Re: SPDX ID for GPL-2.0+ with addendum ?

2014-01-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Hello,

I wrote:

 I ran into a number of source files which include the standard
 GPL-2.0+ license header, but augmented with the following addendum:
 
 For the avoidance of doubt the preferred form of this code is one which
 is in an open non patent encumbered format. Where cryptographic key 
 signing
 forms part of the process of creating an executable the information
 including keys needed to generate an equivalently functional executable
 are deemed to be part of the source code.
 
 I think we will need a new License tag for this, right?
 
 Do you have any suggestion for this?


I found more augmented versions of GPL-2.0+ ; some libgcc files add
this clause:

In addition to the permissions in the GNU General Public License, the
Free Software Foundation gives you unlimited permission to link the
compiled version of this file into combinations with other programs,
and to distribute those combinations without any restriction coming
from the use of this file.  (The General Public License restrictions
do apply in other respects; for example, they cover modification of
the file, and distribution when not linked into a combined
executable.)

Others include this above addendum, and additionally this one:

As a special exception, if you link this library with files
compiled with GCC to produce an executable, this does not cause
the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why
the executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.


Is it correct to assume that we need special license tags for these
two cases, too?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk  Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
G's Third Law: In spite of all evidence  to  the  contra-
ry,  the  entire  universe  is composed of only two basic substances:
magic and bullshit.
H's Dictum:There is no magic ...
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal


Re: SPDX ID for GPL-2.0+ with addendum ?

2014-01-22 Thread Camille Moulin
Le 22/01/2014 12:41, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
 I found more augmented versions of GPL-2.0+ ; some libgcc files add
 this clause:

 In addition to the permissions in the GNU General Public License, the
 Free Software Foundation gives you unlimited permission to link the
 compiled version of this file into combinations with other programs,
 and to distribute those combinations without any restriction coming
 from the use of this file.  (The General Public License restrictions
 do apply in other respects; for example, they cover modification of
 the file, and distribution when not linked into a combined
 executable.)


This is a GCC Runtime Library exception as mentionned at
https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-with-GCC-exception

 Others include this above addendum, and additionally this one:

 As a special exception, if you link this library with files
 compiled with GCC to produce an executable, this does not cause
 the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
 œ
 the executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.
That should be also part of it, I guess. But I can't find a page on
http://www.gnu.org for versions prior to 3.0.


-- 
Gouvernance Open Source - Alter Way www.alterway.fr

___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal


RE: SPDX ID for GPL-2.0+ with addendum ?

2014-01-22 Thread Wheeler, David A
Perhaps there's a need to treat the license text not as a single string, but 
as a set.
E.G., GPL-2.0+,preferred-form,link-exception.

--- David A. Wheeler


-Original Message-
From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org 
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of RUFFIN, MICHEL (MICHEL)
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 8:05 AM
To: Wolfgang Denk; spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
Subject: RE: SPDX ID for GPL-2.0+ with addendum ?

This look like the Guile license
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.6/guile-ref/Guile-License.html

michel.ruf...@alcatel-lucent.com, PhD
Software Coordination Manager, NP IS/IT Distinguished Member of Technical 
Staff Tel +33 6 75 25 21 94 Alcatel-Lucent International, Centre de Villarceaux 
Route De Villejust, 91620 Nozay, France 


-Message d'origine-
De : spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org 
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] De la part de Wolfgang Denk
Envoyé : mercredi 22 janvier 2014 12:42
À : spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
Objet : Re: SPDX ID for GPL-2.0+ with addendum ?

Hello,

I wrote:

 I ran into a number of source files which include the standard 
 GPL-2.0+ license header, but augmented with the following addendum:
 
 For the avoidance of doubt the preferred form of this code is one which
 is in an open non patent encumbered format. Where cryptographic key 
 signing
 forms part of the process of creating an executable the information
 including keys needed to generate an equivalently functional executable
 are deemed to be part of the source code.
 
 I think we will need a new License tag for this, right?
 
 Do you have any suggestion for this?


I found more augmented versions of GPL-2.0+ ; some libgcc files add this 
clause:

In addition to the permissions in the GNU General Public License, the
Free Software Foundation gives you unlimited permission to link the
compiled version of this file into combinations with other programs,
and to distribute those combinations without any restriction coming
from the use of this file.  (The General Public License restrictions
do apply in other respects; for example, they cover modification of
the file, and distribution when not linked into a combined
executable.)

Others include this above addendum, and additionally this one:

As a special exception, if you link this library with files
compiled with GCC to produce an executable, this does not cause
the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General Public License.
This exception does not however invalidate any other reasons why
the executable file might be covered by the GNU General Public License.


Is it correct to assume that we need special license tags for these two cases, 
too?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk  Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
G's Third Law: In spite of all evidence  to  the  contra-
ry,  the  entire  universe  is composed of only two basic substances:
magic and bullshit.
H's Dictum:There is no magic ...
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal


___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal