Re: Indexing xml data
Oh thanks.
I don't want to search on that. I will have a name field that contains the
unique identifier of the document.
2008/7/9 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yep. you cant search. It is better to extract the data out and index
> > it if you want to search
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:51:45 +0530
> >> "Noble Paul _ __" <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> You can put it into a 'string' field directly
> >>
> >> if we refer to the default string field , you won't be able to search
> for the contents of the XML (unless you search for the whole thing),right?
> >>
> >> _
> >> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
> >>
> >> Law of Conservation of Perversity:
> >> we can't make something simpler without making something else more
> complex
> >>
> >> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
> wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have
> been Warned.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --Noble Paul
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --Noble Paul
>
--
Alexander Ramos Jardim
Re: Indexing xml data
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yep. you cant search. It is better to extract the data out and index
> it if you want to search
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:51:45 +0530
>> "Noble Paul _ __" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You can put it into a 'string' field directly
>>
>> if we refer to the default string field , you won't be able to search for
>> the contents of the XML (unless you search for the whole thing),right?
>>
>> _
>> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>>
>> Law of Conservation of Perversity:
>> we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
>>
>> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
>> Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
>> Warned.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Noble Paul
>
--
--Noble Paul
Re: Indexing xml data
yep. you cant search. It is better to extract the data out and index
it if you want to search
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:51:45 +0530
> "Noble Paul _ __" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> You can put it into a 'string' field directly
>
> if we refer to the default string field , you won't be able to search for
> the contents of the XML (unless you search for the whole thing),right?
>
> _
> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>
> Law of Conservation of Perversity:
> we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
>
> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
> Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
> Warned.
>
--
--Noble Paul
Re: Indexing xml data
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:51:45 +0530
"Noble Paul _ __" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can put it into a 'string' field directly
if we refer to the default string field , you won't be able to search for the
contents of the XML (unless you search for the whole thing),right?
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Law of Conservation of Perversity:
we can't make something simpler without making something else more complex
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
Re: Indexing xml data
You can put it into a 'string' field directly On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Alexander Ramos Jardim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to put big xml files on a string field in one of my projects. Does > Solr accept it automatically or should I put a on my xml before > putting on the index? > -- > Alexander Ramos Jardim > -- --Noble Paul
