Re: [squid-users] Squid Report Issue

2003-08-20 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 19.52, Jim_Brouse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

> I searched access.log and I did find a mention of 007
> although it is part of a URL.  Some how the access.log is different
> than normal so then SARG is running against the wrong fields.  What
> do you think is the best way to fix this log?   The log is 121
> Meg's.  I also have another failed log with 28 megs.

Try isolating a number of lines you think are the cause to this 
confusion and then run a SARG report on these. If the probelem is 
reporoducible contact the SARG maintainers and give them the test 
data to reproduce the error.

Regards
Henrik



Re: [squid-users] Squid Report Issue

2003-08-20 Thread Jim_Brouse/PYT

 The day the log was split was actually not the day I had the problem
sorry for the confusion.

 What I am finding is that on days where the log was not split I do
sometimes have many users listed.

 For example we only have several hundred users on the internet but
when this report produces bad data (and I can reproduce the bad report if I
copy the access.log file to any other server running SARG) at that point
the report will list 23801 users but in the user column in the report I see
thousands of entries where IP addresses should be although there are not IP
addresses only numbers like "007"

I searched access.log and I did find a mention of 007 although
it is part of a URL.  Some how the access.log is different than normal so
then SARG is running against the wrong fields.  What do you think is the
best way to fix this log?   The log is 121 Meg's.  I also have another
failed log with 28 megs.


What is happening is that the report generators get confused and the then
the rest of the report is destroyed because it is a sequential file and now
it is looking at a field like a url and think it is the userid field.

What is the best way to run the logs through a scipt that determines
whether or not each line is a good line of data?










Jim






   

Henrik 

NordstromTo: Jim_Brouse/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]   cc:   

he.org>      Subject:     Re: [squid-users] Squid Report 
Issue 
   

08/19/2003 

11:23 AM   

   

   





On Tuesday 19 August 2003 19.07, Jim_Brouse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

> Is it possible for some reason that squid split the acccess.log
> file so now i need to cat them together?

Squid never splits the access.log.

What Squid may do is to rotate access.log into access.log.1,
access.log.2, access.log.3 etc..

If you find other log files then these are either generated by other
software, or extracted logs generated by one of your friends
administrating the server.

Regards
Henrik

--
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org

If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
http://www.marasystems.com/, [EMAIL PROTECTED]






Re: [squid-users] Squid Report Issue

2003-08-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 19.07, Jim_Brouse/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

> Is it possible for some reason that squid split the acccess.log
> file so now i need to cat them together?

Squid never splits the access.log.

What Squid may do is to rotate access.log into access.log.1, 
access.log.2, access.log.3 etc..

If you find other log files then these are either generated by other 
software, or extracted logs generated by one of your friends 
administrating the server.

Regards
Henrik

-- 
Donations welcome if you consider my Free Squid support helpful.
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/business=hno%40squid-cache.org

If you need commercial Squid support or cost effective Squid or
firewall appliances please refer to MARA Systems AB, Sweden
http://www.marasystems.com/, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [squid-users] Squid Report Issue

2003-08-19 Thread Jim_Brouse/PYT

I think I might have found part of the problem.  I have a access.log file
for that date that is 514 megs and I also have a bk.access.log file for
that date that is only 150 megs.  The two files are only separated by

Is it possible for some reason that squid split the acccess.log file so now
i need to cat them together?

How can I tell which one I need to cat to which one?  if I use filename >>
filename how can I tell which one should be >> into the other one?  They
are only separated by a minute.

What I am thinking happened is that while SARG was running then there was
another cron job that did a /us/sbin/squid -k shutdown


Below is their output from an ls -alht
-rwxr--r--1 root root 514M Jul 31 15:14 access-07-25-03.log
-rwxr--r--1 root root 150M Jul 31 15:13
bk.access-07-25-03.log

Jim





   
   
Jim_Brouse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
  
ITRIBE.ORG  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 
cc:
   
08/18/2003 10:51 AM Subject: [squid-users] Squid 
Report Issue 
   
   
   
   





Currently, I am having a problem I can not resolve at this point though.  I
have tried looking everywhere
for information on this particular squid report issue.  I am using SARG for
these reports.

I do not always get these errors.

There is a cron job every night and sometimes I get reports that list about
7000 userid's.

We have less than 500 users that have Internet access and the data for all
of the
500 users is not in report with the 7000 users which do not show correct ip
addresses they are just a set of zeros
here is an example of one of the userids "007" normally it is
an IP address that makes in the userid field.





Jim







[squid-users] Squid Report Issue

2003-08-18 Thread Jim_Brouse/PYT

Currently, I am having a problem I can not resolve at this point though.  I
have tried looking everywhere
for information on this particular squid report issue.  I am using SARG for
these reports.

I do not always get these errors.

There is a cron job every night and sometimes I get reports that list about
7000 userid's.

We have less than 500 users that have Internet access and the data for all
of the
500 users is not in report with the 7000 users which do not show correct ip
addresses they are just a set of zeros
here is an example of one of the userids "007" normally it is
an IP address that makes in the userid field.





Jim