Re: zkcli issues
*), my first guess > would be that the war is not exploded yet. You have to manually unzip or > start and stop solr. > > This logic could probably be added to those scripts (unzip it), but it's > annoying to have any logic in them since everything has to be mirrored in bat > and sh. > > - Mark > > On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Nick Chase wrote: > >> I agree that it *shouldn't* be OS specific. :) Anyway, thanks for the >> suggestion, but that's not it. I get the same error with the script right >> out of the box: >> >> Error: Could not find or load main class >> C:\sw\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\cloud-scripts\..\solr-webapp\webapp\WEB-INF\lib\apache-solr-solrj-4.0.0.jar >> >> And anyway, it's a weird error, referencing a jar as a class, isn't it? >> Start up a JIRA? >> >> - Nick >> >> On 11/16/2012 10:42 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >>> I *think* I tested the script on windows once way back. >>> >>> Anyway, the code itself should not be OS specific. >>> >>> One thing you might want to check if you are copying unix cmd line >>> stuff - I think windows separates classpath entries with ; rather than >>> : - so you likely to need to change that. You'd think java could have >>> been smart enough to accept either/or at worst, but meh. >>> >>> For example: >>> .:/Users/jeeva/dc-1/solr-cli-lib/* >>> should be >>> .;/Users/jeeva/dc-1/solr-cli-lib/* >>> >>> - Mark >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Nick Chase wrote: >>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to solve the issue; now I'm beginning to >>>> wonder if maybe it's because I'm on Windows. Has anyone successfully run >>>> ZkCLI on Windows? >>>> >>>> Nick >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/12/2012 2:27 AM, Jeevanandam Madanagopal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Nick - Sorry, embedded links are not shown in previous email. I'm >>>>> mentioning below. >>>>> >>>>>> Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands >>>>>> (http://www.myjeeva.com/2012/10/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment/#handy-solrcloud-cli-commands) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble >>>>>> (http://www.myjeeva.com/2012/10/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment/#uploading-solrconfig-to-zookeeper) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Jeeva >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Jeevanandam Madanagopal >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Nick - >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe you're experiencing a difficulties with SolrCloud CLI commands >>>>>> for interacting ZooKeeper. >>>>>> Please have a look on below links, it will provide you direction. >>>>>> Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands >>>>>> Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Jeeva >>>>>> >>>>>> On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/11/2012 04:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Nick Chase >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So I'm trying to use ZkCLI without success. I DID start and stop Solr >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> non-cloud mode, so everything is extracted and it IS finding >>>>>>>>> zookeeper*.jar. >>>>>>>>> However, now it's NOT finding SolrJ. >>> >>> >>> > >
Re: Multivalued or not
Okay, I believe you're using Solr 3.6, here you can use schema version 1.5 However, you're currently using version 1.0, it safer to update your schema version to 1.1 then multiValued is false by default. FYI. Schema version info (from schema.xml): -- 1.0: multiValued attribute did not exist, all fields are multiValued by nature 1.1: multiValued attribute introduced, false by default 1.2: omitTermFreqAndPositions attribute introduced, true by default except for text fields 1.3: removed optional field compress feature 1.4: autoGeneratePhraseQueries attribute introduced to drive QueryParser behavior when a single string produces multiple tokens. Defaults to off for version >= 1.4 1.5: omitNorms defaults to true for primitive field types (int, float, boolean, string...) - Jeeva Blog: http://www.myjeeva.com On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:54 PM, Peter Kirk wrote: > Hi, it says version 1.0 > > > > /Peter > > > -Original Message- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com] > Sent: 14. november 2012 10:22 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Multivalued or not > > But what is your schema version? See the top of schema.xml. > > On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:17, Peter Kirk wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Thanks for the reply. It is strange, because when I index to a field defined >> like: >> >> > name="*_string" >> stored="true" >> type="string" /> >> >> Then the results I receive are like: >> >> >> Woodland >> >> >> Which seems to indicate a multivalued field. >> >> If I change the field definition, so I explicitly say multivalued is false: >> >> > name="*_string" >> stored="true" >> type="string" >> multivalued="false" /> >> >> Then the result is like: >> >> Woodland >> >> >> /Peter >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Jeevanandam Madanagopal [mailto:je...