Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-15 Thread Dave Sheeran
apologies the headers I sent was the ones received from SA. The headers in the included message (the original) are..

Return-Path: 
Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: SpamAssassin Failed
Received: from [192.168.2.29] (HELO reception)
by pickering.co.uk (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5)
with ESMTP id 4554456 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:58:54 +
From: Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: testing2
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:58:52 -
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AcPWuLaUHX3HdcSVQ/CjicJtzrqqDQ==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>

On 14 Jan 2004, at 16:06, Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:

No worries mate - a bunch of people were posting the same question - with none of the information needed to see the provlem...
 
If that's all your headers, then the new outlook is a lot CLEANER than 2000 / XP.
 
Here is what mine look like (less the received and other common stuff:
 
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:42:30 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
You are missing a Date header, and X-Mailer - don't even know why it think's it's outlook... but the next step if no one answers better is to look in the code for that rule to see if you can see what's wrong - you may just have to change the score in the short term...
 
m/

-Original Message-
From: Dave Sheeran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:20 AM
To: Mitch (WebCob)
Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

Sorry, been out of the office for a couple of days. Here are hte headers

To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received:by pickering.co.uk (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.5) with PIPE id 4554464; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:59:20 +
Received:from localhost [127.0.0.1] by Pickering with SpamAssassin (2.61-ds8 1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp); Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:59:13 +
Message-Id:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version:SpamAssassin 2.61-ds8 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on Pickering
X-Spam-Flag:YES
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:Yes, hits=4.1 required=4.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.61-ds8
Mime-Version:1.0
Content-Type:multipart/mixed; boundary=--=_3FFEB3B1.7213239D

This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

Content preview: See if this comes through [...] 

Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 4.0 required)
3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't



From:Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 9 January 2004 13:58:52 GMT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: testing2


See if this comes through



On 13 Jan 2004, at 20:37, Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:


Someone has to POST the headers so the problem can be fixed... the rule
needs an update, but no one is submitting the information.

m/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Michael P. Varre
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Dave Sheeran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


This happens with all Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen. Just a
discrepancy I suppose with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differs
from previous versions...

Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered me because my office
has the only Outlook 2003 users that send/receive with my server

I'd be interested to see the details of why this actually happens
though.


Michael Varre ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kishmish LLC. - Systems Administrator
2 Clinton Square Suite 130
Syracuse, NY 13202
t. 315.478.8172
f. 800.375.3951
m. 315.952.5753

Kishmish LLC. Network Services
www.kishmish.com


Do not be afraid to try something new...Remember, amateurs built the
ark; professionals built the Titanic.

[Hidden DOS secret: Add BUGS=OFF to your CONFIG.SYS]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Sheeran
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure
why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook
2003
(11.5608.5606)

3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Softwa

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-15 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)



I 
think the best thing you can do is post a bug...

I'm 
not sure if the developers watch this list (I never saw a reply to my bug post 
here) but there is a bugzilla installation linked from the support 
site.

I'd 
fill out a description and paste these headers there - either that or try 
digging through to find it yourself - I'm not a PERL guru or I'd try to offer 
more advice.

I'm 
betting the version is too high or something silly like that - probably a simple 
fix, just have to get one of the dev's to take notice if it's beyond your PERL 
abilities.

