Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2008-06-10 at 09:08 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
 Hi,
 
   There seemed to have been some discussion back in October
 about BitTorrent. I just noticed that I had :
 
 2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Requestheader contains NULL characters
 2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '^SBitTorrent'
 2008/06/10 03:02:39| clientReadRequest: FD 27 (192.168.3.15:64673) Invalid 
 Request

Are you doing transparent interception of port 80?

Some torrents run on port 80 without using HTTP to bypass stupid port
based firewalls...

Regards
Henrik


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-11 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On tis, 2008-06-10 at 09:08 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
 =20
  There seemed to have been some discussion back in October
  about BitTorrent. I just noticed that I had :
 =20
  2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Requestheader contains NULL charac=
 ters
  2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '^SBitTorrent'
  2008/06/10 03:02:39| clientReadRequest: FD 27 (192.168.3.15:64673) Invali=
 d Request
 
 Are you doing transparent interception of port 80?
 
 Some torrents run on port 80 without using HTTP to bypass stupid port
 based firewalls...
 
 Regards
 Henrik
 
WCCP2 and transparent, yes sir.

The site actually has no locally installed firewalls. The site
is double NAT'd though (And NAT'd/tunneled for Squid)

Tuc


Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-11 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On ons, 2008-06-11 at 09:56 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
 WCCP2 and transparent, yes sir.

Then this problem is more or less unavoidable. Caused by the
interception sending port 80 to an HTTP proxy. Triggered by people
abusing port 80 for non-HTTP traffic.

Regards
Henrik


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-11 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 On ons, 2008-06-11 at 09:56 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  WCCP2 and transparent, yes sir.
 
 Then this problem is more or less unavoidable. Caused by the
 interception sending port 80 to an HTTP proxy. Triggered by people
 abusing port 80 for non-HTTP traffic.
 
 Regards
 Henrik
 
No worries. Just was trying to see if there had been any
other discussion/action/suggestions/etc. I'm having more issues
with fragmentation and swarming from the clients right now than I
am with Squid/WCCPv2 proxying it. :) 

Thanks, Tuc


Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-11 Thread Amos Jeffries
 On ons, 2008-06-11 at 09:56 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  WCCP2 and transparent, yes sir.

 Then this problem is more or less unavoidable. Caused by the
 interception sending port 80 to an HTTP proxy. Triggered by people
 abusing port 80 for non-HTTP traffic.

 Regards
 Henrik

   No worries. Just was trying to see if there had been any
 other discussion/action/suggestions/etc. I'm having more issues
 with fragmentation and swarming from the clients right now than I
 am with Squid/WCCPv2 proxying it. :)

Ah, I got around most of the port-80 abuse issue by informing clients of
the proxy for this type of thing, allowing them to configure their apps to
use it as a gateway gets around a few issues.

(Great side-effect: Some P2P apps using a proxy send their internal IPs to
the server, so remote leeches can't figure out where they are, and other
local peers get a direct connection across.)

The real solution to all your P2P woes though is to implement IPv6. A
growing number of apps will use it anyway and tunnel around. The native
addressing scheme also allows P2P to more efficiently identify peers and
cause much less use of upstream bandwidth.

Amos




[squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-10 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
Hi,

There seemed to have been some discussion back in October
about BitTorrent. I just noticed that I had :

2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Requestheader contains NULL characters
2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '^SBitTorrent'
2008/06/10 03:02:39| clientReadRequest: FD 27 (192.168.3.15:64673) Invalid 
Request

and

2008/06/10 05:02:01| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method 
'C194V^WA9ukDBJ8aCBBFmx'2^_IF5DFCE97F5MjC497B49481|CE9D90B3
9F^W^PBB^Q9DEBGE2/87SC3J92B694ABF8JBDFA?\8^_,FCy
F7^PB0F69D196EFD9BEA0E90xpC1C7^?XRf^86^RADADD6i
^A^E(ACD9^BC4-xACC2^DaE4ESC8DTDB^XFE^Z9
'
2008/06/10 05:02:01| clientReadRequest: FD 28 (192.168.3.15:58694) Invalid 
Request

dotted through my logs.

I was just wondering if anything ever came of the discussion. It looks
like the user was trying to do it proxied, then stopped for 20 minutes, and
then found some other way out.

I don't care if they use it, just wondered if there was a way to 
fully support it.

Thanks, Tuc


Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-10 Thread Amos Jeffries

Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:

Hi,

There seemed to have been some discussion back in October
about BitTorrent. I just noticed that I had :

2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Requestheader contains NULL characters
2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '^SBitTorrent'
2008/06/10 03:02:39| clientReadRequest: FD 27 (192.168.3.15:64673) Invalid 
Request

and

2008/06/10 05:02:01| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method 
'C194V^WA9ukDBJ8aCBBFmx'2^_IF5DFCE97F5MjC497B49481|CE9D90B3
9F^W^PBB^Q9DEBGE2/87SC3J92B694ABF8JBDFA?\8^_,FCy
F7^PB0F69D196EFD9BEA0E90xpC1C7^?XRf^86^RADADD6i
^A^E(ACD9^BC4-xACC2^DaE4ESC8DTDB^XFE^Z9
'
2008/06/10 05:02:01| clientReadRequest: FD 28 (192.168.3.15:58694) Invalid 
Request

dotted through my logs.

