Making identities persistent?

2006-10-31 Thread Stefan Görling
Hi everybody,

I'm trying to get a grip around your great work and have one issue that 
I'm not quite clear on, relevant to the discussion of using 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] identifiers, but also in a more general context. 
Please let me know if I've simply missunderstood my own question.

http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0-09.html#anchor48 says:
OpenID is decentralized. No central authority must approve or register 
Relying Parties or Identity Providers. An End User can freely choose 
which Identity Provider to use. They can preserve their Identifier if 
they switch Identity Providers.

Let us consider the case that I'm an AOL.com customer, and they act as 
an IdP providing we with an identifier. I use this identifier for 3 
years for identity management on most of the services I use, due to the 
huge success of the standard... However, I'm starting to get fed up with 
AOL and terminates my agreement with them. Is there any procedure for me 
to switch to another IdP? How is this done?

Best Regards,

Stefan Görling



___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs


Re: Making identities persistent?

2006-10-31 Thread Shutra Zhou
Yes, this is important thing I thought. We should privide a spec for the
consumer to change their end user's OpenID URL, optionally the end user can use multiple OpenIDs in this consuemr. And this case can be
expended as this, the IdP(OpenID Server) is closed down.2006/10/31, George Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



  


This is a good use case and I
think important for both users and IdPs (now OPs [OpenID Provider] per
the latest editor's conference) to consider.

I see a number of options...

1. There has been some discussion regarding a change identifier
extension that would allow you to change your identifier at the relying
party. This would solve the use case and is necessary regardless of
the other options.

2. The OP (in this case AOL.com) could continue to provide an
identifier management page that would allow the user to specify the
OP of choice. This requires the OP to continue to serve the XRDS doc
or at least the indirection to a XRDS doc with the new OP. This is not
that much extra overhead for the OP, but it will likely be a business
decision as to whether to support such a feature.

3. The user gets to choose their OP so they can ensure that they don't
get locked in. This is the ideal behind user-centric. However, in
practice, it will take good education and time for users to understand
the ramifications of their decisions.

Thanks,
George

Stefan Görling wrote:

  Hi everybody,I'm trying to get a grip around your great work and have one issue that I'm not quite clear on, relevant to the discussion of using 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] identifiers, but also in a more general context. Please let me know if I've simply missunderstood my own question.
http://openid.net/specs/openid-authentication-2_0-09.html#anchor48 says:OpenID is decentralized. No central authority must approve or register Relying Parties or Identity Providers. An End User can freely choose 
which Identity Provider to use. They can preserve their Identifier if they switch Identity Providers.Let us consider the case that I'm an AOL.com customer, and they act as an IdP providing we with an identifier. I use this identifier for 3 
years for identity management on most of the services I use, due to the huge success of the standard... However, I'm starting to get fed up with AOL and terminates my agreement with them. Is there any procedure for me 
to switch to another IdP? How is this done?Best Regards,Stefan Görling___specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs

  




___specs mailing listspecs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs
___
specs mailing list
specs@openid.net
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/specs