[SAtalk] Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

2003-11-11 Thread Robert James Kaes
Hi,
Does anyone have any comments on the quality of the cbl.abuseat.org
DNSBL?  I noticed that it isn't used in SpamAssassin, but it is one of
the black lists checked by spamcop.  Is anyone else using this list?

The purpose of the CBL is to list open proxies (of all types) which
have been detected through spam traps.

Any comments about the use of this list would be appreciated.  Thanks.
-- Robert

-- 
Robert James Kaes---  Flarenet Inc.  ---(519) 426-3782
 http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/
  * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Provider *


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [SAtalk] Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

2003-11-11 Thread Robert James Kaes
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Paul Hutchings wrote:
 Seems well regarded.
 
 I'm currently logging any hits to see if it's worth adding to my per user
 DNSBLs that I use to reject mail to the people who get the most spam.
 
 The ones at http://abuse.easynet.nl are also well worth a look.

Does anyone know why SpamAssassin only used the dynablock.easynet.nl
list, and not any of the other *.easynet.nl lists?  Are those
*.easynet.nl lists composites or duplicates of other lists already in
SpamAssassin?
-- Robert

-- 
Robert James Kaes---  Flarenet Inc.  ---(519) 426-3782
 http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/
  * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Provider *


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[SAtalk] Comments on CBL DNSBL (cbl.abuseat.org)

2003-11-11 Thread Robert James Kaes
Hi,
Does anyone have any comments on the quality of the cbl.abuseat.org
DNSBL?  I noticed that it isn't used in SpamAssassin, but it is one of
the black lists checked by spamcop.  Is anyone else using this list?

The purpose of the CBL is to list open proxies (of all types) which
have been detected through spam traps.

Any comments about the use of this list would be appreciated.  Thanks.
-- Robert

-- 
Robert James Kaes---  Flarenet Inc.  ---(519) 426-3782
 http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/
  * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Provider *


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [SAtalk] passing user: in qmail scripts

2003-09-27 Thread Robert James Kaes
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Paul Farber wrote:
 Since I am using a single uid/gid to deliver mail to all users I cannot use 
 dir ownership (or can I?)  Can I rip it out of the message somehow?
 
 Any fellow qmail users up against this??

If you look in the qmail-command man page you will see that the
RECIPIENT environment variable is set to the expanded email address
for the user.  I have a script I run from the .qmail file that takes
this information to determine which SQL user prefs to use.  You can
find the script at:

  http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/software/spamassassin/spamassassin.sh

It should hopefully be commented enough to follow.  If you go up one
directory in the path above you will find additional information.
(The key lines are the recipient comment though.)

I hope this helps.
-- Robert

-- 
Robert James Kaes---  Flarenet Inc.  ---(519) 426-3782
 http://www.flarenet.com/consulting/
  * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Provider *


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [SAtalk] Spam Rejection Message

2002-12-29 Thread Robert James Kaes
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Actually, this *appeared* to work in testing, but once in production, it
 became pretty clear that the exitcode wasn't doing what I had
 thought/hoped; keeping bounce messages out of the queue.
 
 The only other way I know of dealing with this at the MDA level is to
 route rejected email to /dev/null, which would mean that legit email
 caught by SA (there has been some) would be lost without any notification
 of the sender, which isn't acceptable.
 
 I know of no way to use SA at the MTA level with qmail, and don't use
 Postfix. :-/

What I've done to use SA with qmail is to put in the .qmail file
something like:

|/usr/local/bin/spamassassin.sh

Where spamassassin.sh is shell script which calls spamc and then checks to
see if the message was tagged as spam.  If so is calls something like
this to bounce the message:

  if [[ $message_score -ge $spam_limit ]]; then
exec bouncesaying Your Email was Rejected by out SPAM filters.
  fi

Otherwise it delivers the message using the maildir command and exits
with a return value of 0.  If you'd like I can post my script.  It also
does a bunch of other things like pull the spam_limit from a SQL database,
and also handle the forwarding of email to a remote address.
-- Robert

-- 
  --
Robert James Kaes---  Flarenet Inc.  ---(519) 426-3782
   http://www.flarenet.com/
  * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Provider *
  --



msg11518/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[SAtalk] Understanding the Spam Phrase Scores

2002-10-25 Thread Robert James Kaes
Hi,
Could someone please explain to me how the scoring works for the spam
phrases rule?  For example, why does the phrase orders more have a score
of 330, while the phrase from our has a score of 8294?  What do those
scores signify, and how does one know what score to set for a new phrase?

Thanks for any insight you can provide.
-- Robert

-- 
  --
Robert James Kaes---  Flarenet Inc.  ---(519) 426-3782
   http://www.flarenet.com/
  * Putting the Service Back in Internet Service Provider *
  --



---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future 
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community 
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. 
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk