Re: uima fieldMappings and solr dynamicField
Thanks Tommaso! I'm glad to hear from the person with experience. I'll commit shortly. Koji (11/05/09 17:57), Tommaso Teofili wrote: Thanks Koji for opening that, the dynamicField mapping is a commonly used feature especially for named entities mapping. Tommaso 2011/5/7 Koji Sekiguchi I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2503 . Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/05/06 20:15), Koji Sekiguchi wrote: Hello, I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable currently. Is it a bad idea in terms of use of uima? If it is not so bad, I'd like to try a patch. Background: Because my uima annotator can generate many types of named entity from a text, I don't want to implement so many types, but one type "NamedEntity": com.rondhuit.uima.next.NamedEntity uima.tcas.Annotation name uima.cas.String entity uima.cas.String sample extracted named entities: name="PERSON", entity="Barack Obama" name="TITLE", entity="the President" Now, I'd like to map these named entities to Solr fields like this: PERSON_S:"Barack Obama" TITLE_S:"the President" Because the type of name (PERSON, TITLE, etc.) can be so many, I'd like to use dynamicField *_s. And where * is replaced by the name feature of NamedEntity. I think this is natural requirement from Solr view point, but I'm not sure my uima annotator implementation is correct or not. In other words, should I implement many types for each entity types? (e.g. PersonEntity, TitleEntity, ... instead of NamedEntity) Thank you! Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Re: uima fieldMappings and solr dynamicField
Thanks Koji for opening that, the dynamicField mapping is a commonly used feature especially for named entities mapping. Tommaso 2011/5/7 Koji Sekiguchi > I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2503 . > > Koji > -- > http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ > > (11/05/06 20:15), Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update > > processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable currently. Is it a bad idea > > in terms of use of uima? If it is not so bad, I'd like to try a patch. > > > > Background: > > > > Because my uima annotator can generate many types of named entity from > > a text, I don't want to implement so many types, but one type > "NamedEntity": > > > > > > > > > >com.rondhuit.uima.next.NamedEntity > > > >uima.tcas.Annotation > > > > > >name > > > >uima.cas.String > > > > > >entity > > > >uima.cas.String > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sample extracted named entities: > > > > name="PERSON", entity="Barack Obama" > > name="TITLE", entity="the President" > > > > Now, I'd like to map these named entities to Solr fields like this: > > > > PERSON_S:"Barack Obama" > > TITLE_S:"the President" > > > > Because the type of name (PERSON, TITLE, etc.) can be so many, > > I'd like to use dynamicField *_s. And where * is replaced by the name > > feature of NamedEntity. > > > > I think this is natural requirement from Solr view point, but I'm > > not sure my uima annotator implementation is correct or not. In other > > words, should I implement many types for each entity types? > > (e.g. PersonEntity, TitleEntity, ... instead of NamedEntity) > > > > Thank you! > > > > Koji > > >
Re: uima fieldMappings and solr dynamicField
I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2503 . Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/ (11/05/06 20:15), Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update > processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable currently. Is it a bad idea > in terms of use of uima? If it is not so bad, I'd like to try a patch. > > Background: > > Because my uima annotator can generate many types of named entity from > a text, I don't want to implement so many types, but one type "NamedEntity": > > > > >com.rondhuit.uima.next.NamedEntity > >uima.tcas.Annotation > > >name > >uima.cas.String > > >entity > >uima.cas.String > > > > > > > sample extracted named entities: > > name="PERSON", entity="Barack Obama" > name="TITLE", entity="the President" > > Now, I'd like to map these named entities to Solr fields like this: > > PERSON_S:"Barack Obama" > TITLE_S:"the President" > > Because the type of name (PERSON, TITLE, etc.) can be so many, > I'd like to use dynamicField *_s. And where * is replaced by the name > feature of NamedEntity. > > I think this is natural requirement from Solr view point, but I'm > not sure my uima annotator implementation is correct or not. In other > words, should I implement many types for each entity types? > (e.g. PersonEntity, TitleEntity, ... instead of NamedEntity) > > Thank you! > > Koji
uima fieldMappings and solr dynamicField
Hello, I'd like to use dynamicField in feature-field mapping of uima update processor. It doesn't seem to be acceptable currently. Is it a bad idea in terms of use of uima? If it is not so bad, I'd like to try a patch. Background: Because my uima annotator can generate many types of named entity from a text, I don't want to implement so many types, but one type "NamedEntity": com.rondhuit.uima.next.NamedEntity uima.tcas.Annotation name uima.cas.String entity uima.cas.String sample extracted named entities: name="PERSON", entity="Barack Obama" name="TITLE", entity="the President" Now, I'd like to map these named entities to Solr fields like this: PERSON_S:"Barack Obama" TITLE_S:"the President" Because the type of name (PERSON, TITLE, etc.) can be so many, I'd like to use dynamicField *_s. And where * is replaced by the name feature of NamedEntity. I think this is natural requirement from Solr view point, but I'm not sure my uima annotator implementation is correct or not. In other words, should I implement many types for each entity types? (e.g. PersonEntity, TitleEntity, ... instead of NamedEntity) Thank you! Koji -- http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
