Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For and Squid 3.0

2008-11-17 Thread Silamael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Yes. It is already done and in Squid 3.1.
> 
> We've had a fair number of annoyances found with the 3.1.0.2 packages
> not including everything they needed for the new code. One more in
> todays snapshot. So for testing I'd advise starting with the 20081118
> snapshot.
> 
> Amos

Thank you for the quick reply. So probabely we will upgrade to 3.1 then.

- -- Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJIWl8GgHcOSur6dQRAuKHAKDKj3uM7HUnKm2p4yJUJGco65jd1ACfZCVJ
SpPG1GK3rWcIyCD4H17wMow=
=D5p7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [squid-users] X-Forwarded-For and Squid 3.0

2008-11-17 Thread Amos Jeffries

Silamael wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello!

Are there any plans to implement the X-Forwarded-For feature in Squid3?
We had to use Squid3 due to some ICAP project stuff and we will need the
X-Forwarded-For feature for some other stuff too...



Yes. It is already done and in Squid 3.1.

We've had a fair number of annoyances found with the 3.1.0.2 packages 
not including everything they needed for the new code. One more in 
todays snapshot. So for testing I'd advise starting with the 20081118 
snapshot.


Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE10
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.2


[squid-users] X-Forwarded-For and Squid 3.0

2008-11-17 Thread Silamael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello!

Are there any plans to implement the X-Forwarded-For feature in Squid3?
We had to use Squid3 due to some ICAP project stuff and we will need the
X-Forwarded-For feature for some other stuff too...

Greetings,
Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJISU6GgHcOSur6dQRAufUAJ9bG2eblPcM3vBCKMGSzQHiODiXVgCghi5S
obPHCxz/GAiHpo8Uzyv7aRY=
=0M1T
-END PGP SIGNATURE-