I was just wondering if anything ever came of the discussion. It looks
like the user was trying to do it proxied, then stopped for 20 minutes, and
then found some other way out.

	I don't care if they use it, just wondered if there was a way to 
fully support it.


It's on my todo list a fair way down. Probably around 3.3.
From 3.1 we have dropped a lot of the 'unsupported methods' issues. So 
the first attempts may get through.


I'd put it down to a broken client software through. All the torrents I 
use are proxied properly and working.


Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE1 or 3.0.STABLE6


Re: [squid-users] BitTorrent

2008-06-10 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
 
 Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
  Hi,
  
  There seemed to have been some discussion back in October
  about BitTorrent. I just noticed that I had :
  
  2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Requestheader contains NULL 
  characters
  2008/06/10 03:02:39| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method '^SBitTorrent'
  2008/06/10 03:02:39| clientReadRequest: FD 27 (192.168.3.15:64673) Invalid 
  Request
  
  and
  
  2008/06/10 05:02:01| parseHttpRequest: Unsupported method 
  'C194V^WA9ukDBJ8aCBBFmx'2^_IF5DFCE97F5MjC497B49481|CE9D90B3
  9F^W^PBB^Q9DEBGE2/87SC3J92B694ABF8JBDFA?\8^_,FCy
  F7^PB0F69D196EFD9BEA0E90xpC1C7^?XRf^86^RADADD6i
  ^A^E(ACD9^BC4-xACC2^DaE4ESC8DTDB^XFE^Z9
  '
  2008/06/10 05:02:01| clientReadRequest: FD 28 (192.168.3.15:58694) Invalid 
  Request
  
  dotted through my logs.
  
  I was just wondering if anything ever came of the discussion. It looks
  like the user was trying to do it proxied, then stopped for 20 minutes, and
  then found some other way out.
  
  I don't care if they use it, just wondered if there was a way to 
  fully support it.
 
 It's on my todo list a fair way down. Probably around 3.3.
  From 3.1 we have dropped a lot of the 'unsupported methods' issues. So 
 the first attempts may get through.
 
 I'd put it down to a broken client software through. All the torrents I 
 use are proxied properly and working.
 
Well, we ran into other problems we believe due in whole in some
cases, and part others, so the fact that Squid squawks is the least of our
problems. Now our AND our upstreams Cisco are complaining about Fragment
overlaps, and reassembly issues, etc. Bigger battle (Oh, and the fact our
primary providers antenna at our side seems to be uncontactable.) There
seem to be alot of other issues more pressing.

Thanks for the reply though, we are on 2.6 if it matters...

Tuc


[squid-users] bittorrent with squid

2008-02-14 Thread Arun Shrimali
From: Amos Jeffries [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pokeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:12:13 +1300 (NZDT)
Subject: Re: [squid-users] bittorrent behind squid

 MAN

 you need to set up some firewall rules to run torrents i thinks torrents
 not
 fully support http connections
 they use alternate

.Only the .torrent file download is sure to be performed over HTTP. the
rest of the connection attempts are determined by the .torrent file
contents added by the seed server.

In order to get all torrent downloads through Squid you need a torrent
client software with HTTP-proxy capabilities and configured to use your
squid proxy.

Amos


 Arun Shrimali wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am having client (fedora 8) behind the squid proxy (with
 authentication). I am trying to download the files through bittorrent
 (Transmission) client at fedora client PC.
 Can anybody help me how to configure client (or squid at server) to
 download the files.

 regards

 Arun



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/bittorrent-behind-squid-tp15450228p15462439.html
 Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Can anybody suggest me any torrent client which work well with squid


Re: [squid-users] bittorrent behind squid

2008-02-13 Thread pokeman

MAN 

you need to set up some firewall rules to run torrents i thinks torrents not
fully support http connections 
they use alternate 

Arun Shrimali wrote:
 
 Dear All,
 
 I am having client (fedora 8) behind the squid proxy (with
 authentication). I am trying to download the files through bittorrent
 (Transmission) client at fedora client PC.
 Can anybody help me how to configure client (or squid at server) to
 download the files.
 
 regards
 
 Arun
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/bittorrent-behind-squid-tp15450228p15462439.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Re: [squid-users] bittorrent behind squid

2008-02-13 Thread Amos Jeffries

 MAN

 you need to set up some firewall rules to run torrents i thinks torrents
 not
 fully support http connections
 they use alternate

Only the .torrent file download is sure to be performed over HTTP. the
rest of the connection attempts are determined by the .torrent file
contents added by the seed server.

In order to get all torrent downloads through Squid you need a torrent
client software with HTTP-proxy capabilities and configured to use your
squid proxy.

Amos


 Arun Shrimali wrote:

 Dear All,

 I am having client (fedora 8) behind the squid proxy (with
 authentication). I am trying to download the files through bittorrent
 (Transmission) client at fedora client PC.
 Can anybody help me how to configure client (or squid at server) to
 download the files.

 regards

 Arun



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/bittorrent-behind-squid-tp15450228p15462439.html
 Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.






[squid-users] bittorrent behind squid

2008-02-12 Thread Arun Shrimali
Dear All,

I am having client (fedora 8) behind the squid proxy (with
authentication). I am trying to download the files through bittorrent
(Transmission) client at fedora client PC.
Can anybody help me how to configure client (or squid at server) to
download the files.

regards

Arun