@myjeeva.com] >> Sent: 14. november 2012 10:11 >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Multivalued or not >> >> Hello Peter - >> >> In Solr 3.6 multiValued is false by default. >> >> Since Schema version 1.1 onwards multiValued attribute value is false by >> default (, , ) >> >> -Jeeva >> Blog: http://www.myjeeva.com >> >> >> On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Peter Kirk wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> In Solr 3.6, is multivalued for fields, default true or false? >>> >>> It appears that it is default false for normal fields, and default true for >>> dynamic fields - is that correct? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > >
Re: Multivalued or not
Hello Peter - In Solr 3.6 multiValued is false by default. Since Schema version 1.1 onwards multiValued attribute value is false by default (, , ) -Jeeva Blog: http://www.myjeeva.com On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:04 PM, Peter Kirk wrote: > Hi > > In Solr 3.6, is multivalued for fields, default true or false? > > It appears that it is default false for normal fields, and default true for > dynamic fields - is that correct? > > Thanks, > Peter > > >
Re: zkcli issues
Nick - Sorry, embedded links are not shown in previous email. I'm mentioning below. > Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands > (http://www.myjeeva.com/2012/10/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment/#handy-solrcloud-cli-commands) > Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble > (http://www.myjeeva.com/2012/10/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment/#uploading-solrconfig-to-zookeeper) Cheers, Jeeva On Nov 12, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Jeevanandam Madanagopal wrote: > Nick - > > I believe you're experiencing a difficulties with SolrCloud CLI commands for > interacting ZooKeeper. > Please have a look on below links, it will provide you direction. > Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands > Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble > > Cheers, > Jeeva > > On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > >> On 11/11/2012 04:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Nick Chase wrote: >>>> So I'm trying to use ZkCLI without success. I DID start and stop Solr in >>>> non-cloud mode, so everything is extracted and it IS finding >>>> zookeeper*.jar. >>>> However, now it's NOT finding SolrJ. >>> Not sure about your specific problem in this case, but I chatted with >>> Mark about this while at ApacheCon... it seems like we should be able >>> to explode the WAR ourselves if necessary, eliminating the need to >>> start Solr first. Just throwing it out there before I forgot about it >>> ;-) >>> >>> -Yonik >>> http://lucidworks.com >> >> I guess the tricky part might be knowing where to extract it. We know how to >> do it for the default jetty setup, but that could be reconfigured or you >> could be using another web container. >> >> Kind of annoying. >> >> - Mark >> >
Re: zkcli issues
Nick - I believe you're experiencing a difficulties with SolrCloud CLI commands for interacting ZooKeeper. Please have a look on below links, it will provide you direction. Handy SolrCloud ZkCLI Commands Uploading Solr Configuration into ZooKeeper ensemble Cheers, Jeeva On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > On 11/11/2012 04:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Nick Chase wrote: >>> So I'm trying to use ZkCLI without success. I DID start and stop Solr in >>> non-cloud mode, so everything is extracted and it IS finding zookeeper*.jar. >>> However, now it's NOT finding SolrJ. >> Not sure about your specific problem in this case, but I chatted with >> Mark about this while at ApacheCon... it seems like we should be able >> to explode the WAR ourselves if necessary, eliminating the need to >> start Solr first. Just throwing it out there before I forgot about it >> ;-) >> >> -Yonik >> http://lucidworks.com > > I guess the tricky part might be knowing where to extract it. We know how to > do it for the default jetty setup, but that could be reconfigured or you > could be using another web container. > > Kind of annoying. > > - Mark >
Re: KeeperException (NodeExists for /overseer): SolrCloud Multiple Collections - is it safe ignore these exceptions?
