandlerCollection.java:255) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.handle(HandlerCollection.java:154) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:116) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.handle(Server.java:368) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.handleRequest(AbstractHttpConnection.java:489) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handleRequest(BlockingHttpConnection.java:53) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection.content(AbstractHttpConnection.java:953) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractHttpConnection$RequestHandler.content(AbstractHttpConnection.java:1014) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseNext(HttpParser.java:861) at org.eclipse.jetty.http.HttpParser.parseAvailable(HttpParser.java:240) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.BlockingHttpConnection.handle(BlockingHttpConnection.java:72) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.bio.SocketConnector$ConnectorEndPoint.run(SocketConnector.java:264) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool.runJob(QueuedThreadPool.java:608) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.thread.QueuedThreadPool$3.run(QueuedThreadPool.java:543) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) Den 22-09-2013 17:09, Erick Erickson skrev: right, I think you're running into a bug I remember going by. I can't find it now, JIRA seems to be not responding. As I remember, where if a shard doesn't have a doc on it, you get an error. Although why facet.limit should figure in here is a mystery to me, maybe a coincidence? Significant work has been done about not requiring values for DocValues fields and stuff. Can you give a try on 4.x or the soon-to-be-released 4.5? Best, Erick On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:26 AM, "Trym R. Møller" wrote: Hi I have a problem doing facet search on a doc value field in a multi shard collection. Any ideas what I may be doing wrong? My Solr schema specifies fieldA as a docvalue type and I have created a two shard collection using Solr 4.4.0. When I do a facet search on fieldA with a "large" facet.limit then the query fails with the below exception A "large" facet.limit seems to be when (10 + (facet.limit * 1,5)) * number of shards > rows matching my query The exception does not occur when I run with a single shard collection. It can easily be reproduced by indexing a single row and queryin
Re: isolating solrcloud instance from peer updates
Though as Shalin said, there's no way to do it other than just taking it off completely, can you specify the use case ? On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Aditya Sakhuja wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a way to isolate an active solr-cloud instance from all incoming > replication update requests from peer nodes ? > > -- > Regards, > -Aditya Sakhuja > -- Anshum Gupta http://www.anshumgupta.net
Re: Storing/indexing speed drops quickly
Now running the tests on a slightly reduced setup (2 machines, quadcore, 8GB ram ...), but that doesnt matter We see that storing/indexing speed drops when using IndexWriter.updateDocument in DirectUpdateHandler2.addDoc. But it does not drop when just using IndexWriter.addDocument (update-requests with overwrite=false) Using addDocument: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25718039/AddDocument_2Solr8GB_DocCount.png Using updateDocument: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25718039/UpdateDocument_2Solr8GB_DocCount.png We are not too happy about having to use addDocument, because that allows for duplicates, and we would really want to avoid that (on Solr/Lucene level) We have confirmed that doubling amount of total RAM will double the amount of documents in the index where the indexing-speed starts dropping (when we use updateDocument) On https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25718039/UpdateDocument_2Solr8GB_DocCount.png you can see that the speed drops at around 120M documents. Running the same test, but with Solr machine having 16GB RAM (instead of 8GB) the speed drops at around 240M documents. Any comments on why indexing speed drops with IndexWriter.updateDocument but not with IndexWriter.addDocument? Regards, Per Steffensen On 9/12/13 10:14 AM, Per Steffensen wrote: Seems like the attachments didnt make it through to this mailing list https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25718039/doccount.png https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25718039/iowait.png On 9/12/13 8:25 AM, Per Steffensen wrote: Hi SolrCloud 4.0: 6 machines, quadcore, 8GB ram, 1T disk, one Solr-node on each, one collection across the 6 nodes, 4 shards per node Storing/indexing from 100 threads on external machines, each thread one doc at the time, full speed (they always have a new doc to store/index) See attached images * iowait.png: Measured I/O wait on the Solr machines * doccount.png: Measured number of doc in Solr collection Starting from an empty collection. Things are fine wrt storing/indexing speed for the first two-three hours (100M docs per hour), then speed goes down dramatically, to an, for us, unacceptable level (max 10M per hour). At the same time as speed goes down, we see that I/O wait increases dramatically. I am not 100% sure, but quick investigation has shown that this is due to almost constant merging. What to do about this problem? Know that you can play around with mergeFactor and commit-rate, but earlier tests shows that this really do not seem to do the job - it might postpone the time where the problem occurs, but basically it is just a matter of time before merging exhaust the system. Is there a way to totally avoid merging, and keep indexing speed at a high level, while still making sure that searches will perform fairly well when data-amounts become big? (guess without merging you will end up with lots and lots of "small" files, and I guess this is not good for search response-time) Regards, Per Steffensen
Re: import partition table from oracle
Hi Shalin Thanks a lot. It is the point that I need. Regards 2013/9/23 Shalin Shekhar Mangar > You can use request parameters in your query e.g. > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#Accessing_request_parameters > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:26 AM, YouPeng Yang > wrote: > > Hi > > > > I want to import dataset in a partition of a partition table with DIH. > > And I would like to explicitly define the partition when I do import job. > > > > To be specific. > > 1. I define the DIH configuration like these > > > > > > 2.I send the url: > > http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport?command=full-import&part=p2 > > > > and then the DIHhandler will full import the p2 partition of the table. > > > > Any suggestion will be appreciated. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. >
solr - searching part of words
My field is defined as *text_en is defined as in the original schema.xml that comes with solr Now, my field has the following vaues - "one" - "one1" searching for "one" returns only the field "one". What causes it? how can I change it?
Re: How to define facet.prefix as case-insensitive
thanks. On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: > You'll have to lowercase the term in your app and set > terms.prefix to that value, there's no analysis done > on the terms.prefix value. > > Best, > Erick > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 4:07 AM, Mysurf Mail > wrote: > > I am using facet.prefix for auto complete. > > This is my definition > > > > > > > > explicit > > ... > > true > > on > > Suggest > > > > > > this is my field > > > > > required="false" multiValued="true"/> > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > all works fine but when I search using caps lock it doesn't return > answers. > > Even when the field contains capitals letters - it doesn't. > > > > I assume that the field in solr is lowered (from the field type filter > > definition) but the search term is not. > > How can I control the search term caps/no caps? > > > > Thanks. >
Re: Spellchecking
Thank you!! 2013/9/20 Dyer, James > If you're using "spellcheck.collate" you can also set > "spellcheck.maxCollationTries" to validate each collation against the index > before suggesting it. This validation takes into account any "fq" > parameters on your query, so if your original query has "fq=Product:Book", > then the collations returned will all be vetted by internally running the > query with that filter applied. > > If for some reason your main query does not have "fq=Product:Book", but > you want it considered when collations are being built, you can include > "spellcheck.collateParam.fq=Product:Book". > > See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.collateand > following sections. > > James Dyer > Ingram Content Group > (615) 213-4311 > > > -Original Message- > From: Gastone Penzo [mailto:gastone.pe...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 4:00 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Spellchecking > > Hi, > i'd like to know if is it possibile to have suggests only of a part of > indexes. > for example: > > an ecommerce: > there are a lot of typologies of products (book, dvd, cd..) > > if i search inside books, i want only suggests of books products, not cds > but the spellchecking indexs are all together. > > is it possibile to divided indexes or have suggests only of a typology? > > thanx > > -- > Gastone > > -- *Gastone Penzo* * *
