[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
IMvhO: - table / columns are DB-side terms, relations - sqlalchemy.orm.relation() - are not really. They are more ORM. Foreign keys/Constraints are DB-side, yes. But if annotate relations, then mappers should follow... as they talk of mappers and then keys/joins. TO me, keeping the OO model in DB-side terms may not be the best thing, as OO-side (mappers/props) may be different beast alltogether - names / meanings / etc. On another hand, if model is wholly based on DB-side stuff, then its not really the relations that has to be annotated, its something lower... but i dont know what. ciao svilen On Sunday 04 May 2008 17:13:15 alex bodnaru wrote: hi paul, the relations should follow, indeed. thanks again, alex Paul Johnston wrote: Hi, http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_schema.html#docstrin gs_sqlalchemy.schema_Table shows info as a parameter in the kwargs to a table. So it does, so it's tables and columns. The column info setting is in the same page as you sent across, just a bit further up. What other objects would you like it for? I'm likely to have a requirement for it on relations pretty soon. Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
we were talking conceptually, of course :) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMvhO: - table / columns are DB-side terms, relations - sqlalchemy.orm.relation() - are not really. They are more ORM. Foreign keys/Constraints are DB-side, yes. But if annotate relations, then mappers should follow... as they talk of mappers and then keys/joins. TO me, keeping the OO model in DB-side terms may not be the best thing, as OO-side (mappers/props) may be different beast alltogether - names / meanings / etc. On another hand, if model is wholly based on DB-side stuff, then its not really the relations that has to be annotated, its something lower... but i dont know what. ciao svilen On Sunday 04 May 2008 17:13:15 alex bodnaru wrote: hi paul, the relations should follow, indeed. thanks again, alex Paul Johnston wrote: Hi, http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_schema.html#docstrin gs_sqlalchemy.schema_Table shows info as a parameter in the kwargs to a table. So it does, so it's tables and columns. The column info setting is in the same page as you sent across, just a bit further up. What other objects would you like it for? I'm likely to have a requirement for it on relations pretty soon. Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
Hi, http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_schema.html#docstrings_sqlalchemy.schema_Table shows info as a parameter in the kwargs to a table. So it does, so it's tables and columns. The column info setting is in the same page as you sent across, just a bit further up. What other objects would you like it for? I'm likely to have a requirement for it on relations pretty soon. Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
hi paul, the relations should follow, indeed. thanks again, alex Paul Johnston wrote: Hi, http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_schema.html#docstrings_sqlalchemy.schema_Table shows info as a parameter in the kwargs to a table. So it does, so it's tables and columns. The column info setting is in the same page as you sent across, just a bit further up. What other objects would you like it for? I'm likely to have a requirement for it on relations pretty soon. Paul --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
i read info is such a table option, but i'm not sure it's not deprecating? alex bodnaru wrote: hello friends, however sa stands at the model foundation of an application, i'd be interested to add additional information to some columns/tables/keys. is there a way to insert arbitrary information for sa objects? thanks in advance, alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
Alex, The info bucket is available just on columns at the moment, and it is a supported feature. I think we're open to adding it to other types, such as tables, if someone has a requirement. My desire for this was exactly the same as yours - the SA model serving as the authoritative master definition. Paul On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, alex bodnaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i read info is such a table option, but i'm not sure it's not deprecating? alex bodnaru wrote: hello friends, however sa stands at the model foundation of an application, i'd be interested to add additional information to some columns/tables/keys. is there a way to insert arbitrary information for sa objects? thanks in advance, alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[sqlalchemy] Re: arbitrary information for sa objects
hi paul, thanks for your attention. http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/sqlalchemy_schema.html#docstrings_sqlalchemy.schema_Table shows info as a parameter in the kwargs to a table. it would be great if there were info for other objects too. please point me to the column info setting. best regards, alex Paul Johnston wrote: Alex, The info bucket is available just on columns at the moment, and it is a supported feature. I think we're open to adding it to other types, such as tables, if someone has a requirement. My desire for this was exactly the same as yours - the SA model serving as the authoritative master definition. Paul On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, alex bodnaru [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i read info is such a table option, but i'm not sure it's not deprecating? alex bodnaru wrote: hello friends, however sa stands at the model foundation of an application, i'd be interested to add additional information to some columns/tables/keys. is there a way to insert arbitrary information for sa objects? thanks in advance, alex --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sqlalchemy group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