Thanks Mark! Cheers, Jeeva On Oct 19, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > Yes, those exceptions are fine. These are cases where we try to delete the > node if it's there, but don't care if it's not there - things like that. In > some of these cases, ZooKeeper logs things we can't stop, even though it's > expected that sometimes we will try and remove nodes that are not there or > create nodes that are already there. > > - Mark > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Jeevanandam Madanagopal > wrote: > Hello - > > While doing prototype of SolrCloud with Multiple Collection. Each collection > represents country level data. > - searching within collection represents country level - local search > - searching across collection represents global search > > Attached the graph image of SolrCoud structure. For prototype I'm running > Embedded ZooKeeper ensemble (5 replicated zookeeper servers). > - Searching and Indexing in respective collection works well > - Search across collection works well (for global search) > > > > > While joining the 'Collection2' to zookeeper ensemble I noticed the following > KeeperException in the logger. > > Question 'is it safe to ignore these exceptions?' > > Exception Log snippet: > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn$Factory run > INFO: Accepted socket connection from /fe80:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%1:62700 > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn > readConnectRequest > INFO: Client attempting to establish new session at > /fe80:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%1:62700 > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxn > finishSessionInit > INFO: Established session 0x13a73521356000a with negotiated timeout 15000 for > client /fe80:0:0:0:0:0:0:1%1:62700 > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.zookeeper.server.PrepRequestProcessor > pRequest > INFO: Got user-level KeeperException when processing > sessionid:0x13a73521356000a type:create cxid:0x1 zxid:0xfffe > txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a Error Path:/overseer Error:KeeperErrorCode = > NodeExists for /overseer > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.zookeeper.server.PrepRequestProcessor > pRequest > INFO: Got user-level KeeperException when processing > sessionid:0x13a73521356000a type:create cxid:0x2 zxid:0xfffe > txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a Error Path:/overseer Error:KeeperErrorCode = > NodeExists for /overseer > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.zookeeper.server.PrepRequestProcessor > pRequest > INFO: Got user-level KeeperException when processing > sessionid:0x13a73521356000a type:delete cxid:0x4 zxid:0xfffe > txntype:unknown reqpath:n/a Error > Path:/live_nodes/mac-book-pro.local:7500_solr Error:KeeperErrorCode = NoNode > for /live_nodes/mac-book-pro.local:7500_solr > Oct 18, 2012 4:54:26 PM org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ZkStateReader$3 process > INFO: Updating live nodes > > Cheers, Jeeva > > > > > -- > - Mark
Re: maven artifact for solr-solrj-4.0.0
Sorry, missed the maven central repo link - http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails|org.apache.solr|solr-solrj|4.0.0|jar Cheers, Jeeva Blog: http://www.myjeeva.com On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Jeevanandam Madanagopal wrote: > Grzegorz Sobczyk - It's already available in Maven central repo link > > >org.apache.solr >solr-solrj >4.0.0 > > > PS: use this 'http://search.maven.org' official website of maven central > repository for artifact search/download > > Cheers, Jeeva > Blog: http://www.myjeeva.com > > On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Amit Nithian wrote: > >> I am not sure if this repository >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/ works but >> the modification dates seem reasonable given the timing of the >> release. I suspect it'll be on maven central soon (hopefully) >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Grzegorz Sobczyk >> wrote: >>> Hello >>> Is there maven artifact for solrj 4.0.0 release ? >>> When it will be available to download from http://mvnrepository.com/ ?? >>> >>> version 4.0.0-BETA isn't compatibile with 4.0.0 (problems with zookeeper and >>> clusterstate.json parsing) >>> >>> Best regards >>> Grzegorz Sobczyk >>> >> >
Re: maven artifact for solr-solrj-4.0.0
Grzegorz Sobczyk - It's already available in Maven central repo link org.apache.solr solr-solrj 4.0.0 PS: use this 'http://search.maven.org' official website of maven central repository for artifact search/download Cheers, Jeeva Blog: http://www.myjeeva.com On Oct 18, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Amit Nithian wrote: > I am not sure if this repository > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/ works but > the modification dates seem reasonable given the timing of the > release. I suspect it'll be on maven central soon (hopefully) > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Grzegorz Sobczyk > wrote: >> Hello >> Is there maven artifact for solrj 4.0.0 release ? >> When it will be available to download from http://mvnrepository.com/ ?? >> >> version 4.0.0-BETA isn't compatibile with 4.0.0 (problems with zookeeper and >> clusterstate.json parsing) >> >> Best regards >> Grzegorz Sobczyk >> >
Re: change index/store at indexing time
Maria -
thanks for detailed explanation.
as per schema.xml; stored or indexed should be defined at schema design itself.
as per my understanding defining at runtime is not feasible.
BTW, you can have multiValued="true" attribute for dynamic fields too.
- Jeevanandam
On Apr 29, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Vazquez, Maria (STM) wrote:
> Thanks Jeevanandam.
> That still doesn't have the same behavior as Lucene since multiple fields
> with different names have to be created.
> What I want is this exactly (multi-value field)
>
> document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.YES,
> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
>
> document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.NO,
> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
>
> In Lucene I can save geoids first as stored and in the next line as not
> stored and it will do exactly that. I want to duplicate this behavior in Solr
> but I can't do it having only one field in the schema called geoids that I an
> manipulate at inde time whether to store or not depending on a condition.
>
> Thanks again for the help, hope this explanation makes it more clear in what
> I'm trying to do.
>
> Maria
>
> On Apr 28, 2012, at 11:49 AM, "Jeevanandam"
> mailto:je...@myjeeva.com>> wrote:
>
> Maria,
>
> For your need please define unique pattern using dynamic field in schema.xml
>
> Please have a look http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Dynamic_fields
>
> Hope that helps!
>
> -Jeevanandam
>
> Technology keeps you connected!
>
> On Apr 28, 2012, at 10:33 PM, "Vazquez, Maria (STM)"
> mailto:maria.vazq...@dexone.com>> wrote:
>
> I can call a script for the logic part but what I want to figure out is how
> to save the same field sometimes as stored and indexed, sometimes as stored
> not indexed, etc. From a transformer or a script I didn't see anything where
> I can modify that at indexing time.
> Thanks a lot,
> Maria
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 18:38, "Bill Bell"
> mailto:billnb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Yes you can. Just use a script that is called for each row.
>
> Bill Bell
> Sent from mobile
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:38 PM, "Vazquez, Maria (STM)"
> mailto:maria.vazq...@dexone.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm migrating a project from Lucene 2.9 to Solr 3.4.
> There is a special case in the code that indexes the same field in two
> different ways, which is completely legal in Lucene directly but I don't know
> how to duplicate this same behavior in Solr:
>
> if (isFirstGeo) {
> document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.YES,
> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
> isFirstGeo = false;
> } else {
> if (countProducts < 100)
>document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.NO,
> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
> else
>document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NO));
> }
>
> Is there any way to do this in Solr in a Tranformer? I'm using the DIH to
> index and I can't see a way to do this other than having three fields in the
> schema like geoids_store_index, geoids_nostore_index, and
> geoids_store_noindex.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
> Maria
>
>
>
Re: change index/store at indexing time
As Bill mentioned, you can use Script.
Please have a look:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#ScriptTransformer
- Jeevanandam
On Apr 28, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
> Yes you can. Just use a script that is called for each row.
>
> Bill Bell
> Sent from mobile
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:38 PM, "Vazquez, Maria (STM)"
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm migrating a project from Lucene 2.9 to Solr 3.4.
>> There is a special case in the code that indexes the same field in two
>> different ways, which is completely legal in Lucene directly but I don't
>> know how to duplicate this same behavior in Solr:
>>
>> if (isFirstGeo) {
>>document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.YES,
>> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
>>isFirstGeo = false;
>> } else {
>>if (countProducts < 100)
>> document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.NO,
>> Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
>>else
>> document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.YES,
>> Field.Index.NO));
>> }
>>
>> Is there any way to do this in Solr in a Tranformer? I'm using the DIH to
>> index and I can't see a way to do this other than having three fields in the
>> schema like geoids_store_index, geoids_nostore_index, and
>> geoids_store_noindex.
>>
>> Thanks a lot in advance.
>> Maria
>>
>>
>>
Re: should slave replication be turned off / on during master clean and re-index?
I guess you're looking for 'disabling replication poll on slave' go to 'Replication dashboard[1]', there you have options like Enable/Disable Poll, Force replication, Abort replication dashboard url: http://slave_host:port/solr/corename/admin/replication/index.jsp Poll Disabled => slave will not poll master for replication - Jeevanandam [1] http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#Replication_Dashboard On Apr 28, 2012, at 8:03 AM, geeky2 wrote: > hello, > > thank you for the reply, > >>> > Does a "clean" mean issuing a deletion query (e.g. > *:*) prior to re-indexing all of your content? I > don't think the slaves will download any changes until you've committed at > some point on the master. > << > > well, in this case when i say, "clean" (on the Master), i mean selecting > the "Full Import with Cleaning" button from the DataImportHandler > Development Console page in solr. at the top of the page, i have the check > boxes selected for verbose and clean (*but i don't have the commit checkbox > selected*). > > by doing the above process - doesn't this issue a deletion query - then > start the import? > > and as a follow-up - when actually is the commit being done? > > > here is my from my solrconfig.xml file on the master > > > * > 6 > 1000 >* >10 > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/should-slave-replication-be-turned-off-on-during-master-clean-and-re-index-tp3945531p3945954.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Auto suggest on indexed file content filtered based on user
yes only spellcheck indexed build field is for suggest query I believe, filtering a documents on search handler using fq parameter and spell suggest are two part we are discussing here. lets say you have field for spellcheck - used to build spell dictionary using copyField for populating a spell field and get dictionary created referring spellcheck handler in the default search handler at 'last-components' section, like below spellcheck then you will be able to apply search documents filtering and spellcheck params to search handler while querying. detailed info http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent [probably you might have already went thru :) ] -Jeevanandam On Apr 25, 2012, at 12:01 AM, prakash_ajp wrote: > I read on a couple of other web pages that fq is not supported for suggester. > I even tried the query and it doesn't help. My understanding was, when the > suggest (spellcheck) index is built, only the field chosen is considered for > queries and the other fields from the main index are not available for > filtering purposes once the index is created. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3936144.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Auto suggest on indexed file content filtered based on user
On Apr 24, 2012, at 9:37 PM, prakash_ajp wrote: > Right now, the query is a very simple one, something like q=text. Basically, > it would return ['textview', 'textviewer', ..] hmm, so you're using default query field > > But the issue is, the 'textviewer' could be from a file that is out of > bounds for this user. So, ultimately I would like to include the userName in > the query. As mentioned earlier, userName is another field in the main > index. and you like to filter the result set along with userName field value > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Auto-suggest-on-indexed-file-content-filtered-based-on-user-tp3934565p3935765.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. in this scenario 'fq' parameter will facilitate to achieve your desire result. Please refer http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CommonQueryParameters#fq try this q=text&fq=userName:"prakash" Let us know! -Jeevanandam
Re: Wrong categorization with DIH
Ramo -
Are you using all the selected columns from the query?
select p.title as title, p.id, p.category_id,
p.pic_thumb, c.name as category, c.id as category_id from product p,
category c ...
I see following attributes 'p.id', 'p.category_id' & 'p.pic_thumb' doesn't
have alias defined.
Pointers:
- Select only required field in the sql query
- Ensure sql alias name and attribute name in the schema.xml should match
or
- If you like to do explicit mapping for every column in DIH config as follow
Detailed Info refer this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler
-Jeevanandam
On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:37 PM, Ramo Karahasan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my config is just the following:
>
>
>driver="com.mysql.jdbc.Driver"
> url="jdbc:mysql://xx/asdx"
> user=""
> password=""/>
>
> query="select p.title as title, p.id, p.category_id,
> p.pic_thumb, c.name as category, c.id as category_id from product p,
> category c WHERE p.category_id = c.id AND '${dataimporter.request.clean}'
> != 'false' OR updated_at > '${dataimporter.last_index_time}' ">
>
>
>
>
> I'm doing it as described on:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandlerDeltaQueryViaFullImport
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Best regars,
> Ramo
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Jeevanandam Madanagopal [mailto:je...@myjeeva.com]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. April 2012 17:44
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Wrong categorization with DIH
>
> Ramo -
>
> Please share DIH configuration with us.
>
> -Jeevanandam
>
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Ramo Karahasan wrote:
>
>> Does anyone has an idea what's going wrong here?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ramo
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Gora Mohanty [mailto:g...@mimirtech.com]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2012 11:34
>> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Betreff: Re: Wrong categorization with DIH
>>
>> On 17 April 2012 14:47, Ramo Karahasan
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> i currently face the followin issue:
>>>
>>> Testing the following sql statement which is also used in SOLR (DIH)
>>> leads to a wrong categorization in solr:
>>>
>>> select p.title as title, p.id, p.category_id, p.pic_thumb, c.name as
>>> category, c.id as category_id from product p, category c WHERE
>>> p.category_id = c.id AND p.id = 3091328
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This returns in my sql client:
>>>
>>> Apple MacBook Pro MD313D/A 33,8 cm (13,3 Zoll) Notebook (Intel Core
>>> i5-2435M, 2,4GHz, 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD, Intel HD 3000, Mac OS),
>>> 3091328, 1003, http://m-d.ww.cdn.com/images/I/41teWbp-uAL._SL75_.jpg,
>>> Computer,
>>> 1003
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As you see, the categoryid 1003 points to "Computer"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Via the solr searchadmin i get the following result when searchgin
>>> for
>>> id:3091328
>>>
>>> Sport
>>>
>>> 1003
>> [...]
>>
>> Please share with us the rest of the DIH configuration file, i.e., the
>> part where these data are saved to the Solr index.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gora
>>
>
>
Re: PolySearcher in Solr
Please have a look http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch -Jeevanandam On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy wrote: > Dear all, > > > I came across this while browsing through lucy > > http://lucy.apache.org/docs/perl/Lucy/Search/PolySearcher.html > > Does solr have an equivalent of this? My usecase is exactly the same > (reading through multiple indices in a single shard and perform a > distribution across shards). > > If not can someone give me a hint? I tried swapping readers for a single > searcher, but didn't help. > > -- > With Thanks and Regards, > Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, > Project Trainee, > Zoho Corporation. > +91 9626975420
Re: Wrong categorization with DIH
Ramo - Please share DIH configuration with us. -Jeevanandam On Apr 19, 2012, at 7:46 PM, Ramo Karahasan wrote: > Does anyone has an idea what's going wrong here? > > Thanks, > Ramo > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Gora Mohanty [mailto:g...@mimirtech.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. April 2012 11:34 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Wrong categorization with DIH > > On 17 April 2012 14:47, Ramo Karahasan > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i currently face the followin issue: >> >> Testing the following sql statement which is also used in SOLR (DIH) >> leads to a wrong categorization in solr: >> >> select p.title as title, p.id, p.category_id, p.pic_thumb, c.name as >> category, c.id as category_id from product p, category c WHERE >> p.category_id = c.id AND p.id = 3091328 >> >> >> >> This returns in my sql client: >> >> Apple MacBook Pro MD313D/A 33,8 cm (13,3 Zoll) Notebook (Intel Core >> i5-2435M, 2,4GHz, 4GB RAM, 500GB HDD, Intel HD 3000, Mac OS), 3091328, >> 1003, http://m-d.ww.cdn.com/images/I/41teWbp-uAL._SL75_.jpg, Computer, >> 1003 >> >> >> >> As you see, the categoryid 1003 points to "Computer" >> >> >> >> Via the solr searchadmin i get the following result when searchgin for >> id:3091328 >> >> Sport >> >> 1003 > [...] > > Please share with us the rest of the DIH configuration file, i.e., the part > where these data are saved to the Solr index. > > Regards, > Gora >
Re: Can you suggest a method or pattern to consistently promote a document with any query?
Chris - If you have defined 'last-components' in search handler, forceElevation=true may not required. It gets invoked in search life cycle elevator -Jeevanandam On Apr 18, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Chris Warner wrote: > Thanks to those who responded. A more thorough reading of the wiki and I see > the need for forceElevation=true in the elevate query. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > - Original Message - > From: Otis Gospodnetic > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" ; Chris Warner > > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 10:23 AM > Subject: Re: Can you suggest a method or pattern to consistently promote a > document with any query? > > Chris, > > I haven't checked if Elevate Component has an easy way to push a specific doc > for *all* queries, but have a look > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent > > Otis > > Performance Monitoring SaaS for Solr - > http://sematext.com/spm/solr-performance-monitoring/index.html > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Chris Warner >> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" >> Cc: >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:16 PM >> Subject: Can you suggest a method or pattern to consistently promote a >> document with any query? >> >> Hi, folks, >> >> Perhaps I'm overlooking an obvious solution to a common desire... I'd >> like to return a specific document with every query, as the first result. As >> well, I'd like to have that document be the first result in a *:* query. >> >> I'm looking into index time boosting using the boost attribute on the >> appropriate doc. I haven't tested this yet, and I'm not sure this would >> do anything for the *:* queries. >> >> Thanks for any suggested reading or patterns... >> >> Best, >> Chris >> >> >> -- >> chris_war...@yahoo.com >> >
Re: Can you suggest a method or pattern to consistently promote a document with any query?
Chris - Take a look - QueryElevationComponent http://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent -Jeevanandam On Apr 18, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Chris Warner wrote: > Hi, folks, > > Perhaps I'm overlooking an obvious solution to a common desire... I'd like to > return a specific document with every query, as the first result. As well, > I'd like to have that document be the first result in a *:* query. > > I'm looking into index time boosting using the boost attribute on the > appropriate doc. I haven't tested this yet, and I'm not sure this would do > anything for the *:* queries. > > Thanks for any suggested reading or patterns... > > Best, > Chris > > > -- > chris_war...@yahoo.com
Re: Multi-words synonyms matching
Elisabeth - As you described, below mapping might suit for your need. mairie => hotel de ville, mairie mairie gets expanded to "hotel de ville" and "mairie" at index time. So "mairie" and "hotel de ville" searchable on document. However, still white space tokenizer splits at query time will be a problem as described by Markus. --Jeevanandam On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 PM, elisabeth benoit wrote: > <' mapping instead? Something > < < mairie > < > Yes, thanks, I've tried it but from what I undestand it doesn't solve my > problem, since this means hotel de ville will be replace by mairie at > index time (I use synonyms only at index time). So when user will ask > "hôtel de ville", it won't match. > > In fact, at index time I have mairie in my data, but I want user to be able > to request "mairie" or "hôtel de ville" and have mairie as answer, and not > have mairie as an answer when requesting "hôtel". > > > < white > < > < > < query > < > Ok, I guess this means I have a problem. No simple solution since at query > time my tokenizer do split on white spaces. > > I guess my problem is more or less one of the problems discussed in > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-word-synonyms-td3716292.html#a3717215 > > > Thanks a lot for your answers, > Elisabeth > > > > > > 2012/4/10 Erick Erickson > >> Have you tried the "=>' mapping instead? Something >> like >> hotel de ville => mairie >> might work for you. >> >> Best >> Erick >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:41 AM, elisabeth benoit >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've read several post on this issue, but can't find a real solution to >> my >>> multi-words synonyms matching problem. >>> >>> I have in my synonyms.txt an entry like >>> >>> mairie, hotel de ville >>> >>> and my index time analyzer is configured as followed for synonyms. >>> >>> >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> >>> >>> The problem I have is that now "mairie" matches with "hotel" and I would >>> only want "mairie" to match with "hotel de ville" and "mairie". >>> >>> When I look into the analyzer, I see that "mairie" is mapped into >> "hotel", >>> and words "de ville" are added in second and third position. To change >>> that, I tried to do >>> >>> >> ignoreCase="true" expand="true" >>> tokenizerFactory="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> (as I read in one post) >>> >>> and I can see now in the analyzer that "mairie" is mapped to "hotel de >>> ville", but now when I have query "hotel de ville", it doesn't match at >> all >>> with "mairie". >>> >>> Anyone has a clue of what I'm doing wrong? >>> >>> I'm using Solr 3.4. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Elisabeth >>
Re: Solr is indexing but not showing results
I agree partially, it actually depends. For instance during index time few of the synonyms mapping may or may not expand (for e.g.. frequent data index population from different source). So good apply at index time as well as query time to achieve complete ratio. Mostly of the time I did similar settings to meet customer requirements. For example: - Below sample text datatype with synonyms at index & query time (below config has similar analyzer structure of tokenizer & filter; so we can keep commonly one config too.) -Jeevanandam On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > That is not a good configuration. Synonyms should be expanded at index time, > not query time. --wunder > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 11:43 AM, Jeevanandam Madanagopal wrote: > >> Srini - >> >> This "text" datatype comes as sample configuration in SOLR distribution. >> Check this, it may suit your need! >> >> > autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true"> >> >> >> > ignoreCase="true" >> words="stopwords.txt" >> enablePositionIncrements="true" >> /> >> > generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" >> catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/> >> >> > protected="protwords.txt"/> >> >> >> >> >> > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> >> > ignoreCase="true" >> words="stopwords.txt" >> enablePositionIncrements="true" >> /> >> > generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="0" catenateNumbers="0" >> catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/> >> >> > protected="protwords.txt"/> >> >> >> >> >> >> -Jeevanandam >> >> On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: >> >>> You will need to define or customize a field type for text. >>> >>> The example schema.xml file that is installed with Solr 3.5 has a several >>> kinds of text fields, "text_general" and "text_en" are good places to >>> start. You can use one of those, then customize it. >>> >>> wunder >>> >>> On Apr 9, 2012, at 11:27 AM, srini wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Thanks for your reply. As per your suggestion I changed XML field type >>>> to >>>> text. >>>> >>>> >>> required="true"/> >>>> >>>> but when I start solr it is throwing following exception. >>>> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown fieldtype 'text' >>>> specified on field XML >>>> >>>> Any suggestions!!(Thanks for your reply) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> View this message in context: >>>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-is-indexing-but-not-showing-results-tp3897176p3897626.html >>>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> > > > >
Re: Solr is indexing but not showing results
Srini - This "text" datatype comes as sample configuration in SOLR distribution. Check this, it may suit your need! -Jeevanandam On Apr 10, 2012, at 12:08 AM, Walter Underwood wrote: > You will need to define or customize a field type for text. > > The example schema.xml file that is installed with Solr 3.5 has a several > kinds of text fields, "text_general" and "text_en" are good places to start. > You can use one of those, then customize it. > > wunder > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 11:27 AM, srini wrote: > >> Hi Thanks for your reply. As per your suggestion I changed XML field type to >> text. >> >> > required="true"/> >> >> but when I start solr it is throwing following exception. >> SEVERE: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Unknown fieldtype 'text' >> specified on field XML >> >> Any suggestions!!(Thanks for your reply) >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-is-indexing-but-not-showing-results-tp3897176p3897626.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > >
