Re: Snappuller taking up CPU on master

2008-09-24 Thread rahul_k123

Any Ideas???

rahul_k123 wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Thanks for the reply.
 
 I am not using SOLR for indexing and serving search requests, i am using
 only the scripts for replication.
 
 Yes it looks like I/O, but my question is how to handle this problem and
 is there any optimal way to achieve this.
 
 
 Thanks.
 
 
 
 
 Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Can't tell with certainty without looking, but my guess would be slow
 disk, high IO, and a large number of processes waiting for IO (run vmstat
 and look at the wa column).
 
 Otis
 --
 Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
 
 
 
 - Original Message 
 From: rahul_k123 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:56:48 PM
 Subject: Snappuller taking up CPU on master
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I am using snappuller to sync my slave with master, i am not using rsync
 daemon, i am doing Rsync using remote shell.
 
 When i am serving requests from the master when the snappuller is
 running
 (after optimization, total index is arnd 4 gb it doing the transfer of
 whole
 index), the performance is very bad actually causing timeouts.
 
 
 
 Any ideas why this happens .
 
 
 Any suggestions will help.
 
 
 Thanks.
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19638474.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19654506.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: Snappuller taking up CPU on master

2008-09-23 Thread rahul_k123

Hi,

Thanks for the reply.

I am not using SOLR for indexing and serving search requests, i am using
only the scripts for replication.

Yes it looks like I/O, but my question is how to handle this problem and is
there any optimal way to achieve this.


Thanks.




Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 Can't tell with certainty without looking, but my guess would be slow
 disk, high IO, and a large number of processes waiting for IO (run vmstat
 and look at the wa column).
 
 Otis
 --
 Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
 
 
 
 - Original Message 
 From: rahul_k123 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
 Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:56:48 PM
 Subject: Snappuller taking up CPU on master
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I am using snappuller to sync my slave with master, i am not using rsync
 daemon, i am doing Rsync using remote shell.
 
 When i am serving requests from the master when the snappuller is running
 (after optimization, total index is arnd 4 gb it doing the transfer of
 whole
 index), the performance is very bad actually causing timeouts.
 
 
 
 Any ideas why this happens .
 
 
 Any suggestions will help.
 
 
 Thanks.
 -- 
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19638474.html
 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19642053.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.