[sqlalchemy] Re: Py 2.3 supported in SA 0.5?
Michael Bayer schrieb: 2.3 is definitely not supported in 0.5 unless you can make the case for it ASAP. nobody has made any case for 2.3 as of yet. TurboGears 1.0 still supports Py 2.3, but TG 1.0 favors SQLObject anyway. TG 1.1 which favors SQLAlchemy has also ceased Py 2.3 support. So what concerns TurboGears, I see no problems. -- Christoph --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: Py 2.3 supported in SA 0.5?
2.3 is definitely not supported in 0.5 unless you can make the case for it ASAP. nobody has made any case for 2.3 as of yet. On Jun 19, 1:51 pm, jason kirtland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christoph Zwerschke wrote: Will Python 2.3 still be supported by SA 0.5? I noticed that sqlalchemy.ext.orderinglist uses the new decorator syntax. Oops, that snuck in accidentally is fixed in the trunk for the time being. However, 2.3 will probably not be supported in the final 0.5.0 release. We've had a couple threads on the 2.3 support and no one came to 2.3's defense, so it's on the chopping block. If the migration from list comprehensions to generators negatively impacts performance, then perhaps 2.3 support will stay, but barring that... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: Py 2.3 supported in SA 0.5?
Christoph Zwerschke wrote: Will Python 2.3 still be supported by SA 0.5? I noticed that sqlalchemy.ext.orderinglist uses the new decorator syntax. Oops, that snuck in accidentally is fixed in the trunk for the time being. However, 2.3 will probably not be supported in the final 0.5.0 release. We've had a couple threads on the 2.3 support and no one came to 2.3's defense, so it's on the chopping block. If the migration from list comprehensions to generators negatively impacts performance, then perhaps 2.3 support will stay, but barring that... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
