RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
-Original Message- From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 21 September 2006 4:12 PM To: Steven Wilton Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: one more squid-2.6 rel? tor 2006-09-21 klockan 07:57 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton: OK, here it is. It compiles cleanly now, and worked fine before I had to merge it with the weight support patch that was applied 3 days ago. I'm going to upgrade our caches to the latest 2.6 snapshot + this patch and test with both hash and mask assignments. If it works fine, I'll commit later today. Looks quite fine. Still some blanks to fill in about the undocumented mask assignment identity fields. Maybe things will clear up over time.. But squid.conf notes on wccp2_assignment_method is a little confusing.. + Currently (as of IOS 12.4) cisco routers only support assignment. + Cisco switches support the L2 redirect assignment method. Think this means to read something like: Currently (as of IOS 12.4) cisco routers only support hash assignment and Cisco switches only support mask assignment method. Thanks, I've just comitted a patch to fix this comment. Steven -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.7/454 - Release Date: 21/09/2006
RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
tor 2006-09-21 klockan 07:57 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton: OK, here it is. It compiles cleanly now, and worked fine before I had to merge it with the weight support patch that was applied 3 days ago. I'm going to upgrade our caches to the latest 2.6 snapshot + this patch and test with both hash and mask assignments. If it works fine, I'll commit later today. Looks quite fine. Still some blanks to fill in about the undocumented mask assignment identity fields. Maybe things will clear up over time.. But squid.conf notes on wccp2_assignment_method is a little confusing.. + Currently (as of IOS 12.4) cisco routers only support assignment. + Cisco switches support the L2 redirect assignment method. Think this means to read something like: Currently (as of IOS 12.4) cisco routers only support hash assignment and Cisco switches only support mask assignment method. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: one more squid-2.6 rel?
Hi, At 21.49 20/09/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: ons 2006-09-20 klockan 20:36 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio: I like to add one more thing before: Windows overlapped I/O support for COSS. I'm starting with tests, so if all is good, I should merge it in the incoming weekend. Any changes outside Windows? If so send them for review first. It should be well confined like other changes. The only standard change should be the stripe path stuff. But I like to post the patch for review when ready. Regards Guido - Guido Serassio Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
ons 2006-09-20 klockan 09:13 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton: I'm about to get MASK assignment working in wccp2. I'd like to see that in the next release if possible. Cool. If it's in the next, or the release after that depends on when you finish and how complex the change is to review.. But it will get accepted into 2.6 when you are finished and the review doesn't find any bad things (not that I think it will find any badness). Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: one more squid-2.6 rel?
ons 2006-09-20 klockan 09:02 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd: What do you all think about another squid-2.6 release? A few bugfixes have gone into Squid-2.6. It'd also be good to say this stable release has stable COSS support. Yes, there will be one or two more 2.6 releases when sufficient amount of important changes build up. We are pretty close to that threshold now.. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
Re: one more squid-2.6 rel?
Hi, At 14.55 20/09/2006, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: ons 2006-09-20 klockan 09:02 +0800 skrev Adrian Chadd: What do you all think about another squid-2.6 release? A few bugfixes have gone into Squid-2.6. It'd also be good to say this stable release has stable COSS support. Yes, there will be one or two more 2.6 releases when sufficient amount of important changes build up. We are pretty close to that threshold now.. I like to add one more thing before: Windows overlapped I/O support for COSS. I'm starting with tests, so if all is good, I should merge it in the incoming weekend. Regards Guido - Guido Serassio Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Re: one more squid-2.6 rel?
ons 2006-09-20 klockan 20:36 +0200 skrev Guido Serassio: I like to add one more thing before: Windows overlapped I/O support for COSS. I'm starting with tests, so if all is good, I should merge it in the incoming weekend. Any changes outside Windows? If so send them for review first. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
-Original Message- From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006 8:27 PM To: Steven Wilton Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: RE: one more squid-2.6 rel? ons 2006-09-20 klockan 09:13 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton: I'm about to get MASK assignment working in wccp2. I'd like to see that in the next release if possible. Cool. If it's in the next, or the release after that depends on when you finish and how complex the change is to review.. But it will get accepted into 2.6 when you are finished and the review doesn't find any bad things (not that I think it will find any badness). OK, here it is. It compiles cleanly now, and worked fine before I had to merge it with the weight support patch that was applied 3 days ago. I'm going to upgrade our caches to the latest 2.6 snapshot + this patch and test with both hash and mask assignments. If it works fine, I'll commit later today. Regards Steven -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 19/09/2006 wccp-assignment-head.patch Description: Binary data
Re: one more squid-2.6 rel?
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006, Steven Wilton wrote: OK, here it is. It compiles cleanly now, and worked fine before I had to merge it with the weight support patch that was applied 3 days ago. I'm going to upgrade our caches to the latest 2.6 snapshot + this patch and test with both hash and mask assignments. If it works fine, I'll commit later today. Looks fine. It'll be cool if it all works right. Adrian
RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
I'm about to get MASK assignment working in wccp2. I'd like to see that in the next release if possible. Steven -Original Message- From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 20 September 2006 9:03 AM To: squid-dev@squid-cache.org Subject: one more squid-2.6 rel? Hiya, What do you all think about another squid-2.6 release? A few bugfixes have gone into Squid-2.6. It'd also be good to say this stable release has stable COSS support. Adrian -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 19/09/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date: 19/09/2006
Re: one more squid-2.6 rel?
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006, Steven Wilton wrote: I'm about to get MASK assignment working in wccp2. I'd like to see that in the next release if possible. Nice! I guess the CCE's helped.. Adrian
