Re: Implementing Memcache for Solr
As per my experience with memcache was not so good . Finaly I have configured solr's built in cache for best perfoemance. By memcache we were caching query,bu it solr provides already. you can take a call after Load testing with memcache and without memcache -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Implementing-Memcache-for-Solr-tp1398625p1398823.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Implementing Memcache for Solr
Hi, We were looking at implementing Memcache for Solr. Can someone who has already implemented this let us know if it is a good option to go for i.e. how effective is using memcache compared to Solr's internal cache. Also, are there any down sides to it and difficult to implement. Thanks Hitendra
RE: Memcache for Solr
Apologies, did not realize it. Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 11:11 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Memcache for Solr : References: <4c7d1071.8000...@elyograg.org> : In-Reply-To: <4c7d1071.8000...@elyograg.org> : Subject: Memcache for Solr http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives particularly difficult. See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DonDiego/Thread_hijacking -Hoss -- http://lucenerevolution.org/ ... October 7-8, Boston http://bit.ly/stump-hoss ... Stump The Chump!
Re: Memcache for Solr
Apologies Chris: my mistake. -Glen On 31 August 2010 23:27, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : ? > : The second post was relevant to the original post. > : And even dealt with some of the questions asked in the original: > > The first msg with subject "Memcache for Solr" was a thread-jack of > an existing thread "Stripping leading/trailing punctuation with SOLR-1653" > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Stripping-leading-trailing-punctuation-with-SOLR-1653-td1394514.html#a1394514 > > That was the msg i replied to w/ a request to cease thread hijacking. > > > -Hoss > > -- > http://lucenerevolution.org/ ... October 7-8, Boston > http://bit.ly/stump-hoss ... Stump The Chump! > > -- -
Re: Memcache for Solr
: ? : The second post was relevant to the original post. : And even dealt with some of the questions asked in the original: The first msg with subject "Memcache for Solr" was a thread-jack of an existing thread "Stripping leading/trailing punctuation with SOLR-1653" http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Stripping-leading-trailing-punctuation-with-SOLR-1653-td1394514.html#a1394514 That was the msg i replied to w/ a request to cease thread hijacking. -Hoss -- http://lucenerevolution.org/ ... October 7-8, Boston http://bit.ly/stump-hoss ... Stump The Chump!
Re: Memcache for Solr
? The second post was relevant to the original post. And even dealt with some of the questions asked in the original: Q > are there any down sides to it and difficult to implement A > We found it wasn't feasible to cache arbitrary result sets... ? -glen On 31 August 2010 15:11, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : References: <4c7d1071.8000...@elyograg.org> > : In-Reply-To: <4c7d1071.8000...@elyograg.org> > : Subject: Memcache for Solr > > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists > > When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to > an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the > subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread > you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less > attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives > particularly difficult. > See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DonDiego/Thread_hijacking > > > > -Hoss > > -- > http://lucenerevolution.org/ ... October 7-8, Boston > http://bit.ly/stump-hoss ... Stump The Chump! > > -- -
Re: Memcache for Solr
: References: <4c7d1071.8000...@elyograg.org> : In-Reply-To: <4c7d1071.8000...@elyograg.org> : Subject: Memcache for Solr http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives particularly difficult. See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DonDiego/Thread_hijacking -Hoss -- http://lucenerevolution.org/ ... October 7-8, Boston http://bit.ly/stump-hoss ... Stump The Chump!
RE: Memcache for Solr
Hi, In a restaurant index website, we have used Memcache only for storing the generated HTML facet list when q=*. This cached object was only used when no additional search parameters were specified. It was quite useful because the facet list was always present and only changed if real search parameters were specified. We found it wasn't feasible to cache arbitrary result sets, there would be just too many result sets to cache which would probably never be reused anyway and there is the problem of invalidating cached result sets. I'd rather rely on Solr's filter cache instead. From that point of view, it's only feasible to cache generated objects (HTML or whatever format) that you know are being requested many times. It's easy to implement and doesn't take too much memory that won't be reused anyway. Cheers, -Original message- From: Hitendra Molleti Sent: Tue 31-08-2010 16:38 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Subject: Memcache for Solr Hi, We were looking at implementing Memcache for Solr. Can someone who has already implemented this let us know if it is a good option to go for i.e. how effective is using memcache compared to Solr's internal cache. Also, are there any down sides to it and difficult to implement. Thanks Hitendra
Memcache for Solr
Hi, We were looking at implementing Memcache for Solr. Can someone who has already implemented this let us know if it is a good option to go for i.e. how effective is using memcache compared to Solr's internal cache. Also, are there any down sides to it and difficult to implement. Thanks Hitendra
