On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Cliff wrote:
>>
>> So, anyone looked at dojo in the pass? If so, thoughts on it? Could/would
>> it replace our list tag? Make it better? Compatible licenses?
>>
>> The old age problem of how to represent lots of data in a timely manner to
>> Spacewalk folks and allow them to sort/select/filter/paginate that data.
>>
>> Not saying 'we need to be using this!' - but more interested in what
>> others think about it :)
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dojo_Toolkit
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cliff
>>
>> ___
>> Spacewalk-devel mailing list
>> Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
>
> Sidenote, no Fedora packaging guidelines for javascript libraries yet --
> though one problem we face is that all the compressors are non-free, thus we
> can't include the compressed versions
> in any RPMs.
Can you elaborate on this? I am not certain I understand it.
We ship rails, and rails includes prototype.js and such
>
> Personally I think this is a huge roadblock Fedora needs to solve somehow.
>
> Until then, apps could include such libraries but cannot package the
> compressed versions IIRC.
>
> IMHO, javascript is a requirement for any modern web application, and those
> that use things like NoScript would need to grant exemptions.
>
> --Michael
>
> ___
> Spacewalk-devel mailing list
> Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
>
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