m/

  -Original Message-From: Dave Sheeran 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, January 
  15, 2004 1:32 AMTo: Mitch (WebCob)Cc: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Forged 
  Outlook from Outlook!apologies the headers I sent was 
  the ones received from SA. The headers in the included message (the original) 
  are..Return-Path: Envelope-To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Spam-Status: SpamAssassin FailedReceived: 
  from [192.168.2.29] (HELO reception)by pickering.co.uk (CommuniGate Pro 
  SMTP 4.1.5)with ESMTP id 4554456 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jan 
  2004 13:58:54 +From: "Shirley" 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: testing2Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 
  13:58:52 -MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: 
  text/plain;charset="US-ASCII"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
  7bitX-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510Thread-Index: 
  AcPWuLaUHX3HdcSVQ/CjicJtzrqqDQ==X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
  V6.00.2800.1165Message-ID: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]On 14 Jan 2004, at 16:06, 
  Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:
  No 
worries mate - a bunch of people were posting the same question - with none 
of the information needed to see the provlem...If 
that's all your headers, then the new outlook is a lot CLEANER than 2000 / 
XP.Here 
is what mine look like (less the received and other common stuff:Date: 
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:42:30 -0800Message-ID: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]MIME-Version: 
1.0X-Priority: 
3 (Normal)X-MSMail-Priority: 
NormalX-Mailer: 
Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)Importance: 
NormalX-MimeOLE: 
Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165You 
are missing a Date header, and X-Mailer - don't even know why it think's 
it's outlook... but the next step if no one answers better is to look in the 
code for that rule to see if you can see what's wrong - you may just have to 
change the score in the short 
term...m/-Original 
Message-From: Dave 
Sheeran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:Wednesday, 
January 14, 2004 3:20 AMTo: Mitch (WebCob)Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:Re: 
[SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!Sorry, been out of 
the office for a couple of days. Here are hte 
headersTo:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Return-Path:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Received:by 
pickering.co.uk (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.5) with PIPE id 4554464; Fri, 09 
Jan 2004 13:59:20 +Received:from localhost [127.0.0.1] by 
Pickering with SpamAssassin (2.61-ds8 1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp); Fri, 09 Jan 
2004 13:59:13 
+Message-Id:[EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Spam-Checker-Version:SpamAssassin 
2.61-ds8 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
PickeringX-Spam-Flag:YESX-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Status:Yes, 
hits=4.1 required=4.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME 
autolearn=no 
version=2.61-ds8Mime-Version:1.0Content-Type:multipart/mixed; 
boundary="--=_3FFEB3B1.7213239D"This mail is probably spam. 
The original message has been attachedalong with this report, so you can 
recognize or block similar unwantedmail in future. See 
http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.Content preview: See 
if this comes through [...] Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 
4.0 required)3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS 
Outlook0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but 
isn'tFrom:"Shirley" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 9 January 2004 
13:58:52 GMTTo:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
testing2See if this comes throughOn 13 Jan 
2004, at 20:37, Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:Someone has to POST the 
headers so the problem can be fixed... the ruleneeds an update, but no 
one is submitting the information.m/-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf OfMichael P. VarreSent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:01 
AMTo: Dave Sheeran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!This happens with all 
Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen. Just adiscrepancy I suppose 
with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differsfrom previous 
versions...Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered me 
because my officehas the only Outlook 2003 users that send/receive with 
my serverI'd be interested to see the details of why this 

Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-14 Thread Dave Sheeran
Sorry, been out of the office for a couple of days. Here are hte headers

To: 	  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: 	[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: 	by pickering.co.uk (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.5) with PIPE id 4554464; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:59:20 +
Received: 	from localhost [127.0.0.1] by Pickering with SpamAssassin (2.61-ds8 1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp); Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:59:13 +
Message-Id: 	[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: 	SpamAssassin 2.61-ds8 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on  Pickering
X-Spam-Flag: 	YES
X-Spam-Level: 	
X-Spam-Status: 	Yes, hits=4.1 required=4.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.61-ds8
Mime-Version: 	1.0
Content-Type: 	multipart/mixed; boundary=--=_3FFEB3B1.7213239D

This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been attached
along with this report, so you can recognize or block similar unwanted
mail in future.  See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.

Content preview:  See if this comes through [...] 

Content analysis details:   (4.1 points, 4.0 required)
3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME   Message looks like Outlook, but isn't



From: Shirley [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 9 January 2004 13:58:52 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: testing2


See if this comes through



On 13 Jan 2004, at 20:37, Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:

Someone has to POST the headers so the problem can be fixed... the rule
needs an update, but no one is submitting the information.

m/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Michael P. Varre
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Dave Sheeran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


This happens with all Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen.  Just a
discrepancy I suppose with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differs
from previous versions...

Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered me because my office
has the only Outlook 2003 users that send/receive with my server

I'd be interested to see the details of why this actually happens
though.


Michael Varre ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kishmish LLC. - Systems Administrator
2 Clinton Square Suite 130
Syracuse, NY 13202
t. 315.478.8172
f. 800.375.3951
m. 315.952.5753

Kishmish LLC. Network Services
www.kishmish.com


Do not be afraid to try something new...Remember, amateurs built the
ark; professionals built the Titanic.

[Hidden DOS secret: Add BUGS=OFF to your CONFIG.SYS]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Sheeran
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure
why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook
2003
(11.5608.5606)

3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk



RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-14 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)



No 
worries mate - a bunch of people were posting the same question - with none of 
the information needed to see the provlem...

If 
that's all your headers, then the new outlook is a lot CLEANER than 2000 / 
XP.

Here 
is what mine look like (less the received and other common 
stuff:

Date: 
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:42:30 -0800Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]MIME-Version: 
1.0X-Priority: 3 (Normal)X-MSMail-Priority: NormalX-Mailer: 
Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)Importance: 
NormalX-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2800.1165
You 
are missing a Date header, and X-Mailer - don't even know why it think's it's 
outlook... but the next step if no one answers better is to look in the code for 
that rule to see if you can see what's wrong - you may just have to change the 
score in the short term...

m/

  -Original Message-From: Dave Sheeran 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 
  14, 2004 3:20 AMTo: Mitch (WebCob)Cc: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Forged 
  Outlook from Outlook!Sorry, been out of the office for a 
  couple of days. Here are hte 
  headersTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Return-Path: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Received: 
by pickering.co.uk 
  (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.5) with PIPE id 4554464; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:59:20 
  +Received: from localhost 
  [127.0.0.1] by Pickering with SpamAssassin (2.61-ds8 
  1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp); Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:59:13 +Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Spam-Checker-Version: 
SpamAssassin 2.61-ds8 
  (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
  PickeringX-Spam-Flag: YESX-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: 
Yes, hits=4.1 
  required=4.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no 
  version=2.61-ds8Mime-Version: 
  1.0Content-Type: 
multipart/mixed; 
  boundary="--=_3FFEB3B1.7213239D"This mail is probably spam. 
  The original message has been attachedalong with this report, so you can 
  recognize or block similar unwantedmail in future. See 
  http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.Content preview: See if 
  this comes through [...] Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 4.0 
  required)3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS 
  Outlook0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but 
  isn'tFrom: 
  "Shirley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 
9 January 2004 13:58:52 
  GMTTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
testing2See if this comes throughOn 
  13 Jan 2004, at 20:37, Mitch ((WebCob)) wrote:
  Someone has to POST the headers so the problem can be fixed... 
the ruleneeds an update, but no one is submitting the 
information.m/-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf OfMichael P. VarreSent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:01 
AMTo: Dave Sheeran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
    RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!This happens with all 
Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen. Just adiscrepancy I suppose 
with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differsfrom previous 
versions...Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered me 
because my officehas the only Outlook 2003 users that send/receive with 
my serverI'd be interested to see the details of why this 
actually happensthough.Michael Varre 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])Kishmish LLC. - Systems Administrator2 Clinton 
Square Suite 130Syracuse, NY 13202t. 315.478.8172f. 
800.375.3951m. 315.952.5753Kishmish LLC. Network 
Serviceswww.kishmish.com"Do not be afraid to try something 
new...Remember, amateurs built theark; professionals built the 
Titanic."[Hidden DOS secret: Add BUGS=OFF to your 
CONFIG.SYS]-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of DaveSheeranSent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:52 
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SAtalk] 
    Forged Outlook from Outlook!Hi FolksI'm getting emails 
caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not surewhy as I sent it 
myself from MS Office Outlook2003(11.5608.5606)3.3 
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook0.9 
MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn'tAny 
ideas?Dave 
S---This 
SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.Perforce is the Fast 
Software Configuration Management System offeringadvanced branching 
capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.Free Eval! 
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html___Spamassassin-talk 
mailing 
list[EMAIL PROTECTED]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk---This 
SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.Perforce is the Fast 
Software Configuration Management System offeringadvanced branching 
capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.Free Eval! 
ht

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-13 Thread Michael P. Varre
This happens with all Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen.  Just a
discrepancy I suppose with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differs
from previous versions...

Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered me because my office
has the only Outlook 2003 users that send/receive with my server

I'd be interested to see the details of why this actually happens
though.

 
Michael Varre ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kishmish LLC. - Systems Administrator
2 Clinton Square Suite 130
Syracuse, NY 13202
t. 315.478.8172
f. 800.375.3951
m. 315.952.5753

Kishmish LLC. Network Services
www.kishmish.com
 
 
Do not be afraid to try something new...Remember, amateurs built the
ark; professionals built the Titanic. 
 
[Hidden DOS secret: Add BUGS=OFF to your CONFIG.SYS]
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Sheeran
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure
why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook
2003
(11.5608.5606)

 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S
 



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-13 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Someone has to POST the headers so the problem can be fixed... the rule
needs an update, but no one is submitting the information.

m/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Michael P. Varre
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:01 AM
To: Dave Sheeran; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


This happens with all Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen.  Just a
discrepancy I suppose with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differs
from previous versions...

Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered me because my office
has the only Outlook 2003 users that send/receive with my server

I'd be interested to see the details of why this actually happens
though.


Michael Varre ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kishmish LLC. - Systems Administrator
2 Clinton Square Suite 130
Syracuse, NY 13202
t. 315.478.8172
f. 800.375.3951
m. 315.952.5753

Kishmish LLC. Network Services
www.kishmish.com


Do not be afraid to try something new...Remember, amateurs built the
ark; professionals built the Titanic.

[Hidden DOS secret: Add BUGS=OFF to your CONFIG.SYS]


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave
Sheeran
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!


Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure
why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook
2003
(11.5608.5606)

 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


[SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-11 Thread David Sheeran

Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as I sent it 
myself from MS Office Outlook 2003
(11.5608.5606)

 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-11 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Said before - show is the headers

I imagine they have changed something that will need to be updated in the
rules - you may have to post a bug.

m/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Sheeran
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 6:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!



Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as
I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook 2003
(11.5608.5606)

 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S


---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-10 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Never seen that - post some headers?!?

If someone can confirm it, submit a bug report.

m/

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave
Sheeran
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 6:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!



Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as
I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook
2003
(11.5608.5606)

 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S




---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


[SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-09 Thread Dave Sheeran

Hi Folks

I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as I sent it 
myself from MS Office Outlook
2003
(11.5608.5606)

 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't

Any ideas?

Dave S
 



---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk