[sqlalchemy] Re: New plugins and data types

2008-12-08 Thread Kless

Thanks! Anyway I've seen that it's better add extensions in Elixir,
into a declarative layer, just as has been made in DataMapper.

http://elixir.ematia.de/apidocs/elixir.ext.html

On 7 dic, 14:54, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 we have a bitbucket mirror athttp://www.bitbucket.org/mirror/sqlalchemy/

 On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Kless wrote:



  I agree in that the SQLalchemy core been more centralized but would be
  very well if there would be a distributed version control where can be
  added easily new types.

  See as example to dm-more [1] -- of Datamapper--, where there are many
  contributions and many of them are very interesting.

  [1]http://github.com/sam/dm-more/tree/master/dm-types/lib/dm-types
 http://github.com/sam/dm-more/tree/master
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sqlalchemy] Re: New plugins and data types

2008-12-08 Thread Gaetan de Menten

On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31, Kless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks! Anyway I've seen that it's better add extensions in Elixir,
 into a declarative layer, just as has been made in DataMapper.

As I just said on the Elixir mailing list: not really. The ability to
add new types is an SQLAlchemy feature, not an Elixir one, so there is
no reason to add them only at the Elixir level. That said, I'm not
sure those types belong in SQLAlchemy core. It *might* make sense to
have them in SQLAlchemy.ext namespace?

 http://elixir.ematia.de/apidocs/elixir.ext.html

 On 7 dic, 14:54, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 we have a bitbucket mirror athttp://www.bitbucket.org/mirror/sqlalchemy/

 On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Kless wrote:

  I agree in that the SQLalchemy core been more centralized but would be
  very well if there would be a distributed version control where can be
  added easily new types.

  See as example to dm-more [1] -- of Datamapper--, where there are many
  contributions and many of them are very interesting.

  [1]http://github.com/sam/dm-more/tree/master/dm-types/lib/dm-types
 http://github.com/sam/dm-more/tree/master

-- 
Gaƫtan de Menten
http://openhex.org

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[sqlalchemy] Re: New plugins and data types

2008-12-07 Thread Michael Bayer

we have a bitbucket mirror at http://www.bitbucket.org/mirror/sqlalchemy/


On Dec 7, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Kless wrote:


 I agree in that the SQLalchemy core been more centralized but would be
 very well if there would be a distributed version control where can be
 added easily new types.

 See as example to dm-more [1] -- of Datamapper--, where there are many
 contributions and many of them are very interesting.


 [1] http://github.com/sam/dm-more/tree/master/dm-types/lib/dm-types
 http://github.com/sam/dm-more/tree/master

 


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---