Any Ideas??? rahul_k123 wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I am not using SOLR for indexing and serving search requests, i am using > only the scripts for replication. > > Yes it looks like I/O, but my question is how to handle this problem and > is there any optimal way to achieve this. > > > Thanks. > > > > > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Can't tell with certainty without looking, but my guess would be slow >> disk, high IO, and a large number of processes waiting for IO (run vmstat >> and look at the "wa" column). >> >> Otis >> -- >> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: rahul_k123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 6:56:48 PM >>> Subject: Snappuller taking up CPU on master >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am using snappuller to sync my slave with master, i am not using rsync >>> daemon, i am doing Rsync using remote shell. >>> >>> When i am serving requests from the master when the snappuller is >>> running >>> (after optimization, total index is arnd 4 gb it doing the transfer of >>> whole >>> index), the performance is very bad actually causing timeouts. >>> >>> >>> >>> Any ideas why this happens . >>> >>> >>> Any suggestions will help. >>> >>> >>> Thanks. >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19638474.html >>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> > >
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Snappuller-taking-up-CPU-on-master-tp19638474p19654506.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.